de4dot FAQ
How to deobfuscate but make sure metadata tokens stay the same?
--preserve-tokens
will preserve all important metadata tokens, the #US
and #Blob
heaps, and keep junk data in signatures.
--keep-types
should normally also be used. If used, no obfuscator types or methods will be removed.
Most of the time you don't need to preserve the method parameters' metadata tokens. You can use--preserve-table all,-pd
which will preserve all important tokens except the parameter tokens.
--dont-rename
or --keep-names
can also sometimes be necessary. For example, if you're deobfuscating Confuser obfuscated assemblies, then --keep-names d
will rename everything except fields in delegate types.
If the file has been obfuscated by an unsupported obfuscator, then all tokens are preserved by default.
Examples:
Preserve all important tokens, #US
heap, #Blob
heap, junk sig data, and don't remove any obfuscator types/methods:
de4dot --preserve-tokens --keep-types file.dll
Preserve all tokens except parameter tokens, and don't rename fields in delegate types:
de4dot --keep-names d --preserve-table all,-pd file.dll
An assembly has been obfuscated by two or more supported obfuscators. How do I deobfuscate the assembly?
If two or more obfuscators are detected, de4dot will print that and a description on how to force detection of one of them.
You need to figure out in which order the obfuscators were used and deobfuscate it in reverse order. You should also use --preserve-tokens
to preserve metadata tokens in case the next obfuscator uses hard coded metadata tokens to decrypt eg. strings.
The -p XX
option can be used to force detection of an obfuscator, where XX
is the type of the obfuscator. de4dot -h
will show all types.
Assume filename.dll
has been obfuscated by sa
followed by ef
, then you should use these commands:
de4dot --preserve-tokens --dont-rename filename.dll -p ef -o tmp.dll
de4dot tmp.dll -p sa -o cleaned-file.dll
del tmp.dll
The output will be in cleaned-file.dll
.
How do I decrypt strings in an assembly obfuscated by an unsupported obfuscator?
First you must figure out the metadata token of the string decrypter. You can use Simple Assembly Explorer (SAE). Locate the string decrypter and hover the mouse over the method name and you should see something like 06001234
. That's the method's metadata token. The following command will dynamically decrypt the strings:
de4dot filename.dll --strtyp delegate --strtok 06001234
If it has more than one string decrypter, just append more --strtok 06xxxxxx
like so:
de4dot filename.dll --strtyp delegate --strtok 06001234 --strtok 06001235 --strtok 06001236
--strtyp delegate
will create a dynamic method and simply call the string decrypter and let it decrypt the string for us. --strtype emulate
needs to be used if the string decrypter detects dynamic methods. If you suspect the assembly to be malware, you should only do this in a sandbox since unknown code is executed.
What could be the reason for an assembly to crash if it's been renamed?
If it's a supported obfuscator, renaming should always work, except in a few cases.
It could happen when a resource isn't renamed when the class that uses it has been renamed.
It could also happen if you deobfuscate an assembly, A.dll, but there's another assembly, B.dll, that has a reference to A, and that reference has been renamed in A.dll but not in B.dll. In this case, you must deobfuscate both A.dll and B.dll to make sure all references to A.dll in B.dll also are renamed.
de4dot A.dll B.dll
After deobfuscating a .NET Reactor obfuscated assembly, I see methods with only a throw (uint)-559038242
statement.
That throw is actually throw 0xDEADCODE
. Those methods are encrypted native (x86 code) methods and the throw won't execute at run time. The method body will be replaced with the real method at run time by the obfuscator's methods decryptor. You'll know when there are native methods left in the image if you see something like this after deobfuscation:
Re-encrypted 10/73 native methods
In this example, there are 10 methods left that are still native methods. The remaining 63 methods were converted back to CIL code or deleted from the image. A future version of de4dot may convert the remaining native methods back to CIL code.
de4dot FAQ的更多相关文章
- Google软件构建工具Bazel FAQ
Google软件构建工具Bazel FAQ 本文是我的翻译,原文在这里.欢迎转载,转载请注名本文作者和原始链接 注:如果想了解Bazel的原理,可以看看我之前翻译的Google Blaze原理及使用方 ...
- 领域驱动设计常见问题FAQ
本文出处:http://www.cqrs.nu/Faq What is a domain? The field for which a system is built. Airport managem ...
- CQRS FAQ (翻译)
我从接触ddd到学习cqrs有6年多了, 其中也遇到了不少疑问, 也向很多的前辈牛人请教得到了很多宝贵的意见和建议. 偶尔的机会看到国外有个站点专门罗列了ddd, cqrs和事件溯源的常见问题. 其中 ...
- (译)关于async与await的FAQ
传送门:异步编程系列目录…… 环境:VS2012(尽管System.Threading.Tasks在.net4.0就引入,在.net4.5中为其增加了更丰富的API及性能提升,另外关键字”async” ...
- De4Dot+Reflector 支持多种反混淆
官网: http://www.de4dot.com/ 源码:https://github.com/brianhama/de4dot 使用方法 通过CMD命令方式进入: F:\2\de4dot-v3-1 ...
- Async/Await FAQ
From time to time, I receive questions from developers which highlight either a need for more inform ...
- Unity3D热更新全书FAQ
只要有程序员朋友们问过两次的问题 就会收录在此FAQ中 1.C#Light对比LUA有什么好处 C#Light是静态类型脚本语言,语法同C#,Lua是动态类型脚本语言,这两种都有人喜欢. 我更喜欢静态 ...
- discuz /faq.php SQL Injection Vul
catalog . 漏洞描述 . 漏洞触发条件 . 漏洞影响范围 . 漏洞代码分析 . 防御方法 . 攻防思考 1. 漏洞描述 . 通过获取管理员密码 . 对管理员密码进行破解.通过在cmd5.com ...
- Part 2: Oracle E-Business Suite on Cloud FAQ
Running Oracle E-Business Suite on Oracle Cloud is simple, but it doesn't take too much effort to co ...
随机推荐
- Keras.NET
[翻译]Keras.NET简介 - 高级神经网络API in C# Keras.NET是一个高级神经网络API,它使用C#编写,并带有Python绑定,可以在Tensorflow.CNTK或The ...
- 安装本地 jar 文件
Maven 提供了 maven-install-plugin 可将 jar 文件安装至本地 repository.安装命令如下: mvn install:install-file -Dfile= -D ...
- Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: Location is required
将 Parent root = FXMLLoader.load(getClass().getResource("xml/MainUI.fxml")); 改为: Parent roo ...
- SpringCloud用Zookeeper做服务注册与发现中心代码实现
一:Zookeeper用的是3.5.5版本,SpringBoot用的是2.1.6版本,SpringCloud用的是Greenwich.SR2版本,JDK用的是1.8: 服务提供者product-ser ...
- Java常用命令:jps、jstack、jmap、jstat(带有实例教程)
版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载. https://blog.csdn.net/u013310517/article/details/80990924 查看Java进程:jps ...
- Java的设计模式(7)— 生产者-消费者模式
生产者-消费者模式是一个经典的多线程设计模式,它为多线程间的协作提供了良好的解决方案.这个模式中,通常有两类线程,即若干个生产者线程和若干个消费者线程.生产者线程负责提交用户请求,消费者线程则负责具体 ...
- 【leecode】 Course Schedule
class Solution { public: static bool canFinish(int numCourses, vector<pair<int, int>>&am ...
- 基本数据类型和string的转换
- 第一章 Java的IO演进之路
Unix中5种IO模型 就网络通信而言,一次数据读入可以分为两个阶段,首先等待数据从网络中到达,到达后需要复制到内核的缓冲区中,第二个阶段是从内核的缓冲区复制到进程的缓冲区,复制到进程的缓冲区才算读取 ...
- python之闭包、装饰器
一.学习Python的时候发现函数内部,还可以写函数,并且可以返回函数.觉得挺新奇的,主要是在探索装饰器(有点像Java的注解)的时候,发现这个理解还是很主要的,所以这里记录一下. 二.闭包 1)首先 ...