Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries
https://blog.step.com/2016/04/08/an-open-source-project-for-tech-salaries/
Step.com
Crowdsource your pay from NYC startups and hiring experts
Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries
Over the last month, we’ve seen a lot of compensation data provided anonymously by tech employees. We compiled and standardized some of this data to improve our understanding of what companies are paying, and we realized that we might want to share our findings.
Summary of Results
For this first pass, we focused on engineering compensation at Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft because there were more data points to work with. We standardized the engineering levels to the best of our abilities to compare compensation across companies for each level. We welcome any feedback or corrections to improve our analysis.
We found that Total Annual Compensation is the highest at Google, mostly due to their cash+stock bonus. For Levels 1 and 2, base salaries are comparable across the four companies. At Levels 3 and 4, Google and Facebook offer the highest salaries. Google’s cash+stock bonus value trumps all others, especially at more senior levels.
Median Annual Compensation Per Level

A Closer Look at the Data
Here’s the underlying data to the chart. You can also view the raw data here.
| Count | Annual Comp (Median) | Salary (Median) | Bonus (Median) | Stock Bonus (Median) | Signing Bonus (Median) | ||
| Level 1 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE1 | 33 | $ 117,500 | $95,000 | $15,000 | $20,625 | $25,000 |
| E3 | 14 | $ 154,550 | $107,000 | $10,800 | $33,750 | $75,000 | |
| T3 | 10 | $ 172,000 | $110,000 | $16,125 | $49,000 | $11,000 | |
| Microsoft | SDE1 (59 or 60) | 32 | $ 123,500 | $107,500 | $11,000 | $12,500 | $15,000 |
| Level 2 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE2 | 25 | $ 147,500 | $120,000 | $42,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| E4 | 20 | $ 183,050 | $138,500 | $33,750 | $33,750 | $25,000 | |
| T4 | 25 | $ 201,000 | $ 130,000 | $49,000 | $49,000 | $ 15,000 | |
| Microsoft | SDE2 (61 or 62) | 53 | $ 143,000 | $123,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| Level 3 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE3 | 11 | $ 180,000 | $140,000 | $0 | $38,769 | $50,000 |
| E5 | 19 | $ 249,700 | $170,000 | $62,500 | $62,500 | $50,000 | |
| E6 | 4 | $ 358,750 | $200,000 | $118,750 | $118,750 | $20,000 | |
| T5 | 12 | $ 306,500 | $ 160,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $ 30,000 | |
| T6 | 2 | $ 472,500 | $ 207,500 | $205,000 | $205,000 | $ 7,000 | |
| Microsoft | Senior SDE (63 or 64) | 7 | $ 199,000 | $143,733 | $24,000 | $24,000 | $17,500 |
| Level 4 | |||||||
| Amazon | Principal Software Engineer | 1 | $ 445,000 | $160,000 | $35,000 | $250,000 | |
| T6 | 2 | $ 472,500 | $ 207,500 | $205,000 | $205,000 | $ 7,000 | |
| Microsoft | Principal SDE (65, 66, or 67) | 1 | $ 261,000 | $179,000 | $43,000 | $43,000 |
Notes:
Google's T6 straddles Level 4 and Level 5, which is why it appears in each band
Bonuses and stock amounts were all annualized straight-line. In reality, Amazon's vesting schedule is 5%, 15%, 40%, and 40% over the 4 years, but we ignored this for comparison
Signing bonuses were not included in the Total Compensation calculation
Another way to look at this, for example, is that an SDE2 at Microsoft might make $123,000 base with $20,000 in cash and stock bonus. The equivalent level at Facebook would be an E4 making $138,500 base and about $44,500 in bonus.
We also looked at each company to see how Total Compensation changes across engineering levels. Compensation growth is highest at Google and Facebook, while Amazon has the smallest increase. Reported salary ranges for each level varied significantly. This may reflect different seniority and performance within a level, the value of the company stock when equity was awarded, or other supply and demand factors.
Total Compensation Ranges Per Level

Breaking down compensation between Salary, Equity, and Cash Bonuses, we can see that Facebook and Google offer the largest opportunity for salary and equity value growth with increasing levels.
Median Total Compensation Breakdown

Contribute to the Analysis
We pulled this data together from a few sources listed at the bottom of this post, and we’d like to build on it and make it better. We could use more data points for the four companies, particularly at the higher levels, as well as compensation data for other companies and tech roles. This would allow us to map levels and compensation across the larger companies or see how compensation for each role changes with company growth at smaller companies.
Share your compensation:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vA5fCF5OkNBzNRXRG96SoTmc1tUZjE4KIrqnwW0BZ9w/viewform
All answers will be anonymous and posted to a public sheet for anyone to view and download. We’ll also update our findings and analyses for different companies, tech roles, etc.
Step.com is a salary discovery platform that lets software engineers and product managers find out what companies think of them and how much they’d pay them. Estimates and feedback are based on hiring criteria and anonymized profile data. Step is 100% anonymous and free. For more information, check out www.step.com.

Sources
div{float:left;margin-right:10px;}
div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;}
-->
Share this:
- inShare400
Like this:
Posted in Compensation on April 8, 2016 by stepcareer. 27 Comments
Post navigation
27 comments
juancb42 says:
stepcareer says:
@juancb42, thanks for letting me know! I just updated the image so you should see it now.
rubin says:
The cell : A3:A4 is not formatted correctly and cell E3 is dependent on a formula based on cell J3 which has text!!!
Can you add in your study what is the shared revenue of the company for each of the salaries?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
@rubin thanks for pointing that out. At these 4 companies, bonuses don’t include a percentage of the company’s revenue, if that’s what you’re asking. If we do come across that for other companies, we’ll include in the bonus numbers and note it.
LikeLike
-
love the salary transparency and its potential. would love to see this research expand and develop. imagine an api for this…
stepcareer says:
@Macrina agreed! We’re working on expanding on it and keeping the data open for others to use.
LikeLike
wang zhifeng says:
level1 facebook signing bonus shoud be wrong
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Level 1 Facebook signing bonuses seem very high. We double checked the raw data, and the entries are consistently around $75K. Not sure why, but we left the data as is.
LikeLike
gg says:
most facebookers who return after internship get that 75k. people who are recruited as full timers don’t. which is why there is a skew. also, it seems like principal data for msft is very less. hope we get more data points. is this report updated automatically as we get new data points ?
LikeLike
jandan says:
It’s correct. Most of them interned at FB before, and FB gives that much signing bonus to encourage them to take their return offer.
-
Would it be possible to factor in cost of living differences between Seattle and the Bay Area? WA state doesn’t have income tax, which can make a huge difference when comparing numbers (plus the housing prices in the Bay Area…)
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Great idea. We may try to do that in one of the next updates we do to.
LikeLike
Tony D'souza says:
Your graph for Median Annual Compensation Per Level has the FB and Google labels swapped.
LikeLike
stephie says:
Does the data account for cost of living?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
No, we did not account for cost of living. We may do this for another follow-up analysis.
LikeLike
Joshua Bandy says:
Looks to me like this was produced in Tableau, and it’s a public data source, why not publish it on Tableau public to allow interaction with the data?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
It was just a google doc and some excel charts :). Haven’t had a lot of experience with Tableau, but will check it out. Thanks!
LikeLike
Mila says:
Would be nice to compare gender and ethnicity data, as I suspect the bonuses and stocks could be telling.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
We’re trying to capture gender data now. Good suggestion about the ethnicity data too.
LikeLike
jinny zhou says:
I check the data and it is full of errors. You restrict the analysis to 4 companies, 2 located in SF, and 2 located in Seattle. If I understand correctly, you only look at software engineers but exclude all other positions (like PM) from the 4 companies. I suspect the sample size for your results to be really small and thus may be severely biased. On the other hand, the location effect can not be identified (it is more expensive to live in SF than in Seattle, especially the housing price), therefore even if Google and Facebook are paying higher salaries, the actual salary gap may be quite small. Therefore the results can be quite misleading.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
You’re right in that the sample size is much smaller with just the 4 companies. We’ve indicated the count of each company/level sample size in the table in the blog and the pivot table in the google sheet. There’s not enough data yet to break it down by geography for each company, so for now, we’ve lumped it all together. As we get more data, we can get more granular.
LikeLike
Businessperson says:
It appears there are some inconsistencies in the Annual Comp calculation, some rows include signing bonus whereas others exclude it. For example cell E167 sums salary, bonus, and stock value at grant, whereas cell E133 sums salary, signing bonus, bonus, and stock value at grant.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Thanks for catching that! We’ve fixed it in the raw data and table summary in the blog.
LikeLike
Chase Roberts says:
Can you explain what E5, E6, etc is? Also level 1, level 2 etc.? Is that how long you have been with the company or something?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Here’s Quora answer by a former FTE at Facebook that describes the levels there: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-expectation-out-of-each-software-engineering-level-at-Facebook
For Level 1, Level 2, etc, these are the levels we created to standardize and compare across companies. Hope that helps!
LikeLike
crobertsbmw says:
Thank you much. Very helpful.
LikeLike
Majid Zz (@iammajidzz) says: Looks Cool. Helpful to many and inspiration to few
LikeLike
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries的更多相关文章
- Google, FaceBook, Amazon 加州求职记 (转)
http://blog.csdn.net/ithomer/article/details/8774006 http://www.myvisajobs.com 一年多前,出于显而易见的原因,下定决心肉身 ...
- 25 highest paying companies: Which tech co outranks Google, Facebook and Microsoft?
Tech companies dominate Glassdoor’s ranking of the highest paying companies in the U.S., snagging 20 ...
- 携手 Google 和 Docker 为 Microsoft Azure 带来全新的开源容器技术
发布于 2014-08-08 作者 陈 忠岳 今天对容器管理来说是个好日子.因为今天微软开放技术不止发布一项,而是两项开源计划来帮助云开发者将容器管理又向前推进一步.我们已开始与 Google ...
- 我们是如何拿下Google和Facebook Offer的?
http://posts.careerengine.us/p/57c3a1c1a09633ee7e57803c 大家好,我是小高,CMU CS Master,来Offer第一期学员,2014年初在孙老 ...
- Microsoft Loves Linux
微软新任CEO纳德拉提出的“Microsoft Loves Linux”,并且微软宣布.NET框架的开源,近期Microsoft不但宣布了Linux平台的SQL Server,还宣布了Microsof ...
- (转) The major advancements in Deep Learning in 2016
The major advancements in Deep Learning in 2016 Pablo Tue, Dec 6, 2016 in MACHINE LEARNING DEEP LEAR ...
- How to Prevent Cross-Site Scripting Attacks
How to Prevent Cross-Site Scripting Attacks Reference From: http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/ho ...
- AI佳作解读系列(三)——深度学习中的合成数据研究
Below are some investigation resources for synthetic datasets: 1. Synthetic datasets vs. real images ...
- [Mac A]为什么国外程序员爱用 Mac?
from http://www.vpsee.com/2009/06/why-programmers-love-mac/ Mac 在国外很受欢迎,尤其是在 设计/web开发/IT 人员圈子里.普通用户喜 ...
随机推荐
- idea 错误: -source 1.6 中不支持 diamond 运算符的解决办法
在取一段github代码时,发现说是支持jdk 7 ,但是使用MAVEN编译不过去. 报错信息为错误: -source 1.6 中不支持 diamond 运算符 我使用的环境是1.7 + intel ...
- 从raft论文出发
介绍 Raft是一种为了管理复制日志的一致性算法.为了提升可理解性,Raft 将一致性算法分解成了几个关键模块,例如领导人选举.日志复制和安全性.同时它通过实施一个更强的一致性来减少需要考虑的状态的数 ...
- Node.js最新Web技术栈(2016年4月)
Node.js是比较简单的,只有你有前端js基础,那就按照我的办法来吧!一周足矣,虽然这版上了es语法,但依然是可以简单写,也可以难写,参见<全栈工程师之路-Node.js>,里面讲了No ...
- BI实战派:医疗BI项目落地方案
任何BI项目面临的两大难题是项目价值和基础数据,BI项目应该给企业带来管理优化.业绩增长.医院面临的两大难题,一:绩效管理(奖金分配):二:医患关系:在医院开始自负盈亏时日常基本运营管理显得非常重要. ...
- Java List 生成 树
package com.victop.ibs; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import org.apache.commons ...
- dev控件ASPxComboBox设置ReadOnly="true"后
dev控件ASPxComboBox设置ReadOnly="true"后,在后台OnCallback事件中赋值前台不显示
- 边框圆角Css
.box{ background:grey; //灰色背景 height:50px; //高500像素 width:200px; //宽200像素 border-top-left-radius:15p ...
- Microsoft .NET Pet Shop 4: Migrating an ASP.NET 1.1 Application to 2.0
249 out of 297 rated this helpful - Rate this topic Gregory Leake Microsoft Corporation Alan Le, Ale ...
- [转] PHP读取HTTP接口如何处理超时
原文地址:https://www.jianshu.com/p/446ea7aaea86 最近在工作中遇到一个读取 HTTP 接口慢的问题(使用的是 PHP 服务器端语言),所以想谈谈服务器端读取外部资 ...
- layout_weight使用
layout_weight的真正含义是等比例分割剩余空间, 在线性布局(linearlayout)中对宽度和高度进行比例分割, 三个子linearlayout分割父linearlayout高度,代码如 ...

