KingbaseES V8R3 shared_buffer占用过多导致实例崩溃

背景

有这样一个案例。客户备库意外宕机，从集群日志只看出发生了主备切换，备库一直持续恢复备库没有成功，从数据库日志看到如下报错：

terminating connection because of crash of another server process

DETAIL: The kingbase has commanded this server process to roll back the current transaction and exit, because another server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory.

根据报错提示，怀疑当时并发太高，或者业务繁忙导致shared_buffer不够用，进而导致数据库宕机。由于V8R3版本数据库没有办法收集kwr报告，所以不容易定位这个判断。

分析

现在模拟实验：

测试环境：

[](javascript:void(0)

shared_buffer 设置成16MB
max_wal_size  设置成32MB
create table test01(id integer, val char(1024)); 

insert into test01 values(generate_series(1,2888600),repeat( chr(int4(random()*26)+65),1024));

TEST=# create table test01(id integer, val char(1024));
CREATE TABLE
TEST=# insert into test01 values(generate_series(1,2888600),repeat( chr(int4(random()*26)+65),1024));

等待......
server closed the connection unexpectedly
This probably means the server terminated abnormally
before or while processing the request.

[](javascript:void(0)

ps命令看到了每个process，其中process13674占用了大量内存

数据库日志警告发生corrupted shared memory 。实例崩溃，发生重启。

在这之前触发了大量检查点，这也符合预期，因为已经把max_wal_size调的足够小。需要不断写出page以保证足够的shared_buffer满足insert。

数据库也给出了合理建议增加参数“max_wal_size”大小。

[](javascript:void(0)

2022-05-25 15:38:04 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:05 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:05 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:05 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:05 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:06 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:06 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:07 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:09 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (2 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:09 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:09 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:09 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:10 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:10 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (2 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:12 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:13 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:13 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:14 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:14 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:15 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:16 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:16 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:17 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:17 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:17 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:17 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (1 second apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently (0 seconds apart)
2022-05-25 15:38:18 CST HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter "max_wal_size".
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  server process (PID 13674) was terminated by signal 9: Killed
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST DETAIL:  Failed process was running: insert into test01 values(generate_series(1,2888600),repeat( chr(int4(random()*26)+65),1024));
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  terminating any other active server processes
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST WARNING:  terminating connection because of crash of another server process
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST DETAIL:  The kingbase has commanded this server process to roll back the current transaction and exit, because another server process exited abnormally and possibly corrupted shared memory.
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST HINT:  In a moment you should be able to reconnect to the database and repeat your command.
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  all server processes terminated; reinitializing
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  database system was interrupted; last known up at 2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  database system was not properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  redo starts at 0/8F050338
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  redo wal segment count 1
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  invalid record length at 0/8FA6C178: wanted 24, got 0
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  complete: 1/1
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  redo done at 0/8FA6C108
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  redo done at 0/8FA6C108
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  MultiXact member wraparound protections are now enabled
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  database system is ready to accept connections
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  autovacuum launcher started
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  starting syslogical supervisor
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  starting syslogical database manager for database TEST
2022-05-25 15:38:19 CST LOG:  manager worker [13929] at slot 0 generation 1 detaching cleanly
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  starting syslogical database manager for database TEMPLATE1
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  manager worker [13930] at slot 0 generation 2 detaching cleanly
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  starting syslogical database manager for database TEMPLATE2
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  manager worker [13932] at slot 0 generation 3 detaching cleanly
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  starting syslogical database manager for database SAMPLES
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  manager worker [13935] at slot 0 generation 4 detaching cleanly
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  starting syslogical database manager for database SECURITY
2022-05-25 15:38:20 CST LOG:  manager worker [13940] at slot 0 generation 5 detaching cleanly

[](javascript:void(0)

再查看那个占用内存高的进程已经被干掉。

需要说明的是同样的环境，我在KingbaseV8R6上并没有复现，也没有发生宕机。能看到插入时间比较慢，看到进程占用内存没有如此之高。

总结：

由于突然性大并发导致数据库资源使用上限是常有之事，我们尽量和业务协商保持业务稳定，如有新上业务要提前评估内存，cpu，io使用情况后做决定。是否有可用内存以供增加，不然很容易像以上例子导致数据库崩溃。

尽量升级到高版本规避此问题。或在系统级限定资源消费上限。