This question comes up a lot in conversations I have with developers.

“Why would I want to switch to ASMX services?”

One analogy I have come up with to explain the difference between the two is an airplane analogy.

I associate ASMX services with a Cessna 150(一种小型飞机) cockpit and I associate WCF services with a 747 Jumbo Jet cockpit(操作舱).

I’ll be honest, I’ve never flown a plane but I think I’m smart enough to crank a Cessna 150 if I had to figure it out.  The above screen shot is a real Cessna 150 cockpit.  There are a few gauges, some knobs, etc.  Really not that bad.  And I think this explains ASMX really well.  ASMX services are easy to crank and jump start.  Think about it.  We take an existing Asp.Net website and add a file called “asmx”.  Any method we attribute with [WebMethod] magically turns into a service.  Objects we pass in and pass out that have public getters and setters will be serialized into XML.

   [WebMethod]
public string FlyToDestination(Location loc)
{
// up up and away
}

The barrier to cranking and getting going with an ASMX service is really simple.  And because it is simple, we’ve adopted them on a massive scale.  Let’s turn our attention to WCF.

  

WCF is a jack of all trades.  Think of it like a large plane that can repurposed for hauling passengers, hauling cargo, military use or whatever.  We are dealing with a plane but it is all about how that plane is configured.  Because things can be configured a lot of ways with the WCF 747 plane there are a lot more buttons in the airplane cockpit as compared to the Cessna 150.  The flip side of this is that once you understand how to configure WCF you’ve got one of the most versatile plane in the world!

From a developers stand point, the same logic or code written in an ASMX service works in WCF.  The code between the curly braces is the same.  The bottom line in either case is a method gets called and an object gets passed in (we call this a message when talking about services).  The difference in WCF is we program to a specific contract.  Here’s the same example above done in WCF.

    [ServiceContract]
public interface IAirportService
{
[OperationContract]
string FlyToDestination(Location loc);
} public class AirportService : IAirportService
{ public string FlyToDestination(Location loc)
{
// up up and away
}
}

Instead of attributing the specific method like we do in ASMX, in WCF we attribute the Interface.  Programming to an Interface is a good thing and the reason this is done is to loosely couple the host of the service from the implementation.  Doing this opens the door for hosting WCF services not only in IIS but console apps, Winforms, WPF, etc.  Since we’ve programmed to a contract (which is just an Interface), any class that implements the Interface can be a service.  This is powerful.  This is powerful because how we expose this service is up to us (again it is all about configuration).  Because we can expose our AirportService a number of ways we can see that WCF provides developers the ability to write code once and repurpose their code as needed.

  

Exposing a WCF service requires a little more training from this point forward ( just like flying a 747) because we have to understand how to configure the service.  It is this little bit of extra effort required to understand WCF configuration that stops a lot of developers from using WCF.  This is a shame because when the developer using ASMX wants to guarantee message delivery, participate in transactions, or use binary serialization instead of XML, they’ve got a lot of work ahead of them as compared to WCF.

The moral of the story is ASMX is simple and because it is simple, it isn’t very powerful.  Take the time to learn about WCF because this is the future of the .Net platform, thus it will be time wisely spent.  If you’ve been holding back I encourage you to step out of your old ASMX habits and learn the ways of WCF.

If you would like to dig a little deeper with WCF I encourage you to check out my “Demystifying Windows Communication Foundation” power point.  In there you’ll find a lot more details about how WCF works.

http://keithelder.net/Presentations/DemystyfyingWCF/DemystifyingWindowsCommunicationFoundation.ppt

See Also
http://keithelder.net/2008/10/17/wcf-vs-asmx-webservices/

WCF vs ASMX WebService的更多相关文章

  1. WCF常见问题(1) -- WebService/WCF Session Cookie

    原文:WCF常见问题(1) -- WebService/WCF Session Cookie 在.net 3.0推出WCF之前使用的WebService,有的应用有使用Session保持一些信息,在不 ...

  2. (转)wcf client与webservice通信(-)只修改配置文件而改变服务端

    http://www.cnblogs.com/yiyisawa/archive/2008/12/16/1356191.html 问题: 假设有一个大型系统新版本使用wcf 作为服务端,生成wcf cl ...

  3. WCF与ASMX Web服务差异比较[译]

    First of all, it needs to understand that WCF Service provides all the capabilities of .NET web serv ...

  4. (转)WCF中调用WebService出错,大家帮忙看看,回答就有分

    http://bbs.csdn.net/topics/390542345 在WCF项目里面添加了一个WebService引用,然后在我们调用这个WCF服务时,老出错,提示在 ServiceModel  ...

  5. 项目中使用WCF替换asmx Web service总结

    以前项目解决方案中,用http协议的asmx Web service作服务器数据访问入口,在SoapHeader中写入用户名和加盐密码进行身份认证. http asmx服务是明文传输,传输过程中数据很 ...

  6. [翻译]15个最常见的WCF面试问题

    WCF和ASMX WebService的区别是什么? 最基本的区别在于,ASMX或者ASP.NET WebService是用来通过基于HTTP的SOAP来实现通讯.但WCF可以使用任意协议(HTTP, ...

  7. WCF与WebService的区别

    1.WebService:严格来说是行业标准,不是技术,使用XML扩展标记语言来表示数据(这个是夸语言和平台的关键).微软的Web服务实现称为ASP.NET Web Service.它使用Soap简单 ...

  8. 转:asmx迷10分钟升级成wcf熟手指南

    前言:本文旨在帮助从未接触过wcf(.svc文件)的webservice开发人员,快速将传统的webService/asmx技术迁移到wcf.高手就不用浪费时间往下看了:) 以下所有操作均为vs201 ...

  9. WCF、WebAPI、WCFREST、WebService、WPF之间的区别

    在.net平台下,有大量的技术让你创建一个HTTP服务,像Web Service,WCF,现在又出了Web API.在.net平台下,你有很多的选择来构建一个HTTP Services.我分享一下我对 ...

随机推荐

  1. Network-POJ3694并查集+LCA

    Network Time Limit: 5000MS   Memory Limit: 65536K       Description A network administrator manages ...

  2. c++实现蛇形矩阵总结

    蛇形矩阵,百度了一下,是这么一个东西: 像一条蛇一样依次递增. 我想,竟然做了螺旋矩阵,那做一下这个吧.在之前的螺旋矩阵的main函数基础上,写个函数接口就行了,这一次做的很快,但是这个矩阵感觉比螺旋 ...

  3. ubuntu下安装、启动和卸载SSH

    想往VMWare虚拟机上的Ubuntu里面拷贝代码,发现之前安装好的secureCRT链接不上.发现是ssh安装配置出了问题,于是就把openssh-server卸载后重装,发现又是与openssh- ...

  4. python model对象转为dict数据

    在接口通讯里经常遇到这种需求,需要将对象的字段名和值均传至接口,user = User.objects.get(id=1)笨方法1,没错,我这样写过:di = {}di['username'] = u ...

  5. 《BI项目笔记》创建时间维度(1)

    SSAS Date 维度基本上在所有的 Cube 设计过程中都存在,很难见到没有时间维度的 OLAP 数据库.但是根据不同的项目需求, Date 维度的设计可能不大相同,所以在设计时间维度的时候需要搞 ...

  6. D3.js 做一个简单的图表(条形图)

    柱形图是一种最简单的可视化图标,主要有矩形.文字标签.坐标轴组成. 本文为简单起见,只绘制矩形的部分,用以讲解如何使用 D3 在 SVG 画布中绘图. 一. 画布是什么 前几章的处理对象都是 HTML ...

  7. java.util.concurrent包分类结构图

    摘自:http://blog.csdn.net/tsyj810883979/article/details/6956290

  8. (40) Aeroo 服务安装

    服务器 Odoo 8.0 操作系统: Ubuntu trusty14.04 说明:安装aeroo 要的要两个服务 areoo-docs 和 soffice 这里设定两个端口 8989 和 8100 = ...

  9. python中main()函数写法

    顶顶大名的Guido van Rossum(Python之父)推荐的main写法: #!/usr/bin/python import sys import getopt class Usage(Exc ...

  10. 【转】XGBoost参数调优完全指南(附Python代码)

    xgboost入门非常经典的材料,虽然读起来比较吃力,但是会有很大的帮助: 英文原文链接:https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2016/03/complete-g ...