[转帖]Strong crypto defaults in RHEL 8 and deprecation of weak crypto algorithms
https://access.redhat.com/articles/3642912
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Red Hat Enterprise Linux includes several cryptographic components whose security does not remain constant over time. Algorithms such as (cryptographic) hashing and encryption typically have a lifetime after which they are considered either too risky to use or plainly insecure. That means we need to phase out those algorithms from the default settings, or completely disable them if they cannot be used securely at all. While in the past we did not disable algorithms in a consistent way (different applications utilized different policies), today we have a system-wide policy which is followed by all RHEL crypto core components. These policies allow us to consistently handle and deprecate algorithms system-wide. Decisions about policy contents are based on documents like RFC 7457 which gives a list of attacks taking advantage of legacy crypto algorithms.
The following text lists, in detail, the algorithms that are either completely removed or disabled in the different crypto policy levels in RHEL-8. For a high level description of the change see this blog post and this kbase article.
For further details, please see the crypto-policies manual page.
What policies are provided?
Four policies are provided under the names “LEGACY”, “DEFAULT”, “FUTURE” and “FIPS”. They are summarized and described in the table below.
| Policy name | Description |
|---|---|
| LEGACY | This policy ensures maximum compatibility with legacy systems; it is less secure and it includes support for TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and SSH2 protocols or later. The algorithms DSA, 3DES, and RC4 are allowed, while RSA and Diffie-Hellman parameters are accepted if larger than 1023-bits. |
| DEFAULT | The DEFAULT policy is a reasonable default policy for today's standards, aimed for a balance between usability and security. It allows the TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols, as well as IKEv2 and SSH2. The RSA and Diffie-Hellman parameters are accepted if larger than 2047-bits. |
| FUTURE | A conservative security level that is believed to withstand any near-term future attacks. The purpose of the policy is for testing infrastructure and applications for their readiness for future strengthening of requirements. The policy is not supposed to be used for general purpose systems. This level does not allow the use of SHA-1 in signature algorithms. The RSA and Diffie-Hellman parameters are accepted if larger than 3071-bits. |
| FIPS | A level that conforms to the FIPS140-2 requirements. This policy is used internally by the fips-mode-setup tool which can switch the RHEL system into FIPS140 mode. |
Removed ciphersuites and protocols
These ciphersuites and protocols are completely removed from the core crypto libraries. They are either not present at all in the sources or their support is disabled during the build so it cannot be used by applications in any way.
DES (since RHEL-7)
All export grade ciphersuites (since RHEL-7)
MD5 in signatures (since RHEL-7)
SSLv2 (since RHEL-7)
SSLv3 (since RHEL-8)
All ECC curves < 224 bits (since RHEL-6)
All binary field ECC curves (since RHEL-6)
Disabled in all policy levels
These ciphersuites and protocols are available but disabled in all crypto policy levels. They can be enabled only by explicit configuration of individual applications.
DH with parameters < 1024 bits
RSA with key size < 1024 bits
Camellia
ARIA
SEED
IDEA
Integrity only ciphersuites
TLS Ciphersuites using SHA-384 HMAC
AES-CCM8
all ECC curves incompatible with TLS 1.3, including secp256k1
IKEv1 (since RHEL-8)
Disabled in DEFAULT policy, but enabled in LEGACY policy
These ciphersuites and protocols are disabled in the DEFAULT crypto policy level. They can be enabled by switching the system crypto policy level to LEGACY.
3DES
RC4
DH with parameters < 2048 bits
RSA with key size < 2048 bits
DSA (all key sizes)
TLSv1.0
TLSv1.1
Disabled in the FIPS policy in addition to the DEFAULT policy
The FIPS policy allows only FIPS approved or allowed algorithms. It must be used when the system is required to be FIPS compliant. It is automatically selected when enabling the system FIPS mode.
SHA1 in digital signatures
RSA key exchange
X25519, X448, Ed25519 and Ed448
Chacha20-Poly1305
Disabled in the FUTURE policy, but enabled in the DEFAULT policy
The FUTURE policy provides additional hardening of the system. It is a conservative security level that is believed to withstand any near-term future attacks. The policy is not supposed to be used for general purpose systems.
CBC mode ciphersuites in TLS
Symmetric ciphers with smaller keys than 256 bits
SHA-1 and SHA-224 signatures in certificates
DH with parameters < 3072 bits
RSA with key size < 3072 bits
Please note that most of the current WWW site certificates use just 2048 bits RSA keys so it will not be possible to connect to most of the public WWW sites with this policy.
Remediation of most common issues missing algorithms and protocol support
Switching to the LEGACY policy can be done by issuing the command
update-crypto-policies --set LEGACYfrom the root account.DH with small parameters - either switch to the LEGACY policy, or fix the TLS server to provide at least 2048 bit DH parameters, or use ECDH.
SSLv3 - fix the TLS server to provide TLSv1.2 protocol (or at least TLSv1.0 protocol and switch to the LEGACY policy).
3DES, RC4 - either switch to the LEGACY policy or fix the TLS server to provide AES based ciphersuites.
RSA with small keys, DSA - either switch to the LEGACY policy or generate new keys (with at least 2048 bits but preferably more) and certificates for the TLS server.
TLSv1.0, 1.1 - either switch to the LEGACY policy or update the TLS server to provide TLSv1.2 protocol support.
SHA1 in signatures in FIPS mode - regenerate the certificates to use SHA256 based signatures.
Camellia, SEED, or ARIA - if the application configuration allows for modification of the ciphersuite configuration string, follow the documentation of the application to add these ciphersuites to the configuration string. Or remove the symlink to crypto policy configuration of the appropriate crypto library in /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends and replace it with configuration that will include the needed ciphersuite. Note that any modification described above, is unsupported by Red Hat. In the future we intend to provide a method create and use custom policies.
IKEv1 - To opt out from the policy, comment the line including /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/libreswan.config from /etc/ipsec.conf and add ikev2=never to the libreswan connection configuration.
[转帖]Strong crypto defaults in RHEL 8 and deprecation of weak crypto algorithms的更多相关文章
- Python 明明安装了Crypto模,但报错No module named “Crypto“
安装网上的解决方法卸载:pip uninstall cryptopip uninstall pycryptodomepip uninstall pycrypto重装:pip install Crypt ...
- ARC - strong和weak指针
ARC指南1 - strong和weak指针 提示:本文中所说的"实例变量"即是"成员变量","局部变量"即是"本地变量&qu ...
- 【iOS atomic、nonatomic、assign、copy、retain、weak、strong】的定义和区别详解
一.atomic与nonatomic 1.相同点 都是为对象添加get和set方法 2.不同点 atomic为get方法加了一把安全锁(及原子锁),使得方法get线程安全,执行效率慢 nonatomi ...
- iOS中assign,copy,retain之间的区别以及weak和strong的区别(面试)
• copy: 用于希望保持一份传入值的拷贝,而不是值自身的情况,即把原来的对象完整的赋值到另外一地方,重新加载一内存区,一个地方变了不影响另一个地方的对象. • assign: 简单的直接赋值,相 ...
- Node.js Crypto 加密算法库
Crypto库是随Nodejs内核一起打包发布的,主要提供了加密.解密.签名.验证等功能.Crypto利用OpenSSL库来实现它的加密技术,它提供OpenSSL中的一系列哈希方法,包括hmac.ci ...
- iOS 之 Strong与Weak,_unsafe _unretained与weak区别
1. 在ARC中 strong(强引用) 相当于retain, weak(弱引用) 相当于assign.ARC下,strong告诉编译器自动插入retain.但是在ARC下,代理协议的属性依然用ass ...
- 以太坊的crypto模块--以太坊源码学习
以太坊的crypto模块 该模块分为两个部分一个是实现sha3,一个是实现secp256k1(这也是比特币中使用的签名算法). 需要说明的是secp256k1有两种实现方式,一种是依赖libsecp2 ...
- Unable to execute 'doFinal' with cipher instance [javax.crypto.Cipher@4e025e0a]
org.apache.shiro.crypto.CryptoException: Unable to execute 'doFinal' with cipher instance [javax.cry ...
- No module named "Crypto",如何安装Python三方模块Crypto
前两天公司公司老总让我研究怎么用企业微信第三方应用进行官网对接,完成URL回调验证问题. 具体如何进行Python 的Django网站与企业微信第三方应用进行回调验证的博客地址为:https://ww ...
- [dev][dpdk][crypto] dpdk加解密设备与IPSEC
概述 分三部分,加解密框架(crypto framework),加解密设备(crypto dev),安全协议(Security Framework) × API,设计思路等,都在加解密框架里:见文档 ...
随机推荐
- .NET MAUI (微软 .Net 6 跨多平台应用 UI)框架的研究学习
针对 .NET MAUI (微软 .Net 6 跨多平台应用 UI)框架的研究学习,使用VS2022 C# 和 XAML 创建本机移动和桌面应用,开发一套代码可以发布在 Android . iOS ...
- B 树和 B+ 树及其实现
B 树 B 树和一般的二叉树有许多相似的地方,二者都是为了加快查找的速度,不同之处在于 B 树是为了解决大量的数据而产生的,更加适合读取相对大的数据块的存储系统.B 树的每个节点一般不会存储实际的数据 ...
- FreeMark模板基本知识
FreeMarker模板基础知识 1.FreeMarker与jsp.Thymeleaf并排为三大模板引擎,用于把后端数据渲染到页面上,降低耦合度.动态数据+占位符+静态页面标签构成动态页面. 2.Fr ...
- 基于AI的架构优化:创新数据集构造法提升Feature envy坏味道检测与重构准确率
本文分享自华为云社区<华为云基于AI实现架构坏味道重构取得业界突破,相应文章已被软工顶会FSE 2023收录>,作者: 华为云软件分析Lab. 基于AI技术实现架构坏味道检测与重构建议是当 ...
- Volcano 监控设计解读,一看就懂
摘要:Volcano 方便AI,大数据,基因,渲染等诸多行业通用计算框架介入,提供高性能任务调度引擎,高性能异构芯片管理,高性能任务运行管理等能力. Volcano 是一个 Kubernetes 云原 ...
- OpenHarmony移植案例:如何适配服务启动引导部件bootstrap_lite
摘要:本文介绍了startup子系统之bootstrap_lite服务启动引导部件的移植适配案例及原理. 本文分享自华为云社区<OpenHarmony移植案例与原理 - startup子系统之b ...
- 教你从零搭建Web漏洞靶场OWASP Benchmark
摘要:Owasp benchmark 旨在评估安全测试工具的能力(准确率.覆盖度.扫描速度等等),量化安全测试工具的扫描能力,从而更好得比较各个安全工具优缺点. 本文分享自华为云社区<Web漏洞 ...
- vue2升级vue3: Event Bus 替代方案
在看 https://v3-migration.vuejs.org/breaking-changes/events-api.html 在vue2里面 In 2.x, a Vue instance co ...
- App加固中的代码混淆功能,让逆向工程师很头疼
App加固中的代码混淆功能,让逆向工程师很头疼 "我想离开浪浪山." 在数次尝试破解某个App 时,某个逆向工程师无奈感慨道. 逆向工程师顾名思义就是把一个个完整的软件逆推 ...
- 漏洞评分高达9.8分!Text4Shell 会是下一个 Log4Shell吗?
在过去的几天里,Apache Commons Text 库中一个名为 Text4Shell 的新漏洞引起很大的轰动,该漏洞存在于 Apache Commons Text 1.5到1.9版本中.此警报于 ...