Teamwork

Time Limit: 2000/1000 MS (Java/Others) Memory Limit: 65535/65535 K (Java/Others)
Total Submission(s): 497 Accepted Submission(s): 258

Problem Description
Some locations in city A has been destroyed in the fierce battle. So the government decides to send some workers to repair these locations. There are m kinds of workers that were trained for different skills. Each location need some number of some kinds of workers and has a schedule that at what time can the repair begins, and the time cost of repair. Any job cannot begin until all the workers required arrived.
For example, location 1 needs 2 workers of type 1 and 3 workers of type 2, and the beginning time and time cost is 100 minute and 90 minute correspondingly, then 5 workers that satisfy the requirement should arrive before 100 minute, start working at 100 minute and get the job done at 190 minute. Notice that two different types of workers cannot replace each other, so with 3 workers of type 1 and only 2 workers of type 2, this job cannot be done.
Workers can go from one location to another after their jobs are done. You can take the Euclidean distance between locations as the time workers need to travel between them. Each worker should be sent from a depot initially at 0 minute. Now your task is to determine the minimum number of workers needed to be sent from depot so that all the jobs can be done.

Input
There are multiple test cases, the integer on the first line T (T<25) indicates the number of test cases.
Each test case begins with two integers n (<=150), the number of location(including the depot) and m(<=5), the number of different skills.
The next line gives two integers x0, y0 indicates the coordinate of depot.
Then follows n - 1 lines begins with 4 integer numbers: xi, yi, bi(bi>0), pi(pi>0), (xi, yi) gives the coordinate of the i-th location, bi gives the beginning time and pi gives the time cost. The rest of the line gives m non-negative integers v1, v2, ..., vm, of which the i-th number indicates the the number of workers of type i needed (for all vi, 0<=vi<10, each location at least requires one worker).
All integers are less than 1000000 (106).

Output
For each test cases output one line, the minimum workers to be sent. It is guaranteed that there's always a feasible solution that all the jobs can be done.

Sample Input
2
4 1
0 0
0 1 1 1 3
1 1 3 3 4
1 0 10 1 5
4 1
0 0
0 1 1 1 3
1 1 3 3 4
1 0 3 1 5

Sample Output
5
9

一开始不会,在网上找了一下,看到有一个博客里是这么说的:

没看明白他是什么意思,为什么要把一个点分成3个点。我拿第一组示例输入画了一下图:

  1是源点,3n+1是汇点,中间的3列是拆分之后的3组点。关键看第三列的点,它的流量有两个来源,一是从源点派出,费用是1,代表这部分工人是另行派出的;二是从其他节点派出,费用是0,代表这部分工人是完成其他任务后转来的。

  顺便,从图里可以看出,确实不用分成3个点,第一列完全没必要。这道题整理了一个最小费用流的模板--->

#include<iostream>
#include<cstring>
#include<cstring>
#include<cmath>
#include<cstdio>
using namespace std;
const int Maxn = ;
int n, m, k;
int sta[Maxn], en[Maxn], ty[Maxn][];
double d[Maxn][Maxn];
struct Point {
double x, y;
} p[Maxn];
double DIS(Point a, Point b) {
return sqrt((a.x - b.x) * (a.x - b.x) + (a.y - b.y) * (a.y - b.y));
}
//ALGORITHM MINCOSTFLOW ->
#define ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN 600
#define ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXM 360000
#define ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_INF 0X7FFFFFFF
struct ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_Edge {
int v;
int val;
int cost;
int next;
} ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXM];
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN];
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge;
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN];
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN];
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN];
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_que[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXM];
bool ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN];
void ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_addedge(int u, int v, int val, int cost) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].v = v;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].val = val;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].cost = cost;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].next = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[u];
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[u] = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge++;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].v = u;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].val = ;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].cost = -cost;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge].next = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[v];
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[v] = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge++;
}
void ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_clear() {
memset(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head, -, sizeof(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head));
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_countedge = ;
}
bool ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_spfa(int s, int t) {
memset(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre, -, sizeof(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre));
memset(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis, , sizeof(ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis));
int Head, tail;
Head = tail = ;
for (int i = ; i < ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MAXN; i++) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[i] = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_INF;
}
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_que[tail++] = s;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[s] = s;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[s] = ;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis[s] = ;
while (Head != tail) {
int now = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_que[Head++];
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis[now] = ;
for (int i = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_head[now]; i != -; i = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[i].next) {
int adj = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[i].v;
if (ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[i].val > && ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[now] + ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[i].cost < ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[adj]) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[adj] = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[now] + ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[i].cost;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[adj] = now;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[adj] = i;
if (!ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis[adj]) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_vis[adj] = ;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_que[tail++] = adj;
}
}
}
}
return ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[t] != -;
}
int ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MinCostFlow(int s, int t) {
int cost = , flow = ;
while (ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_spfa(s, t)) {
int f = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_INF;
for (int i = t; i != s; i = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[i])
if (ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[i]].val < f) {
f = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[i]].val;
}
flow += f;
cost += ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_dis[t] * f;
for (int i = t; i != s; i = ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pre[i]) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[i]].val -= f;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_edge[ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_pos[i] ^ ].val += f;
}
}
return cost;
}
// <- ALGORITHM MINCOSTFLOW
void build(int type) {
int i, j;
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_clear();
for (i = ; i <= n; i++) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_addedge(, i + * n, ty[i][type], );
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_addedge(, i + n, ty[i][type], );
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_addedge(i + * n, * n + , ty[i][type], );
for (j = ; j <= n; j++) {
if (sta[i] + en[i] + d[i][j] <= sta[j]) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_addedge(i + n, j + * n, ty[i][type], );
}
}
}
}
int solve() {
int i, j, u, v;
int ans = ;
for (i = ; i <= m; i++) {
build(i);
ans += ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_MinCostFlow(, * n + );
}
return ans;
}
int main() {
int i, j, u, v, c, t;
scanf("%d", &t);
while (t--) {
ALGORITHM_MINCOSTFLOW_clear();
scanf("%d%d", &n, &m);
scanf("%lf%lf", &p[].x, &p[].y);
for (i = ; i <= n; i++) {
scanf("%lf%lf%d%d", &p[i].x, &p[i].y, &sta[i], &en[i]);
for (j = ; j <= m; j++) {
scanf("%d", &ty[i][j]);
}
}
for (i = ; i <= n; i++) {
for (j = i + ; j <= n; j++) {
d[i][j] = d[j][i] = DIS(p[i], p[j]);
}
}
printf("%d\n", solve());
}
return ;
}

Teamwork[HDU4494]的更多相关文章

  1. hdu 4494 Teamwork 最小费用最大流

    Teamwork Time Limit: 20 Sec Memory Limit: 256 MB 题目连接 http://acm.hdu.edu.cn/showproblem.php?pid=4494 ...

  2. Scrum And Teamwork

    Scrum Learning 概念 Scrum是迭代式增量软件开发过程,通常用于敏捷软件开发.Scrum包括了一系列实践和预定义角色的过程骨架.Scrum中的主要角色包括同项目经理类似的Scrum主管 ...

  3. GIT TEAMWORK

    Learn GIT TEAMWORK generalizations Congratulations, you now know enough to start collaborating on Gi ...

  4. CSUOJ 1525 Algebraic Teamwork

    Problem A Algebraic Teamwork The great pioneers of group theory and linear algebra want to cooperate ...

  5. P5124 Teamwork(DP)

    题目: P5124 [USACO18DEC]Teamwork 解析: 动态规划,设\(f[i]\)表示到第\(i\)位的最大值,我们枚举i之前的j个位置\((j<k)\),记录一下这\(j+1\ ...

  6. 2019 GDUT Rating Contest I : Problem B. Teamwork

    题面: 传送门 B. Teamwork Input file: standard input Output file: standard output Time limit: 1 second Memor ...

  7. Teamwork——Week4 团队分工和预估项目时间

    由于我们给每个组员预估的每天用在该团队项目的时间为2h左右,因此我们的时间计算也已2h为基数.下面就是我们的团队分工和预估项目时间. 任务编号 实现人员 任务详细描述 预估时间 任务0 全体组员 看学 ...

  8. Teamwork——Week 4 Daily Scrum Meeting#1 2013.10.23

    一.会议议题 1)根据确立的项目题目,进一步明确PM,DEV,TEST的工作. 2)确定团队分工和预估项目时间. 3)完成项目架构NABC模型. 4)确定第一轮开发团队分工 二.会议时间 2013年1 ...

  9. Teamwork——Week4 团队项目之NABC

    项目框架——NABC模型 一.N(Need需求) 我们组主要的用户对象是第三小组——UI小组的同学们,因此我们的用户需求就是他们的数据需求. 1)提供给UI小组整理好的数据库,和前一组讨论好数据结构. ...

随机推荐

  1. Swift - 初始化Initialization

    Ps:苹果官方文档-Initialization 自定义控件初始化中常见的几种错误(指定构造器和便利构造器)截图:   意思是:1.没有添加重写符override(重写父类方法)2.没有重写initW ...

  2. 三、jQuery--jQuery基础--jQuery基础课程--第6章 jQuery 事件与应用

    1.页面加载时触发ready()事件 ready()事件类似于onLoad()事件,但前者只要页面的DOM结构加载后便触发,而后者必须在页面全部元素加载成功才触发,ready()可以写多个,按顺序执行 ...

  3. IT人学习方法论(一):学习方向

    07年的时候曾经讲过一节Webcast,名叫<使您成为Windows专家的一些学习习惯 >.直到最近,还经常收到听众关于这一节课反馈和心得的电子邮件,可见学习方法论是大家非常关心的问题.因 ...

  4. AIX性能监控

    http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/aix/library/au-aix7memoryoptimize2/ http://www.aixchina.net/Art ...

  5. 23.备忘录模式(Memento Pattern)

    using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace ConsoleApplication6 { /// <summary> ...

  6. 理解Java中的引用传递和值传递

    关于Java传参时是引用传递还是值传递,一直是一个讨论比较多的话题,有论坛说Java中只有值传递,也有些地方说引用传递和值传递都存在,比较容易让人迷惑.关于值传递和引用传递其实需要分情况看待,今天学习 ...

  7. async/await 异步编程(转载)

    转载地址:http://www.cnblogs.com/teroy/p/4015461.html 前言 最近在学习Web Api框架的时候接触到了async/await,这个特性是.NET 4.5引入 ...

  8. Delphi 的知识体系

    第一部分   快速开发的基础 第1章   Delphi 5下的Windows编程    1 1.1   Delphi产品家族    1 1.2  Delphi是什么    3 1.2.1   可视化开 ...

  9. 使用git进行团队合作开发

    1.git 和 svn 的差异 git和svn 最大的差异在于git是分布式的管理方式而svn是集中式的管理方式.如果不习惯用代码管理工具,可能比较难理解分布式管理和集中式管理的概念.下面介绍两种工具 ...

  10. 用.NET开发通用Windows App

    (此文章同时发表在本人微信公众号"dotNET每日精华文章",欢迎右边二维码来关注.) 题记:随着Windows 10的正式发布,作为.NET开发人员应该开始或多或少了解一下通用( ...