优化实例- not use hash to avoid temp space issue
在展开下面的original sql 和 execution plan之前，要知道这个SQL的问题就在于占用大量的TEMP space
orignal SQL
SELECT
roster.IC_N AS icN, roster.WORK_SHIFT_C AS workShiftC, roster.EXTRA_SHIFT_C AS extraShiftC,
roster.GENERATED_SHIFT_C AS generatedShiftC, roster.RESERVE_SHIFT_C AS reserveShiftCode,
num.STAFF_N AS staffNo, grp.scheme_n AS schemeN, deploy.deploy_department_c AS dept,
code.deployment_c AS deploymentC
FROM STAFF_ROSTER roster, STAFF_WORK WORK1, STAFF_CATEGORY category, staff_roster_group grp, STAFF staff,
staff_number num, staff_cross_deploy deploy, staff_deployment_code code
WHERE
WORK1.IC_N = roster.IC_N
AND category.IC_N = roster.IC_N
AND CATEGORY.CATEGORY_C in ('SQC','RQC','WOS','CES','WCES','NTCES','HEP','SOSOS','SVCOS','CCOS','CCSOS','IGCMO','SOCMO','YOCMO','LS','LSUP','LSO','IGCMO2','SOCMO2','YOCMO2','IGCMO3','SOCMO3','YOCMO3')
AND staff.IC_N = roster.IC_N
AND staff.IC_N = num.IC_N
AND staff.IC_N = deploy.IC_N
AND staff.ic_n = grp.ic_n
AND staff.ic_n = code.ic_n(+)
AND code.DEPARTMENT_C(+) = 'C'
AND TO_CHAR(code.SHIFT_D(+), 'DD/MM/YYYY') = '11/03/2014'
AND deploy.WORK_DEPARTMENT_C = 'C'
AND work1.home_department_c = deploy.work_department_c
AND work1.home_department_c = roster.department_c
AND TO_CHAR(roster.SHIFT_D, 'DD/MM/YYYY') = '11/03/2014'
AND WORK1.START_DT <= roster.shift_d
AND ((WORK1.END_DT > roster.shift_d) OR (WORK1.END_DT IS NULL))
AND category.EFFECTIVE_D = (SELECT MAX(SC.EFFECTIVE_D) FROM STAFF_CATEGORY SC WHERE SC.IC_N = roster.IC_N AND SC.EFFECTIVE_D <= roster.SHIFT_D)
AND num.EFFECTIVE_D = (SELECT MAX(SN.EFFECTIVE_D) FROM STAFF_NUMBER SN WHERE SN.IC_N = roster.IC_N AND SN.EFFECTIVE_D <= roster.SHIFT_D)
AND TO_DATE('11/03/2014', 'dd/mm/yyyy') BETWEEN deploy.start_dt AND deploy.end_dt
AND grp.EFFECTIVE_D = (SELECT MAX(SG.EFFECTIVE_D) FROM STAFF_ROSTER_GROUP SG WHERE SG.IC_N = roster.IC_N AND SG.EFFECTIVE_D <= roster.SHIFT_D)
Dont be afraid
origanl EXECUTION plan
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1872515827 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 267 | | 64452 (12)| 00:12:54 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 267 | | 64452 (12)| 00:12:54 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 245 | | 64433 (12)| 00:12:54 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 224 | | 64432 (12)| 00:12:54 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 201 | | 64431 (12)| 00:12:54 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 177 | | 64428 (12)| 00:12:54 |
|* 6 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 150 | | 64427 (12)| 00:12:54 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 123 | | 43227 (12)| 00:08:39 |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 96 | | 21602 (12)| 00:04:20 |
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_ROSTER | 1 | 28 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 11 | 759 | | 138 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 44 | 1804 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| STAFF_CROSS_DEPLOY | 44 | 1364 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_CROSS_DEPLOY_NNDX | 73 | | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_PK | 1 | 10 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_PK | 1 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 | VIEW | VW_SQ_2 | 7227 | 190K| | 21463 (12)| 00:04:18 |
| 17 | HASH GROUP BY | | 7227 | 268K| 234M| 21463 (12)| 00:04:18 |
| 18 | MERGE JOIN | | 5097K| 184M| | 1944 (27)| 00:00:24 |
| 19 | SORT JOIN | | 7227 | 127K| | 39 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | STAFF_NUMBER_PK | 7227 | 127K| | 37 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 21 | SORT JOIN | | 14107 | 275K| 792K| 1731 (20)| 00:00:21 |
|* 22 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_IDX1 | 14107 | 275K| | 1638 (21)| 00:00:20 |
| 23 | VIEW | VW_SQ_3 | 7283 | 192K| | 21624 (12)| 00:04:20 |
| 24 | HASH GROUP BY | | 7283 | 270K| 236M| 21624 (12)| 00:04:20 |
| 25 | MERGE JOIN | | 5136K| 186M| | 1954 (27)| 00:00:24 |
| 26 | SORT JOIN | | 7283 | 128K| | 47 (7)| 00:00:01 |
| 27 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_GROUP_PK | 7283 | 128K| | 45 (3)| 00:00:01 |
|* 28 | SORT JOIN | | 14107 | 275K| 792K| 1731 (20)| 00:00:21 |
|* 29 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_IDX1 | 14107 | 275K| | 1638 (21)| 00:00:20 |
| 30 | VIEW | VW_SQ_1 | 7137 | 188K| | 21200 (12)| 00:04:15 |
| 31 | HASH GROUP BY | | 7137 | 264K| 231M| 21200 (12)| 00:04:15 |
| 32 | MERGE JOIN | | 5033K| 182M| | 1927 (27)| 00:00:24 |
| 33 | SORT JOIN | | 7137 | 125K| | 24 (13)| 00:00:01 |
| 34 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | STAFF_CATEGORY | 7137 | 125K| | 22 (5)| 00:00:01 |
|* 35 | SORT JOIN | | 14107 | 275K| 792K| 1731 (20)| 00:00:21 |
|* 36 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_IDX1 | 14107 | 275K| | 1638 (21)| 00:00:20 |
|* 37 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_WORK | 1 | 27 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 38 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_WORK_UNDX | 1 | | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 39 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_DEPLOYMENT_CODE | 1 | 24 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 40 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_DEPLOYMENT_CODE_PK | 1 | | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 41 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_NUMBER_PK | 1 | 23 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 42 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_GROUP_PK | 1 | 21 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 43 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | |
|* 44 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_CATEGORY_PK | 1 | 22 | | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 6 - access("ITEM_1"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND "ITEM_2"=ROWID)
7 - access("ITEM_5"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND "ITEM_6"=ROWID)
8 - access("ITEM_3"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND "ITEM_4"=ROWID)
12 - filter("DEPLOY"."END_DT">=TO_DATE(' 2014-03-11 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND
"DEPLOY"."START_DT"<=TO_DATE(' 2014-03-11 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
13 - access("DEPLOY"."WORK_DEPARTMENT_C"='C')
14 - access("STAFF"."IC_N"="DEPLOY"."IC_N")
15 - access("STAFF"."IC_N"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND "ROSTER"."DEPARTMENT_C"='C')
filter(TO_CHAR(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("ROSTER"."SHIFT_D"),'DD/MM/YYYY')='11/03/2014')
21 - access("SN"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
filter("SN"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
22 - filter(TO_CHAR(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("ROSTER"."SHIFT_D"),'DD/MM/YYYY')='11/03/2014')
28 - access("SG"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
filter("SG"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
29 - filter(TO_CHAR(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("ROSTER"."SHIFT_D"),'DD/MM/YYYY')='11/03/2014')
35 - access("SC"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
filter("SC"."EFFECTIVE_D"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D")
36 - filter(TO_CHAR(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("ROSTER"."SHIFT_D"),'DD/MM/YYYY')='11/03/2014')
37 - filter("WORK1"."START_DT"<="ROSTER"."SHIFT_D" AND ("WORK1"."END_DT">"ROSTER"."SHIFT_D" OR "WORK1"."END_DT"
IS NULL))
38 - access("WORK1"."IC_N"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND "WORK1"."HOME_DEPARTMENT_C"='C')
40 - access("STAFF"."IC_N"="CODE"."IC_N"(+) AND "CODE"."DEPARTMENT_C"(+)='C')
filter(TO_CHAR(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("CODE"."SHIFT_D"(+)),'DD/MM/YYYY')='11/03/2014')
41 - access("STAFF"."IC_N"="NUM"."IC_N" AND "NUM"."EFFECTIVE_D"="VW_COL_1")
filter("NUM"."EFFECTIVE_D"="VW_COL_1")
42 - access("STAFF"."IC_N"="GRP"."IC_N" AND "GRP"."EFFECTIVE_D"="VW_COL_1")
filter("GRP"."EFFECTIVE_D"="VW_COL_1")
44 - access("CATEGORY"."IC_N"="ROSTER"."IC_N" AND ("CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='CCOS' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='CCSOS' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='CES' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='HEP' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='IGCMO' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='IGCMO2' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='IGCMO3' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='LS' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='LSO' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='LSUP' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='NTCES' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='RQC' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SOCMO' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SOCMO2' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SOCMO3' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SOSOS' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SQC' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='SVCOS' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='WCES' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='WOS' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='YOCMO' OR "CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='YOCMO2' OR
"CATEGORY"."CATEGORY_C"='YOCMO3') AND "CATEGORY"."EFFECTIVE_D"="VW_COL_1") 91 rows selected.
execution plan
OK. 不用纠结于复杂的SQL 逻辑，只要知道hash 占用大量的TEMP，解决办法就是避免HASH.
而存在hash的原因就是因为 subquery 被 unnest了，那么我们可以避免 unnest，方法是设置下面几个参数之一，或者用hint
SQL > alter session set "_optimizer_cost_based_transformation" = OFF ; SQL > alter session set "_gby_hash_aggregation_enabled" = FALSE ; SQL > alter session set "_unnest_subquery"=FALSE;
通过设置参数后得到的execution plan如下
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2603715670 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 186 | 202 (1)| 00:00:03 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 186 | 196 (1)| 00:00:03 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 164 | 177 (1)| 00:00:03 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 143 | 176 (1)| 00:00:03 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 120 | 175 (1)| 00:00:03 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 11 | 1023 | 164 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 11 | 759 | 138 (1)| 00:00:02 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS | | 44 | 1804 | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| STAFF_CROSS_DEPLOY | 44 | 1364 | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_CROSS_DEPLOY_NNDX | 73 | | 9 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 10 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_PK | 1 | 10 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_ROSTER | 1 | 28 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_PK | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_DEPLOYMENT_CODE | 1 | 24 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_DEPLOYMENT_CODE_PK | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | STAFF_WORK | 1 | 27 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_WORK_UNDX | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_NUMBER_PK | 1 | 23 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 18 | | |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_NUMBER_PK | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_GROUP_PK | 1 | 21 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 18 | | |
|* 22 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_ROSTER_GROUP_PK | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 23 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | |
|* 24 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | STAFF_CATEGORY_PK | 1 | 22 | 19 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 25 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 18 | | |
|* 26 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | STAFF_CATEGORY_PK | 1 | 18 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
但是用hint的方式去避免unnest 则没有成功，需要测试。
另外疑惑的地方是，max 这种函数在subquery里应该是不unnest的，为什么这里unnest了？
总结一下， 这个case的问题就在于temp占用高，而hash是典型的占用空间多，所以应该自然而然的想到其它join。
优化实例- not use hash to avoid temp space issue的更多相关文章
- MySQL优化实例
这周就要从泰笛离职了,在公司内部的wiki上,根据公司实际的项目,写了一些mysql的优化方法,供小组里的小伙伴参考下,没想到大家的热情很高,还专门搞了个ppt讲解了一下. 举了三个大家很容易犯错的地 ...
- mysql 优化实例之索引创建
mysql 优化实例之索引创建 优化前: pt-query-degist分析结果: # Query 23: 0.00 QPS, 0.00x concurrency, ID 0x78761E301CC7 ...
- mysql sql优化实例
mysql sql优化实例 优化前: pt-query-degist分析结果: # Query 3: 0.00 QPS, 0.00x concurrency, ID 0xDC6E62FA021C85B ...
- （转载）Android项目实战（二十八）：使用Zxing实现二维码及优化实例
Android项目实战(二十八):使用Zxing实现二维码及优化实例 作者:听着music睡 字体:[增加 减小] 类型:转载 时间:2016-11-21我要评论 这篇文章主要介绍了Android项目 ...
- mysql库表优化实例
一.SQL优化 1.优化SQL一般步骤 1.1 查看SQL执行频率 SHOW STATUS LIKE 'Com_%'; Com_select:执行SELECT操作的次数,一次查询累加1.其他类似 以下 ...
- Android ListView性能优化实例讲解
前言: 对于ListView,大家绝对都不会陌生,只要是做过Android开发的人,哪有不用ListView的呢? 只要是用过ListView的人,哪有不关心对它性能优化的呢? 关于如何对ListVi ...
- iOS 优化实例
一.接口请求优化 在工程项目中,多个一级界面包含状态,如:服务入口的动态配置,未读消息数量,图片文字等,因此产品设计要每次切换 tab 时都请求数据,及时的更新页面状态.在实际开发中,频繁的调用接口, ...
- Nginx+PHP优化实例
1.PHP-FPM高负载的解决办法 http://blog.haohtml.com/archives/11162 2.Nginx优化配置 http://blog.haohtml.com/archive ...
- 弹出框优化实例（alert和confirm）
在项目过程中会遇到需要使用自己定义的弹出框的情况.以前用过ymprompt,但是它太复杂而且不好自己操控.所以自己写了一个弹出框实例. 主要有两类弹出框alert和confirm.基于jQuery a ...
随机推荐
- codevs1993 草地排水（最大流）
1993 草地排水 USACO 时间限制: 2 s 空间限制: 256000 KB 题目等级 : 钻石 Diamond 题目描述 Description 在农夫约翰的农场上,每逢下雨,Bes ...
- Akka源码分析-Actor创建(续)
在上一遍博客中,我们已经分析了actor创建的大致过程,但只是涉及到了Dipatcher/Mailbox/ActorCell/InternalActorRef等对象的创建,并没有介绍我们自定义的继承A ...
- 题解报告：hihoCoder #1175：拓扑排序·二
题目链接:https://hihocoder.com/problemset/problem/1175 时间限制:10000ms 单点时限:1000ms 内存限制:256MB 描述 小Hi和小Ho所在学 ...
- Ambari？自动部署Hadoop集群
自动部署?Ambari Ambari 跟 Hadoop 等开源软件一样,也是 Apache Software Foundation 中的一个项目,并且是顶级项目.就 Ambari 的作用来说,就是创建 ...
- 这辈子写过的比较有意思的几个sql
递归 with myRecursion as( select * from recursion where id=1 union all select r.* from myRecursion m,r ...
- Android开发高手课笔记 - 01 崩溃优化（上）：关于“崩溃”那点事
Android 的两种崩溃 Java 崩溃就是在 Java 代码中,出现了未捕获的异常,导致程序异常退出 Native 崩溃一般都是因为在 Native 代码中访问非法地址,也可能是地址对齐出了问题, ...
- CSS——font
行高的量取方式: 1.第一行可设置margin-top值.然后将第一文字顶部到第二行文字顶部的值作为行高的值(要注意对齐方式) 2.将 3.电视上 font:12px/1.5//字体12px,行高1. ...
- id 转 entity
object 是 entity原始的类 要使用id转化成entity要先将id.getobject 然后将这个值 (entity)转化成entity entity ent =id.getentity& ...
- 原生js实现瀑布流效果
参考此篇:https://segmentfault.com/a/1190000012621936 以下为个人测试中: css: .masonry{ width:100%; } .item{ posit ...
- sql的四种连接方式
1.内联接.(典型的联接运算,使用像 = 或 <> 之类的比较运算符).包括相等联接和自然联接. 内联接使用比较运算符根据每个表共有的列的值匹配两个表中的行.例如,检索 students ...