[转载]Difference between <context:annotation-config> vs <context:component-scan>
在国外看到详细的说明一篇,非常浅显透彻。转给国内的筒子们:-)
原文标题:
Spring中的<context:annotation-config>与<context:component-scan>到底有什么不同?
原文出处:http://stackoverflow.com/a/7456501
<context:annotation-config> is used to activate annotations in beans already registered in the application context (no matter if they were defined with XML or by package scanning).
<context:component-scan> can also do what <context:annotation-config> does but <context:component-scan> also scans packages to find and register beans within the application context.
I'll use some examples to show the differences/similarities.
Lets start with a basic setup of three beans of type A, B and C, with B and C being injected into A.
package com.xxx;
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
With the following XML configuration :
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A">
<property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />
</bean>
Loading the context produces the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@c2ff5
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1e152c5
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@c2ff5
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@1e8a1f6
OK, this is the expected output. But this is "old style" Spring. Now we have annotations so lets use those to simplify the XML.
First, lets autowire the bbb and ccc properties on bean A like so:
package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
This allows me to remove the following rows from the XML:
<property name="bbb" ref="bBean" />
<property name="ccc" ref="cBean" />
My XML is now simplified to this:
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
When I load the context I get the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@5e5a50
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@54a328
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@a3d4cf
OK, this is wrong! What happened? Why aren't my properties autowired?
Well, annotations are a nice feature but by themselves they do nothing whatsoever. They just annotate stuff. You need a processing tool to find the annotations and do something with them.
<context:annotation-config> to the rescue. This activates the actions for the annotations that it finds on the beans defined in the same application context where itself is defined.
If I change my XML to this:
<context:annotation-config />
<bean id="bBean" class="com.xxx.B" />
<bean id="cBean" class="com.xxx.C" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
when I load the application context I get the proper result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@15663a2
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@cd5f8b
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@157aa53
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@15663a2
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@cd5f8b
OK, this is nice, but I've removed two rows from the XML and added one. That's not a very big difference. The idea with annotations is that it's supposed to remove the XML.
So let's remove the XML definitions and replace them all with annotations:
package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class B {
public B() {
System.out.println("creating bean B: " + this);
}
} package com.xxx;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class C {
public C() {
System.out.println("creating bean C: " + this);
}
} package com.yyy;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import com.xxx.B;
import com.xxx.C;
@Component
public class A {
private B bbb;
private C ccc;
public A() {
System.out.println("creating bean A: " + this);
}
@Autowired
public void setBbb(B bbb) {
System.out.println("setting A.bbb with " + bbb);
this.bbb = bbb;
}
@Autowired
public void setCcc(C ccc) {
System.out.println("setting A.ccc with " + ccc);
this.ccc = ccc;
}
}
While in the XML we only keep this:
<context:annotation-config />
We load the context and the result is... Nothing. No beans are created, no beans are autowired. Nothing!
That's because, as I said in the first paragraph, the <context:annotation-config /> only works on beans registered within the application context. Because I removed the XML configuration for the three beans there is no bean created and <context:annotation-config /> has no "targets" to work on.
But that won't be a problem for <context:component-scan> which can scan a package for "targets" to work on. Let's change the content of the XML config into the following entry:
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
When I load the context I get the following output:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@1be0f0a
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@80d1ff
Hmmmm... something is missing. Why?
If you look closelly at the classes, class A has package com.yyy but I've specified in the <context:component-scan> to use package com.xxx so this completely missed my A class and only picked up B and C which are on the com.xxx package.
To fix this, I add this other package also:
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx,com.yyy" />
and now we get the expected result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@15ac3c9
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@ec4a87
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@cd5f8b
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@15ac3c9
And that's it! Now you don't have XML definitions anymore, you have annotations.
As a final example, keeping the annotated classes A, B and C and adding the following to the XML, what will we get after loading the context?
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
We still get the correct result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
Even if the bean for class A isn't obtained by scanning, the processing tools are still applied by <context:component-scan> on all beans registered in the application context, even for A which was manually registered in the XML.
But what if we have the following XML, will we get duplicated beans because we've specified both <context:annotation-config /> and <context:component-scan>?
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
No, no duplications, We again get the expected result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@1d64c37
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
That's because both tags register the same processing tools (<context:annotation-config /> can be omitted if <context:component-scan> is specified) but Spring takes care of running them only once.
Even if you register the processing tools yourself multiple times, Spring will still make sure they do their magic only once; this XML:
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xxx" />
<bean id="aBean" class="com.yyy.A" />
<bean id="bla" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla1" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla2" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
<bean id="bla3" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
will still generate the following result:
creating bean B: com.xxx.B@157aa53
creating bean C: com.xxx.C@ec4a87
creating bean A: com.yyy.A@25d2b2
setting A.bbb with com.xxx.B@157aa53
setting A.ccc with com.xxx.C@ec4a87
OK, that about raps it up.
I hope this information along with the responses from @Tomasz Nurkiewicz and @Sean Patrick Floyd are all you need to understand how <context:annotation-config> and <context:component-scan> work.
[转载]Difference between <context:annotation-config> vs <context:component-scan>的更多相关文章
- Mingyang.net:org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException
org.springframework.context.annotation.ConflictingBeanDefinitionException: Annotation-specified bean ...
- 【原创】大叔经验分享(16)Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
今天尝试运行一个古老的工程,配置好之后编译通过,结果运行时报错: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Une ...
- spring 2.5.6 错误:Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
在运行一个第三方公司交付的项目的时候, 出现: Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Context namespace element 'annot ...
- Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser]
严重: Exception sending context initialized event to listener instance of class org.springframework.we ...
- class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
在搭建SSM项目时报了以下的错误: 06-Oct-2019 11:55:52.109 信息 [RMI TCP Connection(5)-127.0.0.1] org.apache.catalina. ...
- [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher 问题--MyEclipse设置JDK版本
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanDefinitionStoreException: Unexpected exception parsing XML doc ...
- Context namespace element 'component-scan' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.ComponentScanBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
异常信息如下: 错误: Unexpected exception parsing XML document from class path resource [spring/applicationCo ...
- Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigBeanDefinitionParser] are only available on JDK 1.5 and higher
Context namespace element 'annotation-config' and its parser class [org.springframework.context.anno ...
- Spring配置之context:annotation与、component-scan以及annotation-driven
spring boot帮助我们隐藏了大量的细节,有些配置spring boot都是开启的,因此当我们查看遗留项目使用spring时候遇见问题一定细心排查 <!-- context:annotat ...
随机推荐
- swap的应用两个数的交换
#include <stdio.h>//这儿表示的函数的输入输出头文件void swap(int x,int y);void swap_p(int *x,int *y);//表示调用一个方 ...
- Windows下安装Redis
1.首先,Redis官方是支持Linux系统的,我这里不多说,需要的可以参考:http://www.oschina.net/question/12_18065/ 2.Windows 64位下载地址:h ...
- Java Mysql连接池配置和案例分析--超时异常和处理
前言: 最近在开发服务的时候, 发现服务只要一段时间不用, 下次首次访问总是失败. 该问题影响虽不大, 但终究影响用户体验. 观察日志后发现, mysql连接因长时间空闲而被关闭, 使用时没有死链检测 ...
- c#去掉小数点后的无效0
decimal d = 0.0500m; d.ToString("0.##")就出来了 也可以这样 string.Format("{0:0.##}",d000) ...
- 享元模式/Flyweight模式/对象结构型/设计模式
flyweight 享元模式(对象结构型) Flyweight在拳击比赛中指最轻量级,即"蝇量级"或"雨量级",这里选择使用"享元模式"的意 ...
- ASP.NET使用Memcached
一.安装Memcached及Memcached配置和状态查询 要想使用Memcached做缓存首先需要安装Memcached服务,安装方法如下: memcached.exe下载 保存至相应路径 打开c ...
- requirejs的用法(二)
这个系列的第一部分和第二部分,介绍了Javascript模块原型和理论概念,今天介绍如何将它们用于实战. 我采用的是一个非常流行的库require.js. 一.为什么要用require.js? 最早的 ...
- 2016 ccpc 网络选拔赛 F. Robots
Robots Time Limit: 2000/1000 MS (Java/Others) Memory Limit: 65536/65536 K (Java/Others)Total Subm ...
- VirtualBox使用总结
解决VirtualBox安装Mac OS X El Capitan开机卡住问题 在配置完新虚拟机后关闭VirtualBox,用管理员权限启动CMD,转到VirtualBox安装目录,依次运行下列指令: ...
- spring的Scheduled(定时任务)和多线程
一.前言 在我们日常的开发中,经常用到数据同步的更新,这时我们采用的是spring的定时任务和java的多线程进行数据的更新,进行时实的服务调用. 二.实现思路 1.创建线程类 ...