怎么监视跟踪一个进程(Process)中的MS Unit Test DLL的详细性能(performance)【asp.net C#】
This tutorial will show how to instrument a unit test DLL for performance profiling. Visual Studio will allow you to do performance profiling on individual tests (i.e. functions) in a test suite. This can be done in the user interface (i.e. UI or IDE). However if you have a unit test DLL that contains lots of unit tests or test methods, it’s apparently not possible to do performance profiling in the IDE.
Here was my original question:
I have a MS Unit Test DLL written in C# that targets a C++/CLI managed assembly. I have roughly 60 unit tests in that unit test dll. What I would like to do is run all the unit tests under the performance profiler, in the IDE. That is using the performance explorer to run a performance session for all the unit tests in my test DLL. I know how to do this from the command line, but I feel that is a last resort. I’d like to do this in the IDE if possible. It is possible to create a performance session for one unit test in the unit test DLL. The steps are listed here: ms-help://MS.VSCC.v90/MS.MSDNQTR.v90.en/dv_vsetlt01/html/4cc514d2-47bd-4f1c-a039-5ffae7c68bf1.htm i.e. Right click over a test result, and select "Create Performance Session". Whereupon the Performance Explorer will show a new session based off of one unit test. That’s great, but I’ve got 60 unit tests in my DLL. I don’t want to have to create 60 performance sessions.
Preparation
Build the code that you will be testing. In my case it was the following DLL’s (Assuming a common root folder)
|
DLL name |
Description |
| ..\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dl | The DLL with the code I wanted to test |
| ..\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll | This DLL contains my unit tests |
Then just to play it safe, run all the unit tests (This can be done in the IDE) in UnitTest.dll. It pays to be paranoid like this since if you want to detect bugs early and swiftly.
Now the strategy for profiling an entire DLL is to:
- Instrument the DLL. This means to inject performance related commands into the code. Don’t worry it’s perfectly safe.
- Turn on performance profiling via a global command.
- Run your unit tests. Here is where the real work gets done.
- Turn off performance profiling via a global command. (A results file gets saved somewhere).
- Turn on performance profiling via a global command.
- Un-Instrument the DLL. This means restoring it to it’s original state. (i.e. Don’t ship a DLL with performance profiling enabled).
Instrument the Binaries
I instrument my DLL’s using the following batch script called: Instrument_ON.bat
- @echo off
- @echo Instrumenting Binary
- set VS90TEAMTOOLS="%VS90COMNTOOLS%..\..\Team Tools\Performance Tools\"
- %VS90TEAMTOOLS%\VSInstr.exe ..\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll
- %VS90TEAMTOOLS%\VSInstr.exe ..\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll
- pause
- @echo on
The results of instrumenting it looks like this:
Instrumenting Binary Microsoft (R) VSInstr Post-Link Instrumentation 9.0.30729 x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved.
File to Process: F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll –> F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\ManagedAPI\Win32\De bug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll Original file backed up to F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll.orig
Successfully instrumented file F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug\UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll. Warning VSP2013 : Instrumenting this image requires it to run as a 32-bit process. The CLR header flags have been updated to reflect this. Microsoft (R) VSInstr Post-Link Instrumentation 9.0.30729 x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved.
File to Process: F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll –> F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll Original file backed up to F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll.orig
Successfully instrumented file F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll. Press any key to continue . . .
Turn on Monitor
I then turn on performance profiling using the following batch script called: Performance_ON.bat
- @echo off
- @echo Turning ON performance coverage session recorder
- set VS90TEAMTOOLS="%VS90COMNTOOLS%..\..\Team Tools\Performance Tools"
- %VS90TEAMTOOLS%\VsPerfCmd /start:trace /output:ManagedAPI.vsp
- pause
- @echo on
The results of this batch scripts looks like this:
Turning ON performance coverage session recorder Microsoft (R) VSPerf Command Version 9.0.30729 x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved.
Press any key to continue . . .
The results of this script is it starts another process that will monitor any application that happens to be instrumented with performance profiling, or code coverage profiling. In our case it started a process called VsPerfMon.exe:

Run Unit Tests
I then run all the unit tests in my DLL using another batch script. Now I have two build configurations (debug and release) so I have two batch scripts to run those: Run_Tests_Debug.bat and Run_Tests_Release.bat. Here is one of them:
- @echo off
- color 16
- @echo Running Unit Tests
- call "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Team Tools\Performance Tools\VsPerfCLREnv" /traceon
- call "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat";
- mstest /testcontainer:%CD%\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll > results.txt
- pause
- @echo on
Notice there the actual call to mstest.exe is what runs the unit tests. Notice that I piped the results of running the actual unit tests into a text file (i.e. results.txt). I did this because it gives me a more permanent record of how my unit tests did.
The mstest.exe file resides on my computer at:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\Common7\IDE\MSTest.exe"
The output, to the console window, of this script on my looks like the following:
Running Unit Tests Enabling VSPerf Trace Profiling of managed applications (excluding allocation profiling).
Current Profiling Environment variables are: COR_ENABLE_PROFILING=1 COR_PROFILER={6468ec6c-94bd-40d3-bd93-4414565dafbf} COR_LINE_PROFILING=0 COR_GC_PROFILING=0 Setting environment for using Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 x86 tools. Press any key to continue . . .
Noticed I redirected the standard output (standard out) to a text file. The results.txt file looks like this:
Microsoft (R) Test Execution Command Line Tool Version 9.0.30729.1 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loading F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug\UnitTest.dll… Starting execution…
Results Top Level Tests ——- ————— Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_GetAllEntities Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_GetFileEntities Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_LookupEntity Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_LookupEntitybyReference Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_LookupEntityUnique Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_LookupFile Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_Misc Passed UnitTest.DatabaseTest.DatabaseTest_OpenClose Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassNests Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassType Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeDerivedFrom Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeEnums Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeFields Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeInheritance Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeTemplates Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestClassTypeUnions Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestGetDefinedMethods Passed UnitTest.Derived.ClassTypeTest.TestGetMethods Passed UnitTest.Derived.EnumTypeTest.EnumTest_Enumerators Passed UnitTest.Derived.EnumTypeTest.EnumTest_Type Passed UnitTest.Derived.FileEntityTest.TestFileEntity Passed UnitTest.Derived.FileEntityTest.TestFileEntity_base_h Passed UnitTest.Derived.FileEntityTest.TestFileEntity_classes_h Passed UnitTest.Derived.FileEntityTest.TestFileEntityClassTypes Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Constructor Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Inline Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Inline_B Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_LexerStuff Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_A Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_B Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_C Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_D Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_E Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Member_F Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_MemberBlank Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Overrides Passed UnitTest.Derived.MethodTypeTest.MethodTest_Pure Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Basic Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Comments Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Comments_Enums Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Comments_FunctionDeclarations Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Comments_FunctionDefinitions Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Comments_Typedefs Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_FileReference Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_LineNumbers Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_LineNumbers_FunctionDeclarations Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_LineNumbers_FunctionDefinitions Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_LineNumbers_UnresolvedMethods Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Refs Passed UnitTest.EntityTest.EntityTest_Types Passed UnitTest.KindTest.KindTest_Basic Passed UnitTest.LexerTest.Lexer_Test Passed UnitTest.LexerTest.Lexer_Test_GetLexeme Passed UnitTest.LexerTest.Lexer_Test_Next Passed UnitTest.LexerTest.Lexer_Test_Previous Passed UnitTest.LexerTest.Lexer_Test_Ref Passed UnitTest.ReferenceTest.ReferencesTest_Basic Passed UnitTest.ReferenceTest.ReferencesTest_Copying 58/58 test(s) Passed
Summary ——- Test Run Completed. Passed 58 ———- Total 58 Results file: F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\TestResults\Chris Johnson_CHRISJOHNSON-PC 2010-02-17 23_38_54.trx Run Configuration: Default Run Configuration
Feels good to see all the unit tests pass. But now I have to save out the results of the performance profiling. And to do this, I now have to turn off the VsPerfMon.exe process that is running, and was running when I ran my unit tests.
Turn off Monitor
I have a batch script that turns off monitoring and saves out a results file containing all the profiling goodness. Performance_OFF.bat
- @echo off
- @echo Turning off performance coverage session recorder
- set VS90TEAMTOOLS="%VS90COMNTOOLS%..\..\Team Tools\Performance Tools"
- %VS90TEAMTOOLS%\VSPerfCmd /shutdown
- pause
- @echo on
The results of this batch script looks like this:
Turning off performance coverage session recorder Microsoft (R) VSPerf Command Version 9.0.30729 x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved.
Shutting down the Profile Monitor ———————————————————— Press any key to continue . . .
Now a new file is saved out to my computer:
F:\CodePlex\UnderstandAPI\Managed\Performance\ManagedAPI.vsp
Notice the name: ManagedAPI.vsp. This is the same name I passed in when I turned on the Performance Monitor. Remember this?
from: Performance_ON.bat
…
VsPerfCmd /start:trace /output:ManagedAPI.vsp
Now at this point, you can do two things:
- Examine your performance results. This is done by double clicking the ManagedAPI.vsp file. This will just launch visual studio, and display the results of your tests:
- Or Uninstrument your DLL’s. It’s never a good idea to ship DLL’s with instrumentation in them.

Un-Instrument the Binaries
I have a script that does this for me: Instrument_OFF.bat
- @echo off
- @echo Removing Instrumented Files
- pushd ..\ManagedAPI\Win32\Debug
- if exist UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.instr.pdb (
- del UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.instr.pdb
- del UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll
- rename UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll.orig UnderstandWrapper.ManagedAPI.dll
- )
- popd
- pushd ..\UnitTest\bin\x86\Debug
- if exist UnitTest.instr.pdb (
- del UnitTest.instr.pdb
- del UnitTest.dll
- rename UnitTest.dll.orig UnitTest.dll
- )
- popd
- pause
- @echo on
When I run this, I get the following results in the command window:
Removing Instrumented Files Press any key to continue . . .
However, sometimes I do this only after I reviewed my performance results. Since the performance results display in visual studio may be dependent on the instrumented binaries to properly display its data.
View Results
Now that you have your .vsp file it is time to open it. The file ManagedAPI.vsp shows the following in visual studio:

From there you can analyze the results and find your performance bottlenecks.
怎么监视跟踪一个进程(Process)中的MS Unit Test DLL的详细性能(performance)【asp.net C#】的更多相关文章
- 一个进程(Process)最多可以生成多少个线程(Thread)
1.进程中创建线程的限制 默认情况下,一个线程的栈要预留1M的内存空间,而一个进程中可用的内存空间只有2G,所以理论上一个进程中最多可以开2048个线程,但是内存当然不可能完全拿来作线程的栈,所以实际 ...
- 如何在 Linux 中统计一个进程的线程数
编译自:http://ask.xmodulo.com/number-of-threads-process-linux.html作者: Dan Nanni原创:LCTT https://linux.cn ...
- java代码中获取进程process id(转)
另一方面,线程ID=进程ID+内部线程对象ID并不成立, 参考: blog.csdn.net/heyetina/article/details/6633901 如何在java代码中获取进 ...
- linux暂停一个在运行中的进程【转】
转自:https://blog.csdn.net/Tim_phper/article/details/53536621 转载于: http://www.cszhi.com/20120328/linux ...
- 如何在Linux中统计一个进程的线程数(转)
方法一: /proc proc 伪文件系统,它驻留在 /proc 目录,这是最简单的方法来查看任何活动进程的线程数. /proc 目录以可读文本文件形式输出,提供现有进程和系统硬件相关的信息如 CPU ...
- 计算机必知必会:进程process与线程thread 进程定义为一个正在运行的程序的实例
http://www.nowamagic.net/librarys/veda/detail/1741进程和线程这对概念的理解也是很难的,至今网络上可查的资料对其的理解出入都挺大,在不同的操作系统中,如 ...
- (转)如何在Linux中统计一个进程的线程数
如何在Linux中统计一个进程的线程数 原文:http://os.51cto.com/art/201509/491728.htm 我正在运行一个程序,它在运行时会派生出多个线程.我想知道程序在运行时会 ...
- C# 最基本的涉及模式(单例模式) C#种死锁:事务(进程 ID 112)与另一个进程被死锁在 锁 | 通信缓冲区 资源上,并且已被选作死锁牺牲品。请重新运行该事务,解决方案: C#关闭应用程序时如何关闭子线程 C#中 ThreadStart和ParameterizedThreadStart区别
C# 最基本的涉及模式(单例模式) //密封,保证不能继承 public sealed class Xiaohouye { //私有的构造函数,保证外部不能实例化 private ...
- 在GNU Linux中怎样得到一个进程当前的流量
/********************************************************************* * Author : Samson * Date ...
随机推荐
- < %=...%>< %#... %>< % %>< %@ %>具体意义
< %=...%>< %#... %>< % %>< %@ %>< %#... %>: 是在绑定控件DataBind()方法执行时被执行,用 ...
- Mac 切换Windows 使用虚拟机, 不推荐双系统
为什么使用虚拟机而不是双系统? 1.虚拟机可以随时在两个系统之间进行切换,便于在工作时使用而不影响效率.如果是双系统,在切换到另一个系统时需要关机重启,太过麻烦. 2.虚拟机除了运行Windows之 ...
- pl/sql programming 15 数据提取
数据提取 -- 游标 游标只是一个指向某个结果集的指针. 声明游标: cursor employee_cur IS select * from employees; 打开游标: open employ ...
- JSON 之 SuperObject(3): 访问
测试数据提前加入 Memo1 中: 代码文件: unit Unit1; interface uses Windows, Messages, SysUtils, Variants, Classes, ...
- Android uiautomator gradle build system
This will guide you through the steps to write your first uiautomator test using gradle as it build ...
- content management system
Defination of CMS: The definition of a CMS is an application (more likely web-based), that provides ...
- openerp 7 在ubuntu上设置开机启动
我们要让openerp开机运行起来. 第一步,先进入系统目录: cd /etc/init.d 第二步,创建文件.命名为openerp-server sudo vi openepr-server 第三步 ...
- UIView的clipsToBounds属性,layoutSubViews及触摸事件传递(默认情况下)总结
一.UIView的clipsToBounds属性 * 默认情况下,超出父控件尺寸范围的子控件还是可见的 * 如果设置父控件的clipsToBounds=YES,就会裁剪掉超出父控件尺寸范围内的子控件, ...
- gridview自定义表头
gridview为我们提供了丰富的接口,用于满足自定义需求. 通常asp:gridview会根据绑定的列Columns自动生成表头,展现在前台元素. 序号 类别 有时候需要复杂一些的表头. 序号 类别 ...
- 【解题报告】PKU 2826 An Easy Problem?!
原题链接:http://poj.org/problem?id=2826 一题很蛋疼的一题.目前为止还有一个问题我没搞清楚,问题注在代码中. 题目大意: 外面下雨了,农民Johnoson的bull(?? ...