领导让我帮忙支持下其他项目的SQL优化工作,呦西,是收集案例的好时机。

下面SQL都是在不能远程的情况下,按照原SQL的逻辑等价改写完成否发给现场同事验证。


案例一

慢SQL,4.32秒:

SELECT MY_.*, RM
FROM (SELECT ROWNUM RM, V_.*
FROM (SELECT *
FROM (select count(1) processidnum,
t.processid,
t.proc_name_ as procname
FROM tkdkdkdk t
WHERE 1 = 1
and (t.ASSIGNEE_ = 'server' or exists(select 1
FROM pepepep p
WHERE p.task_ = t.ID_
and (p.agent_userid_ = 'server' or
(substr(p.groupid_, 6) in
(select role_code
FROM upupupup
WHERE user_code = 'server') or
p.userid_ = 'server'))))
GROUP BY t.processid, t.proc_name_)) V_
WHERE ROWNUM <= 100000) MY_
WHERE RM >= 1;

慢SQL执行计划:


改写优化,445ms:

SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM (SELECT a.*,
rownum rn
FROM (SELECT count(1) processidnum,
t.processid,
t.proc_name_ AS procname
FROM tkdkdkdk t
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT distinct p.task_
FROM pepepep p
LEFT JOIN
(SELECT role_code
FROM upupupup
WHERE user_code = 'server'
GROUP BY role_code) tsu
ON (substr(p.groupid_, 6) = tsu.role_code)
WHERE (p.agent_userid_ = 'server'
OR (tsu.role_code is NOT null
OR p.userid_ = 'server'))) x
ON t.ID_ = x.task_
WHERE 1 = 1
AND (t.ASSIGNEE_ = 'server'
OR x.task_ is NOT NULL)
GROUP BY t.processid, t.proc_name_) a)
WHERE rownum <= 100000)
WHERE rn >= 1;

改写优化后执行计划:

 优化思路:

  1、原SQL有很多子查询,可能会导致计划走NL,改成JOIN后让CBO自动判断是否走HASH还是NL。

  2、换了个标准的分页框架。


案例二

慢SQL,2.6秒:

SELECT MY_.*, RM
FROM (SELECT ROWNUM RM, V_.*
FROM (SELECT *
FROM (select t.*, t.org_code || '-' || t.org_name as codename
FROM (select tc.*
FROM tgtgtgtg tc
start with TC.ORG_ID = '6000001'
connect by prior ORG_ID = tc.parent_id) t
WHERE org_level <= 3
ORDER BY CASE
WHEN ',' || nvl(null, 'fingard') || ',' like '%,' || ORG_ID || ',%' THEN CASE
WHEN length(nvl(org_order, '')) = '9'
then org_order || ''
else '1' || org_code end
when length(nvl(org_order, '')) = '9' then '99999999' || org_order || ''
else '999999991' || org_code end)) V_
WHERE ROWNUM <= 10) MY_;
WHERE RM >= 1;


改写优化一,3.4秒:

SELECT MY_.*, RM
FROM (SELECT ROWNUM RM, V_.*
FROM (SELECT *
FROM (select a.*, a.org_code || '-' || a.org_name as codename
FROM (WITH t(
lv,
codename,
ORG_ID,
parent_id,
org_order,
org_code,
org_name,
org_level
) AS (SELECT 1 as lv,
tc.org_code || '-' || tc.org_name AS codename,
tc.org_name,
tc.ORG_ID,
tc.parent_id,
tc.org_order,
tc.org_code,
tc.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg tc
WHERE tc.ORG_ID = '6000001'
UNION ALL
SELECT t.lv + 1,
e.org_code || '-' || e.org_name AS codename,
e.org_name,
e.ORG_ID,
e.parent_id,
e.org_order,
e.org_code,
e.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg e
INNER JOIN t ON t.ORG_ID = e.parent_id)
SELECT *
FROM t) a
WHERE a.org_level <= 3
ORDER BY CASE
WHEN ',' || nvl(null, 'fingard') || ',' like '%,' || ORG_ID || ',%' THEN CASE
WHEN length(nvl(org_order, '')) = '9'
then org_order || ''
else '1' || org_code end
when length(nvl(org_order, '')) = '9' then '99999999' || org_order || ''
else '999999991' || org_code end)) V_
WHERE ROWNUM <= 10) MY_;
WHERE RM >= 1;

使用CTE递归改写方案在PostgreSQL上是个通用的做法,也能取得比较好的性能效果。

但是在OB上反而效果更差点,NL算子性能不够强,使用NESTED-LOOP JOIN 性能反而没有NESTED-LOOP CONNECT BY 算子好。

OB研发在NESTED-LOOP JOIN算子上还有继续优化的空间。


改写优化二,1.5秒:

既然使用NL性能不够理想的情况下,就要想办法使用HASH来优化SQL整体的执行效率。

将自动递归的方式改成手动。

1、首先需要知道数据整体的层级有多少。

SELECT DISTINCT lv
FROM (SELECT level lv
FROM tgtgtgtg tc
START WITH TC.ORG_ID = '6000001'
CONNECT BY PRIOR ORG_ID = tc.parent_id) t;

2、了解到整体的数据是13层,然后使用self join 将不同层级的数据关联起来。

SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM (SELECT a.*, rownum rn
FROM (SELECT x.*
FROM (WITH tgtgtgtg AS
(SELECT org_code, org_name, org_id, parent_id, org_order, org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg) SELECT 1 AS lv,
v1.org_code || '-' || v1.org_name AS codename,
v1.ORG_ID,
v1.parent_id,
v1.org_order,
v1.org_code,
v1.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 2 AS lv,
v2.org_code || '-' || v2.org_name AS codename,
v2.ORG_ID,
v2.parent_id,
v2.org_order,
v2.org_code,
v2.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 3 AS lv,
v3.org_code || '-' || v3.org_name AS codename,
v3.ORG_ID,
v3.parent_id,
v3.org_order,
v3.org_code,
v3.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 4 AS lv,
v4.org_code || '-' || v4.org_name AS codename,
v4.ORG_ID,
v4.parent_id,
v4.org_order,
v4.org_code,
v4.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 5 AS lv,
v5.org_code || '-' || v5.org_name AS codename,
v5.ORG_ID,
v5.parent_id,
v5.org_order,
v5.org_code,
v5.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 6 AS lv,
v6.org_code || '-' || v6.org_name AS codename,
v6.ORG_ID,
v6.parent_id,
v6.org_order,
v6.org_code,
v6.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 7 AS lv,
v7.org_code || '-' || v7.org_name AS codename,
v7.ORG_ID,
v7.parent_id,
v7.org_order,
v7.org_code,
v7.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 8 AS lv,
v8.org_code || '-' || v8.org_name AS codename,
v8.ORG_ID,
v8.parent_id,
v8.org_order,
v8.org_code,
v8.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 9 AS lv,
v9.org_code || '-' || v9.org_name AS codename,
v9.ORG_ID,
v9.parent_id,
v9.org_order,
v9.org_code,
v9.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v9 ON v8.ORG_ID = v9.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 10 AS lv,
v10.org_code || '-' || v10.org_name AS codename,
v10.ORG_ID,
v10.parent_id,
v10.org_order,
v10.org_code,
v10.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v9 ON v8.ORG_ID = v9.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v10 ON v9.ORG_ID = v10.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 11 AS lv,
v11.org_code || '-' || v11.org_name AS codename,
v11.ORG_ID,
v11.parent_id,
v11.org_order,
v11.org_code,
v11.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v9 ON v8.ORG_ID = v9.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v10 ON v9.ORG_ID = v10.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v11 ON v10.ORG_ID = v11.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 12 AS lv,
v12.org_code || '-' || v12.org_name AS codename,
v12.ORG_ID,
v12.parent_id,
v12.org_order,
v12.org_code,
v12.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v9 ON v8.ORG_ID = v9.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v10 ON v9.ORG_ID = v10.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v11 ON v10.ORG_ID = v11.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v12 ON v11.ORG_ID = v12.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001' UNION ALL SELECT 13 AS lv,
v13.org_code || '-' || v13.org_name AS codename,
v13.ORG_ID,
v13.parent_id,
v13.org_order,
v13.org_code,
v13.org_level
FROM tgtgtgtg v1
JOIN tgtgtgtg v2 ON v1.ORG_ID = v2.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v3 ON v2.ORG_ID = v3.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v4 ON v3.ORG_ID = v4.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v5 ON v4.ORG_ID = v5.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v6 ON v5.ORG_ID = v6.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v7 ON v6.ORG_ID = v7.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v8 ON v7.ORG_ID = v8.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v9 ON v8.ORG_ID = v9.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v10 ON v9.ORG_ID = v10.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v11 ON v10.ORG_ID = v11.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v12 ON v11.ORG_ID = v12.parent_id
JOIN tgtgtgtg v13 ON v12.ORG_ID = v13.parent_id
WHERE v1.ORG_ID = '6000001') x
WHERE org_level <= 3
ORDER BY CASE
WHEN ',' || NVL(NULL, 'fingard') || ',' LIKE '%,' || ORG_ID || ',%' THEN
CASE
WHEN LENGTH(NVL(org_order, '')) = '9' THEN
org_order || ''
ELSE '1' || org_code
END
WHEN LENGTH(NVL(org_order, '')) = '9' THEN
'99999999' || org_order || ''
ELSE '999999991' || org_code END ) a)
WHERE rownum <= 10)
WHERE rn >= 1;

现场同学差集比较,确认改写后的SQL是等价的,执行时间从2.6秒降低到1.5秒能跑出结果。

原来18行的SQL改成了250多行后才优化了1秒的执行时间,实在没其他办法了,希望OB产研后续能CBO算子继续优化下。

OceanBase 金融项目优化案例的更多相关文章

  1. 数据库优化案例——————某市中心医院HIS系统

    记得在自己学习数据库知识的时候特别喜欢看案例,因为优化的手段是容易掌握的,但是整体的优化思想是很难学会的.这也是为什么自己特别喜欢看案例,今天也开始分享自己做的优化案例. 最近一直很忙,博客产出也少的 ...

  2. 使用Jquery+EasyUI 进行框架项目开发案例解说之二---用户管理源代码分享

    使用Jquery+EasyUI 进行框架项目开发案例解说之二 用户管理源代码分享  在上一篇文章<使用Jquery+EasyUI进行框架项目开发案例解说之中的一个---员工管理源代码分享> ...

  3. 深入浅出聊Unity3D项目优化:从Draw Calls到GC

    前言: 刚开始写这篇文章的时候选了一个很土的题目...<Unity3D优化全解析>.因为这是一篇临时起意才写的文章,而且陈述的都是既有的事实,因而给自己“文(dou)学(bi)”加工留下的 ...

  4. Unity3D项目优化(转)

    前言: 刚开始写这篇文章的时候选了一个很土的题目...<Unity3D优化全解析>.因为这是一篇临时起意才写的文章,而且陈述的都是既有的事实,因而给自己“文(dou)学(bi)”加工留下的 ...

  5. 联想ERP项目实施案例分析(10):回到最初再反思IT价值

    联想ERP项目实施案例分析(10):回到最初再反思IT价值 投入上千万(未来每年的维护费也非常高),投入一年实施时间,高级副总裁亲自挂帅,各级业务部门管理者亲自负责.骨干业务人员充当区域IT实施者/推 ...

  6. Linux企业生产环境用户权限集中管理项目方案案例

    企业生产环境用户权限集中管理项目方案案例: 1 问题现状 当前我们公司里服务器上百台,各个服务器上的管理人员很多(开发+运维+架构+DBA+产品+市场),在大家登录使用Linux服务器时,不同职能的员 ...

  7. 0515项目优化和List集合

    0515项目优化和List集合 1. 项目优化 1.1 分析当前情况 问题 数据存储是数组形式,数据类型明确.复用度较低. 需求 Student操作使用的代码,StudentManager想要操作考虑 ...

  8. 【C#】项目优化实战

    [C#]项目优化实战 一. 数据库设计 1. 常量的枚举值直接存中文不要存数字(注意是常量,如果显示值可变就不能) 例如:男女,在数据库中不要存1和0,直接存男和女. 这样的好处:读取数据的时候可以避 ...

  9. 使用Jquery+EasyUI 进行框架项目开发案例讲解之五 模块(菜单)管理源码分享

    http://www.cnblogs.com/huyong/p/3454012.html 使用Jquery+EasyUI 进行框架项目开发案例讲解之五  模块(菜单)管理源码分享    在上四篇文章 ...

  10. 使用Jquery+EasyUI 进行框架项目开发案例讲解之四 组织机构管理源码分享

    http://www.cnblogs.com/huyong/p/3404647.html 在上三篇文章  <使用Jquery+EasyUI进行框架项目开发案例讲解之一---员工管理源码分享> ...

随机推荐

  1. iLogtail开源之路

    简介: 2022年6月底,阿里云iLogtail代码完整开源,正式发布了完整功能的iLogtail社区版.iLogtail作为阿里云SLS官方标配的采集器,多年以来一直稳定服务阿里集团.蚂蚁集团以及众 ...

  2. SQL窗口分析函数使用详解系列三之偏移量类窗口函数

    1.综述 本文以HiveSQL语法进行代码演示. 对于其他数据库来说同样也适用,比如SparkSQL,FlinkSQL以及Mysql8,Oracle,SqlServer等传统的关系型数据库. 已更新第 ...

  3. webapp监听手机物理返回键,返回上一页面或者关闭app

    网上抄的做笔记: 1.项目下建文件夹commonFunction->physicBackListener.js 2.这个js文件内复制代码: document.addEventListener( ...

  4. 《深度学习原理与Pytorch实战》(第二版)

    第1章 深度学习简介 深度学习--利用深度人工神经网络来进行自动分类.预测和学习的技术,深度学习=深度人工神经网络 超过三层的神经网络都可以叫做深度神经网络 人工神经网络的关键算法--反向传播算法 深 ...

  5. 自定义Lua解析器管理器-------演化脚本V0.5

    [3]自定义Lua解析器管理器-------演化脚本V0.5 方便我们在项目中使用Lua解析方法,我们封装管理一个lua解析器,管理LuaState的方法执行. 解析器脚本: using LuaInt ...

  6. 解决Host key verification failed.(亲测有效)

    哈喽哇,今天在访问远程服务器的时候,出现了一个小问题. 原因:之前ssh联系过服务器,重置服务器后,再次连接服务器,就会出这个问题. 一.发现问题 问题如下图代码: $ ssh root@108.61 ...

  7. Golang 之 casbin(权限管理)

    目录 1. 权限管理 官网 编辑器测试 1.1.1. 特征 Casbin的作用 Casbin不执行的操作 1.1.2. 怎么运行的 1.1.3. 安装 1. 示例代码 xormadapter 2. 示 ...

  8. 基本base样式

    /* 去除常见标签默认的 margin 和 padding */ body, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, input { ma ...

  9. linux cd命令的重要用法:cd -,cd ~

    cd命令的作用:进入磁盘的某个目录下. [root@node5 ~]# cd /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ [root@node5 network-scripts]# ...

  10. EDP .Net开发框架--组织架构

    职类 职类是将职务进行分类管理,并定义了职类标记和职级.职类标记会带入到该职类下的职务作为职务的标记,并为职务提供职级范围选择. "高管类"职类定义了其职级范围为"PM1 ...