[Testing] JavaScript Mocking Fundamentals
Ensure Functions are Called Correctly with JavaScript Mocks
Often when writing JavaScript tests and mocking dependencies, you’ll want to verify that the function was called correctly. That requires keeping track of how often the function was called and what arguments it was called with. That way we can make assertions on how many times it was called and ensure it was called with the right arguments.
Function to be mocked: utils.js
// returns the winning player or null for a tie
// Let's pretend this isn't using Math.random() but instead
// is making a call to some third party machine learning
// service that has a testing environment we don't control
// and is unreliable so we want to mock it out for tests.
function getWinner(player1, player2) {
const winningNumber = Math.random();
return winningNumber < 1 / 3
? player1
: winningNumber < 2 / 3
? player2
: null;
} module.exports = {getWinner};
Implementaion: thumbwar.js
const utils = require("./utils");
function thumbWar(player1, player2) {
const numberToWin = 2;
let player1Wins = 0;
let player2Wins = 0;
while (player1Wins < numberToWin && player2Wins < numberToWin) {
const winner = utils.getWinner(player1, player2);
if (winner === player1) {
player1Wins++;
} else if (winner === player2) {
player2Wins++;
}
}
return player1Wins > player2Wins ? player1 : player2;
}
module.exports = thumbWar;
Testing:
const thumbWar = require("./thumbwar");
const utils = require("./utils");
const assert = require("assert");
test("returns winner", () => {
const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
utils.getWinner = jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
// check the params are correct
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
// check the fn has been called number of times
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
// check each time call the fn with the correct params
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW");
utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
});
Here we are using 'jest.fn' to mock the function.
We can also create a mock fn by ourselves.
function fn(impl) {
const mockFn = (...args) => {
mockFn.mock.calls.push(args);
return impl(...args);
};
mockFn.mock = {calls: []};
return mockFn;
}
test("returns winner: fn", () => {
const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
utils.getWinner = fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
assert.strictEqual(winner, "KCD");
assert.deepStrictEqual(utils.getWinner.mock.calls, [
["KCD", "KW"],
["KCD", "KW"],
]);
utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
});
Restore the Original Implementation of a Mocked JavaScript Function with jest.spyOn
With our current usage of the mock function we have to manually keep track of the original implementation so we can cleanup after ourselves to keep our tests idempotent (moonkey patching). Let’s see how jest.spyOn can help us avoid the bookkeeping and simplify our situation.
test("returns winner", () => {
//const originalGetWinner = utils.getWinner;
//utils.getWinner = jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
jest.spyOn(utils, "getWinner");
utils.getWinner.mockImplementation((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW");
// utils.getWinner = originalGetWinner;
utils.getWinner.mockRestore();
});
Here we are using jest.spyOn function.
We can also write spyOn function by ourselves.
function fn(impl = () => {}) {
const mockFn = (...args) => {
mockFn.mock.calls.push(args);
mockFn.mockImplementation = newImpl => (impl = newImpl);
return impl(...args);
};
mockFn.mock = {calls: []};
return mockFn;
}
function spyOn(obj, prop) {
// store the origianl fn
const originalValue = obj[prop];
// assign new mock fn
obj[prop] = fn;
// add restore fn
obj[prop].mockRestore = () => (obj[prop] = originalValue);
}
test("returns winner: fn", () => {
spyOn(utils, "getWinner");
utils.getWinner.mockImplementation = fn((p1, p2) => p1); // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
assert.strictEqual(winner, "KCD");
assert.deepStrictEqual(utils.getWinner.mock.calls, [
["KCD", "KW"],
["KCD", "KW"],
]);
utils.getWinner.mockRestore();
});
Mock a JavaScript module in a test
So far we’re still basically monkey-patching the utils module which is fine, but could lead to problems in the future, especially if we want to mock a ESModule export which doesn’t allow this kind of monkey-patching on exports. Instead, let’s mock the entire module so when our test subject requires the file they get our mocked version instead.
To mock a whole module. we can use 'jest.mock':
const thumbWar = require("./thumbwar");
const utils = require("./utils");
const assert = require("assert");
jest.mock("./utils", () => {
return {
getWinner: jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1), // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
};
});
test("returns winner", () => {
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW");
utils.getWinner.mockReset();
});
Now we don't need to mock the 'getWinner' function inside test, 'jest.mock' can be used anywhere, jest will make sure it mock will be hoisted to the top.
Make a shared JavaScript mock module
Often you’ll want to mock the same file throughout all the tests in your codebase. So let’s make a shared mock file in Jest's __mocks__ directory which Jest can load for us automatically.
__mocks__/utils.js:
module.exports = {
getWinner: jest.fn((p1, p2) => p1), // eslint-disable-line no-unused-vars
};
const thumbWar = require("../thumbwar");
const utils = require("../utils");
const assert = require("assert");
jest.mock("../utils");
test("returns winner", () => {
const winner = thumbWar("KCD", "KW");
expect(winner).toBe("KCD");
expect(utils.getWinner.mock.calls).toEqual([["KCD", "KW"], ["KCD", "KW"]]);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, "KCD", "KW");
expect(utils.getWinner).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(2, "KCD", "KW");
utils.getWinner.mockReset();
});
[Testing] JavaScript Mocking Fundamentals的更多相关文章
- Googletest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework
Googletest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework https://github.com/google/googletest
- [Testing] Static Analysis Testing JavaScript Applications
The static code analysis and linting tool ESLint is the de-facto standard for linting JavaScript pro ...
- 12款简化 Web 开发的 JavaScript 开发框架
前端框架简化了开发过程中,像 Bootstrap 和 Foundation 就是前端框架的佼佼者.在这篇文章了,我们编制了一组新鲜的,实用的,可以帮助您建立高质量的 Web 应用程序的 JavaScr ...
- JavaScript测试工具比较: QUnit, Jasmine, and Mocha
1. QUnit A JavaScript Unit Testing framework. QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testi ...
- 15款加速 Web 开发的 JavaScript 框架
JavaScript 可以通过多种方式来创建交互式的网站和 Web 应用程序.利用 JavaScript,可以让你移动 HTML 元素,创建各种各样的自定义动画,给你的访问者更好的终端用户体验. 对于 ...
- 关于JavaScript测试工具:QUnit, Jasmine, MoCha
在进行前端开发过程中,在某些场景下,需要通过编写单元测试来提高代码质量.而JavaScript常用的单元测试框架有这几个:QUnit, Jasmine, MoCha.下面就基于这三个工具,简单做一比较 ...
- Top JavaScript Frameworks, Libraries & Tools and When to Use Them
It seems almost every other week there is a new JavaScript library taking the web community by storm ...
- 近期流行的JavaScript框架与主题
[新年快乐]2017年你应该关注的JavaScript框架与主题 2017-01-01 王下邀月熊 JavaScript JavaScript的繁荣促生了很多优秀的技术.框架与工具库,这空前的繁荣也给 ...
- JavaScript引擎基本原理: 优化prototypes
原文链接: JavaScript engine fundamentals: optimizing prototypes 这篇文章介绍了一些JavaScript引擎常用的优化关键点, 并不只是Bened ...
随机推荐
- The eleven Day
库操作 一 系统数据库 information_schema: 虚拟库,不占用磁盘空间,存储的是数据库启动后的一些参数,如用户表信息.列信息.权限信息.字符信息等 performance_schema ...
- mcu读写调式
拿仿真SPIS为例: 对于其他外设(UART.SPIM.I2S.I2C...)都是一个道理. 当MCU写时:主要对一个寄存器进行写,此寄存器是外设的入口(基本都会做并转串逻辑). spis_tx_da ...
- 1、初学探讨PYTHON的itchat和wxpy两库
最近好奇学习了python,觉得简单明了,但是最头疼的就是调整空格和调试吧,的确调试不如C#使用visual studio 方便,都是使用print()来调试.也许因为我是菜鸟,如果大家还有更好的方法 ...
- Python9-迭代器-生成器-day13
迭代器# print('__iter__' in dir(int))# print('__iter__' in dir(list))# print('__iter__' in dir(dict))# ...
- Django模板语言中的自定义方法filter过滤器实现web网页的瀑布流
模板语言自定义方法介绍 自定义方法注意事项 Django中有simple_tag 和 filter 两种自定义方法,之前也提到过,需要注意的是 扩展目录名称必须是templatetags templa ...
- java 协程框架quasar gradle配置
https://github.com/puniverse/quasar-gradle-template/blob/master/gradle/agent.gradle 1.将其中的"-jav ...
- Exchange 正版化 授权
网友说法: Exchange服务器版其实价格不高,企业版也就是几万左右,贵的是客户端授权,一个客户端授权大概要300多.但是,但是,中国企业买Exchange客户端一般都是可以按比例买的,比如10%- ...
- 【01】blockqote美化
[01]blockqote美化 <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="zh-cn"> <head> <meta ch ...
- SQL注入与xss
1. 什么是SQL注入 所谓SQL注入,就是通过把SQL命令插入到Web表单递交或输入域名或页面请求的查询字符串,最终达到欺骗服务器执行恶意的SQL命令.通过递交参数构造巧妙的SQL语句,从而成功获取 ...
- HDU-4849 Wow! Such City!,最短路!
Wow! Such City! 题意:题面很难理解,幸亏给出了提示,敲了一发板子过了.给出x数组y数组和z数组的求法,并给出x.y的前几项,然后直接利用所给条件构造出z数组再构造出C数组即可,C ...