library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待
1.现象:
客户10.2.0.4 RAC环境，出现大量的library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待，经分析是由于统计信息收集僵死导致的。
数据库在8点到9点期间，数据库两个节点都存在明显的cursor: pin S wait on X和library cache lock的等待：
TOP 5 EVENT:
|
Event |
Waits |
Time(s) |
Avg Wait(ms) |
% Total Call Time |
Wait Class |
|
cursor: pin S wait on X |
1,573,056 |
30,651 |
19 |
146.2 |
Concurrency |
|
library cache lock |
31,757 |
7,009 |
221 |
33.4 |
Concurrency |
|
CPU time |
6,416 |
30.6 |
|||
|
DFS lock handle |
12,381 |
2,979 |
241 |
14.2 |
Other |
|
latch: library cache |
1,646 |
1,974 |
1,199 |
9.4 |
Concurrency |
|
Event |
Waits |
Time(s) |
Avg Wait(ms) |
% Total Call Time |
Wait Class |
|
cursor: pin S wait on X |
17,586,451 |
342,437 |
19 |
812.1 |
Concurrency |
|
library cache lock |
63,657 |
30,153 |
474 |
71.5 |
Concurrency |
|
CPU time |
3,820 |
9.1 |
|||
|
db file sequential read |
241,761 |
1,094 |
5 |
2.6 |
User I/O |
|
inactive session |
两个节点的等待现象基本一致，而节点1上还存在明显的DFS lock handle等待事件。
通过分析ASH信息，发现library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待基本上都是6点之后才开始出现：
2.分析原因
SELECT trunc(sample_time, 'hh24') TIME, COUNT(*)
FROM WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE ash.event_id = en.event_id
AND sample_time>= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmdd')
AND event_name IN ('cursor: pin S wait on X', 'library cache lock')
GROUP BY trunc(sample_time, 'hh24')
ORDER BY 1;
查询事件发生的情况
而观察出现cursor: pin S wait on X和library cache lock等待会话的BLOCKING SESSION，发现大部分处于等待的会话被会话37锁定：
SELECT to_char(sample_time, 'hh24:mi:ss.ff') TIME, session_id sid,
decode(en.event_name, 'cursor: pin S wait on X', to_number(substr(ltrim(to_char(p2, '0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx')), 1, 8), 'xxxxxxxx'), blocking_session) b_sid,
en.event_name
FROM WRH$_ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE ash.event_id = en.event_id(+)
AND instance_number = 1
AND sample_time >= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
AND sample_time <= to_timestamp('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
ORDER BY 1;
查询堵塞事件
TIME SID B_SID EVENT_NAME
------------------ ---------- ---------- ------------------------------
08:00:09.569 457 4294967291 latch: library cache
08:00:09.569 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:09.569 1763 4294967291 SQL*Net message FROM client
08:00:09.569 123 4294967295 kksfbc child completion
08:00:09.569 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:09.569 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:09.569 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:09.569 233 4294967291 db file scattered READ
08:00:09.569 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:09.569 1889 4294967291 gc CURRENT block 2-way
08:00:09.569 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:09.569 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:19.669 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:19.669 233 4294967291 db file scattered READ
08:00:19.669 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:19.669 1763 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:19.669 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:19.669 457 4294967291 kksfbc child completion
08:00:19.669 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:19.669 654 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:19.669 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:19.669 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 457 4294967291 kksfbc child completion
08:00:29.769 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:29.769 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:29.769 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:29.769 654 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:29.769 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:29.769 1763 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:29.769 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 123 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 196 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 233 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:29.769 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:29.769 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:39.879 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:39.879 658 4294967291 db file sequential READ
08:00:39.879 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:39.879 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:39.879 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:39.879 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:39.879 1849 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:39.879 327 4294967291 SQL*Net message TO client
08:00:39.879 235 4294967291 rdbms ipc reply
08:00:39.879 19 4294967291 rdbms ipc reply
08:00:39.879 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:39.879 123 4294967294 enq: WF - contention
08:00:49.987 476 4294967291 kst: async disk IO
08:00:49.987 500 4294967292 db file sequential READ
08:00:49.987 382 4294967291 gc cr block busy
08:00:49.987 1969 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 857 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 812 168 cursor: pin S wait ON X
08:00:49.987 235 4294967295 kksfbc child completion
08:00:49.987 658 4294967295 latch: library cache
08:00:49.987 19 4294967291 latch: library cache
08:00:49.987 981 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:49.987 168 73 library cache LOCK
08:00:49.987 1889 4294967291 SQL*Net message FROM client
08:00:49.987 73 73 DFS LOCK handle
08:00:49.987 52 981 cursor: pin S wait ON X
查询结果
可以判断，导致数据库实例HANG死的原因是因为SID为73的进程：
SELECT to_char(sample_time, 'hh24:mi:ss'), program, action, event_name
FROM wrh$_active_session_history ash, wrh$_event_name en
WHERE session_id = 73
AND ash.event_id = en.event_id(+)
AND sample_time >= to_date('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
AND sample_time <= to_date('', 'yyyymmddhh24mi')
ORDER BY 1;
查询该会话运行的程序
TO_CHAR( PROGRAM ACTION EVENT_NAME
-------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------------------------
05:50:07 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:50:17 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:50:27 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:50:37 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:50:47 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc cr block 2-way
05:50:57 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:08 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:18 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:51:28 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc cr multi block request
05:51:38 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB direct path WRITE temp
05:51:48 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:51:58 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:08 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:18 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:52:28 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:52:38 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:49 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:52:59 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:53:09 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:19 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file scattered READ
05:53:29 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:39 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:53:49 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc CURRENT GRANT 2-way
05:53:59 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:09 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:20 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:30 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:40 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:54:50 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:00 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:10 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:55:20 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:30 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:40 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:55:51 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:01 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:11 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:21 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:31 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:41 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:56:51 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB gc CURRENT GRANT 2-way
05:57:01 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB library cache pin
05:57:11 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:57:21 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:57:32 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:57:42 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:57:52 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
05:58:02 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:58:12 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:58:22 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:32 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:42 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:58:52 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:03 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:13 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:23 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:33 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
05:59:43 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB db file sequential READ
05:59:53 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
06:00:03 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:13 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB latch: library cache
06:00:23 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:34 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:44 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB DFS LOCK handle
06:00:54 oracle@orcldb5 (J002) GATHER_STATS_JOB
查询结果
根据MOS文档，Bug 6011045 – DBMS_STATS causes deadlock between ‘cursor: pin S wait on X’ and ‘library cache lock’ [ID 6011045.8]，这个问题是RAC环境中Oracle收集统计信息的BUG，在自动收集数据字典信息时，可能会出现进程HANG死，并导致大量的library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待，此外还可能出现DFS lock handle以及row cache lock的等待。
这个BUG确认影响版本包括10.2.0.4和10.2.0.5，这个BUG Oracle在10.2.0.5.5 PSU中进行了修复。
library cache lock和cursor: pin S wait on X等待的更多相关文章
- 关于library cache lock和row cache lock产生的常见原因
这两个等待事件其实很少出现在top5列表中,一般都没什么印象,在此整理记录以便以后查阅. 常见的library cache lock产生的原因在<高级OWI与Oracle性能调查>这本书和 ...
- 如何使用event 10049分析定位library cache lock and library cache pin
Oracle Library Cache 的 lock 与 pin 说明 一. 相关的基本概念 之前整理了一篇blog,讲了Library Cache 的机制,参考: Oracle Library c ...
- impdp时卡住,DW等待library cache lock
同事反映impdp时在SCHEMA_REPORT/TYPE/TYPE_SPEC步骤卡住,1个多小时后也没有响应, 查下v$session: select program,sid, event,bloc ...
- Library cache lock/pin详解
Library cache lock/pin 一.概述 ---本文是网络资料加metalink 等整理得来一个实例中的library cache包括了不同类型对象的描述,如:游标,索引,表,视图,过程 ...
- 外键约束列并没有导致大量建筑指数library cache pin/library cache lock
外键约束列并没有导致大量建筑指数library cache pin/library cache lock 清除一个100大数据表超过一百万线,发现已经运行了几个小时: delete B001.T_B1 ...
- Library Cache: Lock, Pin and Load Lock
What is "Library cache lock" ? This event controls the concurrency between clients of the ...
- Library cache lock 故障解决一例
今天收到同事电话,说是数据库中一张名为acct_balance进行操作是奇慢,第一反映是不是扫行计划有问题,结果我错了,现将过程记录下来. 用pl/sql连上数据库情况:1.对acct_balance ...
- Performance tuning library cache lock & single-task message
My colleague suddenly encountered a problem today,a Database becomes very slow , and the a lot of se ...
- 深入理解shared pool共享池之library cache的library cache lock系列四
本文了解下等待事件library cache lock,进一步理解library cache,之前的文章请见: 深入理解shared pool共享池之library cache的library ca ...
随机推荐
- Python概述_软件安装_常见问题
1. Python安装 目前python有2个大版本,2和3,由于2和3语法有差别,现有的许多库都是基于python2开发,本系列文章以python2为主. 1.1 重要概念 1. 动态语言 运行 ...
- React属性和状态对比
一.相似点 二.区别 三.如何区分 PS:所有的数据都可以变成属性
- 超级内存NVDIMM
1.序言 基于非易失性内存(NVDIMM)的新一代内存条规格已经研制成功,其中集成了DRAM和非易失性存储芯片,能够在完全断电的时候完整保存内存数据,并支持主内存在持久高速高性能计算上的应用.区别于普 ...
- 注塑成型工艺知识大全（Injection Molding）
注塑成型,广泛用于热塑性塑料产品的制造工艺 工艺成本:模具费用(高),单件费用(低) 典型产品:汽车塑料部件,消费电子产品塑料外壳等 产量适合:只适合大批量生产 质量:极高的表面精确度,同一批次的产品 ...
- Ubuntu rsync同步
>服务器端:Ubuntu 9.10 - 192.168.1.3客户端:Ubuntu 10.04 - 192.168.1.73 我们先来设置一下服务器端的配置 1.ubuntu系统安装完之后,rs ...
- iOS iphone屏幕分析（岂止而大）
在写本文前,我必须介绍几点内容:第一点:屏幕上面显示的内容多少和屏幕的尺寸大小无关第二点:屏幕上面显示的内容多少和分辨率完全无关第三点:屏幕上面显示的内容多少和屏幕尺寸.屏幕分辨率.PPI等都是无关的 ...
- DB2基本操作
--重启数据库 FORCE APPLICATION ALL DB2STOP DB2START --创建数据库 CREATE DATABASE mysdedb USING CODESET UTF-8 T ...
- 关于Netty4.x中文教程系列更新进度的说明和道歉
最近一些事情.貌似发现很久没更新教程了.这里和大家说一声对不起.教程5的前半部分差不多年前就写好了.但是由于年前我在的项目组项目进度比较紧张.一直在加班.教程的后半部分就一直没有写.年后由于一些公司人 ...
- 了解ThinkPHP(一)
1.项目开发,中,会遇到的问题: 1). 多人开发项目,分工不合理,(html php mysql) 2). 代码风格不一样,后期维护十分困难 3). 项目生命周期十分短,项目生命没有延续性, ...
- ListView 连接数据库的增删改查
private string link = "server=.;database=list;user=sa;pwd=123"; public void chaxun() //创建一 ...