Recently I’ve found out that we can easily cause a memory leaks in our .net application by improper usage of the dependency injection container Autofac.

The case of this problem concerns only components that implements IDisposable interface, so are meant to handle some unmanaged resources and need to be disposed when no longer needed. Let me show you how to reproduce this problem in an example. For the sake of presentation both, the component and testing code are as simple as possible and do nothing really usable. 
The disposable component is defined as follows

 public class MyComponent : IDisposable
{
public MyComponent()
{
//component created
} ~MyComponent()
{
//component garbage collected
} public void Dispose()
{
//component disposed
}
}

So we got a constructor, finalizer and the Dispose() method. The most important for us is when the finalizer is called, which means that the instance of MyComponent is being released and collected by a garbage collector. 
Now let’s do write some testing code with use of Autofac container

 static void Main(string[] args)
{
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterType<MyComponent>();
var container = builder.Build();
test(container);
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
} public static void test(ILifetimeScope scope)
{
using (var auxComponent = scope.Resolve<MyComponent>())
{ }
}

First we register MyComponent and build the container. Then, in test method, we ask the container to resolve the component for us in a using block. As we know the disposable object auxComponent, created in scope ofusing block is automatically disposed when runtime leaves the using block. And that is true as we can easily check by placing a breakpoint in Dispose() method of the component and running above code. 
However, the using block is also a scope for the instance of MyComponent which we create in it, since auxComponent variable is not reachable outside that block. Therefore we expect that the instance, we created, will be garbage collected (the component’s finalizer will be called), when we call lines 7 and 8. Unfortunately this is not happening.

The Autofac is designed in the way that by default it holds a references to all disposable components we request, and call Dispose() on them when the whole container is disposed! Yeap, somehow to avoid the situation we forgot to call dispose on those. Unfortunately that also means that those components are not collected by a GC as long as the container itself is collected!

This and other aspects of Autofac are excellently described by Nicholas Blumhardt in his blog post An Autofac Lifetime Primer.

Her I will only show you a proper and recommended way of working with IDisposable components and Autofac. 
The general advice using Autofac is to never resolve components from the root container. Always resolve and then dispose the lifetime scopes (ILifetimeScope). This prevents a memory leaks and facilitates creating units of work in the application. IDIsposable component resolved within a lifetime scope is associated to it and stays alive as long as the containing lifetime scope stays alive. 
Back to our example, let’s modify the code so that we will use a nested lifetime scope.

 static void Main(string[] args)
{
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterType<MyComponent>();
var container = builder.Build();
test(container);
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
} public static void test(ILifetimeScope scope)
{
var localScope = scope.BeginLifetimeScope();
using (var auxComponent = localScope.Resolve<MyComponent>())
{ }
}

Now you can see that the finalizer of the MyComponent class is called when debugger reaches lines 7 and 8. The component is resolved from nested lifetime scope and is successfully collected since the localScope exists only within a test method. 
Here the component is disposed because we keep it within a using block. If we want the Autofac to handle the disposal of the resolved components for us we need to dispose the lifetime scope itself instead.

 static void Main(string[] args)
{
var builder = new ContainerBuilder();
builder.RegisterType<MyComponent>();
var container = builder.Build();
test(container);
GC.Collect();
GC.WaitForPendingFinalizers();
} public static void test(ILifetimeScope scope)
{
using (var localScope = scope.BeginLifetimeScope())
{
var auxComponent = localScope.Resolve<MyComponent>();
var auxComponent2 = localScope.Resolve<MyComponent>();
}
}

Now both instances of the MyComponent class are disposed and available for GC collection at the end of usingblock.

Memory leak by misusing Autofac的更多相关文章

  1. Android 内存管理 &Memory Leak & OOM 分析

    转载博客:http://blog.csdn.net/vshuang/article/details/39647167 1.Android 进程管理&内存 Android主要应用在嵌入式设备当中 ...

  2. quartz集群报错but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak.

    quartz集群报错but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak. 在一台配置1核2G内存的阿里云服务器 ...

  3. 山东省第七届ACM省赛------Memory Leak

    Memory Leak Time Limit: 2000MS Memory limit: 131072K 题目描述 Memory Leak is a well-known kind of bug in ...

  4. caching redirect views leads to memory leak (Spring 3.1)

    在Spring 3.1以及以下版本使用org.springframework.web.servlet.view.UrlBasedViewResolver + cache(如下配置),在会出现任意种re ...

  5. 一则JVM memory leak解决的过程

    起因是我们的集群应用(3台机器)新版本测试过程中,一般的JVM内存占用 都在1G左右, 但在运行了一段时间后,慢慢升到了4G, 这是一个明显不正常的现象. 定位 过程: 1.先在该机器上按照步骤尝试重 ...

  6. Linux C/C++ Memory Leak Detection Tool

    目录 . 内存使用情况分析 . 内存泄漏(memory leak) . Valgrind使用 1. 内存使用情况分析 0x1: 系统总内存的分析 可以从proc目录下的meminfo文件了解到当前系统 ...

  7. SilverLight - Memory Leak

    There is a memory leak issue in current silverlight project. It occurs in the search function: the m ...

  8. A memory leak issue with WPF Command Binding

    Background In our application, we have a screen which hosts several tabs. In each tab, it contains a ...

  9. quartzScheduler_Worker-1] but has failed to stop it. This is very likely to create a memory leak解决

    01-Jul-2016 07:24:20.218 INFO [main] org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start Server startup in 80 ...

随机推荐

  1. I2S音频总线学习(二)I2S总线协议

    http://blog.csdn.net/ce123_zhouwei/article/details/6919954

  2. Linux下使用Opencv打开笔记本摄像头

    新建test文件夹,文件夹存在test.cpp和CMakeLists.txt test.cpp#include <iostream> #include <string> #in ...

  3. jq的.off解绑事件

    .off( events [, selector ] [, handler ] ) 描述:移除一个事件处理函数 events 类型: String 一个或多个空格分隔的事件类型和可选的命名空间,或仅仅 ...

  4. flutter笔记1:VScode安装dart code插件踩坑记录

    新手菜鸟一枚,想从产品转入技术坑,目标:移动端APP开发.最近听技术达人 飞狐 说flutter beta发布了,支持跨平台APP开发,各种强大易上手,于是乎零基础入坑~话说想提高英文水平的同学,请移 ...

  5. iOS-分组UITableView删除崩溃问题(当删除section中最后一条数据崩溃的情况)

    错误: The number of sections contained in the table view after the update (1) must be equal to the num ...

  6. I.MX6 I2C DS1337 disable square-wave output

    linux I2C DS1337 disable square-wave output \\\\\\\\\\\-*- 目录 -*-////////// | 一.DS1337访问寄存器说明: | 二.c ...

  7. spi总结

    SPI的四种模式 SPI的相位(CPHA)和极性(CPOL)分别可以为0或1,对应的4种组合构成了SPI的4种模式(mode) Mode 0:CPOL = 0,CPHA = 0 Mode 1:CPOL ...

  8. javascript 小代码

    if(!("a" in window)){ var a =1; } alert(a); //undefined var a = 1,b=function a (x){ x & ...

  9. 每天一个linux命令:【转载】touch命令

    linux的touch命令不常用,一般在使用make的时候可能会用到,用来修改文件时间戳,或者新建一个不存在的文件. 1.命令格式: touch [选项]... 文件... 2.命令参数: -a    ...

  10. Java并发--并发容器之ConcurrentHashMap

    下面这部分内容转载自: http://www.haogongju.net/art/2350374 JDK5中添加了新的concurrent包,相对同步容器而言,并发容器通过一些机制改进了并发性能.因为 ...