Facebook Messenger的后台架构是什么样的?
后台的架构是由前台的需求决定的。做 mobile app 的需求跟做 web app 是不一样的,比如 mobile app 对实时性的要求比较强(移动用户都没耐性),移动设备网络不稳定(要能做到断点续传),网络流量有限(后台传来的数据得尽量小)。
Facebook 的这个架构主要的 idea 是数据分层存储,热数据存在双指针的队列里(放在内存),冷数据存在 MySql (在 SSD 上),最冷的数据存在磁盘上。这篇文章最好搭配这个视频看
MySQL for Messaging - @Scale 2014 - Data9
Facebook: Building Mobile-First Infrastructure for Messenger
Messages have been part of Facebook for many years, beginning as direct messaging similar to email (available in your inbox the next time you visited the site) and then eventually evolving into a real-time messaging platform that provides access to your
messages on a number of mobile apps or in a browser. But until recently the back-end systems hadn't evolved much from early iterations, and Messenger's performance and data usage started to lag behind — especially on networks with costly data plans and limited
bandwidth. To fix this, we needed to completely re-imagine how data is synchronized to the device and change how data is processed in the back end to support our new synchronization protocol.
The version of Messenger we released at the end of last year was the first taste of a “mobile first” experience for Facebook Messenger. For the past year, while our app developer teammates have been improving the UI and expanding Messenger's feature set,
the Messaging infrastructure team has been working to make the platform more reliable on the back end and use less data. As a result, we created a new Messenger sync protocol that decreased non-media data usage by 40% and developed a new service called Iris
to power it. By reducing congestion on the network, we've seen an approximately 20% decrease in the number of people who experience errors when trying to send a message.
The clients
The original protocol for getting data down to Messenger apps was pull-based. When receiving a message, the app first received a lightweight push notification indicating new data was available. This triggered the app to send the server a complicated HTTPS
query and receive a very large JSON response with the updated conversation view.
Instead of this model, we decided to move to a push-based snapshot + delta model. In this model, the client retrieves an initial snapshot of their messages (typically the only HTTPS pull ever made) and then subscribes to delta updates, which are immediately
pushed to the app through MQTT (a low-power, low-bandwidth protocol) as messages are received. When the client is pushed an update, it simply applies them to its local copy of the snapshot. As a result, without ever making an HTTPS request, the app can quickly
display an up-to-date view.
We further optimized this flow by moving away from JSON encoding for the messages and delta updates. JSON is great if you need a flexible, human-readable format for transferring data without a lot of developer overhead. However, JSON is not very efficient
on the wire. Compression helps some, but it doesn’t entirely compensate for the inherent inefficiencies of JSON’s wire format. We evaluated several possibilities for replacing JSON and ultimately decided to use Thrift. Switching to Thrift from JSON allowed
us to reduce our payload size on the wire by roughly 50%.
The server
Messaging data has traditionally been stored on spinning disks. In the pull-based model, we’d write to disk before sending a trigger to Messenger to read from disk. Thus, this giant storage tier would serve real-time message data as well as the full conversation
history. One large storage tier doesn't scale well to synchronize recent messages to the app in real time. So in order to support this new, faster sync protocol and maintain consistency between the Messenger app and long-term storage, we need to be able to
stream the same sequence of updates in real time to Messenger and to the storage tier in parallel on a per user basis.
Iris is a totally ordered queue of messaging updates (new messages, state change for messages read, etc.) with separate pointers into the queue indicating the last update sent to your Messenger app and the traditional storage tier. When successfully sending
a message to disk or to your phone, the corresponding pointer is advanced. When your phone is offline, or there is a disk outage, the pointer stays in place while new messages can still be enqueued and other pointers advanced. As a result, long disk write
latencies don't hinder Messenger's real-time communication, and we can keep Messenger and the traditional storage tier in sync at independent rates.
Effectively, this queue allows a tiered storage model based on recency:
The most recent messages are immediately sent to online apps and to the disk storage tier from Iris's memory
A week's worth of messages are served by the queue's backing store in the case of disk outage or the Messenger app being offline for a while
Older conversation history and full inbox snapshot fetches are served from the traditional disk storage tier
We looked at several existing technologies to support the queue's backing store, but couldn't find anything that met our needs in terms of scale, reliability, speed, and flexibility. Ultimately, we opted to build the queue storage on top of MySQL and flash.
For MySQL we decided to use semi-sync replication, which can give you durability across multiple servers. By leveraging this technology, we can handle database hardware failures in under 30 seconds, and the latency for enqueueing a new message is an order
of magnitude less than writing to the traditional disk storage. Since we enqueue a message once to MySQL and then push it to apps and disk in parallel, Messenger receives messages faster and more reliably.[1]
Results
The benefits of this new infrastructure are quite remarkable. The new sync protocol reduces Messenger's non-media data usage by about 40%. Additionally, reducing congestion on the network leads to roughly a 20% decrease in the number of people who experience
errors when trying to send a message.
Lessons learned
When building a high-quality real-time mobile application, it’s important to remember that the network is a scarce resource that must be used as efficiently as possible. Every byte wasted has a very real impact on the experience of the application. By sending
less data and reducing HTTPS fetches, apps receive updates with lower latency and higher reliability. Extending desktop-focused infrastructure for a mobile world could work well, but building new mobile first infrastructure with protocols designed for pushable
devices offers even better experiences.
Footnotes
[1] For more information on the improvements required in MySQL availability and performance to have it serve this new protocol, please see
Harrison Fisk's presentation9 at the
@Scale 2014 conference.
Thanks to all the engineers who have contributed to this project, including Andrew Lutsenko, Andy Chen, Brian Tang, Changle Wang, Domas Mituzas, Harrison Fisk, Jeff Ferland, Olivia Bishop, Pierre-Luc Bertrand, Sachin Kulkarni, Thomas Georgiou, and Ting
Yang.
原链接可能国内被墙了,搬到国内。
原文地址:http://whosmall.com
Facebook Messenger的后台架构是什么样的?的更多相关文章
- 为Facebook messenger平台开发聊天机器人
介绍 在电子商务网上商店发明之前,我们总是有机会与销售代表或分销商在选择商品或服务时交谈.在进入数字世界后,这个领域变得沉默.这样对顾客方便吗?我认为不是.向销售代表或经销商询问他们想要的产品或服务是 ...
- 利用ThinkPHP搭建网站后台架构
记录一下ThinkPHP搭建网站后台.调整好样式等操作步骤 下载好ThinkPHP(3.2.3),解压后将核心文件夹ThinkPHP以及index.php等文件复制到网站根目录如下图 对index.p ...
- QPS从0到4000请求每秒,谈达达后台架构演化之路
达达是全国领先的最后三公里物流配送平台. 达达的业务模式与滴滴以及Uber很相似,以众包的方式利用社会闲散人力资源,解决O2O最后三公里即时性配送难题(目前达达已经与京东到家合并). 达达业务主要包含 ...
- Ultimate Facebook Messenger for Business Guide (Feb 2019)
Ultimate Facebook Messenger for Business Guide (Updated: Feb 2019) By Iaroslav Kudritskiy November 2 ...
- 达达O2O后台架构演进实践:从0到4000高并发请求背后的努力
1.引言 达达创立于2014年5月,业务覆盖全国37个城市,拥有130万注册众包配送员,日均配送百万单,是全国领先的最后三公里物流配送平台. 达达的业务模式与滴滴以及Uber很相似,以众包的方式利 ...
- QPS从0到4000请求每秒,谈达达后台架构演化之路(转载)
https://blog.csdn.net/czbing308722240/article/details/52350219 QPS从0到4000请求每秒,谈达达后台架构演化之路 达达是全国领先的 ...
- IT咨询顾问:一次吐血的项目救火 java或判断优化小技巧 asp.net core Session的测试使用心得 【.NET架构】BIM软件架构02:Web管控平台后台架构 NetCore入门篇:(十一)NetCore项目读取配置文件appsettings.json 使用LINQ生成Where的SQL语句 js_jquery_创建cookie有效期问题_时区问题
IT咨询顾问:一次吐血的项目救火 年后的一个合作公司上线了一个子业务系统,对接公司内部的单点系统.我收到该公司的技术咨询:项目启动后没有规律的突然无法登录了,重新启动后,登录一断时间后又无法重新登 ...
- .NET Core API后台架构搭建
ASP.NET Core API后台架构搭建 项目文件:https://files.cnblogs.com/files/ZM191018/WebAPI.zip 本篇可以了解到: 依赖注入 Dapper ...
- Java生鲜电商平台-商城后台架构与原型图实战
Java生鲜电商平台-商城后台架构与原型图实战 说明:生鲜电商平台的运营平台,其中需要很多的功能进行管理.目前把架构与原型图实战分享给大家,希望对大家有用. 仪表盘/首页,简单统计,报表页,运营快捷口 ...
随机推荐
- 【对noip结束后一个月内的总结】
最近在刷一些树结构,但发现没有一个提纲,觉得有点不知所措,经常学完一个就发现还有比它更好的,而且比较耗时间.于是沙茶准备按顺序刷bzoj的省选题,看看效果怎么样……求大神指教
- VBPR: Visual Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback-AAAI2016 -20160422
1.Information publication:AAAI2016 2.What 基于BPR模型的改进:在商品喜好偏序对的学习中,将商品图片的视觉信息加入进去,冷启动问题. 3.Dataset Am ...
- 调用天气Api实现天气查询
上面是简单截图: 前台代码: @{ Layout = null; } <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta name=&qu ...
- 【JavaEE企业应用实战学习记录】struts2实现登录并获取各个范围的数据
package sanglp; import com.opensymphony.xwork2.*; /** * Created by Administrator on 2016/10/6. */ pu ...
- Hibernate的三种状态
Hibernate的对象有3种状态,分别为:瞬时态(Transient). 持久态(Persistent).脱管态(Detached).处于持久态的对象也称为PO(Persistence Objec ...
- 【UR #2】树上GCD
这道题是有根树点分治+烧脑的容斥+神奇的分块 因为是规定1为根,还要求LCA,所以我们不能像在无根树上那样随便浪了,必须规定父亲,并作特殊讨论 因为gcd并不好求,所以我们用容斥转化一下,求x为gcd ...
- 安全框架 SpringSecurity 和 Shiro 对比
突然再次很想理一下权限的事,但是实在不知道实际情况选哪个框架好,现在整理下网上的资料,做一下对比. 1.Spring-security 对spring 结合较好,如果项目用的springmvc ,使用 ...
- Echarts-画柱状,折线图
导入echarts包 <script src='../scripts/libraries/echarts/echarts-all.js'></script> 堆积图js var ...
- linux centos中使用yum安装tomcat
在linux下部署java开发的web应用,一般采用Tomact+jre环境(可不需要apache),在RHEL和CentOS下,可以采用yum在线自动安装方式安装,具体操作如下: 可以先查看tomc ...
- maven2打包不同jdk版本的包
通常在一些特别情况下,我们需要为单独某一个构件打包多个不同jdk版本的包,用来支持不同的jdk,基于maven我们就可以很方便的做到这点. 1.在项目的pom文件中加入如下配置 <project ...