Default arguments and virtual function

　　

　　Predict the output of following C++ program.

 1 #include <iostream>
 2 using namespace std;
 3
 4 class Base
 5 {
 6 public:
 7     virtual void fun ( int x = 0 )
 8     {
 9         cout << "Base::fun(), x = " << x << endl;
10     }
11 };
12
13 class Derived : public Base
14 {
15 public:
16     virtual void fun ( int x )
17     {
18         cout << "Derived::fun(), x = " << x << endl;
19     }
20 };
21
22
23 int main()
24 {
25     Derived d1;
26     Base *bp = &d1;
27     bp->fun();
28     return 0;
29 }

　　Output:

　　Derived::fun(), x = 0
　　　　

　　If we take a closer look at the output, we observe that fun() of derived class is called and default value of base class fun() is used.
　　Default arguments do not participate in signature of functions. So signatures of fun() in base class and derived class are considered same, hence the fun() of base class is overridden. Also, the default value is used at compile time. When compiler sees that an argument is missing in a function call, it substitutes the default value given. Therefore, in the above program, value of x is substituted at compile time, and at run time derived class’s fun() is called.

　　Now predict the output of following program.

 1 #include <iostream>
 2 using namespace std;
 3
 4 class Base
 5 {
 6 public:
 7     virtual void fun ( int x = 0)
 8     {
 9         cout << "Base::fun(), x = " << x << endl;
10     }
11 };
12
13 class Derived : public Base
14 {
15 public:
16     virtual void fun ( int x = 10 ) // NOTE THIS CHANGE
17     {
18         cout << "Derived::fun(), x = " << x << endl;
19     }
20 };
21
22
23 int main()
24 {
25     Derived d1;
26     Base *bp = &d1;
27     bp->fun();
28     return 0;
29 }

　　The output of this program is same as the previous program. The reason is same, the default value is substituted at compile time. The fun() is called on bp which is a pointer of Base type. So compiler substitutes 0 (not 10).

　　In general, it is a best practice to avoid default values in virtual functions to avoid confusion.

　　Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above.
　　

　　转载请注明：http://www.cnblogs.com/iloveyouforever/

　　2013-11-26　　20:18:49