在国外看到详细的说明一篇,非常浅显透彻。转给国内的筒子们:-)

原文标题:

Spring中的<context:annotation-config>与<context:component-scan>到底有什么不同?

原文出处:http://stackoverflow.com/a/7456501

<context:annotation-config> is used to activate annotations in beans already registered in the application context (no matter if they were defined with XML or by package scanning).

<context:component-scan> can also do what <context:annotation-config> does but <context:component-scan> also scans packages to find and register beans within the application context.

I'll use some examples to show the differences/similarities.

Lets start with a basic setup of three beans of type AB and C, with B and C being injected into A.

 package com.xxx;
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}

With the following XML configuration :

 <bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A">
<property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />
</bean>

Loading the context produces the following output:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@c2ff5
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1e152c5
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@c2ff5
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6

OK, this is the expected output. But this is "old style" Spring. Now we have annotations so lets use those to simplify the XML.

First, lets autowire the bbb and ccc properties on bean A like so:

 package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}

This allows me to remove the following rows from the XML:

 <property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />

My XML is now simplified to this:

 <bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />

When I load the context I get the following output:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@5e5a50
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@54a328
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@a3d4cf

OK, this is wrong! What happened? Why aren't my properties autowired?

Well, annotations are a nice feature but by themselves they do nothing whatsoever. They just annotate stuff. You need a processing tool to find the annotations and do something with them.

<context:annotation-config> to the rescue. This activates the actions for the annotations that it finds on the beans defined in the same application context where itself is defined.

If I change my XML to this:

 <context:annotation-config />
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />

when I load the application context I get the proper result:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@15663a2
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@cd5f8b
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@157aa53
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@15663a2
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@cd5f8b

OK, this is nice, but I've removed two rows from the XML and added one. That's not a very big difference. The idea with annotations is that it's supposed to remove the XML.

So let's remove the XML definitions and replace them all with annotations:

 package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
@Component
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}

While in the XML we only keep this:

 <context:annotation-config />

We load the context and the result is... Nothing. No beans are created, no beans are autowired. Nothing!

That's because, as I said in the first paragraph, the <context:annotation-config /> only works on beans registered within the application context. Because I removed the XML configuration for the three beans there is no bean created and <context:annotation-config /> has no "targets" to work on.

But that won't be a problem for <context:component-scan> which can scan a package for "targets" to work on. Let's change the content of the XML config into the following entry:

 <context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />

When I load the context I get the following output:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@1be0f0a
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@80d1ff

Hmmmm... something is missing. Why?

If you look closelly at the classes, class A has package com.yyy but I've specified in the <context:component-scan> to use package com.xxx so this completely missed my A class and only picked up B and C which are on the com.xxx package.

To fix this, I add this other package also:

<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx,com.yyy" />

and now we get the expected result:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@15ac3c9
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@ec4a87
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@15ac3c9

And that's it! Now you don't have XML definitions anymore, you have annotations.

As a final example, keeping the annotated classes AB and C and adding the following to the XML, what will we get after loading the context?

 <context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />

We still get the correct result:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87

Even if the bean for class A isn't obtained by scanning, the processing tools are still applied by <context:component-scan> on all beans registered in the application context, even for A which was manually registered in the XML.

But what if we have the following XML, will we get duplicated beans because we've specified both <context:annotation-config /> and <context:component-scan>?

 <context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />

No, no duplications, We again get the expected result:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87

That's because both tags register the same processing tools (<context:annotation-config /> can be omitted if <context:component-scan> is specified) but Spring takes care of running them only once.

Even if you register the processing tools yourself multiple times, Spring will still make sure they do their magic only once; this XML:

 <context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
<bean id="bla" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla1" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla2" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla3" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />

will still generate the following result:

creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@25d2b2
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87

OK, that about raps it up.

I hope this information along with the responses from @Tomasz Nurkiewicz and @Sean Patrick Floyd are all you need to understand how <context:annotation-config> and <context:component-scan> work.

[转载]Difference between <context:annotation-config> vs <context:component-scan>的更多相关文章

  1. Mingyang.net:org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException

    org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException: Annotation-specified bean ...

  2. 【原创】大叔经验分享(16)Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher

    今天尝试运行一个古老的工程,配置好之后编译通过,结果运行时报错: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Une ...

  3. spring 2.5.6 错误:Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher

    在运行一个第三方公司交付的项目的时候, 出现: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Context namespace element 'annot ...

  4. Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser]

    严重: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.springframework.we ...

  5. class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher

    在搭建SSM项目时报了以下的错误: 06-Oct-2019 11:55:52.109 信息 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-127.0.0.1] org.apache.catalina. ...

  6. [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher 问题--MyEclipse设置JDK版本

    org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Unexpected exception parsing XML doc ...

  7. Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher

    异常信息如下: 错误: Unexpected exception parsing XML document from class path resource [spring/applicationCo ...

  8. Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher

    Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.anno ...

  9. Spring配置之context:annotation与、component-scan以及annotation-driven

    spring boot帮助我们隐藏了大量的细节,有些配置spring boot都是开启的,因此当我们查看遗留项目使用spring时候遇见问题一定细心排查 <!-- context:annotat ...

随机推荐

  1. strust1与strust2,springmvc三者之间的区别?

    strust1与struts2的区别    1.struts2是基于webWork的一个全新的框架,比struts1学习更方便    Struts2主要是改进了Struts1的servlet和acti ...

  2. 64位win7下安装SQL Server 2008(图文解说版)

    运行sql安装 单击安装-全新的sql server独立安装,如果我们准备好了故障转移群集,那么我们就可以创建故障转移群集sql 常规检查 一笑而过 选择版本,或者输入密钥自动识别版本 授权协议 支持 ...

  3. CoreAnimation 之CAReplicatorLayer

    CAReplicatorLayer: 主要作用有以下两个: CAReplicatorLayer的目的是为了高效生成许多相似的图层,它会绘制一个或多个图层的子图层 并在每个复制体上应用不同的变换 使用C ...

  4. __cdecl 、__fastcall、__stdcall

    调用约定: __cdecl __fastcall与 __stdcall,三者都是调用约定(Calling convention),它决定以下内容:1)函数参数的压栈顺序,2)由调用者还是被调用者把参数 ...

  5. Delphi:与VCL同步(Synchronize()、用消息来同步)

    看本文时,可以同时参考:Delphi中线程类 TThread实现多线程编程(事件.临界区.Synchronize.WaitFor……) 先说一下RTL和VCL RTL(Run-Time library ...

  6. java和c#使用hessian通信

    介绍 hessian主页:http://hessian.caucho.com/ 一个简单的例子学习hessian服务:服务端为Java,客户端为C#. 先要准备好C#和Java的第三方类库:http: ...

  7. ASP.NET MVC与ASP.NET Web Form简单区别与适用场景

    概论: Asp.net  微软 提供web开发框架或者技术.分Web Form和ASP.NET MVC.下面简单说明各自优缺点及使用场景. Web Form 优点: 1.支持丰富的服务器控件.如:Gr ...

  8. 【leetcode】Excel Sheet Column Title & Excel Sheet Column Number

    题目描述: Excel Sheet Column Title Given a positive integer, return its corresponding column title as ap ...

  9. Java Arrays类进行数组排序

    排序算法,基本的高级语言都有一些提供.C语言有qsort()函数,C++有sort()函数,java语言有Arrays类(不是Array).用这些排序时,都可以写自己的排序规则. Java API对A ...

  10. UML学习(三)-----序列图

    UML的模型中可分为两种,动态模型和静态模型.用例图.类图和对象图都是UML中的静态结构模型.而在UML系统动态模型的其中一种就是交互视图,它描述了执行系统功能的各个角色之间相互传递消息的顺序关系.序 ...