[20190416]完善shared latch测试脚本2.txt
[20190416]完善shared latch测试脚本2.txt
--//昨天测试shared latch,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/267265/viewspace-2641414/,感觉有点开窍了.^_^.
http://andreynikolaev.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/shared-latch-behaves-like-enqueue/
For the shared latches Oracle 10g uses kslgetsl(laddr, wait, why, where, mode) function. Oracle 11g has kslgetsl_w()
function with the same interface, but internally uses ksl_get_shared_latch(). Like in my previous post, I guess the
meaning of kslgetsl() arguments as:
--//对于共享锁存，Oracle 10g使用kslgetsl(laddr，wait，why，where，mode)函数。Oracle 11g具有相同接口的kslgetsl_w()函数，但
--//在内部使用ksl_get_share_latch()。与上一篇文章一样，我认为kslgetsl()参数的含义是：
--//注:我以前一直以为还是kslgetsl,原来11g已经改为kslgetsl_w,不过内部使用还是ksl_get_shared_latch().
laddress -- address of latch in SGA
wait -- flag. If not 0, then willing-to-wait latch get
why -- context why the latch is acquired at this where.
where -- location from where the latch is acquired (x$ksllw.indx)
And the last one is:
mode – Exclusive or shared mode
the mode argument took only two values:
8 -- "SHARED"
16 -- "EXCLUSIVE"
--//我当时的测试针对'gcs partitioned table hash' latch,完善修改测试脚本,增加一些通用性.
1.环境:
SYS@book> @ ver1
PORT_STRING VERSION BANNER
------------------------------ -------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx 11.2.0.4.0 Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production
$ cat peek.sh
#! /bib/bash
# 参数如下:latch_name Monitoring_duration
sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<EOF
col laddr new_value laddr
SELECT sysdate,addr laddr FROM v\$latch_parent WHERE NAME='$1';
oradebug setmypid
$(seq $2|xargs -I{} echo -e 'oradebug peek 0x&laddr 8\nhost sleep 1' )
EOF
$ cat shared_latch.txt
/* 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num */
connect / as sysdba
col laddr new_value laddr
col vmode new_value vmode
select decode(lower('&&5'),'s',8,'x',16,'8',8,'16',16) vmode from dual ;
SELECT addr laddr FROM v$latch_parent WHERE NAME='&&1';
oradebug setmypid
oradebug call kslgetsl_w 0x&laddr &&2 &&3 &&4 &vmode
host sleep &&6
oradebug call kslfre 0x&laddr
exit
$ cat latch_free.sql
/*
This file is part of demos for "Contemporary Latch Internals" seminar v.18.09.2010
Andrey S. Nikolaev (Andrey.Nikolaev@rdtex.ru)
http://AndreyNikolaev.wordpress.com
This query shows trees of processes currently holding and waiting for latches
Tree output enumerates these processes and latches as following:
Process <PID1>
<latch1 holding by PID1>
<processes waiting for latch1>
...
<latch2 holding by PID1>
<processes waiting for latch2>
...
Process <PID2>
...
*/
set head off
set feedback off
set linesize 120
select sysdate from dual;
select LPAD(' ', (LEVEL - 1) )
||case when latch_holding is null then 'Process '||pid
else 'holding: '||latch_holding||' "'||name||'" lvl='||level#||' whr='||whr||' why='||why ||', SID='||sid
end
|| case when latch_waiting is not null then ', waiting for: '||latch_waiting||' whr='||whr||' why='||why
end latchtree
from (
/* Latch holders */
select ksuprpid pid,ksuprlat latch_holding, null latch_waiting, to_char(ksuprpid) parent_id, rawtohex(ksuprlat) id,
ksuprsid sid,ksuprllv level#,ksuprlnm name,ksuprlmd mode_,ksulawhy why,ksulawhr whr from x$ksuprlat
union all
/* Latch waiters */
select indx pid,null latch_holding, ksllawat latch_waiting,rawtohex(ksllawat) parent_id,to_char(indx) id,
null,null,null,null,ksllawhy why,ksllawer whr from x$ksupr where ksllawat !='00'
union all
/* The roots of latch trees: processes holding latch but not waiting for latch */
select pid, null, null, null, to_char(pid),null,null,null,null,null,null from (
select distinct ksuprpid pid from x$ksuprlat
minus
select indx pid from x$ksupr where ksllawat !='00')
) latch_op
connect by prior id=parent_id
start with parent_id is null;
$ cat /usr/local/bin/timestamp.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
while (<>) {
($sec,$min,$hour,$mday,$mon,$year,$wday,$yday,$isdst) = localtime();
printf("%02d:%02d:%02d", $hour, $min, $sec);
print ": $_";
#print localtime() . ": $_";
}
--//使用timestamp.pl在开始标注时间.这样更加清晰.
2.测试:
--//补充测试 X mode,S mode ,X 模式的情况.
$ cat f1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 s 6 > /dev/null &
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 0.1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt
09:28:38: SYSDATE LADDR
09:28:38: ------------------- ----------------
09:28:38: 2019-04-16 09:28:38 0000000060018A18
09:28:38: Statement processed.
09:28:38: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:39: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:40: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:41: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:42: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:43: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
09:28:44: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:45: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:46: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:47: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:48: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:49: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:50: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:51: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:52: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:53: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:54: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:55: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
09:28:56: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:28:57: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:28:58: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:28:59: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:29:00: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:29:01: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
09:29:02: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
09:29:03: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
09:29:04: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
09:29:05: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
09:29:06: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
09:29:07: [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 09:28:38 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
12 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//仅仅注意一个细节,peek值 的后4位并没有出现0x40000000的情况.
$ cat /tmp/latch_free.txt
2019-04-16 09:28:38
2019-04-16 09:28:39
Process 28
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=58
2019-04-16 09:28:40
Process 28
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=58
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:41
Process 28
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=58
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:42
Process 28
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=58
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:44
Process 28
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=58
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:45
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:46
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:47
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:48
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:49
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:50
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:51
Process 30
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=86
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:52
Process 30
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=86
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:53
Process 30
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=86
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:54
Process 30
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=86
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:56
Process 30
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=86
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=5 why=4
2019-04-16 09:28:57
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:28:58
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:28:59
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:29:00
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:29:01
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:29:02
Process 31
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=101
2019-04-16 09:29:03
2019-04-16 09:29:04
--//结果我就不再讲解了.
--//不过有点奇怪的是,如果修改f1.sh如下:
$ cat f1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 s 6 > /dev/null &
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 s 6 > /dev/null &
##sleep 0.1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
--//注解sleep 0.01秒.结果如下:
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 09:33:37 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001D 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
12 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//给人的感觉优先处理X mode 锁,然后才是S mode.我测试多次结果都一样.如果修改如下:
$ cat f1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 s 6 > /dev/null &
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 x 6 > /dev/null &
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 s 6 > /dev/null &
##sleep 0.1
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 09:37:56 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001B 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001E 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//仅仅注意一个细节,peek值 的后4位并没有出现0x40000000的情况.
--//latch_free.txt
2019-04-16 09:37:56
2019-04-16 09:37:57
Process 27
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=44
2019-04-16 09:37:58
Process 27
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=44
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=10 why=9
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=12 why=11
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=8 why=7
--//同时执行的sql语句,总是最后1个先启动执行.
2019-04-16 09:37:59
Process 27
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=44
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=10 why=9
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=12 why=11
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=8 why=7
2019-04-16 09:38:01
Process 27
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=44
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=10 why=9
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=12 why=11
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=8 why=7
2019-04-16 09:38:02
Process 27
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=5 why=4, SID=44
Process 29, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=10 why=9
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=12 why=11
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=8 why=7
2019-04-16 09:38:03
Process 29
holding: 0000000060018A18 "gcs partitioned table hash" lvl=6 whr=10 why=9, SID=72
Process 30, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=12 why=11
Process 31, waiting for: 0000000060018A18 whr=8 why=7
--//总之,有了这些脚本大家可以自行组合测试.我仅仅测试
--//SSS XSS SXS XXX
--//这里算是XSX,是否后4位出现的规律与第1次持有的mode是shared还是EXCLUSIVE有关.
--//视乎peek看到的值与入队时当前持有的状态shared,exclusive有关.
$ cat g1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 09:48:14 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
2 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
4 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 40000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001D 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001E 20000000
12 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//这样出现后4位是0x40000000好像仅仅一种可能,就是当前持有S mode,入队X mode时才会出现这样的情况.
--//再做一个例子:
$ cat g1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 09:58:45 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
2 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
2 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000002 00000000
2 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000002 40000000
2 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 40000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001E 20000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001F 20000000
10 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//出现2次后4位是0x40000000的情况.可以理解这样模式持有S mode的情况下,有X mode入队,才会出现这样的情况.
$ cat h1.sh
#! /bin/bash
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 6 7 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 4.1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 10:11:26 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
1 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
5 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 40000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
12 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//出现1次.最后我感觉脚本写的还是不好,每次都覆盖前面的测试结果.加入时间变量,修改如下:
$ cat g1.sh
#! /bin/bash
zdate=$(date '+%H%M%S')
echo $zdate
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 30 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks_${zdate}.txt &
seq 30 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free_${zdate}.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2.1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 x 6 > /dev/null &
wait
--//大家可以自行组合,peek看到的值也许不重要,只要知道请求都是S mode下不会阻塞.
--//X模式下,请求的S模式都会导致串行化.同时S mode也会阻塞X mode就足够了.最后测试一种情况看看:
$ cat i1.sh
#! /bin/bash
zdate=$(date '+%H%M%S')
echo $zdate
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 36 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks_${zdate}.txt &
seq 36 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free_${zdate}.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2.1
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 s 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks_102719.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 10:27:19 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
1 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000002 00000000
5 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
18 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//可以最后请求S mode 没有阻塞,需要18秒完成.如果修改如下:
$ cat i1.sh
#! /bin/bash
zdate=$(date '+%H%M%S')
echo $zdate
source peek.sh 'gcs partitioned table hash' 36 | timestamp.pl >| /tmp/peeks_${zdate}.txt &
seq 36 | xargs -I{} echo -e 'sqlplus -s -l / as sysdba <<< @latch_free\nsleep 1' | bash >| /tmp/latch_free_${zdate}.txt &
# 参数如下: @ latch.txt latch_name willing why where mode sleep_num
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 4 5 x 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 7 8 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 2
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 9 10 s 6 > /dev/null &
sleep 1.9
sqlplus /nolog @ shared_latch.txt 'gcs partitioned table hash' 1 11 12 s 6 > /dev/null &
wait
$ grep -v '^.*: $' /tmp/peeks_103201.txt | cut -c10- | uniq -c
1 SYSDATE LADDR
1 ------------------- ----------------
1 2019-04-16 10:32:01 0000000060018A18
1 Statement processed.
6 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 0000001C 20000000
18 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000001 00000000
12 [060018A18, 060018A20) = 00000000 00000000
--//可以发现我仅仅修改sleep 1.9秒,就导致后面3个S mode串行化.需要24秒完成.一旦串行化就很慢.
--//有点想作者说的那样shared latch like enquence.
[20190416]完善shared latch测试脚本2.txt的更多相关文章
- [20190416]查看shared latch gets的变化.txt
[20190416]查看shared latch gets的变化.txt 1.环境:SYS@book> @ ver1PORT_STRING VERSION ...
- [20190416]exclusive latch测试脚本.txt
[20190416]exclusive latch测试脚本.txt --//昨天做了shared latch的测试脚本,今天完善exclusive latch测试脚本,上个星期的测试我是手工执行的.- ...
- [20190419]shared latch spin count 2.txt
[20190419]shared latch spin count 2.txt --//上午测试shared latch XX模式的情况,链接:http://blog.itpub.net/267265 ...
- [20190415]关于shared latch(共享栓锁).txt
[20190415]关于shared latch(共享栓锁).txt http://andreynikolaev.wordpress.com/2010/11/17/shared-latch-behav ...
- [20190505]关于latch 一些统计信息.txt
[20190505]关于latch 一些统计信息.txt --//我在两篇文章,提到一些latch的统计信息.链接如下:http://blog.itpub.net/267265/viewspace-2 ...
- [20190423]简单测试latch nowilling等待模式.txt
[20190423]简单测试latch nowilling等待模式.txt --//我对这个问题的理解就是如果参数willing=0,表示无法获取该latch,直接退出,再寻找类似的latch.--/ ...
- [20190419]shared latch spin count.txt
[20190419]shared latch spin count.txt --//昨天测试exclusive latch spin count = 20000(缺省).--//今天测试shared ...
- [20190416]process allocation latch.txt
[20190416]process allocation latch.txt --//看链接:http://andreynikolaev.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/hidden ...
- [20190416]11g下那些latch是Exclusive的.txt
[20190416]11g下那些latch是Exclusive的.txt --//昨天测试了11g下那些latch是共享的,链接:--//是否反过来剩下的都是Exclusive的.继续测试: 1.环境 ...
随机推荐
- SoEasyPlatform 代码生成器
介绍 一款轻量级开源的代码生成器,相对较动软代码生成器而言要轻量的多,支持多种数据库,所用到dll组件也都在github有源码,代码非常的简单有点基础的看源码可以把生成的项目改成自已的风格. 特色 该 ...
- SQL Server内幕之数据页
数据页是包含已添加到数据库表中的用户数据的结构. 如前所述, 数据页有三种, 每个都以不同的格式存储数据. SQL server 有行内数据页.行溢出数据页和 LOB 数据页. 与 SQL serve ...
- idea解决Maven jar依赖冲突（四）
首先点击右侧的MavenProjects打开以下界面: 这个界面是maven的命令界面: 点击这个图标会进入如下界面: 左上角可以缩放,点击线可以取消冲突依赖,红色线为冲突依赖. 上图为无依赖冲突的s ...
- SQLServer之分离数据库
分离数据库注意事项 要求具有 db_owner 固定数据库角色中的成员资格. 可以分离数据库的数据和事务日志文件,然后将它们重新附加到同一或其他 SQL Server实例. 如果要将数据库更改到同一计 ...
- [题解] 2038: [2009国家集训队]小Z的袜子(hose)
莫队,卡常数 题目地址 思路 设\(\text{Vis[i]}\)为元素\(\text{i}\)在区间\(\text{[L,R]}\)的出现次数 考虑区间\(\text{[L,R]}\)和元素\(\t ...
- pgsql sql 统计整理
字符字段转整型查询: SELECT mon_id as staTime,SUM (CAST ( index_value AS INT )) AS totalCount FROM aidata.rep_ ...
- 在asp.net core2.1中添加中间件以扩展Swashbuckle.AspNetCore3.0支持简单的文档访问权限控制
Swashbuckle.AspNetCore3.0 介绍 一个使用 ASP.NET Core 构建的 API 的 Swagger 工具.直接从您的路由,控制器和模型生成漂亮的 API 文档,包括用于探 ...
- 总结Java常用到的六个加密技术和代码
加密,是以某种特殊的算法改变原有的信息数据,使得未授权的用户即使获得了已加密的信息,但因不知解密的方法,仍然无法了解信息的内容.大体上分为双向加密和单向加密,而双向加密又分为对称加密和非对称加密(有些 ...
- 实战经验|大神战队都在i春秋教你打CTF
全国大学生信息安全竞赛创新实践能力赛旨在培养.选拔.推荐优秀信息安全专业人才创造条件,促进高等学校信息安全专业课程体系.教学内容和方法的改革,培养学生的创新意识与团队合作精神,普及信息安全知识,增强学 ...
- VS2017 无法连接到Web服务器“IIS Express”终极解决方案
今天日了gou了,一大早打开VS2017的时候出现无法连接到Web服务器"IIS Express"的错误,然后必应了一下,再谷歌了一下找到的解决方法也都千篇一律,奈何都没能解决,最 ...