正则表达式lookahead and lookbehind zero-length assertions
正则表达式非常好的网站: https://www.regular-expressions.info/lookaround.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lookahead and Lookbehind Zero-Length Assertions
Lookahead and lookbehind, collectively called "lookaround", are zero-length assertions just like the start and end of line, and start and end of word anchors explained earlier in this tutorial. The difference is that lookaround actually matches characters, but then gives up the match, returning only the result: match or no match. That is why they are called "assertions". They do not consume characters in the string, but only assert whether a match is possible or not. Lookaround allows you to create regular expressions that are impossible to create without them, or that would get very longwinded without them.
Positive and Negative Lookahead
Negative lookahead is indispensable if you want to match something not followed by something else. When explaining character classes, this tutorial explained why you cannot use a negated character class to match a q not followed by a u. Negative lookahead provides the solution: q(?!u). The negative lookahead construct is the pair of parentheses, with the opening parenthesis followed by a question mark and an exclamation point. Inside the lookahead, we have the trivial regex u.
Positive lookahead works just the same. q(?=u) matches a q that is followed by a u, without making the u part of the match. The positive lookahead construct is a pair of parentheses, with the opening parenthesis followed by a question mark and an equals sign.
You can use any regular expression inside the lookahead (but not lookbehind, as explained below). Any valid regular expression can be used inside the lookahead. If it contains capturing groups then those groups will capture as normal and backreferences to them will work normally, even outside the lookahead. (The only exception is Tcl, which treats all groups inside lookahead as non-capturing.) The lookahead itself is not a capturing group. It is not included in the count towards numbering the backreferences. If you want to store the match of the regex inside a lookahead, you have to put capturing parentheses around the regex inside the lookahead, like this: (?=(regex)). The other way around will not work, because the lookahead will already have discarded the regex match by the time the capturing group is to store its match.
Regex Engine Internals
First, let's see how the engine applies q(?!u) to the string Iraq. The first token in the regex is the literal q. As we already know, this causes the engine to traverse the string until the q in the string is matched. The position in the string is now the void after the string. The next token is the lookahead. The engine takes note that it is inside a lookahead construct now, and begins matching the regex inside the lookahead. So the next token is u. This does not match the void after the string. The engine notes that the regex inside the lookahead failed. Because the lookahead is negative, this means that the lookahead has successfully matched at the current position. At this point, the entire regex has matched, and q is returned as the match.
Let's try applying the same regex to quit. q matches q. The next token is the u inside the lookahead. The next character is the u. These match. The engine advances to the next character: i. However, it is done with the regex inside the lookahead. The engine notes success, and discards the regex match. This causes the engine to step back in the string to u.
Because the lookahead is negative, the successful match inside it causes the lookahead to fail. Since there are no other permutations of this regex, the engine has to start again at the beginning. Since q cannot match anywhere else, the engine reports failure.
Let's take one more look inside, to make sure you understand the implications of the lookahead. Let's apply q(?=u)ito quit. The lookahead is now positive and is followed by another token. Again, q matches q and u matches u. Again, the match from the lookahead must be discarded, so the engine steps back from i in the string to u. The lookahead was successful, so the engine continues with i. But i cannot match u. So this match attempt fails. All remaining attempts fail as well, because there are no more q's in the string.
Positive and Negative Lookbehind
Lookbehind has the same effect, but works backwards. It tells the regex engine to temporarily step backwards in the string, to check if the text inside the lookbehind can be matched there. (?<!a)b matches a "b" that is not preceded by an "a", using negative lookbehind. It doesn't match cab, but matches the b (and only the b) in bed or debt. (?<=a)b (positive lookbehind) matches the b (and only the b) in cab, but does not match bed or debt.
The construct for positive lookbehind is (?<=text): a pair of parentheses, with the opening parenthesis followed by a question mark, "less than" symbol, and an equals sign. Negative lookbehind is written as (?<!text), using an exclamation point instead of an equals sign.
More Regex Engine Internals
Let's apply (?<=a)b to thingamabob. The engine starts with the lookbehind and the first character in the string. In this case, the lookbehind tells the engine to step back one character, and see if a can be matched there. The engine cannot step back one character because there are no characters before the t. So the lookbehind fails, and the engine starts again at the next character, the h. (Note that a negative lookbehind would have succeeded here.) Again, the engine temporarily steps back one character to check if an "a" can be found there. It finds a t, so the positive lookbehind fails again.
The lookbehind continues to fail until the regex reaches the m in the string. The engine again steps back one character, and notices that the a can be matched there. The positive lookbehind matches. Because it is zero-length, the current position in the string remains at the m. The next token is b, which cannot match here. The next character is the second a in the string. The engine steps back, and finds out that the m does not match a.
The next character is the first b in the string. The engine steps back and finds out that a satisfies the lookbehind. bmatches b, and the entire regex has been matched successfully. It matches one character: the first b in the string.
Important Notes About Lookbehind
The good news is that you can use lookbehind anywhere in the regex, not only at the start. If you want to find a word not ending with an "s", you could use \b\w+(?<!s)\b. This is definitely not the same as \b\w+[^s]\b. When applied to John's, the former matches John and the latter matches John' (including the apostrophe). I will leave it up to you to figure out why. (Hint: \b matches between the apostrophe and the s). The latter also doesn't match single-letter words like "a" or "I". The correct regex without using lookbehind is \b\w*[^s\W]\b (star instead of plus, and \W in the character class). Personally, I find the lookbehind easier to understand. The last regex, which works correctly, has a double negation (the \W in the negated character class). Double negations tend to be confusing to humans. Not to regex engines, though. (Except perhaps for Tcl, which treats negated shorthands in negated character classes as an error.)
The bad news is that most regex flavors do not allow you to use just any regex inside a lookbehind, because they cannot apply a regular expression backwards. The regular expression engine needs to be able to figure out how many characters to step back before checking the lookbehind. When evaluating the lookbehind, the regex engine determines the length of the regex inside the lookbehind, steps back that many characters in the subject string, and then applies the regex inside the lookbehind from left to right just as it would with a normal regex.
Many regex flavors, including those used by Perl, Python, and Boost only allow fixed-length strings. You can use literal text, character escapes, Unicode escapes other than \X, and character classes. You cannot use quantifiers or backreferences. You can use alternation, but only if all alternatives have the same length. These flavors evaluate lookbehind by first stepping back through the subject string for as many characters as the lookbehind needs, and then attempting the regex inside the lookbehind from left to right.
PCRE is not fully Perl-compatible when it comes to lookbehind. While Perl requires alternatives inside lookbehind to have the same length, PCRE allows alternatives of variable length. PHP, Delphi, R, and Ruby also allow this. Each alternative still has to be fixed-length. Each alternative is treated as a separate fixed-length lookbehind.
Java takes things a step further by allowing finite repetition. You still cannot use the star or plus, but you can use the question mark and the curly braces with the max parameter specified. Java determines the minimum and maximum possible lengths of the lookbehind. The lookbehind in the regex (?<!ab{2,4}c{3,5}d)test has 5 possible lengths. It can be from 7 through 11 characters long. When Java (version 6 or later) tries to match the lookbehind, it first steps back the minimum number of characters (7 in this example) in the string and then evaluates the regex inside the lookbehind as usual, from left to right. If it fails, Java steps back one more character and tries again. If the lookbehind continues to fail, Java continues to step back until the lookbehind either matches or it has stepped back the maximum number of characters (11 in this example). This repeated stepping back through the subject string kills performance when the number of possible lengths of the lookbehind grows. Keep this in mind. Don't choose an arbitrarily large maximum number of repetitions to work around the lack of infinite quantifiers inside lookbehind. Java 4 and 5 have bugs that cause lookbehind with alternation or variable quantifiers to fail when it should succeed in some situations. These bugs were fixed in Java 6.
The only regex engines that allow you to use a full regular expression inside lookbehind, including infinite repetition and backreferences, are the JGsoft engine and the .NET framework RegEx classes. These regex engines really apply the regex inside the lookbehind backwards, going through the regex inside the lookbehind and through the subject string from right to left. They only need to evaluate the lookbehind once, regardless of how many different possible lengths it has.
Finally, flavors like JavaScript, std::regex, and Tcl do not support lookbehind at all, even though they do support lookahead.
Lookaround Is Atomic
The fact that lookaround is zero-length automatically makes it atomic. As soon as the lookaround condition is satisfied, the regex engine forgets about everything inside the lookaround. It will not backtrack inside the lookaround to try different permutations.
The only situation in which this makes any difference is when you use capturing groups inside the lookaround. Since the regex engine does not backtrack into the lookaround, it will not try different permutations of the capturing groups.
For this reason, the regex (?=(\d+))\w+\1 never matches 123x12. First the lookaround captures 123 into \1. \w+ then matches the whole string and backtracks until it matches only 1. Finally, \w+ fails since \1 cannot be matched at any position. Now, the regex engine has nothing to backtrack to, and the overall regex fails. The backtracking steps created by \d+ have been discarded. It never gets to the point where the lookahead captures only 12.
Obviously, the regex engine does try further positions in the string. If we change the subject string, the regex (?=(\d+))\w+\1 does match 56x56 in 456x56.
If you don't use capturing groups inside lookaround, then all this doesn't matter. Either the lookaround condition can be satisfied or it cannot be. In how many ways it can be satisfied is irrelevant.
Make a Donation
Did this website just save you a trip to the bookstore? Please make a donation to support this site, and you'll get a lifetime of advertisement-free access to this site! Credit cards, PayPal, and Bitcoin gladly accepted.
正则表达式lookahead and lookbehind zero-length assertions的更多相关文章
- 『BASH』——Hadex's brief analysis of "Lookahead and Lookbehind Zero-Length Assertions"
/*为节省时间,本文以汉文撰写*/ -前言- 深入学习正则表达式,可以很好的提高思维逻辑的缜密性:又因正则应用于几乎所有高级编程语言,其重要性不言而喻,是江湖人士必备的内功心法. 正则表达式概要(ob ...
- 零宽断言 -- Lookahead/Lookahead Positive/Negative
http://www.vaikan.com/regular-expression-to-match-string-not-containing-a-word/ 经常我们会遇到想找出不包含某个字符串的文 ...
- Python正则表达式使用小记
最近做Python课实验发现正则表达式和它在py中的的标准库re有很多能多琢磨一下的点,遂决定写成一篇小记,以后想复习能再来看看. 名词 因为不同文献书籍对正则表达式的描述有差别,我在这里列出一下我已 ...
- iOS 正则表达式使用(转)
1/ 教程一:认识正则表达式 .http://deerchao.net/tutorials/regex/regex.htm#mission 表7.尚未详细讨论的语法 代码/语法 说明 \a 报警字符( ...
- PCRE Perl Compatible Regular Expressions Learning
catalog . PCRE Introduction . pcre2api . pcre2jit . PCRE Programing 1. PCRE Introduction The PCRE li ...
- Java String.replaceAll() 与后向引用(backreference)
问题 昨天看到一篇博文,文中谈到一道 Java 面试题: 给定一字符串,若该字符串中间包含 "*",则删除该 "*":若该字符串首字符或尾字符为 "* ...
- 深入JS正则先行断言
这里是 Mastering Lookahead and Lookbehind 文章的简单翻译,这篇文章是在自己搜索问题的时候stackoverflow上回答问题的人推荐的,看完觉得写得很不错.这里的简 ...
- 使用js和jq去掉左右空格方法
<!DOCTYPE html><html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> <script src ...
- java split函数应该注意的问题
split函数的参数是一个String,但是这个String会被解释成一个正则表达式. 比如 "test.txt".split(".").length得到的值是 ...
随机推荐
- c#中out参数的作用
给你个简单的解释说法吧.虽然不完全对.但是我可以让你理解OUT有什么作用.呵呵 举个例子.每个方法只能有一个返回值.但是你想有多个返回值,呵呵.OUT就起作用了啊.比如分页,不光返回数据,还要返回总记 ...
- vue动态设置页面title方法
第一种方法 npm install vue-wechat-title --save 在mian.js中引入 //设置title import VueWechatTitle from 'vue-wech ...
- LeetCode887鸡蛋掉落——dp
题目 题目链接 你将获得 K 个鸡蛋,并可以使用一栋从 1 到 N 共有 N 层楼的建筑.每个蛋的功能都是一样的,如果一个蛋碎了,你就不能再把它掉下去,如果没有碎可以继续使用.你知道存在楼层 F , ...
- CAD参数绘制样条线(com接口)
在CAD设计时,需要绘制样条线,用户可以设置样条线线重及颜色等属性. 主要用到函数说明: _DMxDrawX::PathLineTo 把路径下一个点移到指定位置.详细说明如下: 参数 说明 DOUBL ...
- wpf Command 携带当前窗口
Command="{Binding GoPayCommand}" CommandParameter="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeS ...
- python note of decorator
def decorate_log(decorate_arg,*args,**kwargs): # 存放装饰器参数 def decorate_wrapper(func,*args,**kwargs): ...
- 诊断:ORA-16188: LOG_ARCHIVE_CONFIG settings inconsistent with previously started instance
11g数据库里面一个套RAC环境,之前搭建过DG,后来拆除掉.某次演练重启的时候,碰到数据库无法open的情况.日志显示 WARNING: The 'LOG_ARCHIVE_CONFIG' init. ...
- BZOJ 1565 植物大战僵尸 最大权闭合子图+网络流
题意: 植物大战僵尸,一个n*m的格子,每 个格子里有一个植物,每个植物有两个属性: (1)价值: (2)保护集合,也就是这个植物可以保护矩阵中的某些格子. 现在你是僵尸,你每次只能从(i,m) 格子 ...
- 性能测试培训day1
测试本质: 1构造测试数据和期望结果 2执行 3验证 自动化测试: 写完代码,单元测试测代码逻辑,单元测试搞清楚代码逻辑就行了(白盒测试)先静态,运行前用工具扫描BUG例如(a==11写成a=11), ...
- db2,差集
--漏报的数据 FROM A LEFT JOIN A′ ON 交集的条件 WHERE A′.xx IS NULL --多报的数据 FROM A′ LEFT JOIN A ON 交集的条件 WHERE ...