NIST SP 800-37 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy
NIST SP 800-37
Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations
A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy
It structured into 3 level organization view, business mission and information system view.
800-37 is short for NIST SP 800-37, or NIST 800-37. 800-37 can be applied on all industry like military, airflight, etc. For IT industry it is a framework to risk management by invoking multiple NIST standards including: FIPS 199, NIST 800-53B, NIST 800-53A, etc.
ABSTRACT
Risk Management Framework (RMF) is for managing security and privacy risk, to maintain risk at an appropriate level, including:
- information security categorization
- control selection
- implementation
- assessment
- authorization
- monitoring
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
Risk management by
- promoting security and privacy capabilities throughout SDLC;
- maintaining awareness of security and posture of privacy though continuous monitoring processes;
- senior leaders and executives facilitate decisions on risk;
2.1 ORGANIZATION-WIDE RISK MANAGEMENT
Managing security and privacy risk involves the entire organization.
Level One
Senior leaders’ vision, goal, objectives.
Level Two
Middle level leaders planning, managing projects on developing, implementing, operating, and maintaining to support mission and business process.
Level Three
Information systems apply middle level leader’s project. Addressing risks, executing risk decision.
How to RMF(keywords: preparation)
Identifying business functions, processes of information systems;
Identifying key stakeholders(including external);
Identifying prioritizing assets(including information systems);
Understanding threats to information systems;
Understanding adverse effects on individuals;
Conducting risk assessments;
Identifying and prioritizing security and privacy requirements;
Determining authorization scopes;
Developing security and privacy architecture;
Tracing all risk controls during system software development lifecycle.
2.2 RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK STEPS AND STRUCTURE
Steps for implementing RMF.
- Categorize the system by impact of loss. To learn more about please read SP 800-30 and FIPS 199.
- Select (tailor) controls(related NIST 800-53B).
- Implement the controls.
- Assess (track) the controls.
- Authorize the system or common(inherited) controls based on determination that risk is acceptable.
- Monitor (track) the system and controls(related NIST 800-53A).
FLEXIBILITY IN RMF IMPLEMENTATION
Organization could do following adjustment: executing tasks in different order, emphasizing specific tasks, combining tasks, including Cyber Security Framework to enhancing RMF asks.
2.3 INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY IN THE RMF
The RMF require two programs to protect PII:
Security program
protecting information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction to provide confidentiality, integrity, availability.
Privacy program
compliance with privacy requirements to protect individuals.
2.7 SECURITY AND PRIVACY POSTURE
The security and privacy posture represents:
- the status of information systems and information resources (e.g., personnel, equipment, funds, and information technology) based on information assurance resources (e.g., policies, procedures) and
- the capabilities in place to manage the defense; and
- comply with applicable privacy requirements and manage privacy risks; and
- react as the situation changes.
2.8 SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT
SCRM policy(NIST 180-161) address supply chain risks.
building trust relationships and communicating with both internal and external stakeholders.
3.2 CATEGORIZE
|
Tasks |
Outcomes |
|
TASK C-1 SYSTEM DESCRPTION |
Create an assets list group by system with parameters: system version or release number; manufacturer and supplier information; network topology, etc. |
|
TASK C-2 SECURITY CATEGORIZATION |
Impact level of systems (see FIPS 199) |
|
TASK C-3 APPROVAL |
Approval of TASK C-1 and TASK C-2 by senior management team. |
3.3 SELECT(controls)
|
Tasks |
Outcomes |
|
TASK S-1 to S-4 CONTROL SELECTION AND TAILORING |
Selecting and tailoring controls by NIST SP 800-53B. You may create customized controls on tailoring procedure. |
|
TASK S-5 CONTINOUS MONITORING STRATEGY |
Control assessment by NIST SP 800-53A. You may create customized assessment for tailored controls on TASK S1-S4. |
|
TASK S-6 PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL |
Approval by senior management team. |
3.4 IMPLEMENT(controls to plans)
|
Tasks |
Outcomes |
|
TASK I-1, I-2 |
Put controls into SDLC design phase, privacy plan to make sure controls are practicable. Adjusting controls if needs. |
3.5 ASSESS( plans)
The step is optional since 3.3 SELECT, 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION has done most of jobs.
3.6 AUTHORIZATION( plans by senior management officials)
The step is optional since there are approval task in 3.1 CATEGORIZATION and 3.2 SELECT.
3.7 MONITOR
|
Tasks |
Outcomes |
|
TASK M-1 SYSTEM AND ENVIROMENT CHANGES |
Updating security and privacy plan when operational environment changes such as configuration changes. Updating controls may needed. |
|
TASK M-2, M-3, M-4, M-5 |
updated security and privacy assessment reports |
|
TASK M-6 |
Review the security and privacy posture of the system on an ongoing basis to determine whether the risk remains acceptable. |
|
TASK M-7 |
Disposal controls after system removed. |
Tips
Cybersecurity Framework Profiles is another way of implementing preparing TASK P-4 in RMF.
The SDLC process is the best practice for RMF implementation.
Acronyms
SDLC, Software Development Lifecycle
SCRM, Supply Chain Risk Management
Reference
National Institute of Standards and Technology, December 2018, NIST Special Publication 800-37 Revision 2 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy, https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-37r2
PNNL, November 2018, Risk Management Framework Process Map, PNNL-28347.
Veracode, 2008, Understanding NIST 800‐37 FISMA Requirements.
NIST SP 800-37 Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations A System Life Cycle Approach for Security and Privacy的更多相关文章
- Stakeholder Risk Management
In this article we'll address the people swirling around your project: stakeholders. You'll find som ...
- 10 Golden Rules of Project Risk Management
The benefits of risk management in projects are huge. You can gain a lot of money if you deal with u ...
- 【EMV L2】终端风险管理(Terminal Risk Management)
终端风险管理使大额交易联机授权,并确保芯片交易能够周期性地进行联机以防止在脱机环境中也许无法察觉的风险. 虽然发卡行被强制要求在应用交互特征(AIP)中将终端风险管理位设置成1以触发终端风险管理,但终 ...
- Security and Risk Management(5)
Ethics: ISC Code of Ethics You agree to this before the exam, and the code of ethics is very testabl ...
- SQL Server get SP parameters and get output fields type information
Summary 本文主要介绍一下,SQL里面的两个很实用的两个操作: 获取存储过程的参数信息 SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.PARAMETERS WHERE SPE ...
- 论文阅读 Prefetch-aware fingerprint cache management for data deduplication systems
论文链接 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11704-017-7119-0 这篇论文试图解决的问题是在cache 环节之前,prefetch-ca ...
- Disruptor 详解
想了解一个项目,最好的办法就是,把它的源码搞到本地自己捣鼓. 在网上看了 N 多人对 Disruptor 速度的吹捧,M 多人对它的机制分析,就连 Disruptor 官方文档中,也 NB 哄哄自诩: ...
- CWE 4.3:强化你的数据自我保护能力
摘要:如何通过软件自动的检查法规中涉及的数据保护, 新版的CWE 4.3 给出了一个解决途径. 1. 按照惯例,先说故事 用12月初在深圳参加的"全球C++及系统软件技术大会"里C ...
- [Z] 计算机类会议期刊根据引用数排名
一位cornell的教授做的计算机类期刊会议依据Microsoft Research引用数的排名 link:http://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/csconf.html Th ...
- 《Network Security A Decision and Game Theoretic Approach》阅读笔记
网络安全问题的背景 网络安全研究的内容包括很多方面,作者形象比喻为盲人摸象,不同领域的网络安全专家对网络安全的认识是不同的. For researchers in the field of crypt ...
随机推荐
- 2020 ccpc秦皇岛 赛后总结!!!!
amazing!!!! 金牌!!!!! 总结一下这次的发挥,以及如何冲到了金牌. 1 有队友单开了银牌题,50分钟过了K题,当时只有5个人过K.他敲的过程中另个队友想出来另外一题的思路,等过了K,我直 ...
- Weak Encryption 弱加密安全问题处理
Weak Encryption Abstract 程序使用了弱加密算法,无法保证敏感数据的保密性. Explanation 陈旧的加密算法(如 DES)再也不能为敏感数据提供足够的保护了. 加密算法依 ...
- C++ 浮点数比较代码
#include <algorithm> #include <cmath> #include <iostream> // 如果 a 和 b 之间的差异在 a 和 b ...
- 火山引擎 A/B 测试产品——DataTester 私有化架构分享
作为一款面向 ToB 市场的产品--火山引擎A/B测试(DataTester)为了满足客户对数据安全.合规问题等需求,探索私有化部署是产品无法绕开的一条路. 在面向 ToB 客户私有化的实际落地中,火 ...
- 系统评价——数据包络分析DEA的R语言实现(七)
数据包络分析(Data envelopment analysis,DEA)是运筹学中用于测量决策部门生产效率的一种方法,它是基于相对效率发展的崭新的效率评估方法. 详细来说,通过使用数学规划模型,计算 ...
- CentOS 落幕,将于2021年底结束维护
官方最新消息: 译文: CentOS项目的未来是CentOS Stream,明年,我们将把重点从重建Red Hat Enterprise Linux(RHEL)的CentOS Linux转移到Cent ...
- SpringBoot整合RocketMQ,老鸟们都是这么玩的!
今天我们来讨论如何在项目开发中优雅地使用RocketMQ.本文分为三部分,第一部分实现SpringBoot与RocketMQ的整合,第二部分解决在使用RocketMQ过程中可能遇到的一些问题并解决他们 ...
- RDIFramework.NET WinForm版新增通知公告、系统新闻模块
1.系统新闻功能描述 系统新闻模块,用户可以根据实际情况做相应应用,如用在内部业务系统的展示中或网站上新闻的展示.新闻可以分类进行管理,非常的实用.系统新闻管理主要分为添加.修改.删除与移动系统新闻. ...
- 数组描述线性表(C++实现)
线性表也称有序表,其每一个实例都是元素的一个有序集合 抽象类linearList 一个抽象类包含没有实现代码的成员函数,这样的成员函数称为纯虚函数,用数字0作为初始值来说明 template<c ...
- Android事件分发-基础原理和场景分析
作者:京东零售 郭旭锋 1 为什么需要事件分发 和其他平台类似,Android 中 View 的布局是一个树形结构,各个 ViewGroup 和 View 是按树形结构嵌套布局的,从而会出现用户触摸的 ...