In this Document

  Purpose
  Troubleshooting Steps
  What is a 'library cache: mutex X' wait?
  What causes 'library cache: mutex X' wait?
  Name of events in 12c and higher
  How to diagnose the cause.
  How to Examine the Diagnostics.
  Potential Solutions
  Troubleshooting heavy contention for 'library cache: mutex X' waits for 11g and later
  References

APPLIES TO:

Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition - Version 11.1.0.6 and later
Oracle Database Cloud Schema Service - Version N/A and later
Oracle Database Exadata Cloud Machine - Version N/A and later
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure - Database Service - Version N/A and later
Oracle Database Exadata Express Cloud Service - Version N/A and later
Information in this document applies to any platform.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the article is to help troubleshoot contention for the wait event 'library cache: mutex X'.

TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS

What is a 'library cache: mutex X' wait?

The mutex feature is a mechanism to control access to in memory structures. It is used in a number of areas including the library cache.

The library cache is a memory area that holds parsed cursor structures needed to execute SQL.

Waits for 'library cache: mutex X' are similar to a library cache waits in earlier versions.  'library cache: mutex X' may be caused by many issues (including application issues, lack of sharing resulting in high version counts etc.) but essentially something is holding the mutex for "too long" such that other session have to wait for the resource.  If there is contention on the latches/mutexes that protect the library cache structures this means that there is stress on the parsing system. Parsing of SQL takes longer because it cannot get the resources they need. This delays other operations and generally slows the system.

Because of the varied causes, it is important to find the correct cause; so that the right solution can be implemented.

What causes 'library cache: mutex X' wait?

  • Frequent Hard Parses - If the frequency of Hard Parsing is extremely high, then contention can occur on this pin.
  • High Version Counts - When Version counts become excessive, a long chain of versions needs to be examined and this can lead to contention on this event
  • Invalidations - An invalidation is a measure of the number of times a cached cursor is deleted from the cache because it is no longer valid. A cursor is invalidated because something has changed such that the copy of the cursor in memory is not valid any more. For example, regathering the statistics on an object or modifying a table definition is enough to invalidate a cursor for a query that is based on that object. When a cursor is invalidated, any sessions wanting to use the cursor need to wait for a valid version to be loaded. If there is excessive or unnecessary invalidation then significant waits for 'library cache: mutex X' can be seen.
  • Reloads - Reload is a count of the number of times a cursor that previously existed in the cache, was searched for, found to not be there (because it had aged out etc) and then had to be re-compiled and re-loaded in to the library cache. High reloads are a bad thing because they indicate that you are doing work that you would not have had to do if your cache was setup appropriately so as not to remove the cursor in the first place. If a cursor is being reloaded then it cannot be grabbed for work by a session and this can lead to waits for 'library cache: mutex X'.
  • Known Bugs

Name of events in 12c and higher

In 12, the events have been split further into three separate events:

* library cache: mutex X  -- for handle objects

* library cache: bucket mutex X -- for library cache hash buckets

* library cache: dependency mutex X -- for dependencies

How to diagnose the cause.

1. Check to see if anything has changed:   
     a. increased load?
     b. any change in the application, os, or middle tier?
     c. any os changes?

2. Is there a trend to the waits for 'library cache: mutex X':
    a. is there a certain time of the day when this wait is seen?
    b. does something trigger this wait?

3. During the time of the issue, run AWR and ADDM.  Also obtain the baseline to compare the load, parameter changes, and any other differences. 
To gather this it is suggested to run AWR and ADDM for half an hour to an hour interval as follows:

SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/awrrpt.sql
SQL> @$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/admin/addmrpt.sql

See:

Document 1680075.1 How to Generate and Check an ADDM report
Document 1903158.1 How to Collect Standard Diagnostic Information Using AWR Reports for Performance Issues

4. Sometimes system state dump is necessary to match known issues. For example, if there is no obvious candidate SQL in AWR, capturing holder or waiter processes in systemstate allows you to focus in on potential problems. Run system state when processes appear hung on 'library cache: mutex X':

(a) Non-Rac

sqlplus "/ as sysdba"

oradebug setmypid
oradebug unlimit
oradebug dump systemstate 266
wait 90 seconds
oradebug dump systemstate 266
wait 90 seconds
oradebug dump systemstate 266
quit

(b) RAC

$ sqlplus '/ as sysdba'
oradebug setmypid
oradebug unlimit
oradebug setinst all
oradebug -g all hanganalyze 4
oradebug -g all dump systemstate 266
quit

5.  Errorstacks: Another way to obtain process information is with errorstack. Assuming you can identify a blocker, taking errorstacks will provide much the same information as systemstates but with a much reduced disk footprint for trace. Once the ospid of the blocker has been found, an errorstack can be generated:

$ sqlplus
SQL> oradebug setospid <p.spid from above>
oradebug dump errorstack 3
<< wait 1min>>
oradebug dump errorstack 3
<< wait 1min>>
oradebug dump errorstack 3
exit

In particular, the stack from the resultant trace can be used to match known issues.
The system state and errorstacks are not easily readable; so a Service Request may need to be opened to read the files.

6. Sometimes it is not feasible to run system state dump, as it may be resource intensive.  So the following sql can also be ran in interval:

select s.sid, t.sql_text
from v$session s, v$sql t
where s.event like '%mutex%'
and t.sql_id = s.sql_id

Check to see what sessions are waiting on.

7. In 11g RAC, there is another less resource intensive tool that can be used when compared with taking system state dumps:

Document 459694.1 Procwatcher: Script to Monitor and Examine Oracle DB and Clusterware Processes

How to Examine the Diagnostics.

1. Normally, the top wait event will be the library cache: mutex X in the problematic AWR:

2. First look for high parsing and high version counts from AWR.
Click on *SQL Statistics under Main Report of AWR:

Then, under SQL Statistics click on 'SQL ordered by Parse Calls' and  'SQL ordered by Version Count' to view that information:

Check for high parse calls.

Check to see if there is high parse calls to execute.  Ideally, there should be less parse to executions.  Notice there is as many parses as executes, indicating cursors are not used well in the application.  Once the cursor is opened and parsed, it should be kept open.  Check with the application developer on how to keep the cursor opened to re execute the sqls.

Next, check the version count of the sql:

From this list, investigate the SQLs with the high version count. What are the reasons that these statements are not shared? Can this be addressed? 
Check V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR to see the potential reason for the high version count using:

Document 438755.1 Formated V$SQL_SHARED_CURSOR Report by SQLID or Hash Value
Document 296377.1 Troubleshooting: High Version Count Issues

Potential Solutions

1. Check for high hard  parsing, as this can cause can reloads in the sql area.  Check the hard parse under the load profile:

This load shows 26.3 hard parses per second, indicating high hard parsing.  Check to see if the application is sharing the sql.  If application is mostly using literals, see if the sqls can be shared by using bind variables. Furthermore, review the 'Over Parsing' section of the following note:

Document 33089.1 TROUBLESHOOTING: Possible Causes of Poor SQL Performance

Also check for high reloads in the sql area:

If there is a high number of reloads, then look to see if cursors are being shared efficiently (remember reloads counts cursors that were once cached but are no longer there). If they are, then check to see if the shared pool or sga_target is large enough; the cursors may be being aged out because there is insufficient space for them. Remember that inefficient sharing means that the library cache will fill up with non-reuseable cursors which may then cause reuseable ones to be flushed out. These will cause reloads when they are re-executed.
If sharing is efficient and the shared pool is too small, then shareable SQL statements will age out and hard parses will be higher. In most cases however this is not the case and the problem is inefficient sharing. The following note is helpful in tuning the shared pool:

Document 62143.1 Understanding and Tuning the Shared Pool

2. Check for invalidations under Library Cache Activity.  If the invalidation has high number, then check ddl's performed during the time such as truncate, drop, grants, dbms_stats, etc.

3. Check the following note for relevant bugs under 'Known Bugs' and relevant version:

Document 727400.1 WAITEVENT: "library cache: mutex X"

4. For 11g, make sure cursor_sharing is not similar, as it has been deprecated.  This may also cause mutex waits:

Document 1169017.1 ANNOUNCEMENT: Deprecating the cursor_sharing = ‘SIMILAR’ setting

5. If the database has been migrated from 10g to 11g and mutex performance issue surfaces, please consider the 11.2.0.2.2 psu + fix for Unpublished Bug 12431716. Many mutex fixes are already included in this patch:

Document 1291879.1 Oracle Database Patch Set Update 11.2.0.2.2 Known Issues

Troubleshooting heavy contention for 'library cache: mutex X' waits for 11g and later

For known issues and troubleshooting 'library cache: mutex X' wait for 11g and later, review following note:

Document 2051456.1 Troubleshooting Databases Hang Due to Heavy Contention for 'library cache: mutex X' Waits (Oracle 11.2 and Later)

REFERENCES

NOTE:459694.1 - Procwatcher: Script to Monitor and Examine Oracle DB and Clusterware Processes

NOTE:62143.1 - Troubleshooting: Understanding and Tuning the Shared Pool
NOTE:727400.1 - WAITEVENT: "library cache: mutex X"
NOTE:1291879.1 - Oracle Database Patch Set Update 11.2.0.2.2 Known Issues
NOTE:1169017.1 - ANNOUNCEMENT: Deprecating the Cursor_Sharing = 'SIMILAR' Setting
NOTE:296377.1 - Troubleshooting: High Version Count Issues
NOTE:33089.1 - * TROUBLESHOOTING: Possible Causes of Poor SQL Performance
NOTE:438755.1 - High SQL Version Counts - Script to determine reason(s)
NOTE:2051456.1 - Troubleshooting Databases Hang Due to Heavy Contention for 'library cache: mutex X' Waits (Oracle 11.2 and Later)

Troubleshooting 'library cache: mutex X' Waits. (Doc ID 1357946.1)的更多相关文章

  1. Troubleshooting 'library cache: mutex X' Waits.

    What is a 'library cache: mutex X' wait? The mutex feature is a mechanism to control access to in me ...

  2. library cache: mutex X

    我们先来看看 library cache: mutex X . 是个什么东西 The library cache mutex is acquired for similar purposes that ...

  3. 11g等待事件之library cache: mutex X

    11g等待事件之library cache: mutex X 作者: dbafree 日期: 2012 年 07 月 01 日发表评论 (0)查看评论   library cache: mutex X ...

  4. Oracle数据库大量library cache: mutex X及latch: shared pool问题排查一例

    业务系统数据库夯住,数据库内大量的library cache: mutex X及latch: shared pool等待,alert日志信息如下 Tue Sep :: WARNING: inbound ...

  5. [20190402]Library Cache mutex.txt

    [20190402]Library Cache mutex.txt 1.环境:SCOTT@book> @ ver1PORT_STRING                    VERSION   ...

  6. rac数据库默认sql tuning advisor,导致大量library cache lock

    rac数据库默认sql tuning advisor,导致大量library cache lock 问题现象:客户反映周六周日固定十点钟,一个程序会特别慢(大概10分钟),平时1到2秒.查看当时的日志 ...

  7. Resolving Issues of "Library Cache Pin" or "Cursor Pin S wait on X" (Doc ID 1476663.1)

    Doc ID 1476663.1) To Bottom In this Document   Purpose   Troubleshooting Steps   Brief Definition:   ...

  8. 关于library cache lock和row cache lock产生的常见原因

    这两个等待事件其实很少出现在top5列表中,一般都没什么印象,在此整理记录以便以后查阅. 常见的library cache lock产生的原因在<高级OWI与Oracle性能调查>这本书和 ...

  9. Undo 相关的等待事件和已知问题 (Doc ID 1575701.1)

    Undo Related Wait Events & Known Issues (Doc ID 1575701.1) APPLIES TO: Oracle Database - Enterpr ...

随机推荐

  1. 数据库优化案例——————某知名零售企业ERP系统

    写在前面 记得在自己学习数据库知识的时候特别喜欢看案例,因为优化的手段是容易掌握的,但是整体的优化思想是很难学会的.这也是为什么自己特别喜欢看案例,今天也分享自己做的优化案例. 之前分享过OA系统.H ...

  2. git客户端保存用户名密码

    [转载]原文地址:https://blog.csdn.net/qq_26819733/article/details/52735123/ 看图说话,直接在Tortoisegit的设置中,点git-&g ...

  3. 2020考研-必须了解的干货"极限微分和你说的悄悄话"

    极限微分和你说的悄悄话 2019-03-02 RunWsh 美食供应商有考研学子 想必接触过数学或物理的都对牛顿和莱布尼兹不陌生.如果你是考研大军中的一员,估计天天会与他们眉来眼去的吧! 牛顿莱布:别 ...

  4. 每日分享!~ 使用js原生方式对拖拉元素(鼠标的事件)

    一个元素放置页面上.如何进行拖拉,实现想放哪里就放哪里的效果呢? 效果如下: 如果让你写这个效果,你会如何写呢? --- 思路分析:我首先想到的是,对这个元素先绑定一个事件.(什么事件? 那当然是鼠标 ...

  5. 【机器学习】--xgboost初始之代码实现分类

    一.前述 上节我们讲解了xgboost的基本知识,本节我们通过实例进一步讲解. 二.具体 1.安装 默认可以通过pip安装,若是安装不上可以通过https://www.lfd.uci.edu/~goh ...

  6. 4.alembic数据迁移工具

    alembic是用来做ORM模型与数据库的迁移与映射.alembic使用方式跟git有点类似,表现在两个方面,第一个,alemibi的所有命令都是以alembic开头: 第二,alembic的迁移文件 ...

  7. vimium使用

    vimium使用 chrome下面的vimium插件已经慕名已久,迟迟没有做尝试,今天在家有空就熟悉了一下vimium,感觉还是棒棒的.记录一下一些使用心得. 常用按钮 j 向上滚动 k 向下滚动 d ...

  8. Dalvik 虚拟机操作码

    Dalvik 虚拟机操作码 表中的vx.vy.vz表示某个Dalvik寄存器.根据不同指令可以访问16.256或64K寄存器. 表中lit4.lit8.lit16.lit32.lit64表示字面值(直 ...

  9. 痞子衡嵌入式:如果i.MX RT是一匹悍马,征服它时别忘了用马镫MCUBootUtility

    -- 跨界之风吹满地,先锋当属NXP; 微控制器谁独骚?当仁不让看RT! 恩智浦半导体2017年10月正式发布了业内首款跨界处理器-i.MX RT系列,这是MCU界的汗血宝马,更是一匹桀骜不驯的悍马. ...

  10. java自定义连接池

    1.java自定义连接池 1.1连接池的概念: 实际开发中"获取连接"或“释放资源”是非常消耗系统资源的两个过程,为了姐姐此类性能问题,通常情况我们采用连接池技术来贡献连接Conn ...