[转载]Difference between <context:annotation-config> vs <context:component-scan>
在国外看到详细的说明一篇,非常浅显透彻。转给国内的筒子们:-)
原文标题:
Spring中的<context:annotation-config>与<context:component-scan>到底有什么不同?
原文出处:http://stackoverflow.com/a/7456501
<context:annotation-config> is used to activate annotations in beans already registered in the application context (no matter if they were defined with XML or by package scanning).
<context:component-scan> can also do what <context:annotation-config> does but <context:component-scan> also scans packages to find and register beans within the application context.
I'll use some examples to show the differences/similarities.
Lets start with a basic setup of three beans of type A, B and C, with B and C being injected into A.
package com.xxx;
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
With the following XML configuration :
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A">
<property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />
</bean>
Loading the context produces the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@c2ff5
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1e152c5
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@c2ff5
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6
OK, this is the expected output. But this is "old style" Spring. Now we have annotations so lets use those to simplify the XML.
First, lets autowire the bbb and ccc properties on bean A like so:
package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
This allows me to remove the following rows from the XML:
<property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />
My XML is now simplified to this:
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
When I load the context I get the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@5e5a50
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@54a328
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@a3d4cf
OK, this is wrong! What happened? Why aren't my properties autowired?
Well, annotations are a nice feature but by themselves they do nothing whatsoever. They just annotate stuff. You need a processing tool to find the annotations and do something with them.
<context:annotation-config> to the rescue. This activates the actions for the annotations that it finds on the beans defined in the same application context where itself is defined.
If I change my XML to this:
<context:annotation-config />
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
when I load the application context I get the proper result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@15663a2
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@cd5f8b
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@157aa53
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@15663a2
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@cd5f8b
OK, this is nice, but I've removed two rows from the XML and added one. That's not a very big difference. The idea with annotations is that it's supposed to remove the XML.
So let's remove the XML definitions and replace them all with annotations:
package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
@Component
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
While in the XML we only keep this:
<context:annotation-config />
We load the context and the result is... Nothing. No beans are created, no beans are autowired. Nothing!
That's because, as I said in the first paragraph, the <context:annotation-config /> only works on beans registered within the application context. Because I removed the XML configuration for the three beans there is no bean created and <context:annotation-config /> has no "targets" to work on.
But that won't be a problem for <context:component-scan> which can scan a package for "targets" to work on. Let's change the content of the XML config into the following entry:
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
When I load the context I get the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@1be0f0a
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@80d1ff
Hmmmm... something is missing. Why?
If you look closelly at the classes, class A has package com.yyy but I've specified in the <context:component-scan> to use package com.xxx so this completely missed my A class and only picked up B and C which are on the com.xxx package.
To fix this, I add this other package also:
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx,com.yyy" />
and now we get the expected result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@15ac3c9
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@ec4a87
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@15ac3c9
And that's it! Now you don't have XML definitions anymore, you have annotations.
As a final example, keeping the annotated classes A, B and C and adding the following to the XML, what will we get after loading the context?
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
We still get the correct result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
Even if the bean for class A isn't obtained by scanning, the processing tools are still applied by <context:component-scan> on all beans registered in the application context, even for A which was manually registered in the XML.
But what if we have the following XML, will we get duplicated beans because we've specified both <context:annotation-config /> and <context:component-scan>?
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
No, no duplications, We again get the expected result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
That's because both tags register the same processing tools (<context:annotation-config /> can be omitted if <context:component-scan> is specified) but Spring takes care of running them only once.
Even if you register the processing tools yourself multiple times, Spring will still make sure they do their magic only once; this XML:
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
<bean id="bla" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla1" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla2" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla3" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
will still generate the following result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@25d2b2
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
OK, that about raps it up.
I hope this information along with the responses from @Tomasz Nurkiewicz and @Sean Patrick Floyd are all you need to understand how <context:annotation-config> and <context:component-scan> work.
[转载]Difference between <context:annotation-config> vs <context:component-scan>的更多相关文章
- Mingyang.net:org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException
org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException: Annotation-specified bean ...
- 【原创】大叔经验分享(16)Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
今天尝试运行一个古老的工程,配置好之后编译通过,结果运行时报错: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Une ...
- spring 2.5.6 错误:Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
在运行一个第三方公司交付的项目的时候, 出现: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Context namespace element 'annot ...
- Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser]
严重: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.springframework.we ...
- class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
在搭建SSM项目时报了以下的错误: 06-Oct-2019 11:55:52.109 信息 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-127.0.0.1] org.apache.catalina. ...
- [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher 问题--MyEclipse设置JDK版本
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Unexpected exception parsing XML doc ...
- Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
异常信息如下: 错误: Unexpected exception parsing XML document from class path resource [spring/applicationCo ...
- Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.anno ...
- Spring配置之context:annotation与、component-scan以及annotation-driven
spring boot帮助我们隐藏了大量的细节,有些配置spring boot都是开启的,因此当我们查看遗留项目使用spring时候遇见问题一定细心排查 <!-- context:annotat ...
随机推荐
- 史上最简单,一步集成侧滑(删除)菜单,高仿QQ、IOS。
重要的话 开头说,not for the RecyclerView or ListView, for the Any ViewGroup. 本控件不依赖任何父布局,不是针对 RecyclerView. ...
- AJAX里,使用XML返回数据类型,实现简单下拉列表
XML:可扩展标记语言 HTML:超文本标记语言 标签:<标签名></标签名> 特点: 1.必须要有一个根 2.标签名自定义 3.对大小写敏感 4.有开始就要有结束 5.同一级 ...
- URL类型入参串调用接口
最近通过调用另一个合作公司提供的接口实现方法,借鉴同事之前编写的方法 Models.JSON.Patient类中有各种属性,也可增加属性来满足新需求 public string TakeAppoint ...
- 【maven】maven创建web项目-pom文件提示web.xml is missing and <failOnMissingWebXml> is set to true
使用maven创建web项目,选择war类型后,pom文件红叉 提示web.xml is missing and <failOnMissingWebXml> is set to true ...
- python 函数的参数定义及调用
参数定义:1. 位置参数: 这是熟悉的标准化参数,位置参数必须在调用函数中定义的准确顺序来传递,在没有默认参数的情况下,传入参数 的精确数目必须和声明的数目一致. def foo(who, ...
- LINUX 查看当前系统的负载情况
uptime linux uptime命令主要用于获取主机运行时间和查询linux系统负载等信息. eg: # uptime 02:03:50 up 126 days, 12:57, 2 users, ...
- Scrum项目8.0
目标:我们开始做每个需要细致的界面,比方说登陆,注册,游戏界面,难度选择 内容:登陆界面:登陆名,登陆密码,登陆按钮,以及优美的底图. 注册页面:名称,密码,登陆按钮,以及优美的底图. 游戏界面:难度 ...
- 分享一下自己用c++写的小地图
http://www.unrealchina.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=451&extra=&from=portal&page= ...
- discuz sphinx全文检索搜索引擎方案
基于discuz的索引配置文件,这个配置文件比较灵活,可以根据不同的需求来配置 # # linuxTone full index search configure file # source lt_p ...
- PNG和Gif及JPEG图片格式比较
Gif格式特点 透明性Gif是一种布尔透明类型,既它可以是全透明,也可以是全不透明,但是它并没有半透明(alpha 透明). 动画Gif这种格式支持动画. 无损耗性Gif是一种无损耗的图像格式,这也意 ...