Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries
https://blog.step.com/2016/04/08/an-open-source-project-for-tech-salaries/
Step.com
Crowdsource your pay from NYC startups and hiring experts
Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries
Over the last month, we’ve seen a lot of compensation data provided anonymously by tech employees. We compiled and standardized some of this data to improve our understanding of what companies are paying, and we realized that we might want to share our findings.
Summary of Results
For this first pass, we focused on engineering compensation at Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft because there were more data points to work with. We standardized the engineering levels to the best of our abilities to compare compensation across companies for each level. We welcome any feedback or corrections to improve our analysis.
We found that Total Annual Compensation is the highest at Google, mostly due to their cash+stock bonus. For Levels 1 and 2, base salaries are comparable across the four companies. At Levels 3 and 4, Google and Facebook offer the highest salaries. Google’s cash+stock bonus value trumps all others, especially at more senior levels.
Median Annual Compensation Per Level

A Closer Look at the Data
Here’s the underlying data to the chart. You can also view the raw data here.
| Count | Annual Comp (Median) | Salary (Median) | Bonus (Median) | Stock Bonus (Median) | Signing Bonus (Median) | ||
| Level 1 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE1 | 33 | $ 117,500 | $95,000 | $15,000 | $20,625 | $25,000 |
| E3 | 14 | $ 154,550 | $107,000 | $10,800 | $33,750 | $75,000 | |
| T3 | 10 | $ 172,000 | $110,000 | $16,125 | $49,000 | $11,000 | |
| Microsoft | SDE1 (59 or 60) | 32 | $ 123,500 | $107,500 | $11,000 | $12,500 | $15,000 |
| Level 2 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE2 | 25 | $ 147,500 | $120,000 | $42,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| E4 | 20 | $ 183,050 | $138,500 | $33,750 | $33,750 | $25,000 | |
| T4 | 25 | $ 201,000 | $ 130,000 | $49,000 | $49,000 | $ 15,000 | |
| Microsoft | SDE2 (61 or 62) | 53 | $ 143,000 | $123,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $20,000 |
| Level 3 | |||||||
| Amazon | SDE3 | 11 | $ 180,000 | $140,000 | $0 | $38,769 | $50,000 |
| E5 | 19 | $ 249,700 | $170,000 | $62,500 | $62,500 | $50,000 | |
| E6 | 4 | $ 358,750 | $200,000 | $118,750 | $118,750 | $20,000 | |
| T5 | 12 | $ 306,500 | $ 160,000 | $100,000 | $100,000 | $ 30,000 | |
| T6 | 2 | $ 472,500 | $ 207,500 | $205,000 | $205,000 | $ 7,000 | |
| Microsoft | Senior SDE (63 or 64) | 7 | $ 199,000 | $143,733 | $24,000 | $24,000 | $17,500 |
| Level 4 | |||||||
| Amazon | Principal Software Engineer | 1 | $ 445,000 | $160,000 | $35,000 | $250,000 | |
| T6 | 2 | $ 472,500 | $ 207,500 | $205,000 | $205,000 | $ 7,000 | |
| Microsoft | Principal SDE (65, 66, or 67) | 1 | $ 261,000 | $179,000 | $43,000 | $43,000 |
Notes:
Google's T6 straddles Level 4 and Level 5, which is why it appears in each band
Bonuses and stock amounts were all annualized straight-line. In reality, Amazon's vesting schedule is 5%, 15%, 40%, and 40% over the 4 years, but we ignored this for comparison
Signing bonuses were not included in the Total Compensation calculation
Another way to look at this, for example, is that an SDE2 at Microsoft might make $123,000 base with $20,000 in cash and stock bonus. The equivalent level at Facebook would be an E4 making $138,500 base and about $44,500 in bonus.
We also looked at each company to see how Total Compensation changes across engineering levels. Compensation growth is highest at Google and Facebook, while Amazon has the smallest increase. Reported salary ranges for each level varied significantly. This may reflect different seniority and performance within a level, the value of the company stock when equity was awarded, or other supply and demand factors.
Total Compensation Ranges Per Level

Breaking down compensation between Salary, Equity, and Cash Bonuses, we can see that Facebook and Google offer the largest opportunity for salary and equity value growth with increasing levels.
Median Total Compensation Breakdown

Contribute to the Analysis
We pulled this data together from a few sources listed at the bottom of this post, and we’d like to build on it and make it better. We could use more data points for the four companies, particularly at the higher levels, as well as compensation data for other companies and tech roles. This would allow us to map levels and compensation across the larger companies or see how compensation for each role changes with company growth at smaller companies.
Share your compensation:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1vA5fCF5OkNBzNRXRG96SoTmc1tUZjE4KIrqnwW0BZ9w/viewform
All answers will be anonymous and posted to a public sheet for anyone to view and download. We’ll also update our findings and analyses for different companies, tech roles, etc.
Step.com is a salary discovery platform that lets software engineers and product managers find out what companies think of them and how much they’d pay them. Estimates and feedback are based on hiring criteria and anonymized profile data. Step is 100% anonymous and free. For more information, check out www.step.com.

Sources
div{float:left;margin-right:10px;}
div.wpmrec2x div.u > div:nth-child(3n){margin-right:0px;}
-->
Share this:
- inShare400
Like this:
Posted in Compensation on April 8, 2016 by stepcareer. 27 Comments
Post navigation
27 comments
juancb42 says:
stepcareer says:
@juancb42, thanks for letting me know! I just updated the image so you should see it now.
rubin says:
The cell : A3:A4 is not formatted correctly and cell E3 is dependent on a formula based on cell J3 which has text!!!
Can you add in your study what is the shared revenue of the company for each of the salaries?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
@rubin thanks for pointing that out. At these 4 companies, bonuses don’t include a percentage of the company’s revenue, if that’s what you’re asking. If we do come across that for other companies, we’ll include in the bonus numbers and note it.
LikeLike
-
love the salary transparency and its potential. would love to see this research expand and develop. imagine an api for this…
stepcareer says:
@Macrina agreed! We’re working on expanding on it and keeping the data open for others to use.
LikeLike
wang zhifeng says:
level1 facebook signing bonus shoud be wrong
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Level 1 Facebook signing bonuses seem very high. We double checked the raw data, and the entries are consistently around $75K. Not sure why, but we left the data as is.
LikeLike
gg says:
most facebookers who return after internship get that 75k. people who are recruited as full timers don’t. which is why there is a skew. also, it seems like principal data for msft is very less. hope we get more data points. is this report updated automatically as we get new data points ?
LikeLike
jandan says:
It’s correct. Most of them interned at FB before, and FB gives that much signing bonus to encourage them to take their return offer.
-
Would it be possible to factor in cost of living differences between Seattle and the Bay Area? WA state doesn’t have income tax, which can make a huge difference when comparing numbers (plus the housing prices in the Bay Area…)
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Great idea. We may try to do that in one of the next updates we do to.
LikeLike
Tony D'souza says:
Your graph for Median Annual Compensation Per Level has the FB and Google labels swapped.
LikeLike
stephie says:
Does the data account for cost of living?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
No, we did not account for cost of living. We may do this for another follow-up analysis.
LikeLike
Joshua Bandy says:
Looks to me like this was produced in Tableau, and it’s a public data source, why not publish it on Tableau public to allow interaction with the data?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
It was just a google doc and some excel charts :). Haven’t had a lot of experience with Tableau, but will check it out. Thanks!
LikeLike
Mila says:
Would be nice to compare gender and ethnicity data, as I suspect the bonuses and stocks could be telling.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
We’re trying to capture gender data now. Good suggestion about the ethnicity data too.
LikeLike
jinny zhou says:
I check the data and it is full of errors. You restrict the analysis to 4 companies, 2 located in SF, and 2 located in Seattle. If I understand correctly, you only look at software engineers but exclude all other positions (like PM) from the 4 companies. I suspect the sample size for your results to be really small and thus may be severely biased. On the other hand, the location effect can not be identified (it is more expensive to live in SF than in Seattle, especially the housing price), therefore even if Google and Facebook are paying higher salaries, the actual salary gap may be quite small. Therefore the results can be quite misleading.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
You’re right in that the sample size is much smaller with just the 4 companies. We’ve indicated the count of each company/level sample size in the table in the blog and the pivot table in the google sheet. There’s not enough data yet to break it down by geography for each company, so for now, we’ve lumped it all together. As we get more data, we can get more granular.
LikeLike
Businessperson says:
It appears there are some inconsistencies in the Annual Comp calculation, some rows include signing bonus whereas others exclude it. For example cell E167 sums salary, bonus, and stock value at grant, whereas cell E133 sums salary, signing bonus, bonus, and stock value at grant.
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Thanks for catching that! We’ve fixed it in the raw data and table summary in the blog.
LikeLike
Chase Roberts says:
Can you explain what E5, E6, etc is? Also level 1, level 2 etc.? Is that how long you have been with the company or something?
LikeLike
stepcareer says:
Here’s Quora answer by a former FTE at Facebook that describes the levels there: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-expectation-out-of-each-software-engineering-level-at-Facebook
For Level 1, Level 2, etc, these are the levels we created to standardize and compare across companies. Hope that helps!
LikeLike
crobertsbmw says:
Thank you much. Very helpful.
LikeLike
Majid Zz (@iammajidzz) says: Looks Cool. Helpful to many and inspiration to few
LikeLike
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft Salaries的更多相关文章
- Google, FaceBook, Amazon 加州求职记 (转)
http://blog.csdn.net/ithomer/article/details/8774006 http://www.myvisajobs.com 一年多前,出于显而易见的原因,下定决心肉身 ...
- 25 highest paying companies: Which tech co outranks Google, Facebook and Microsoft?
Tech companies dominate Glassdoor’s ranking of the highest paying companies in the U.S., snagging 20 ...
- 携手 Google 和 Docker 为 Microsoft Azure 带来全新的开源容器技术
发布于 2014-08-08 作者 陈 忠岳 今天对容器管理来说是个好日子.因为今天微软开放技术不止发布一项,而是两项开源计划来帮助云开发者将容器管理又向前推进一步.我们已开始与 Google ...
- 我们是如何拿下Google和Facebook Offer的?
http://posts.careerengine.us/p/57c3a1c1a09633ee7e57803c 大家好,我是小高,CMU CS Master,来Offer第一期学员,2014年初在孙老 ...
- Microsoft Loves Linux
微软新任CEO纳德拉提出的“Microsoft Loves Linux”,并且微软宣布.NET框架的开源,近期Microsoft不但宣布了Linux平台的SQL Server,还宣布了Microsof ...
- (转) The major advancements in Deep Learning in 2016
The major advancements in Deep Learning in 2016 Pablo Tue, Dec 6, 2016 in MACHINE LEARNING DEEP LEAR ...
- How to Prevent Cross-Site Scripting Attacks
How to Prevent Cross-Site Scripting Attacks Reference From: http://resources.infosecinstitute.com/ho ...
- AI佳作解读系列(三)——深度学习中的合成数据研究
Below are some investigation resources for synthetic datasets: 1. Synthetic datasets vs. real images ...
- [Mac A]为什么国外程序员爱用 Mac?
from http://www.vpsee.com/2009/06/why-programmers-love-mac/ Mac 在国外很受欢迎,尤其是在 设计/web开发/IT 人员圈子里.普通用户喜 ...
随机推荐
- Dock的生态开源技术(Etcd&Machine&Compose&Swarm&Mesos&Kubernetes)
Etcd CoreOS公司开源的高可用分布式键值数据库Etcd,该项目已经被广泛应用到分布式系统的一致性实现和服务发现中,基于Go语言实现. Etcd就是专门为集群环境设计,可以很好地实现数据一致性, ...
- PHP在使用正则表达式验证,防注入的时候要注意一下的细节
如下:这是一个防止用户输入的数据中包含SQL的一些关键字的正则表达式 之前一直认为这写的很正确,没多大的问题,而且自己测试也没问题, 因为关键字包含 And,而如果用户输入andy的时候呢,汗,所以还 ...
- mysql空间扩展 VS PostGIS
http://www.cnblogs.com/LBSer/p/3629149.html 功能 Mysql spatial extension PostGIS 空间索引 仅MyISAM支持R树索引,I ...
- in运算符
//in运算符(用来判断一个属性是否在对象里面)var obj={"username":"hh"};console.log("username&quo ...
- 通过wireshark抓包来讲解HTTP中Connection: keep-alive头部的作用
今天周末时间,有空给大家讲解一个小知识点,即HTTP的keep-alive头部.我使用wireshark来抓取网络包来在实战中讲解.希望能让大家更容易.更直观的理解! HTTP中keep-alive头 ...
- COM线程模型的行为
原文:https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ms809971.aspx Behavior of the COM Threading Models COM线程模型的行为 ...
- Java利用反射取得类的所有信息
Java中可以利用反射获取类的名称.构造函数.属性.方法.也就是说可以通过反射可以取得类的所有信息(不管该成员是否封装为private). 如有下面的Dept类定义: package org.lyk. ...
- 【原】使用Maven完成自动化打包并部署到Linux服务器下(Tomcat7)
最近在使用maven,顺便尝试了下tomcat部署.网上找到了很多资料但是都不是最新的,所以贴上比较新的Tomcat7部署代码和配置,方便以后回顾-->测试OK. 1. 首先是配置Tomcat ...
- 解决:java 读取 resources 下面的 json 文件
前言:java 读取 工程下的配置文件,文件类型为 json(*.json),记录一下始终读取不到 json 文件的坑.maven项目 直接上工具类代码 package com.yule.compon ...
- python多线程之threading模块
threading模块中的对象 其中除了Thread对象以外,还有许多跟同步相关的对象 threading模块支持守护线程的机制 Thread对象 直接调用法 import threading imp ...

