时隔一年再读到the star
|
The Star Arthur C. Clarke It is three thousand light-years to the Vatican. Once, I believed that space could have no power over faith, just as I believed that the heavens declared the glory of God's handiwork. Now I have seen that handiwork, and my faith is sorely troubled. I stare at the crucifix that hangs on the cabin above the Mark VI Computer, and for the first time in my life I wonder if it is no more than an empty symbol. I have told no one yet, but the truth cannot be concealed. The facts are there for all to read, recorded on the countless miles of magnetic tape and thousands of photographs we are carrying back to Earth. Other scientists can interpret them as easily as I can, and I am not one who would condone that tampering with the truth which often gave my order a bad name in the olden days. The crew are already sufficiently depressed: I wonder how they will take this ultimate irony. Few them have any religious faith, yet they will not relish using this final weapon in their campaign against me—that private, good‑natured, but fundamentally serious, war which lasted all the way from Earth. It amused them to have a Jesuit as chief astrophysicist: Dr. Chandler, for instance, could never get over it (why are medical men such notorious atheists?). Sometimes he would meet me on the observation deck, where the lights are always so low that the stars shine with undiminished glory. He would come up to me in the gloom and stand staring out of the great oval port, while the heavens crawled slowly around us as the ship turned end over end with the residual spin we had never bothered to correct. "Well, Father," he would say at last, "it goes on forever and forever, and perhaps Something made it. But how you can believe that Something has a special interest in us and our miserable little world—that just beats me." Then the argument would start, while the stars and nebulae would swing around us in silent, endless arcs beyond the flawlessly clear plastic of the observation port. It was, I think, the apparent incongruity of position that caused most amusement to the crew. In vain I would point to my three papers in the Astrophysical Journal, my five in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. I would remind them that my order has long been famous for its scientific works. We may be few now, ever since the eighteenth century we have made contributions to astronomy and geophysics out of all proportion to our numbers. Will my report on the Phoenix Nebula end our thousand years of history? It will end, I fear, much more than that. I do not know who gave the nebula its name, which seems to me a very bad one. If it contains a prophecy, it is one that cannot be verified for several billion years. Even the word nebula is misleading: this is a far smaller object than those stupendous clouds of mist—the stuff of unborn stars-that are scattered throughout the length of the Milky Way. On the cosmic scale, indeed, the Phoenix Nebula is a tiny thing—a tenuous shell of gas surrounding a single star. Or what is left of a star . . . The Rubens engraving of Loyola seems to mock me as it hangs there above the spectrophotometer tracings. What would you, Father, have made of knowledge that has come into my keeping, so far from the little world that was all the universe you knew? Would your faith have risen to the challenge, as mine has failed to do? You gaze into the distance, Father, but I have traveled a distance beyond any that you could have imagined when you founded our order a thousand years ago. No other survey ship has been so from Earth: we are at the very frontiers of the explored universe. We set out to reach the Phoenix Nebula, we succeeded, and we are homeward bound with our burden of knowledge. I wish I could lift that burden from my shoulders, but I call to you in vain across the centuries and the light‑years that lie between us. On the book you are holding the words are plain to read. AD MAIOREM DEI GLORIAM, the message runs, but it is a message I can no longer believe. Would you still believe it, if you could see what we have found? We knew, of course, what the Phoenix Nebula was. Every year, in our galaxy alone, more than a hundred stars explode, blazing for a few hours or days with thousands of times their normal brilliance before they sink back into death and obscurity. Such are the ordinary novae—the commonplace disasters of the universe. I have recorded the spectrograms and light curves of dozens since I started working at the Lunar Observatory. But three or four times in every thousand years occurs something beside which even a nova pales into total insignificance. When a star becomes a supernova, it may for a little while outshine all the massed suns of the galaxy. The Chinese astronomers watched this happen in A.D. 1054, not knowing what it was they saw. Five centuries later, in 1572, a supernova blazed in Cassiopeia so brilliantly that it was visible in the daylight sky. There have been three more in the thousand years that have passed since then. Our mission was to visit the remnants of such a catastrophe, to reconstruct the events that led up to it, and, if possible, to learn its cause. We came slowly in through the concentric shells of gas that had been blasted out six thousand years before, yet were expanding still. They were immensely hot, radiating even now with a fierce violet light, but were far too tenuous to do us any damage. When the star had exploded, its outer layers had been driven upward with such speed that they had escaped completely from its gravitational field. Now they formed a hollow shell large enough to engulf a thousand solar systems, and at its center burned the tiny, fantastic object which the star had now become—a White Dwarf, smaller than the Earth, yet weighing a million times as much. The glowing gas shells were all around us, banishing the normal night of interstellar space. We were flying into the center of a cosmic bomb that had detonated millennia ago and whose incandescent fragments were still hurtling apart. The immense scale of the explosion, and the fact that the debris already covered a volume of space many billions of miles across, robbed the scene of any visible movement. It would take decades before the unaided eye could detect any motion in these tortured wisps and eddies of gas, yet the sense of turbulent expansion was overwhelming. We had checked our primary drive hours before, and were drifting slowly toward the fierce little star ahead. Once it had been a sun like our own, but it had squandered in a few hours the energy that should have kept it shining for a million years. Now it was a shrunken miser, hoarding its resources as if trying to make amends for its prodigal youth. No one seriously expected to find planets. If there had been any before the explosion, they would have been boiled into puffs of vapor, and their substance lost in the greater wreckage of the star itself. But we made the automatic search, as we always do when approaching an unknown sun, and presently we found a single small world circling the star at an immense distance. It must have been the Pluto of this vanished solar system, orbiting on the frontiers of the night. Too far from the central sun ever to have known life, its remoteness had saved it from the fate of all its lost companions. The passing fires had seared its rocks and burned away the mantle of frozen gas that must have covered it in the days before the disaster. We landed, and we found the Vault. Its builders had made sure that we should. The monolithic marker that stood above the entrance was now a fused stump, but even the first long‑range photographs told us that here was the work of intelligence. A little later we detected the continent-wide pattern of radioactivity that had been buried in the rock. Even if the pylon above the Vault had been destroyed, this would have remained, an immovable and all but eternal beacon calling to the stars. Our ship fell toward this gigantic bull's‑eye like an arrow into its target. The pylon must have been a mile high when it was built, but now it looked like a candle that had melted down into a puddle of wax. It took us a week to drill through the fused rock, since we did not have the proper tools for a task like this. We were astronomers, not archaeologists, but we could improvise. Our original purpose was forgotten: this lonely monument, reared with such labor at the greatest possible distance from the doomed sun, could have only one meaning. A civilization that knew it was about to die had made its last bid for immortality. It will take us generations to examine all the treasures that were placed in the Vault. They had plenty of time to prepare, for their sun must have given its first warnings many years before the final detonation. Everything that they wished to preserve, all the fruit of their genius, they brought here to this distant world in the days before the end, hoping that some other race would find it and that they would not be utterly forgotten. Would we have done as well, or would we have been too lost in our own misery to give thought to a future we could never see or share? If only they had had a little more time! They could travel freely enough between the planets of their own sun, but they had not yet learned to cross the interstellar gulfs, and the nearest solar system was a hundred light‑years away. Yet even had they possessed the secret of the Transfinite Drive, no more than a few millions could have been saved. Perhaps it was better thus. Even if they had not been so disturbingly human as their sculpture shows, we could not have helped admiring them and grieving for their fate. They left thousands of visual records and the machines for projecting them, together with elaborate pictorial instructions from which it will not be difficult to learn their written language. We have examined many of these records, and brought to life for the first time in six thousand years the warmth and beauty of a civilization that in many ways must have been superior to our own. Perhaps they only showed us the best, and one can hardly blame them. But their worlds were very lovely, and their cities were built with a grace that matches anything of man's. We have watched them at work and play, and listened to their musical speech sounding across the centuries. One scene is still before my eyes—a group of children on a beach of strange blue sand, playing in the waves as children play on Earth. Curious whip-like trees line the shore, and some very large animal is wading in the shallows yet attracting no attention at all. And sinking into the sea, still warm and friendly and life‑giving, is the sun that will soon turn traitor and obliterate all this innocent happiness. Perhaps if we had not been so far from home and so vulnerable to loneliness, we should not have been so deeply moved. Many of us had seen the ruins of ancient civilizations on other worlds, but they had never affected us so profoundly. This tragedy was unique. It is one thing for a race to fail and die, as nations and cultures have done on Earth. But to be destroyed so completely in the full flower of its achievement, leaving no survivors—how could that be reconciled with the mercy of God? My colleagues have asked me that, and I have given what answers I can. Perhaps you could have done better, Father Loyola, but I have found nothing in the Exercitia Spiritualia that helps me here. They were not an evil people: I do not know what gods they worshiped, if indeed they worshiped any. But I have looked back at them across the centuries and have watched while the loveliness they used their last strength to preserve was brought forth again into the light of their shrunken sun. They could have taught us much: why were they destroyed? I know the answers that my colleagues will give when they get back to Earth. They will say that the universe has no purpose and no plan, that since a hundred suns explode every year in our galaxy, at this very moment some race is dying in the depths of space. Whether that race has done good or evil during its lifetime will make no difference in the end: there is no divine justice, for there is no God. Yet, of course, what we have seen proves nothing of the sort. Anyone who argues thus is being swayed by emotion, not logic. God has no need to justify His actions to man. He who built the universe can destroy it when He chooses. It is arrogance—it is perilously near blasphemy—for us to say what He may or may not do. This I could have accepted, hard though it is to look upon whole worlds and peoples thrown into the furnace. But there comes a point when even the deepest faith must falter, and now, as I look at the calculations lying before me, I know I have reached that point at last. We could not tell, before we reached the nebula, how long ago the explosion took place. Now, from the astronomical evidence and the record in the rocks of that one surviving planet, I have been able to date it very exactly. I know in what year the light of this colossal conflagration reached our Earth. I know how brilliantly the supernova whose corpse now dwindles behind our speeding ship once shone in terrestrial skies. I know how it must have blazed low in the east before sunrise, like a beacon in that oriental dawn. There can be no reasonable doubt: the ancient mystery is solved at last. Yet, oh God, there were so many stars you could have used. What was the need to give these people to the fire, that the symbol of their passing might shine above Bethlehem? |
时隔一年再读到the star的更多相关文章
- 再读《C++ Primer》——变量和基本类型
刚上大学那时,几个室友一块买了本<C++ Primer>第4版,看了一遍后就没怎么碰了,偶尔拿出来翻翻,当作工具书使用.后来知道有第5版了,一直觉得内容差不多吧.直到最近,再读其中的一些内 ...
- 再读GFS论文
http://loopjump.com/gfs_paper_note/ 再读GFS的一些笔记.主要涉及GFS架构.Chunk大小选择的一些折中考量.元数据管理及锁.写数据流程.GFS一致性模型的理解. ...
- 再读《Java编程思想 》
前段时间在豆瓣上无意间看到一个帖子"我为什么把thinking in java 读了10遍",是11年的帖子,下面评论至今,各种声音都有,不过大多数还是佩服和支持的.我个人来讲也是 ...
- 再读Android sqlite
再读Android sqlite Android原生支持sqlite数据库操作,sqlite时轻量级关系型数据库,支持标准sql语句.Android对sqlite进行良好的接口封装来避免sql注入等安 ...
- 吃透Javascript数组操作的正确姿势—再读《Js高程》
Javascript中关于数组对象的操作方法比较多也比较杂,正好再次捡起<Javascript高级程序设计>来读,把它们一一总结梳理了一下: 方法类别 方法名称 方法描述 参数 返回值 备 ...
- 再读TCP/IP网络7层协议
随着工作的深入,每次读这7层协议,每次都有不同的理解. 分层名 分层号 ...
- 再读vue2.0
玩过一段时间后在来读读vue2.0会发现受益良多 概述: vue2.0 是一套构建用户界面的渐进式框架, 使用virtual DOM 提供了响应式和组件化, 允许使用简介的模板语法来声明式的将数据渲 ...
- 知识在与温故、总结-再读CLR
序 CLR,通用语言运行时,每个.Net 程序猿,都会第一时间接触到.记得2008年,第一次学习Jeffrey Richter的CLR Via C#,读的懵懵懂懂,大抵因为编码太少,理解的只是概念和皮 ...
- 【源码分析】HashMap源码再读-基于Java8
最近工作不是太忙,准备再读读一些源码,想来想去,还是先从JDK的源码读起吧,毕竟很久不去读了,很多东西都生疏了.当然,还是先从炙手可热的HashMap,每次读都会有一些收获.当然,JDK8对HashM ...
随机推荐
- C# 合并及拆分Word文档
本文简要分析一下如何如何使用C#简单实现合并和拆分word文档.平时我们在处理多个word文档时,可能会想要将两个文档合并为一个,或者是将某个文档的一部分添加到另一个文档中,有的时候也会想要将文档拆分 ...
- nodejs、npm、grunt——名词解释
最近着手开发一个新项目,打算从工程化的角度整理一套自己的前端开发.发布体系. grunt这些工具,之前别人用我也用,并没有认真想过它们的前世今生,正好趁着这个机会,我来理一理目前业界比较流行这些工具的 ...
- 利用Python进行数据分析(12) pandas基础: 数据合并
pandas 提供了三种主要方法可以对数据进行合并: pandas.merge()方法:数据库风格的合并: pandas.concat()方法:轴向连接,即沿着一条轴将多个对象堆叠到一起: 实例方法c ...
- 详解web容器 - Jetty与Tomcat孰强孰弱
Jetty 基本架构 Jetty目前的是一个比较被看好的 Servlet 引擎,它的架构比较简单,也是一个可扩展性和非常灵活的应用服务器.它有一个基本数据模型,这个数据模型就是 Handler(处理器 ...
- 精彩 JavaScript 代码片段
1. 根据给定的条件在原有的数组上,得到所需要的新数组. ——<JavaScript 王者归来> var a = [-1,-1,1,2,-2,-2,-3,-3,3,-3]; functio ...
- 设计模式(十二)享元模式(Flyweight Pattern)
一.引言 在软件开发过程,如果我们需要重复使用某个对象的时候,如果我们重复地使用new创建这个对象的话,这样我们在内存就需要多次地去申请内存空间了,这样可能会出现内存使用越来越多的情况,这样的问题是非 ...
- 【无私分享:ASP.NET CORE 项目实战(第二章)】添加EF上下文对象,添加接口、实现类以及无处不在的依赖注入(DI)
目录索引 [无私分享:ASP.NET CORE 项目实战]目录索引 简介 上一章,我们介绍了安装和新建控制器.视图,这一章我们来创建个数据模型,并且添加接口和实现类. 添加EF上下文对象 按照我们以前 ...
- PHP 代理模式
代理模式:为其他对象提供一种代理以控制对这个对象的访问. [代理模式中主要角色] 抽象主题角色:声明了代理主题和真实主题的公共接口,使任何需要真实主题的地方都能用代理主题代替. 代理主题角色:含有真实 ...
- 物联网框架SuperIO 2.2.9和ServerSuperIO 2.1同时更新,更适用于类似西门子s7-200发送多次数据,才能读取数据的情况
一.解决方案 二.更新内容 1.修改IRunDevice接口,把void Send(io,bytes)改成int Send(io,bytes).2.修改网络控制器,发送数据不直接使用IO实例,改为使用 ...
- QT数据库连接的几个重要函数的使用及注意事项(原创)
注:在这里数据库对象等同于数据库连接对象,也就是QSqlDatabase类的对象 QSqlDatabase QSqlDatabase::addDatabase((const QString & ...