WCF vs ASMX WebService
This question comes up a lot in conversations I have with developers.
“Why would I want to switch to ASMX services?”
One analogy I have come up with to explain the difference between the two is an airplane analogy.
I associate ASMX services with a Cessna 150(一种小型飞机) cockpit and I associate WCF services with a 747 Jumbo Jet cockpit(操作舱).

I’ll be honest, I’ve never flown a plane but I think I’m smart enough to crank a Cessna 150 if I had to figure it out. The above screen shot is a real Cessna 150 cockpit. There are a few gauges, some knobs, etc. Really not that bad. And I think this explains ASMX really well. ASMX services are easy to crank and jump start. Think about it. We take an existing Asp.Net website and add a file called “asmx”. Any method we attribute with [WebMethod] magically turns into a service. Objects we pass in and pass out that have public getters and setters will be serialized into XML.
[WebMethod]
public string FlyToDestination(Location loc)
{
// up up and away
}
The barrier to cranking and getting going with an ASMX service is really simple. And because it is simple, we’ve adopted them on a massive scale. Let’s turn our attention to WCF.
WCF is a jack of all trades. Think of it like a large plane that can repurposed for hauling passengers, hauling cargo, military use or whatever. We are dealing with a plane but it is all about how that plane is configured. Because things can be configured a lot of ways with the WCF 747 plane there are a lot more buttons in the airplane cockpit as compared to the Cessna 150. The flip side of this is that once you understand how to configure WCF you’ve got one of the most versatile plane in the world!
From a developers stand point, the same logic or code written in an ASMX service works in WCF. The code between the curly braces is the same. The bottom line in either case is a method gets called and an object gets passed in (we call this a message when talking about services). The difference in WCF is we program to a specific contract. Here’s the same example above done in WCF.
[ServiceContract]
public interface IAirportService
{
[OperationContract]
string FlyToDestination(Location loc);
} public class AirportService : IAirportService
{ public string FlyToDestination(Location loc)
{
// up up and away
}
}
Instead of attributing the specific method like we do in ASMX, in WCF we attribute the Interface. Programming to an Interface is a good thing and the reason this is done is to loosely couple the host of the service from the implementation. Doing this opens the door for hosting WCF services not only in IIS but console apps, Winforms, WPF, etc. Since we’ve programmed to a contract (which is just an Interface), any class that implements the Interface can be a service. This is powerful. This is powerful because how we expose this service is up to us (again it is all about configuration). Because we can expose our AirportService a number of ways we can see that WCF provides developers the ability to write code once and repurpose their code as needed.
Exposing a WCF service requires a little more training from this point forward ( just like flying a 747) because we have to understand how to configure the service. It is this little bit of extra effort required to understand WCF configuration that stops a lot of developers from using WCF. This is a shame because when the developer using ASMX wants to guarantee message delivery, participate in transactions, or use binary serialization instead of XML, they’ve got a lot of work ahead of them as compared to WCF.
The moral of the story is ASMX is simple and because it is simple, it isn’t very powerful. Take the time to learn about WCF because this is the future of the .Net platform, thus it will be time wisely spent. If you’ve been holding back I encourage you to step out of your old ASMX habits and learn the ways of WCF.
If you would like to dig a little deeper with WCF I encourage you to check out my “Demystifying Windows Communication Foundation” power point. In there you’ll find a lot more details about how WCF works.
http://keithelder.net/Presentations/DemystyfyingWCF/DemystifyingWindowsCommunicationFoundation.ppt
See Also
http://keithelder.net/2008/10/17/wcf-vs-asmx-webservices/
WCF vs ASMX WebService的更多相关文章
- WCF常见问题(1) -- WebService/WCF Session Cookie
原文:WCF常见问题(1) -- WebService/WCF Session Cookie 在.net 3.0推出WCF之前使用的WebService,有的应用有使用Session保持一些信息,在不 ...
- (转)wcf client与webservice通信(-)只修改配置文件而改变服务端
http://www.cnblogs.com/yiyisawa/archive/2008/12/16/1356191.html 问题: 假设有一个大型系统新版本使用wcf 作为服务端,生成wcf cl ...
- WCF与ASMX Web服务差异比较[译]
First of all, it needs to understand that WCF Service provides all the capabilities of .NET web serv ...
- (转)WCF中调用WebService出错,大家帮忙看看,回答就有分
http://bbs.csdn.net/topics/390542345 在WCF项目里面添加了一个WebService引用,然后在我们调用这个WCF服务时,老出错,提示在 ServiceModel ...
- 项目中使用WCF替换asmx Web service总结
以前项目解决方案中,用http协议的asmx Web service作服务器数据访问入口,在SoapHeader中写入用户名和加盐密码进行身份认证. http asmx服务是明文传输,传输过程中数据很 ...
- [翻译]15个最常见的WCF面试问题
WCF和ASMX WebService的区别是什么? 最基本的区别在于,ASMX或者ASP.NET WebService是用来通过基于HTTP的SOAP来实现通讯.但WCF可以使用任意协议(HTTP, ...
- WCF与WebService的区别
1.WebService:严格来说是行业标准,不是技术,使用XML扩展标记语言来表示数据(这个是夸语言和平台的关键).微软的Web服务实现称为ASP.NET Web Service.它使用Soap简单 ...
- 转:asmx迷10分钟升级成wcf熟手指南
前言:本文旨在帮助从未接触过wcf(.svc文件)的webservice开发人员,快速将传统的webService/asmx技术迁移到wcf.高手就不用浪费时间往下看了:) 以下所有操作均为vs201 ...
- WCF、WebAPI、WCFREST、WebService、WPF之间的区别
在.net平台下,有大量的技术让你创建一个HTTP服务,像Web Service,WCF,现在又出了Web API.在.net平台下,你有很多的选择来构建一个HTTP Services.我分享一下我对 ...
随机推荐
- Java 菜鸟学习之 script脚本语句
脚本语句 一般分为 顺序语句 分支语句 循环语句 顺序语句 就是从上到下依次读取 分支语句 是if语句 if(判断条件) { 满足条件执行的语句 } else { 不满足条件执行的语句 ...
- EF获取一个或者多个字段
有时候直接查询出一个实体,比较浪费性能,对于字段比较少的表来说差异不大,但是如果一个表有几十个字段,你只要取出一个字段或者几个字段,而取出整个实体,性能就会有差异了. /// <summary& ...
- 流镜像(华为S9306和S5700)
流镜像是指将设备.端口或者VLAN内收.发的指定类型报文复制到观察端口上,监控设备只对指定类型报文进行监测. 流镜像有基于ACL和基于MQC(即复杂流分类)两种配置方式.前者配置简便,但是没有后者支持 ...
- Windows Store Apps, Error: The certificate specified has expired.(转)
Windows Store Apps, Error: The certificate specified has expired. 0 comments|Posted on October 7th, ...
- C++11 图说VS2013下的引用叠加规则和模板参数类型推导规则
背景: 最近在学习C++STL,出于偶然,在C++Reference上看到了vector下的emplace_back函数,不想由此引发了一系列的“探索”,于是就有了现在这篇博文. 前言: ...
- javascript实现图片滚动
闲来无事捣鼓了一个原来的js图片滚动 首先看看 静态页的结构: <body> <a href="javascript: le()">向左</a> ...
- Sprint(第四天11.17)
燃尽图
- 《点石成金:访客至上的Web和可用性设计秘笈(原书第3版)》--- 读书笔记
这是一本绝妙的书, 它的英语书名是“Don't make me think”.更确切的说是个小册子, 但是作者的语言实在是让人忍俊不禁. 真TM的有趣, 为毛外国人就能写出如此美妙的书? 而国人却不能 ...
- CAD字体显示问号的解决办法
CAD字体显示问号的解决办法1.选中问号的文字,ctrl+1查看下文字样式,以standard为例.2.运行st命令,设置standard样式的字体名为windows自带的ttf字体,例如宋体或者仿宋 ...
- sanBox部署简介
参考资料:1 http://www.kaaproject.org/getting-started/ 此链接告诉我们部署sandbox的两种方法. 2 http://docs.kaaprojec ...