When it comes to the NBA draft, experts tend to argue about a number of things: at which position will a player be selected? what is the best draft class ever? etc… Luckily, the wealth of data made available by the great people ofhttp://www.basketball-reference.com/draft/ make it possible to address a number of these, and other questions.

To begin, I started off by writing a quick Python script to scrape draft data for the time period of 1980-2014 (see at the end of this post for the source code, or on my GitHub). For the purpose of this analysis, I focussed on some key metrics that I deemed to be informative and useful enough to investigate further, which included:

  • Name of player (player)
  • College of drafted player (college)
  • Year of draft (draft_year)
  • Draft pick rank (rank)
  • Team that drafter the player (team)
  • Total games played (gp)
  • Total minutes played (mp)
  • Minutes per game (mpg)
  • Points per game (ppg)
  • Assists per game (apg)
  • Rebounds per game (rbg)
  • Win shares (ws)
  • Win shares per 48 minutes (ws_48)
  • Total years in league (yrs)

Once this was achieved, I began by measuring the respective contribution of each pick position during the period of 1980-2014. Here, I simply computed and normalized the median statistics for each pick position. Not too surprisingly, higher draft picks tend to be contribute more to their respective teams, although we do notice that some late 2nd round draft pick have high win shares per 48 numbers. It turns out that these correspond to the picks at which Kurt Rambis (57th) and Manu Ginobilli (58th) were picked…but more on this later


Next, I decided to estimate the quality of each draft year by measuring how players performed in comparison to players picked at the same rank during other years. I was somewhat surprised to discover that the draft crop of 2008 was the one with the highest win shares, although looking back at the players that participated at that draft,it makes a lot of sense! On the other hand, the vaunted draft class of 1984 (Olajuwon, Barkley, Jordan) and 2003 (James, Anthony, Wade, Bosh) did not fare as well, which may be attributable to the fact that these included more elite players, but were far less deep in the lower picks of the draft.

Next, I looked at the longevity of each draft pick, in other words how long each draft pick is expected to remain in the NBA league, which can be achieved by using survival curves. Not too surprisingly, higher draft picks are much more likely to stay longer in the league. As a general observation, this also means that NBA teams are quite proficient at selecting the right players at the right position.

At this point, we can examine the relative performance of NBA teams with regards to their drafting skills. To do this, I compared the performance of each player compared to the average performance of other players drafted at the same position, computed the respective ratios, and summed these up for each NBA team. This analysis revealed that the top 5 drafting teams were Detroit Pistons, Cleveland Cavaliers, Memphis Grizzlies, Phoenix Suns and the San Antonio Spurs (I purposely ignored the Brooklyn Nets and the New Orleans Hornets because of the small number of years these two teams have been in the league.)

Finally, I decided to look for the best players picked at each position. Again, I compared each player’s career stats to the average numbers obtained by other players picked at the same position. For display purposes, I only show the top three players at each pick position, although you can easily reproduce the results by re-running my code here. (At this point, I should take the opportunity to advertise the great stargazerR package, which allows to quickly output R objects into LaTex or HTML tables). The results I obtained made a lot of sense, and I was very interested to learn that even at pick position 13, Kobe Bryant was only the 2nd best pick, as he was outnumbered by none other than the Mailman himself (i.e. Karl Malone). Of course, this analysis only considers numbers as opposed to achievements and trophies, but I think it is still amusing to find that Kobe Bryant isn’t even the most productive player at his position.

  Best pick 2nd best pick 3rd best pick
1 LeBron James John Wall Allen Iverson
2 Isiah Thomas Jason Kidd Gary Payton
3 Michael Jordan Deron Williams Pau Gasol
4 Chris Paul Russell Westbrook Stephon Marbury
5 Charles Barkley Dwyane Wade Kevin Garnett
6 Damian Lillard Brandon Roy Antoine Walker
7 Kevin Johnson Stephen Curry Alvin Robertson
8 Andre Miller Clark Kellogg Detlef Schrempf
9 Dirk Nowitzki Tracy McGrady Andre Iguodala
10 Paul Pierce Brandon Jennings Paul George
11 Fat Lever Michael Carter-Williams Terrell Brandon
12 Mookie Blaylock Muggsy Bogues John Bagley
13 Karl Malone Kobe Bryant Sleepy Floyd
14 Tim Hardaway Clyde Drexler Peja Stojakovic
15 Steve Nash Al Jefferson Gary Grant
16 John Stockton Nikola Vucevic Metta World Peace
17 Jrue Holiday Josh Smith Shawn Kemp
18 Mark Jackson Ty Lawson Joe Dumars
19 Rod Strickland Zach Randolph Jeff Teague
20 Larry Nance Jameer Nelson Paul Pressey
21 Rajon Rondo Darren Collison Michael Finley
22 Scott Skiles Reggie Lewis Kenneth Faried
23 Tayshaun Prince A.C. Green Wilson Chandler
24 Sam Cassell Kyle Lowry Arvydas Sabonis
25 Jeff Ruland Mark Price Nicolas Batum
26 Vlade Divac Kevin Martin George Hill
27 Dennis Rodman Jamaal Tinsley Jordan Crawford
28 Tony Parker Sherman Douglas Gene Banks
29 Toni Kukoc Josh Howard P.J. Brown
30 Gilbert Arenas Nate McMillan David Lee
31 Doc Rivers Danny Ainge Nikola Pekovic
32 Rashard Lewis Brent Price Luke Walton
33 Grant Long Dirk Minniefield Steve Colter
34 Carlos Boozer Mario Chalmers C.J. Miles
35 Mike Iuzzolino DeAndre Jordan Derek Smith
36 Clifford Robinson Ersan Ilyasova Omer Asik
37 Nick Van Exel Mehmet Okur Jeff McInnis
38 Chandler Parsons Chris Duhon Steve Blake
39 Rafer Alston Earl Watson Khris Middleton
40 Monta Ellis Dino Radja Lance Stephenson
41 Cuttino Mobley Popeye Jones Otis Smith
42 Stephen Jackson Patrick Beverley Matt Geiger
43 Michael Redd Eric Snow Trevor Ariza
44 Chase Budinger Malik Rose Cedric Henderson
45 Goran Dragic Hot Rod Williams Antonio Davis
46 Jeff Hornacek Jerome Kersey Voshon Lenard
47 Paul Millsap Mo Williams Gerald Wilkins
48 Marc Gasol Micheal Williams Cedric Ceballos
49 Andray Blatche Haywoode Workman Kyle O’Quinn
50 Ryan Gomes Paul Thompson Lavoy Allen
51 Kyle Korver Jim Petersen Lawrence Funderburke
52 Fred Hoiberg Anthony Goldwire Lowes Moore
53 Anthony Mason Tod Murphy Greg Buckner
54 Sam Mitchell Shandon Anderson Mark Blount
55 Luis Scola Kenny Gattison Patrick Mills
56 Ramon Sessions Amir Johnson Joe Kopicki
57 Manu Ginobili Marcin Gortat Frank Brickowski
58 Kurt Rambis Don Reid Robbie Hummel
59 NA NA NA
60 Isaiah Thomas Drazen Petrovic Robert Sacre

As usual, all the code for this analysis can be found on GitHub account.

CAVEATS

With regards to the analysis shown above, it is important to highlight a few potential caveats:

    • I worked with career averages, which somewhat ignores the years of peak performance achieved by certain players. However, I feel it that career averages are a reasonably good proxy for overall player competence.
    • I completely ignored the fact that some teams had more opportunities to select higher draft picks than others (cough…Cleveland…cough). As such, there may be a bias towards historically bad teams that would have been in the top 5 picks more often than others. However, I did compare each player to others that were picked at the same position, some hopefully this will bypass the issue (for example, if a team had plenty of NO 1 picks that were bad compared to other NO 1 picks, this insight will be revealed in the analysis)

转自:https://statofmind.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/comparing-the-contribution-of-nba-draft-picks/

Comparing the contribution of NBA draft picks(转)的更多相关文章

  1. Git工作流指南:Gitflow工作流 Comparing Workflows

    Comparing Workflows The array of possible workflows can make it hard to know where to begin when imp ...

  2. Go 2 Draft Designs

    Go 2 Draft Designs 28 August 2018 Yesterday, at our annual Go contributor summit, attendees got a sn ...

  3. Comparing the MSTest and Nunit Frameworks

    I haven't seen much information online comparing the similarities and differences between the Nunit ...

  4. 见证历史 -- 2013 NBA 热火夺冠之路有感

    见证历史-- 2013 NBA 热火夺冠之路有感今年NBA季后赛从第一轮看起,到最终的热火夺冠,应该看得是最爽的一次.但一些情节和细节,回忆起来,深有感悟. 1. 做人要低调詹宁斯豪言演黑八雄鹿本赛季 ...

  5. Writing the first draft of your science paper — some dos and don’ts

    Writing the first draft of your science paper — some dos and don’ts 如何起草一篇科学论文?经验丰富的Angel Borja教授告诉你 ...

  6. JavaScript案例六:简单省市联动(NBA版)

    JavaScript实现简单省市(NBA版)联动 <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <title>JavaScript实现简单 ...

  7. More on Conditions - To Compare -Comparing Sequences and Other Types

    The conditions used in while and if statements can contain any operators, not just comparisons. The ...

  8. Educational Codeforces Round 5 A. Comparing Two Long Integers

    A. Comparing Two Long Integers time limit per test 2 seconds memory limit per test 256 megabytes inp ...

  9. Codeforces Educational Codeforces Round 5 A. Comparing Two Long Integers 高精度比大小,模拟

    A. Comparing Two Long Integers 题目连接: http://www.codeforces.com/contest/616/problem/A Description You ...

随机推荐

  1. Statistical Models and Social Science

    1.1 Statistical Models and Social Reality KEY: complex society v.s statistical models relationship,d ...

  2. 一次young gc耗时过长优化过程

    1    问题源起 上游系统通过公司rpc框架调用我们系统接口超时(默认超时时间为100ms)数量从50次/分突然上涨到2000次/分,在发生变化时间段里我们的系统也没有做过代码变更,但上游系统的调用 ...

  3. 《Python自然语言处理》第二章 学习笔记

    import nltk from nltk.book import * nltk.corpus.gutenberg.fileids() emma = nltk.corpus.gutenberg.wor ...

  4. tmux鼠标配置出现错误unknown option: mode-mouse

    setw -g mode-mouse on set -g mouse-select-pane on set -g mouse-resize-pane on set -g mouse-select-wi ...

  5. 在mysql 5.6的环境下修改生产环境的表结构(在线ddl) ----工具pt-osc

    随着需求的变化越来越快,在线修改表结构变得越来越需要. 在mysql5.6以前,mysql的修改表结构操作会锁表,这样就会造成开发人员或者DBA修改表结构必须要等到凌晨流量谷值或者停服修改.这样必定会 ...

  6. 关于AysncController的一次测试(url重写后静态页文件内容的读取是否需要使用异步?)

    因为做网站的静态页缓存,所以做了这个测试 MVC项目 准备了4个Action,分两组,一组是读取本地磁盘的一个html页面文件,一组是延时2秒 public class TestController ...

  7. Python -堆的实现

    最小(大)堆是按完全二叉树的排序顺序的方式排布堆中元素的,并且满足:ai  >a(2i+1)  and ai>a(2i+2)( ai  <a(2i+1)  and ai<a(2 ...

  8. java构造代码块,构造函数和普通函数的区别和调用时间

    在这里我们谈论一下构造代码块,构造函数和普通函数的区别和调用时间.构造代码块:最早运行,比构造函数运行的时间好要提前,和构造函数一样,只在对象初始化的时候运行.构造函数:运行时间比构造代码块时间晚,也 ...

  9. java异常总结(转载)

    转至 Java常见异常(Runtime Exception )小结 http://www.apkbus.com/android-58405-1-1.html 本文重在Java中异常机制的一些概念.写本 ...

  10. js里变量的作用域

    一.在js中,变量的定义并不是以代码块作为作用域的,而是以函数作为作用域.也就是说,如果变量是在某个函数中定义的,那么,它在函数以外的地方是不可见的.但是,如果该变量是定义在if或者for这样的代码块 ...