FORTIFY_SOURCE
In recent years Linux distributions started treating security more seriously. Out of many security features two are directly affecting C programmers: -fstack-protector and -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. These GCC options are now enabled by default on Ubuntu and Fedora.
What do these options do?
-fstack-protector
Consider the following C function:
void
fun()
{
char
*buf
=
alloca(0x100);
/* Don't allow gcc to optimise away the buf */
asm
volatile(""
::
"m"
(buf));
}
Compiled without the stack protector, with -fno-stack-protector option, GCC produces the following assembly:
<fun>:
push %ebp ; prologue
mov %esp,%ebp
sub $0x128,%esp ; reserve 0x128B on the stack
lea 0xf(%esp),%eax ; eax = esp +
0xf
and $0xfffffff0,%eax ; align eax
mov %eax,-0xc(%ebp)
; save eax in the stack frame
leave ; epilogue
ret
On the other hand with -fstack-protector option GCC adds protection code to your functions that use alloca or have buffers larger than 8 bytes. Additional code ensures the stack did not overflow. Here's the generated assembly:
<fun>:
push %ebp ; prologue
mov %esp,%ebp
sub $0x128,%esp ; reserve 0x128B on the stack
mov %gs:0x14,%eax ; load stack canary using gs
mov %eax,-0xc(%ebp)
; save it in the stack frame
xor %eax,%eax ; clear the register
lea 0xf(%esp),%eax ; eax = esp +
0xf
and $0xfffffff0,%eax ; align eax
mov %eax,-0x10(%ebp) ; save eax in the stack frame
mov -0xc(%ebp),%eax ; load canary
xor %gs:0x14,%eax ; compare against one in gs
<fun+0x2f>
<__stack_chk_fail@plt>
leave ; epilogue
ret
After a function prologue a canary is loaded and saved into the stack. Later, just before the epilogue the canary is verified against the original. If the values don't match the program exits with an appropriate message. This can protect against some buffer overflow attacks. It incurs some performance penalty but it seems to be worth the benefit.
When the stack is overwritten and __stack_chk_fail branch is taken the program crashes with a message like this:
***
stack
smashing
detected
***:
./protected
terminated
=======
Backtrace:
=========
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x45)[0xf76da0e5]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x10409a)[0xf76da09a]
./protected[0x80484de]
./protected[0x80483d7]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0xf75ef4d3]
./protected[0x8048411]
=======
Memory
map:
========
08048000-08049000
r-xp
00:13
./protected
08049000-0804a000
r--p
00:13
./protected
0804a000-0804b000
rw-p
00:13
./protected
092e5000-09306000
rw-p
00:00
[heap]
f759e000-f75ba000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75ba000-f75bb000
r--p
0001b000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75bb000-f75bc000
rw-p
0001c000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75d5000-f75d6000
rw-p
00:00
f75d6000-f7779000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f7779000-f777b000
r--p
001a3000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f777b000-f777c000
rw-p
001a5000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f777c000-f777f000
rw-p
00:00
f7796000-f779a000
rw-p
00:00
f779a000-f779b000
r-xp
00:00
[vdso]
f779b000-f77bb000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
f77bb000-f77bc000
r--p
0001f000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
f77bc000-f77bd000
rw-p
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
ffeb2000-ffed3000
rw-p
00:00
[stack]
Aborted
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Sample C code:
void
fun(char
*s)
{
char
buf[0x100];
strcpy(buf,
s);
/* Don't allow gcc to optimise away the buf */
asm
volatile(""
::
"m"
(buf));
}
Compiled without the code fortified, with -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE option:
<fun>:
push %ebp ; prologue
mov %esp,%ebp
sub $0x118,%esp ; reserve 0x118B on the stack
mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax ; load parameter `s` to eax
mov %eax,0x4(%esp)
; save parameter for strcpy
lea -0x108(%ebp),%eax ; count `buf`
in eax
mov %eax,(%esp)
; save parameter for strcpy
<strcpy@plt>
leave ; epilogue
ret
With -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2:
<fun>:
push %ebp ; prologue
mov %esp,%ebp
sub $0x118,%esp ; reserve 0x118B on the stack
movl $0x100,0x8(%esp) ; save value 0x100 as parameter
mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax ; load parameter `s` to eax
mov %eax,0x4(%esp) ; save parameter for strcpy
lea -0x108(%ebp),%eax ; count `buf` in eax
mov %eax,(%esp)
; save parameter for strcpy
<__strcpy_chk@plt>
leave ; epilogue
ret
You can see GCC generated some additional code. This time instead of calling strcpy(dst, src) GCC automatically calls __strcpy_chk(dst, src, dstlen). With FORTIFY_SOURCE whenever possible GCC tries to uses buffer-length aware replacements for functions like strcpy, memcpy, memset, etc.
Again, this prevents some buffer overflow attacks. Of course you should avoidstrcpy and always use strncpy, but it's worth noting that FORTIFY_SOURCE can also help with strncpy when GCC knows the destination buffer size. For example:
void
fun(char
*s,
int
l)
{
char
buf[0x100];
strncpy(buf,
s,
l);
asm
volatile(""
::
"m"
(buf[0]));
}
Here GCC instead of calling strncpy(dst, src, l) will call__strncpy_chk(dst, src, l, 0x100) as GCC is aware of the size of the destination buffer.
When the buffer is overrun the program fails with a message very similar to the one seen previously. Instead of "stack smashing detected" you'll see "buffer overflow detected" headline:
***
buffer
overflow
detected
***:
./fortified
terminated
=======
Backtrace:
=========
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x45)[0xf76d30e5]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x102eba)[0xf76d1eba]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x1021ed)[0xf76d11ed]
./fortified[0x8048488]
./fortified[0x80483a7]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf3)[0xf75e84d3]
./fortified[0x80483e1]
=======
Memory
map:
========
08048000-08049000
r-xp
00:13
./fortified
08049000-0804a000
r--p
00:13
./fortified
0804a000-0804b000
rw-p
00:13
./fortified
08d6b000-08d8c000
rw-p
00:00
[heap]
f7597000-f75b3000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75b3000-f75b4000
r--p
0001b000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75b4000-f75b5000
rw-p
0001c000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1
f75ce000-f75cf000
rw-p
00:00
f75cf000-f7772000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f7772000-f7774000
r--p
001a3000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f7774000-f7775000
rw-p
001a5000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so
f7775000-f7778000
rw-p
00:00
f778f000-f7793000
rw-p
00:00
f7793000-f7794000
r-xp
00:00
[vdso]
f7794000-f77b4000
r-xp
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
f77b4000-f77b5000
r--p
0001f000
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
f77b5000-f77b6000
rw-p
08:01
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.15.so
fff8d000-fffae000
rw-p
00:00
[stack]
Aborted
SRC=https://idea.popcount.org/2013-08-15-fortify_source/
FORTIFY_SOURCE的更多相关文章
- gcc和g++
一.GCC GNU编译器套件(GNU Compiler Collection)包括C.C++.Objective-C.Fortran.Java.Ada和Go语言的前端,也包括了这些语言的库(如libs ...
- Android 1.5-7.0(持续更新)安全机制一览
Android 1.5 ProPolice to prevent stack buffer overruns (-fstack-protector),在缓冲区buffer与返回地址之间加入Canary ...
- Pwn入坑指南
栈溢出原理 参考我之前发的一篇 Windows栈溢出原理 还有 brant 师傅的<0day安全笔记> Pwn常用工具 gdb:Linux下程序调试 PEDA:针对gdb的python漏洞 ...
- Linux下pwn从入门到放弃
Linux下pwn从入门到放弃 0x0 简介 pwn,在安全领域中指的是通过二进制/系统调用等方式获得目标主机的shell. 虽然web系统在互联网中占有比较大的分量,但是随着移动端,ioT的逐渐流行 ...
- OWASP固件安全性测试指南
OWASP固件安全性测试指南 固件安全评估,英文名称 firmware security testing methodology 简称 FSTM.该指导方法主要是为了安全研究人员.软件开发人员.顾问. ...
- Linux保护机制和绕过方式
Linux保护机制和绕过方式 CANNARY(栈保护) 栈溢出保护是一种缓冲区溢出攻击缓解手段,当函数存在缓冲区溢出攻击漏洞时,攻击者可以覆盖栈上的返回地址来让shellcode能够得到执行.用C ...
- PWN二进制漏洞学习指南
目录 PWN二进制漏洞学习指南 前言 前置技能 PWN概念 概述 发音 术语 PWN环境搭建 PWN知识学习途径 常见漏洞 安全机制 PWN技巧 PWN相关资源博客 Pwn菜鸡小分队 PWN二进制漏洞 ...
- 2020ACTF pwn writeup
为了打2021的ACTF,想着把2020年的pwn题做一做吧,发现2020年的pwn题质量还挺高的.反倒是2021年的题目质量不太高,好像是没有专门的pwn师傅出题,可以理解,毕竟办校赛,说白了就是用 ...
- WHUCTF PWN题目
花了大概两天时间来做WHUCTF的题目,第一次排名这么靠前.首先感谢武汉大学举办这次萌新赛,也感谢fmyy的师傅的耐心指导,让我第一次做出堆的题目来. pwnpwnpwn 这是一道栈题目,32位程序, ...
随机推荐
- openStack调试
- 数据库异常 :java.sql.SQLException: Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: YES)
最近在新项目中突然出现了 java.sql.SQLException: Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: YES) ...
- E20170624-ts
stateless adj. 无国家的,无国籍的; groupware 群件 cookie n. 饼干; 小甜点; 吸引人的年轻妇女; 甜面包; session n. 开会,会议; (法庭的) 开 ...
- String Successor(模拟)
http://acm.zju.edu.cn/onlinejudge/showProblem.do?problemCode=3490 题意:给出一个字符串,一个操作次数,每次操作从当前字符串最右边的字符 ...
- StreamingListener技术点
以下是对StreamingListene的研究,由于比较简单,故只贴代码,不做解释 /** * Created by gabry.wu on 2016/5/27. * 实现StreamingListe ...
- Lambda表达式怎么写SQL中的in?
ambda表达式查询没有IN这个方法,可以变通一下,in查询的数组是否包含在映射对象里面的集合里 直接贴代码吧,一看就懂了 class Program { static void Main(strin ...
- Set-----集合入门
函数中的集合和 数学中的集合 基本上差不多 集合中每个元素最多只能出现一次 并且 当元素储存到set集合之中 会自动 按照 ascll 进行 从小到大的 排序 大神关于 set 的 详 ...
- 【洛谷2926/BZOJ1607】[USACO08DEC]Patting Heads拍头(筛法)
题目: 洛谷2926 (截止至本博客发表时,BZOJ1607题面有误,正确题面请到洛谷2926查看) 分析: = 一句话题意:给定\(n\)个数\(\{a_i\}\),求对于每个\(a_i\)有多少个 ...
- html表单代码演示
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/stri ...
- Flume特点
Flume 特点 1.可靠性 当节点出现故障时,日志能够被传送到其他节点上而不会丢失. Flume提供了三种级别的可靠性保障,从强到弱依次分别为: (1) end-to-end(收到数据agent首 ...