Sometimes when working on a large project, I find it useful to figure out all the places from which some function or method is called. Moreover, more often than not I don't just want the immediate caller, but the whole call stack. This is most useful in two scenarios - when debugging and when trying to figure out how some code works.

One possible solution is to use a debugger - run the program within a debugger, place a breakpoint in the interesting place, examine call stack when stopped. While this works and can sometimes be very useful, I personally prefer a more programmatic approach. I want to change the code in a way that will print out the call stack in every place I find interesting. Then I can use grepping and more sophisticated tools to analyze the call logs and thus gain a better understanding of the workings of some piece of code.

In this post, I want to present a relatively simple method to do this. It's aimed mainly at Linux, but should work with little modification on other Unixes (including OS X).

Obtaining the backtrace - libunwind

I'm aware of three reasonably well-known methods of accessing the call stack programmatically:

  1. The gcc builtin macro __builtin_return_address: very crude, low-level approach. This obtains the return address of the function on each frame on the stack. Note: just the address, not the function name. So extra processing is required to obtain the function name.
  2. glibc's backtrace and backtrace_symbols: can obtain the actual symbol names for the functions on the call stack.
  3. libunwind

Between the three, I strongly prefer libunwind, as it's the most modern, widespread and portable solution. It's also more flexible than backtrace, being able to provide extra information such as values of CPU registers at each stack frame.

Moreover, in the zoo of system programming, libunwind is the closest to the "official word" you can get these days. For example, gcc can use libunwind for implementing zero-cost C++ exceptions (which requires stack unwinding when an exception is actually thrown) [1]. LLVM also has a re-implementation of the libunwind interface in libc++, which is used for unwinding in LLVM toolchains based on this library.

Code sample

Here's a complete code sample for using libunwind to obtain the backtrace from an arbitrary point in the execution of a program. Refer to the libunwind documentation for more details about the API functions invoked here:

#define UNW_LOCAL_ONLY
#include <libunwind.h>
#include <stdio.h> // Call this function to get a backtrace.
void backtrace() {
unw_cursor_t cursor;
unw_context_t context; // Initialize cursor to current frame for local unwinding.
unw_getcontext(&context);
unw_init_local(&cursor, &context); // Unwind frames one by one, going up the frame stack.
while (unw_step(&cursor) > 0) {
unw_word_t offset, pc;
unw_get_reg(&cursor, UNW_REG_IP, &pc);
if (pc == 0) {
break;
}
printf("0x%lx:", pc); char sym[256];
if (unw_get_proc_name(&cursor, sym, sizeof(sym), &offset) == 0) {
printf(" (%s+0x%lx)\n", sym, offset);
} else {
printf(" -- error: unable to obtain symbol name for this frame\n");
}
}
} void foo() {
backtrace(); // <-------- backtrace here!
} void bar() {
foo();
} int main(int argc, char **argv) {
bar(); return 0;
}

  

 

libunwind is easy to install from source or as a package. I just built it from source with the usual configuremake and make install sequence and placed it into /usr/local/lib.

Once you have libunwind installed in a place the compiler can find [2], compile the code snippet with:

gcc -o libunwind_backtrace -Wall -g libunwind_backtrace.c -lunwind

Finally, run:

$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib ./libunwind_backtrace
0x400958: (foo+0xe)
0x400968: (bar+0xe)
0x400983: (main+0x19)
0x7f6046b99ec5: (__libc_start_main+0xf5)
0x400779: (_start+0x29)

So we get the complete call stack at the point where backtrace is called. We can obtain the function symbol names and the address of the instruction where the call was made (more precisely, the return address which is the next instruction).

Sometimes, however, we want not only the caller's name, but also the call location (source file name + line number). This is useful when one function calls another from multiple locations and we want to pinpoint which one is actually part of a given call stack. libunwind gives us the call address, but nothing beyond. Fortunately, it's all in the DWARF information of the binary, and given the address we can extract the exact call location in a number of ways. The simplest is probably to call addr2line:

$ addr2line 0x400968 -e libunwind_backtrace
libunwind_backtrace.c:

We pass the PC address to the left of the bar frame to addr2line and get the file name and line number.

Alternatively, we can use the dwarf_decode_address example from pyelftools to obtain the same information:

$ python <path>/dwarf_decode_address.py 0x400968 libunwind_backtrace
Processing file: libunwind_backtrace
Function: bar
File: libunwind_backtrace.c
Line:

If printing out the exact locations is important for you during the backtrace call, you can also go fully programmatic by using libdwarf to open the executable and read this information from it, in the backtrace call. There's a section and a code sample about a very similar task in my blog post on debuggers.

C++ and mangled function names

The code sample above works well, but these days one is most likely writing C++ code and not C, so there's a slight problem. In C++, names of functions and methods are mangled. This is essential to make C++ features like function overloading, namespaces and templates work. Let's say the actual call sequence is:

namespace ns {

template <typename T, typename U>
void foo(T t, U u) {
backtrace(); // <-------- backtrace here!
} } // namespace ns template <typename T>
struct Klass {
T t;
void bar() {
ns::foo(t, true);
}
}; int main(int argc, char** argv) {
Klass<double> k;
k.bar(); return ;
}

The backtrace printed will then be:

0x400b3d: (_ZN2ns3fooIdbEEvT_T0_+0x17)
0x400b24: (_ZN5KlassIdE3barEv+0x26)
0x400af6: (main+0x1b)
0x7fc02c0c4ec5: (__libc_start_main+0xf5)
0x4008b9: (_start+0x29)

Oops, that's not nice. While some seasoned C++ veterans can usually make sense of simple mangled names (kinda like system programmers who can read text from hex ASCII), when the code is heavily templated this can get ugly very quickly.

One solution is to use a command-line tool - c++filt:

$ c++filt _ZN2ns3fooIdbEEvT_T0_
void ns::foo<double, bool>(double, bool)

However, it would be nicer if our backtrace dumper would print the demangled name directly. Luckily, this is pretty easy to do, using the cxxabi.h API that's part of libstdc++ (more precisely, libsupc++). libc++ also provides it in the low-level libc++abi. All we need to do is call abi::__cxa_demangle. Here's a complete example:

#define UNW_LOCAL_ONLY
#include <cxxabi.h>
#include <libunwind.h>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib> void backtrace() {
unw_cursor_t cursor;
unw_context_t context; // Initialize cursor to current frame for local unwinding.
unw_getcontext(&context);
unw_init_local(&cursor, &context); // Unwind frames one by one, going up the frame stack.
while (unw_step(&cursor) > ) {
unw_word_t offset, pc;
unw_get_reg(&cursor, UNW_REG_IP, &pc);
if (pc == ) {
break;
}
std::printf("0x%lx:", pc); char sym[];
if (unw_get_proc_name(&cursor, sym, sizeof(sym), &offset) == ) {
char* nameptr = sym;
int status;
char* demangled = abi::__cxa_demangle(sym, nullptr, nullptr, &status);
if (status == ) {
nameptr = demangled;
}
std::printf(" (%s+0x%lx)\n", nameptr, offset);
std::free(demangled);
} else {
std::printf(" -- error: unable to obtain symbol name for this frame\n");
}
}
} namespace ns { template <typename T, typename U>
void foo(T t, U u) {
backtrace(); // <-------- backtrace here!
} } // namespace ns template <typename T>
struct Klass {
T t;
void bar() {
ns::foo(t, true);
}
}; int main(int argc, char** argv) {
Klass<double> k;
k.bar(); return ;
}

This time, the backtrace is printed with all names nicely demangled:

$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib ./libunwind_backtrace_demangle
0x400b59: (void ns::foo<double, bool>(double, bool)+0x17)
0x400b40: (Klass<double>::bar()+0x26)
0x400b12: (main+0x1b)
0x7f6337475ec5: (__libc_start_main+0xf5)
0x4008b9: (_start+0x29)

Obtaining the backtrace - libunwind的更多相关文章

  1. 高效获得Linux函数调用栈/backtrace的方法【转】

    转自:https://blog.csdn.net/littlefang/article/details/42295803 有四种方法可以获得Linux的函数调用堆栈,参见CALL STACK TRAC ...

  2. Obtaining Query Count Without executing a Query in Oracle D2k

    Obtaining Query Count Without executing a Query in Oracle D2k Obtaining a count of records that will ...

  3. iOS 崩溃日志 Backtrace的符号化

    iOS的崩溃日志配合dsym文件可以找到崩溃时的backtrace,这是解决崩溃的最重要的信息. 如果是在同一台mac上打包, 导入crash log时候会自动将backtrace符号化,可以看到方法 ...

  4. CGContextTranslateCTM: invalid context 0x0. If you want to see the backtrace, please set CG_CONTEXT_SHOW_BACKTRACE environmental variable.

    最近在测试的过程中, 发现了SpringBoar的一个问题: SpringBoard[53] <Error>: CGContextTranslateCTM: invalid context ...

  5. 利用backtrace和objdump进行分析挂掉的程序

    转自:http://blog.csdn.net/hanchaoman/article/details/5583457 汇编不懂,先把方法记下来. glibc为我们提供了此类能够dump栈内容的函数簇, ...

  6. chromium的Backtrace记录

    ffmpeg处理完视频流后,上层的webrtc调用错误,可以看出webrtc的调用过程: Backtrace: webrtc::RTPFragmentationHeader::CopyFrom [0x ...

  7. SQLSERVER:Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.

    背景: 在最近开发中遇到一个问题,对一个数据库进行操作时,我采用64个并行的任务每个任务保证一个数据库连接对象:但是每个任务内部均包含有24个文件需要读取,在读取文件之后,我们需要快速将这24个文件批 ...

  8. 嵌入式 linux下利用backtrace追踪函数调用堆栈以及定位段错误

    嵌入式 linux下利用backtrace追踪函数调用堆栈以及定位段错误 2015-05-27 14:19 184人阅读 评论(0) 收藏 举报  分类: 嵌入式(928)  一般察看函数运行时堆栈的 ...

  9. linux下利用backtrace追踪函数调用堆栈以及定位段错误

    一般察看函数运行时堆栈的方法是使用GDB(bt命令)之类的外部调试器,但是,有些时候为了分析程序的BUG,(主要针对长时间运行程序的分析),在程序出错时打印出函数的调用堆栈是非常有用的. 在glibc ...

随机推荐

  1. 玩转OneNET物联网平台之MQTT服务③ —— 远程控制LED(设备自注册)

    授人以鱼不如授人以渔,目的不是为了教会你具体项目开发,而是学会学习的能力.希望大家分享给你周边需要的朋友或者同学,说不定大神成长之路有博哥的奠基石... QQ技术互动交流群:ESP8266&3 ...

  2. Jedis运用scan删除正则匹配的key

    jedis运用scan删除正则匹配的key  我们都知道用keys *进行查询key的时候会进行堵塞,导致redis整体不可用,而使用scan命令则不会.   RedisServiceImpl中sca ...

  3. 百万年薪python之路 -- MySQL数据库之 MySQL行(记录)的操作(二) -- 多表查询

    MySQL行(记录)的操作(二) -- 多表查询 数据的准备 #建表 create table department( id int, name varchar(20) ); create table ...

  4. [UWP]使用GetAlphaMask制作阴影

    1. 前言 最近常常接触到GetAlphaMask,所以想写这篇文章介绍下GetAlphaMask怎么使用.其实GetAlphaMask的使用场景十分有限,Github上能搜到的内容都是用来配合Dro ...

  5. 前端jsp联系项目相关经验

    ——引语 总算是有时间将我这几个月总结下了  前面都是总结的比较凌乱.希望这次好好组织语言 接触到前端js时还是比较陌生的了,因为之前一直用的zk来进行开发的,不过稍稍提下总能记起一些来,对比以前用的 ...

  6. SpringBoot整合MybatisPlus3.X之Wrapper(五)

    官方文档说明: 以下出现的第一个入参boolean condition表示该条件是否加入最后生成的sql中 以下代码块内的多个方法均为从上往下补全个别boolean类型的入参,默认为true 以下出现 ...

  7. jwt token

    1 ,session 认证机制: ,用户登录,传递用户名和密码给客户端 ,服务器进行用户名和密码的校验,如果校验成功,将用户保存到session ,将sessionid通过cookie返回给客服端,客 ...

  8. 机器学习 AI 谷歌ML Kit 与苹果Core ML

    概述 移动端所说的AI,通常是指"机器学习". 定义:机器学习其实就是研究计算机怎样模拟人类的学习行为,以获取新的知识或技能,并重新组织已有的知识结构使之不断改善自身.从实践的意义 ...

  9. mybatis-spring 启动过程和调用过程

    mybatis-spring 可以为我们做什么 mybatis框架已经很不错了,它把配置和执行sql的通用过程抽象出来.只要你符合mybatis框架的要求,首先有正确的配置,然后有model,inte ...

  10. 获得shell的几种姿势

    windows提权 1.通过sqlmap连接mysql获取shell (1)直接连接数据库 sqlmap.py -d "mysql://root:123456@127.0.0.1:3306/ ...