Web 应用程序使用的 Cookie

个人认为这里设置的cookie与访问cookie的安全性关联大一点,配置节如下

<httpCookies domain="String"
httpOnlyCookies="true|false"
requireSSL="true|false" />   

httpOnlyCookies:默认是false,作用是是否禁用浏览器脚本访问cookie。在Form认证时会颁发一个认证票写在cookie,最开始我以为这里设置了则可以访问,结果并不是,个人推断是这个配置节的设置和Form节点里的配置无关。

下面来弄个测试一下代码

服务端添加代码

Response.SetCookie(new HttpCookie("testcookie", "test"));

浏览器端添加脚本

$(function myfunction() {

alert(document.cookie);

}); 

如无意外运行结果

接着把httpOnlyCookies设成true

<httpCookies

httpOnlyCookies="true" />

运行结果

另外HttpCookie类中有个属性是HttpOnly,把它设成true,结果一样如上图所示,空的,估计在验证票中的cookie也是把HttpOnly设成了true,使得就算在配置中设置了仍然无效

Response.SetCookie(new HttpCookie("testcookie", "test") { HttpOnly=true});

查看源码得知生成验证票的代码中FormsAuthentication.GetAuthCookie方法生成HttpCookie

下面一篇摘自MSDN的老外文章说的就是跨站点脚本攻击的,记忆中好像看蒋金楠老师的《ASP.NET MVC 4 框架揭秘》也提到过相关的东西,现在看就更明白他说得是啥了,只不过文章比较旧了,老是在提IE6 SP1升级了啥啥啥。

Mitigating Cross-site Scripting With HTTP-only Cookies

One of the more common security problems plaguing(脆弱的) Web servers is cross-site scripting. Cross-site scripting is a server-side vulnerability(漏洞) that is often created when rendering user input as HTML. Cross-site scripting attacks can expose sensitive information about the users of the Web site. In order to help mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting, a new feature has been introduced in Microsoft Internet Explorer 6. This feature is a new attribute for cookies which prevents them from being accessed through client-side script. A cookie with this attribute is called an HTTP-only cookie. Any information contained in an HTTP-only cookie is less likely to be disclosed to a hacker or a malicious Web site. The following example is a header that sets an HTTP-only cookie.

Set-Cookie: USER=123; expires=Wednesday, 09-Nov-99 23:12:40 GMT; HttpOnly

This topic briefly explains cross-site scripting, the potential risk of a cookie that can be accessed through script, and how this risk has been mitigated by HTTP-only cookies in Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (SP1).

Cross-site Scripting

Cross-site scripting is a common server-side vulnerability which allows a hacker to trick a user into disclosing sensitive information that is normally reserved for a specific Web site. The various steps of a cross-site scripting attack can best be explained with a simple example.

An Example of Cross-site Scripting

To understand how cross-site scripting is typically exploited, consider the following hypothetical example.

The A. Datum Corporation runs a Web site that allows you to track the latest price of your stock portfolio. To add a friendly touch, after logging in to the A. Datum Web site, you are redirected to www.adatum.com/default.asp?name=Brian and a server-side script generates a welcome page that says "Welcome Back Brian!". The stocks in your portfolio are stored in a database, and the Web site places a cookie on your computer containing a key to that database. The cookie is retrieved anytime you visit the A. Datum Web site.

A hacker realizes that the A. Datum Web site suffers from a cross-site scripting bug and decides to exploit this to gather some information about you that you'd rather not disclose; the names of the stocks in your portfolio. The hacker sends you an e-mail that claims you've just won a vacation getaway and all you have to do is "click here" to claim your prize. The URL for the hypertext link iswww.adatum.com/default.asp?name=<script>evilScript()</script>. When you click this link, the Web site tries to be friendly by greeting you, but instead displays, "Welcome Back !". What happened to your name? By clicking the link in the e-mail, you've told the A. Datum Web site that your name is <script>evilScript()</script>. The Web server generated HTML with this "name" embedded and sent it to your browser. Your browser correctly interprets this as script, and because client-side script is typical browser functionality, runs the script without prompting you. If this script instructs the browser to send a cookie containing your stock portfolio to the hacker's computer, it quickly complies. After all, the instruction came from the A. Datum Web site which owns that cookie.

The following image demonstrates this concept visually by showing the process in five steps. First, the user clicks a link embedded in e-mail from the hacker (step 1). This generates a request to a Web site (step 2) which, because of a cross-site scripting bug, complies with the request and sends malicious script back to the user's browser (step 3). The script host executes the malicious code (step 4) and sends the sensitive data to the hacker's computer (step 5).

There are many variations on this example of cross-site scripting. For more examples and further details see Cross-site Scripting.

Protecting Data with HTTP-only Cookies

To mitigate the risk of information disclosure with a cross-site scripting attack, a new attribute is introduced to cookies for Internet Explorer 6 SP1. This attribute specifies that a cookie is not accessible through script. By using HTTP-only cookies, a Web site eliminates the possibility that sensitive information contained in the cookie can be sent to a hacker's computer or Web site with script.

A cookie is set on the client with an HTTP response header. The following example shows the syntax used in this header.

Set-Cookie: <name>=<value>[; <name>=<value>]
[; expires=<date>][; domain=<domain_name>]
[; path=<some_path>][; secure][; HttpOnly]

Note  The HttpOnly attribute is not case sensitive.

If the HttpOnly attribute is included in the response header, the cookie is still sent when the user browses to a Web site in the valid domain. The cookie cannot be accessed through script in Internet Explorer 6 SP1, even by the Web site that set the cookie in the first place. This means that even if a cross-site scripting bug exists, and the user is tricked into clicking a link that exploits this bug, Windows Internet Explorer does not send the cookie to a third party. The information is safe.

Note  The use of HTTP-only cookies is one of several techniques that, when used together, can mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting. Used alone, it cannot completely eliminate the danger of cross-site scripting.

Browser Support for HTTP-only Cookies

If a Web site sets an HTTP-only cookie on a browser that does not support HTTP-only cookies, the cookie is either ignored or downgraded to a traditional, scriptable cookie. This leaves information vulnerable to attack for users of some browsers.

For a company intranet Web page, administrators could require the use of a browser that recognizes HTTP-only cookies for all users. This ensures that information is not disclosed with a cross-site scripting bug.

For a public Web site where it is important to support multiple browsers, consider using client-side script to determine the browser version for each visitor. The Web site can restrict sensitive information to visitors using browsers that mitigate cross-site scripting attacks for cookies. Visitors with browsers that do not support HTTP-only cookies can be given limited information or functionality along with a request to upgrade their software.

When determining the browser version of Internet Explorer, it is important to keep in mind that the user agent string for Internet Explorer 6 SP1 is identical to the user agent string for Internet Explorer 6. Client-side script must also check the minor version number with theappMinorVersion property of the navigator object to determine whether Internet Explorer 6 SP1 is installed.

来自 <https://msdn.microsoft.com/zh-CN/Library/ms533046.aspx>

httpCookie与Cookie安全的更多相关文章

  1. asp.net中HttpCookie操作cookie的方法

    微软对HttpCookie的定义为"提供创建和操作各 HTTP Cookie 的类型安全方法." HttpCookie的构造函数一共有两个 1.HttpCookie(String) ...

  2. safari cookie设置中文失败

    最近用H5进行手机端开发,由于是window操作系统,为了方便开发和调试,直接在chrome浏览器上进行测试,然后在android机上进行手机端测试,当功能基本完工后,原来在android上运行正常的 ...

  3. 【.NET】Cookie操作类

    public static class CookiesHelper { /// <summary> /// Cookies赋值 /// </summary> /// <p ...

  4. asp.net,cookie,写cookie,取cookie

    Cookie是一段文本信息,在客户端存储 Cookie 是 ASP.NET 的会话状态将请求与会话关联的方法之一.Cookie 也可以直接用于在请求之间保持数据,但数据随后将存储在客户端并随每个请求一 ...

  5. 细说Cookie

    阅读目录 开始 Cookie 概述 Cookie的写.读过程 使用Cookie保存复杂对象 Js中读写Cookie Cookie在Session中的应用 Cookie在身份验证中的应用 Cookie的 ...

  6. .NET的Cookie相关操作

    using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Text; using System.Web; namespace Comm ...

  7. asp.net各种cookie代码和解析

    Cookie是一段文本信息,在客户端存储 Cookie 是 ASP.NET 的会话状态将请求与会话关联的方法之一.Cookie 也可以直接用于在请求之间保持数据,但数据随后将存储在客户端并随每个请求一 ...

  8. [转]ASP.Net篇之Session与Cookie

    本文转自:http://www.cnblogs.com/japanbbq/archive/2011/08/31/2160494.html Session: Session是“会话”的意思,然而,因为h ...

  9. C# Cookie工具类

    /// <summary> /// Cookies赋值 /// </summary> /// <param name="strName">主键& ...

随机推荐

  1. 通过一组RESTful API暴露CQRS系统功能

    命令和查询责任分离(CQRS)是由Greg Young提出的一种将系统的读(查询).写(命令)操作分离为两种独立子系统的架构模式.命令通常是异步执行的,并存储在一个事务型数据库中,而读操作则通常是最终 ...

  2. 系统监控工具 Tsar

    Tsar是淘宝的一个用来收集服务器系统和应用信息的采集报告工具,如收集服务器的系统信息(cpu,mem等),以及应用数据(nginx.swift等),收集到的数据存储在服务器磁盘上,可以随时查询历史信 ...

  3. ABP理论学习之Javascript API(理论完结篇)

    返回总目录 本篇目录 Ajax Notification Message UI block和busy 事件总线 Logging 其他工具功能 说在前面的话 不知不觉,我们送走了2015,同时迎来了20 ...

  4. ABP理论学习之异常处理

    返回总目录 本篇目录 介绍 开启错误处理 非Ajax请求 展示异常信息 UserFriendlyException Error模型 Ajax请求 异常事件 介绍 在一个web应用中,异常通常是在MVC ...

  5. ReactJS入门(二)—— 组件的生命周期

    如果你熟悉avalon,使用过 data-include-rendered 和 data-include-loaded 等回调方法,那么你会很好地理解React组件的各个生命周期. 说白了其实就是Re ...

  6. Microsoft Azure Web Sites应用与实践【1】—— 打造你的第一个Microsoft Azure Website

    Microsoft Azure Web Sites应用与实践 系列: [1]—— 打造你的第一个Microsoft Azure Website [2]—— 通过本地IIS 远程管理Microsoft ...

  7. ASP.NET Web API自身对CORS的支持:从实例开始

    在<通过扩展让ASP.NET Web API支持W3C的CORS规范>中我们通过自定义的HttpMessageHandler为ASP.NET Web API赋予了跨域资源共享的能力,具体来 ...

  8. php后台修改人员表信息

    显示info人员表里所有内容 1 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "h ...

  9. 即时搜索(input框)

    做搜索功能的时候,经常遇到输入框检查的需求,最常见的是即时搜索,今天好好小结一下. 即时搜索的方案: (1)change事件    触发事件必须满足两个条件: a)当前对象属性改变,并且是由键盘或鼠标 ...

  10. BCP 数据的导入和导出

    BCP 命令的参数很多,使用 -h 查看帮助信息,注意:参数是区分大小写的 使用BCP命令导出和导入数据常用的参数如下 bcp {[[database_name.][schema_name]].{ta ...