利用no_merge优化
SQL> select a.unit3_code 机构编码,
2 a.unit3_name 机构名称,
3 a.dept1_code 部门编码,
4 a.dept1_name 部门名称,
5 a.mgr_code 客户经理编码,
6 a.mgr_name 客户经理名称,
7 b.base 基数
8 from s_pm_mgr_dept_rela a,
9 (select t2.mgr_code, sum(T1.avg * t2.share_rate / 100) / 10000 base
10 from (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1,
27 (select t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
28 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
29 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
30 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
31 bap_cm_account t1,
32 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
33 bap_nctobapdept t4
34 where 1 = 1
35 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
36 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
37 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
38 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
39 '',
40 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
41 'M'),
42 t1.seal_date(+)),
43 '-') > '20121217'
44 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
45 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
46 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
47 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
48 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
49 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
50 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
51 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2
52 Where t1.acct_no_pk = t2.acct_no_pk
53 group by t2.mgr_code) b
54 where a.mgr_code = b.mgr_code
55 and a.dept1_code <> '999999999'
56 and a.dept1_code = '18605'
57 and a.unit3_code = '18601'
58 and 1 = 1
59 and a.mgr_code IN ('00798', '00817')
60 order by 1, 3, 5
61 ; Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1749794338 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 288 | 11414 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 288 | 11414 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 1 | 288 | 11413 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
|* 3 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 258 | 11408 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 207 | 11407 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 139 | 11402 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 7 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1 | 98 | 11398 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 8 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | | |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA | 1 | 63 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MGR_DEPT_RELA_IDX5 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 11 | BUFFER SORT | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 12 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 13 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 14 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
| 16 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ACCT_DTL_IDX1 | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 22 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("T2"."PK_DEPT"="T4"."PK_NCTOBAPDEPT"(+))
3 - filter("A"."MGR_CODE"=NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx')) AND
(NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00798' OR
NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00817'))
9 - filter("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999')
10 - access("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
15 - filter("ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",1,1)='1' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",4,1)='1' AND
"T1"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999' AND TO_NUMBER("T1"."CUR_CODE")=1)
17 - filter("T3"."ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT')
18 - access("T3"."DATA_DATE"=20121217 AND "T1"."ACCT_NO_PK"="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
19 - filter(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+),'','N',"T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+))='N' AND
REPLACE("T1"."EFFECT_DATE"(+),'-')<='20121217' AND DECODE(TO_CHAR("T1"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T1"."DR"(+))=0 AND
REPLACE(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+),'',"PKG_UF_BANK"."FN_GETNEXTDAY"('20121217','M'),"T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+)),'-')>'20121217
')
20 - access("T1"."ACCOUNT"(+)="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
21 - filter(DECODE(TO_CHAR("T2"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T2"."DR"(+))=0)
22 - access("T1"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"="T2"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"(+))
23 - filter("T4"."DEPTCODE"(+)<>'999999999') Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
214 recursive calls
0 db block gets
11912102 consistent gets
122578 physical reads
13516 redo size
1064 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1625 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
2 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed
select count(*) from S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA A where ("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
and ("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999');
---返回2条记录 (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1 (select t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
28 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
29 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
30 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
31 bap_cm_account t1,
32 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
33 bap_nctobapdept t4
34 where 1 = 1
35 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
36 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
37 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
38 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
39 '',
40 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
41 'M'),
42 t1.seal_date(+)),
43 '-') > '20121217'
44 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
45 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
46 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
47 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
48 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
49 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
50 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
51 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2 | 12 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 13 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 14 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
| 16 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY |
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 1 | 41 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | ACCT_DTL_IDX1 | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 352 | 352 |
|* 19 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 2 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 22 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PK_BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 可以看到t1视图没有展开,但是t2视图确被展开了,尝试让t2视图不展开 SQL> select a.unit3_code 机构编码,
2 a.unit3_name 机构名称,
3 a.dept1_code 部门编码,
4 a.dept1_name 部门名称,
5 a.mgr_code 客户经理编码,
6 a.mgr_name 客户经理名称,
7 b.base 基数
8 from s_pm_mgr_dept_rela a,
9 (select /*+ no_merge(t2)*/ t2.mgr_code, sum(T1.avg * t2.share_rate / 100) / 10000 base
10 from (select acct_no_pk,
11 (SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20121217', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) -
12 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE, '20120101', T1.Y_ADD_AF, 0)) +
13 SUM(DECODE(T1.DATA_DATE,
14 '20120101',
15 T1.ADJUST_AMT_AF,
16 0))) /
17 PKG_UF_BANK.FN_GETDAYS('20120101', '20121217') AVG
18 from t_pm_acct_dtl_af t1
19 where 1 = 1
20 and t1.data_date in ('20120101', '20121217')
21 and acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT'
22 and t1.cur_code = 1
23 and substr(flag, 1, 1) = '1'
24 and substr(flag, 4, 1) = '1'
25 and t1.dept1_code <> '999999999'
26 group by acct_no_pk) t1,
27 (select
28 t3.acct_no_pk as acct_no_pk,
29 NVL(t2.cm_code, nvl(T3.MGR_CODE, 'xxxxxx')) as mgr_code,
30 decode(T1.SHARE_RATE, '', 100, T1.SHARE_RATE) as share_rate
31 from t_pm_acct_dtl t3,
32 bap_cm_account t1,
33 bap_cm_psndoc t2,
34 bap_nctobapdept t4
35 where 1 = 1
36 and t1.account(+) = t3.acct_no_pk
37 and decode(t1.seal_flag(+), '', 'N', t1.seal_flag(+)) = 'N'
38 and replace(t1.effect_date(+), '-') <= '20121217'
39 and replace(decode(t1.seal_date(+),
40 '',
41 pkg_uf_bank.FN_GETNEXTDAY('20121217',
42 'M'),
43 t1.seal_date(+)),
44 '-') > '20121217'
45 and decode(t1.dr(+), '', 0, t1.dr(+)) = 0
46 and t1.pk_cm_psndoc = t2
47 .pk_cm_psndoc(+)
48 and decode(t2.dr(+), '', 0, t2.dr(+)) = 0
49 and t2.pk_dept = t4.pk_nctobapdept(+)
50 and t4.deptcode(+) <> '999999999'
51 and t3.data_date = '20121217'
52 and t3.acct_flag = 'DEPOSIT') t2
53 Where t1.acct_no_pk = t2.acct_no_pk
54 group by t2.mgr_code) b
55 where a.mgr_code = b.mgr_code
56 and a.dept1_code <> '999999999'
57 and a.dept1_code = '18605'
58 and a.unit3_code = '18601'
59 and 1 = 1
60 and a.mgr_code IN ('00798', '00817')
61 order by 1, 3, 5
62 ; Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 74438866 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 150 | 19483 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 150 | 19483 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 150 | 19482 (14)| 00:00:57 | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 115 | 8086 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
| 4 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | | | | | |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_PM_MGR_DEPT_RELA | 1 | 63 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 6 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MGR_DEPT_RELA_IDX5 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 7 | VIEW | | 12519 | 635K| 8082 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 8 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 12519 | 2322K| 8082 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_NCTOBAPDEPT | 609 | 18270 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 10 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
|* 11 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 12519 | 1956K| 8077 (13)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_CM_PSNDOC | 84 | 4284 | 33 (10)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 13 | HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER | | 629K| 65M| 8021 (12)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | BAP_CM_ACCOUNT | 1 | 68 | 5627 (12)| 00:00:17 | | |
| 15 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE | | 629K| 24M| 2370 (13)| 00:00:07 | KEY | KEY |
|* 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL | 629K| 24M| 2370 (13)| 00:00:07 | 352 | 352 |
| 17 | VIEW | | 93 | 3255 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 18 | HASH GROUP BY | | 93 | 5487 | 11396 (15)| 00:00:33 | | |
| 19 | PARTITION LIST INLIST | | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T_PM_ACCT_DTL_AF | 93 | 5487 | 11395 (15)| 00:00:33 |KEY(I) |KEY(I) |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("T1"."ACCT_NO_PK"="T2"."ACCT_NO_PK")
3 - access("A"."MGR_CODE"="T2"."MGR_CODE")
5 - filter("A"."DEPT1_CODE"='18605' AND "A"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999')
6 - access("A"."UNIT3_CODE"='18601' AND ("A"."MGR_CODE"='00798' OR "A"."MGR_CODE"='00817'))
8 - access("T2"."PK_DEPT"="T4"."PK_NCTOBAPDEPT"(+))
9 - filter("T4"."DEPTCODE"(+)<>'999999999')
10 - filter(NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00798' OR
NVL("T2"."CM_CODE",NVL("T3"."MGR_CODE",'xxxxxx'))='00817')
11 - access("T1"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"="T2"."PK_CM_PSNDOC"(+))
12 - filter(DECODE(TO_CHAR("T2"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T2"."DR"(+))=0)
13 - access("T1"."ACCOUNT"(+)="T3"."ACCT_NO_PK")
14 - filter(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+),'','N',"T1"."SEAL_FLAG"(+))='N' AND
REPLACE("T1"."EFFECT_DATE"(+),'-')<='20121217' AND DECODE(TO_CHAR("T1"."DR"(+)),'',0,"T1"."DR"(+))=0 AND
REPLACE(DECODE("T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+),'',"PKG_UF_BANK"."FN_GETNEXTDAY"('20121217','M'),"T1"."SEAL_DATE"(+)),'-')>
'20121217')
16 - filter("T3"."ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT')
20 - filter("ACCT_FLAG"='DEPOSIT' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",1,1)='1' AND SUBSTR("FLAG",4,1)='1' AND
"T1"."DEPT1_CODE"<>'999999999' AND TO_NUMBER("T1"."CUR_CODE")=1) Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
154 recursive calls
0 db block gets
193327 consistent gets
13545 physical reads
692 redo size
1064 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1649 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
2 rows processed
利用no_merge优化的更多相关文章
- Android中利用ViewHolder优化自定义Adapter的典型写法
利用ViewHolder优化自定义Adapter的典型写法 最近写Adapter写得多了,慢慢就熟悉了. 用ViewHolder,主要是进行一些性能优化,减少一些不必要的重复操作.(WXD同学教我的. ...
- 利用Gulp优化部署Web项目[长文慎入]
Gulp Gulp是一款项目自动化的构建工具,与Grunt一样可以通过创建任务(Task)来帮助我们自动完成一些工作流的内容.当然,今天我们的内容并不是讨论这二者的区别,仅仅是介绍介绍如何利用Gulp ...
- 【转】利用TCMalloc优化Nginx的性能
From: http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2013-04/83197.html TCMalloc的全称是 Thread-Caching Malloc,是谷歌开发的开源工具 ...
- 利用Select2优化@Html.ListBoxFor显示，学会用MultiSelectList
最近需要用到多选框,Asp.Net MVC自带的@Html.ListBox或@Html.ListBoxFor的显示效果太差,于是找到了Select2进行优化,并正式了解了多选框的操作方法. 首先介绍多 ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语句
MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执行联结操作时匹配其它表的数据行的搜索速度. MySQL也能利用索引来快速地执行ORDER BY和GROUP BY语句的排序和分组操作. 通 ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语句 【转载】
本文转载自:http://blog.csdn.net/ryb7899/article/details/5580624 .感谢相关作者. MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执 ...
- shellcode在栈溢出中的利用与优化
0x00 前言 在<Windows Shellcode学习笔记——shellcode的提取与测试>中介绍了如何对shellcode作初步优化,动态获取Windows API地址并调用,并通 ...
- 利用jsPerf优化Web应用的性能
在前端开发的过程中,掌握好浏览器的特性进行有针对性的性能调优是一项基本工作,jsperf.com是一个用来发布基于HTML的针对性能比较的测试用例的网站,你可以在jsPerf上在线填写和运行测试用例, ...
- MySQL如何利用索引优化ORDER BY排序语
MySQL索引通常是被用于提高WHERE条件的数据行匹配或者执行联结操作时匹配其它表的数据行的搜索速度. MySQL也能利用索引来快速地执行ORDER BY和GROUP BY语句的排序和分组操作. 通 ...
随机推荐
- ajax大数据排队导出+进度条
描述 :我们现在有很多数据,分表存放,现在需要有精度条的导出.最后面有完整源码. 效果图:
- windows 8 解决端口(COM和LPT)问题：Prolific USB-to-Serial Comm Port(COM4)驱动异常的问题
本来都正常的,一段时间后就不能用了,网上搜索了一圈,现记录下来,供大家参考 操作系统是win8 64位的 参考网址(http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_92942dba010 ...
- linux下实现tomcat定时自动重启
tomcat自带的脚本中没有提供直接restart的模式,但是有start和shutdown两种模式.要实现restart模式,实际上只需要判断是否已经启动tomcat,若已经启动则限制性shutdo ...
- html响应式布局，css响应式布局，响应式布局入门
html响应式布局,css响应式布局,响应式布局入门 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>& ...
- tp集成支付宝担保支付
现在的网站功能越来越全乎了,很多网站都需要做支付功能,而且很多大平台都提供了各式各样的api来扩充自己的用户和开发者.话说,这种使用大平台的api来做支付,无论是从成本上还是从开发效率上都是很好的选择 ...
- 前台 添加引用 iis文件路径
1. <script src="../../../_layouts/15/JS/jquery-1.7.2.js"></script> 在前台添加的引用与II ...
- asp IIS部署An error occurred on the server when processing the URL错误提示解决
An error occurred on the server when processing the URL. Please contact the system administrator.If ...
- 动态库DLL加载方式-静态加载和动态加载
静态加载: 如果你有a.dll和a.lib,两个文件都有的话可以用静态加载的方式: message函数的声明你应该知道吧,把它的声明和下面的语句写到一个头文件中 #pragma comment(lib ...
- PHP 学习笔记 （二）
PHP中的错误级别: PHP中的报错有3中级别: NOTICE.WARNING.ERROR. NOTICE是级别最轻的一种,一般表示代码不规范,但是程序是可以正常运行的 Warning是比NOTICE ...
- X-Plane飞行模拟资源整理一
计划开一个博客整理一下飞行仿真软件二次开发的相关内容 预计将陆续介绍X-Plane.Microsoft Flight Simulator.FlightGear三个主流飞行模拟器. 此处为目录(占坑,随 ...