[转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 6.
1. Introduction.
1.1 Starting from part
4 I have started to discuss how to interop marshal a managed array of
TestStructure structs that is contained within a structure.
1.2 We have seen in part 4 an example for marshaling
such a container structure to unmanaged code “one way” (i.e. as an “in”
parameter).
1.3 In part
5 we learned how to marshal such a container structure from an
unmanaged function to managed code as an “out” (return) parameter.
1.4 Here in part 6, we shall look into how to marshal
such a container structure bi-directionally, i.e. as both an “in” and an
“out” (or reference) parameter.
1.5 Just as I did in part 5, I shall take this
opportunity to demonstrate the use of several IRecordInfo methods which pertain
to UDTs. Through these IRecordInfo methods I hope to show strong consistency and
robustness of both the IRecordInfo interface as well as the
SAFEARRAY.
2. The TestStructure, ArrayContainer Structures and
the CSConsoleApp.tlb Type
Library.
2.1 We shall continue to use the TestStructure and the
ArrayContainer structures that we have previously defined in part 1 and part 4
respectively.
2.2 We shall also be using the CSConsoleApp.tlb type
library that we have updated in part 4.
3. Unmanaged API that Returns an ArrayContainer
Structure as a Reference Parameter.
3.1 In this section, I shall present a new unmanaged
function to be exported from the UnmanagedDll.dll that
we have been using since part 1. This function takes a pointer to an
ArrayContainer structure as input parameter.
3.2 The intension of this function is to modify the
underlying ArrayContainer structure with new values for its fields. This
ArrayContainer structure is in this way returned to the calling function with
modified field data.
3.3 Full source codes of this unmanaged function is
listed below :
extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void __stdcall ModifyArrayContainer
(
/*[in, out]*/ ArrayContainer* pArrayContainerToModify
)
{
IRecordInfoPtr spIRecordInfoArrayContainer = NULL;
HRESULT hrRet; hrRet = GetIRecordType
(
TEXT("CSConsoleApp.tlb"),
__uuidof(ArrayContainer),
&spIRecordInfoArrayContainer
); // We do something drastic : we completely clear the contents of
// "pArrayContainerToModify". This will release object references
// and other values of the UDT without deallocating the UDT.
//
// As a result, the "array_of_test_structures" SAFEARRAY contained
// inside "pArrayContainerToModify" will be destroyed.
spIRecordInfoArrayContainer -> RecordClear((PVOID)pArrayContainerToModify); // We now create an STL vector of TestStructure structs.
std::vector<TestStructure> vecTestStructure;
TestStructure test_structure; test_structure.m_integer = 100;
test_structure.m_double = 100.0;
test_structure.m_string = ::SysAllocString(L"New string");
vecTestStructure.push_back(test_structure); test_structure.m_integer = 101;
test_structure.m_double = 101.0;
test_structure.m_string = ::SysAllocString(L"New string");
vecTestStructure.push_back(test_structure); test_structure.m_integer = 102;
test_structure.m_double = 102.0;
test_structure.m_string = ::SysAllocString(L"New string");
vecTestStructure.push_back(test_structure); test_structure.m_integer = 103;
test_structure.m_double = 103.0;
test_structure.m_string = ::SysAllocString(L"New string");
vecTestStructure.push_back(test_structure); IRecordInfoPtr spIRecordInfoTestStructure = NULL; hrRet = GetIRecordType
(
TEXT("CSConsoleApp.tlb"),
__uuidof(TestStructure),
&spIRecordInfoTestStructure
); // Define a receiver of the SAFEARRAY that we want
// to now create using CreateSafeArrayEx<>().
SAFEARRAY* pSafeArrayOfTestStructure = NULL; CreateSafeArrayEx<TestStructure, VT_RECORD>
(
(TestStructure*)&(vecTestStructure[0]),
vecTestStructure.size(),
(PVOID)spIRecordInfoTestStructure,
pSafeArrayOfTestStructure
); // At this point, "pSafeArrayOfTestStructures" contains
// copies of TestStructure structs from "vecTestStructure". // Define a VARIANT that will contain "pSafeArrayOfTestStructure".
VARIANT varFieldValue; VariantInit(&varFieldValue);
V_VT(&varFieldValue) = (VT_ARRAY | VT_RECORD);
V_ARRAY(&varFieldValue) = pSafeArrayOfTestStructure; // Set the "array_of_test_structures" field
// of the "pArrayContainerReceiver" structure.
//
// As an alternative to PutFieldNoCopy() as
// used in GetArrayContainer(), we now use
// the PutField() method which will make a
// complete copy of the data contained
// inside "varFieldValue" to set as the
// field value of "array_of_test_structures".
//
// Hence later on, we must either destroy
// "pSafeArrayOfTestStructure" by a call to
// SafeArrayDestroy() or by calling VariantClear().
spIRecordInfoArrayContainer -> PutField
(
INVOKE_PROPERTYPUT,
pArrayContainerToModify,
L"array_of_test_structures",
&varFieldValue
); std::vector<TestStructure>::iterator theIterator; // The members of structures which are reference types
// (e.g. m_string which is BSTR) must be freed here.
// This is because SAFEARRAYs use copy-semantics.
// That is, they store an entire copy of the structures
// that we insert into it.
//
// Therefore each TestStructure structure inside the
// SAFEARRAY will contain a BSTR copy in its m_string member.
for (theIterator = vecTestStructure.begin(); theIterator != vecTestStructure.end(); theIterator++)
{
TestStructure& test_structure = *theIterator; spIRecordInfoTestStructure -> RecordClear((PVOID)&test_structure);
} // Because we have used IRecordInfo::PutField()
// to insert "pSafeArrayOfTestStructure" as a field
// value into "ArrayContainer", we must now destroy
// "pSafeArrayOfTestStructure" either by calling
// SafeArrayDestroy() or by calling VariantClear()
// but not both.
//
VariantClear(&varFieldValue);
}
The following is a summary of the workings of this
function :
- The function begins by completely clearing the fields of
“pArrayContainerToModify”. - This will result in the complete destruction of the
“array_of_test_structures” SAFEARRAY field of
“pArrayContainerToModify”. - Later on in the function, a new SAFEARRAY will be
created and will replace the one that has just been
destroyed. - This will present no problem to the corresponding
“array_of_test_structures” field of the managed ArrayContainer structure that
was passed to the ModifyArrayContainer() function in the managed client
application. This is because a brand new managed array will be created and then
initialized with new values from the new “array_of_test_structures” SAFEARRAY.
But more on this when we get there later. - A STL vector of TestStructure structs (i.e.
“vecTestStructure”) will then be instantiated and filled with
values. - Then a new SAFEARRAY (i.e. “pSafeArrayOfTestStructure”)
will be created using the CreateSafeArrayEx<>() helper function. The
SAFEARRAY will be filled with TestStructure structs copied from the earlier
“vecTestStructure” vector. - And then the IRecordInfo::PutField() method will be
called on the IRecordInfo interface associated with the ArrayContainer UDT to
insert the values of “pSafeArrayOfTestStructure” into the
“array_of_test_structures” field of the input
“pArrayContainerToModify”. - At this point, the whole purpose of the
ModifyArrayContainer() function has been accomplished. - What remains is clean-up.
- The TestStructure structs contained inside
“vecTestStructure” must now each be destroyed. We loop through the elements of
“vecTestStructure” and call on the IRecordInfo interface associated with
the TestStructure UDT to clear each structure. - Note that we must not call IRecordInfo::RecordDestroy()
because this will cause the memory area occuppied by each TestStructure struct
to be freed. - This is not permitted because each TestStructure struct
contained inside “vecTestStructure” remains owned by “vecTestStructure”. Only
“vecTestStructure” can de-allocate each struct. - Finally, we call on VariantClear() to clear the
“varFieldValue” VARIANT that was used in the call to
IRecordInfo::PutField(). - Alternatively, SafeArrayDestroy() can also be used to
directly destroy “pSafeArrayOfTestStructure”. - However, do not call both VariantClear() and
SafeArrayDestroy().
4. Example Call to
ModifyArrayContainer().
4.1 The following is how the ModifyArrayContainer()
function is declared in a client C# code :
[DllImport("UnmanagedDll.dll", CallingConvention = CallingConvention.StdCall)]
private static extern void ModifyArrayContainer
(
[In][Out] ref ArrayContainer ArrayContainerToModify
);
- When the interop marshaler internally makes a call to
the ModifyArrayContainer() function, it will create the unmanaged version of the
ArrayContainer structure and then pass a pointer to it as parameter to the
ModifyArrayContainer() function. - A pointer to this unmanaged ArrayContainer structure is
passed instead of a complete structure itself due to the use of the OutAttribute
as well as the out keyword. - This is so that the underlying structure can be modified
by the ModifyArrayContainer() function. The ModifyArrayContainer() function has
the right to do so because the OutAttribute indicates that the parameter is to
be returned from it. - Now due to the presence of the InAttribute, the existing
contents of the managed ArrayContainer structure will be transformed
into respective fields of the unmanaged version of the ArrayContainer
structure which is then passed along to the ModifyArrayContainer()
function.
4.2 The following is a sample C# function that calls
ModifyArrayContainer() :
static void DoTest_ModifyArrayContainer()
{
ArrayContainer ArrayContainerToModify = new ArrayContainer();
// Define and instantiate a managed array of 3
// TestStructure structs for the "array_of_test_structures"
// field.
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures = new TestStructure[3]; // Assign simple values to the elements of the array.
for (int i = 0; i < ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures.Length; i++)
{
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_integer
= i;
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_double
= (double)i;
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_string
= string.Format("Hello World [{0}]", i);
} // Call on ModifyArrayContainer() to modify ArrayContainerToModify.
ModifyArrayContainer(ref ArrayContainerToModify); // Display the contents of the "array_of_test_structures" array
// inside ArrayContainerToModify.
for (int i = 0; i < ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures.Length; i++)
{
Console.WriteLine("ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[{0}].m_integer : [{1}]",
i, ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_integer);
Console.WriteLine("ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[{0}].m_double : [{1}]",
i, ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_double);
Console.WriteLine("ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[{0}].m_string : [{1:S}]",
i, ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[i].m_string);
}
}
The following are some important points pertaining to
the code above :
- An ArrayContainer structure “ArrayContainerToModify” is
defined and instantiated. - The “array_of_test_structures” field of
“ArrayContainerToModify” is instantiated to an array of 3 TestStructure
structs. - Simple values are then assigned to the elements of the
array. - The ModifyArrayContainer() function is then called with
“ArrayContainerToModify” passed as a reference parameter. - Under the covers, when the ModifyArrayContainer() is
called, an unmanaged counterpart of the “ArrayContainerToModify”
structure is allocated by the interop marshaler and filled with
actual field values based on those of the managed “ArrayContainerToModify”
structure. - A pointer to this unmanaged “ArrayContainerToModify”
structure is then passed to the ModifyArrayContainer() function. - When the ModifyArrayContainer() returns, the latest
contents of the unmanaged “ArrayContainerToModify” structure is used to rebuild
the managed “ArrayContainerToModify” structure. - The DoTest_ModifyArrayContainer() function then loops
through the contents of the new “ArrayContainerToModify” structure and display
all its new contents.
4.3 At runtime, the above function will produce the
following console output :
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[0].m_integer : [100]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[0].m_double : [100]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[0].m_string : [New string]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[1].m_integer : [101]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[1].m_double : [101]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[1].m_string : [New string]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[2].m_integer : [102]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[2].m_double : [102]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[2].m_string : [New string]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[3].m_integer : [103]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[3].m_double : [103]
ArrayContainerToModify.array_of_test_structures[3].m_string : [New string]
5. In Conclusion.
5.1 Here in part 6, we have looked at how managed
structures may be passed to and returned from unmanaged code bi-directionally by
way of a SAFEARRAY contained in an outer wrapping structure.
5.2 More good demonstrations of methods of the
IRecordInfo interface (RecordClear(), PutField()) was given. The
VariantClear() function was also used to completely clear a SAFEARRAY. I
certainly hope that the reader has benefitted from this.
5.3 In part 7, we shall shift gears again and up the
ante in complexity. We shall be explore marshaling a structure that contains an
array of ArrayContainer structures.
5.4 Noting that each ArrayContainer structue contains an
array of TestStructure structs, we are talking about marshaling a potentially
great number of TestStructure structs.
[转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 6.的更多相关文章
- [转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 1.
1. Introduction. 1.1 I have previously written about exchanging SAFEARRAYs of managed structures wit ...
- [转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 5.
1. Introduction. 1.1 In part 4, I have started to discuss how to interop marshal a managed array tha ...
- [转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 4.
1. Introduction. 1.1 In parts 1 through 3 of this series of articles, I have thoroughly discussed th ...
- [转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 3.
1. Introduction. 1.1 In part 1 of this series of articles, I demonstrated how to transfer managed ar ...
- [转]Marshaling a SAFEARRAY of Managed Structures by P/Invoke Part 2.
1. Introduction. 1.1 In part 1 of this series of articles, I explained how managed arrays may be tra ...
- [转]Passing Managed Structures With Strings To Unmanaged Code Part 2
1. Introduction. 1.1 In part 1 of this series of blogs we studied how to pass a managed structure (w ...
- [转]Passing Managed Structures With Strings To Unmanaged Code Part 1
1. Introduction. 1.1 Managed structures that contain strings are a common sight. The trouble is that ...
- [转]Passing Managed Structures With Strings To Unmanaged Code Part 3
1. Introduction. 1.1 In part 1 of this series of blogs we studied how to pass a managed structure (w ...
- Passing JavaScript Objects to Managed Code
Silverlight If the target managed property or input parameter is strongly typed (that is, not typed ...
随机推荐
- jQuery笔记——Ajax
Ajax 全称为:“Asynchronous JavaScript and XML”(异步 JavaScript 和 XML), 它并不是 JavaScript 的一种单一技术,而是利用了一系列交互式 ...
- AUC ROC PR曲线
ROC曲线: 横轴:假阳性率 代表将负例错分为正例的概率 纵轴:真阳性率 代表能将正例分对的概率 AUC是ROC曲线下面区域得面积. 与召回率对比: AUC意义: 任取一对(正.负)样本,把正样本预测 ...
- python--open用法
open/文件操作f=open('/tmp/hello','w') #open(路径+文件名,读写模式) #读写模式:r只读,r+读写,w新建(会覆盖原有文件),a追加,b二进制文件.常用模式 如:' ...
- js取得前2位字符
<label id="ab">0</label> <script language="javascript"> url=&q ...
- 使用ReentrantReadWriteLock类
读读共享 类ReentrantReadWriteLock的使用:写写互斥 读写互斥
- CSS JQuyer 元素选择
$(this) 当前 HTML 元素 $("p") 所有 <p> 元素 $("p.intro") 所有 class="intro" ...
- sql 2008 权限角色控制
Use Test --创建角色 create role rtt create user username for login username --将用户TestUser添加到TestRole角色中 ...
- Minimum Sum of Array(map)
You are given an array a consisting of n integers a1, ..., an. In one operation, you can choose 2 el ...
- HashMap与ConcurrentHashMap的区别(转)
从JDK1.2起,就有了HashMap,正如前一篇文章所说,HashMap不是线程安全的,因此多线程操作时需要格外小心. 在JDK1.5中,伟大的Doug Lea给我们带来了concurrent包,从 ...
- tmux颜色高亮跟vim不一致的情况
安装完tmux之后,按照网上大神的配置,稍微配置了下~/.tmux.conf: # 改变快捷键前缀 unbind C-b set -g prefix C-a # 绑定配置加载按键 bind r sou ...