While I ended up using a CSS-only implementation for this pen, I started by writing it mostly using classes and JavaScript.

However, I had a conflict. I wanted to use Delegated Events but I also wanted to minimize the dependancies I wanted to inject. I didn't want to have to import all of jQuery for this little test, just to be able to use delegated events one bit.

Let's take a closer look at what exactly delegated events are, how they work, and various ways to implement them.

Ok, so what's the issue?

Let's look at a simplified example:

Let's say that I had a list of buttons and each time I clicked on one, then I want to mark that button as "active". If I click it again, then deactivate it.

So let's start with some HTML:

<ul class="toolbar">
<li><button class="btn">Pencil</button></li>
<li><button class="btn">Pen</button></li>
<li><button class="btn">Eraser</button></li>
</ul>

I could use standard JavaScript event handler by doing something like this:

var buttons = document.querySelectorAll(".toolbar .btn");

for(var i = 0; i < buttons.length; i++) {
var button = buttons[i];
button.addEventListener("click", function() {
if(!button.classList.contains("active"))
button.classList.add("active");
else
button.classList.remove("active");
});
}

And this looks good... but it wont' work... Not the way one might expect it to.

Bitten by closures

For those of you that have been doing functional JavaScript for a while, the problem is pretty obvious.

For the uninitiated, the handler function closes over the button variable. However, there is only one of them; it gets reassigned by each iteration of the loop.

The first time though the loop, it points a the first button. The next time, the second button. And so on. However, by the time that you click one of the elements, the loop has completed and the button variable will point at the last element iterated over. Not good.

What we really need is a stable scope for each function; let's refactor an extract a handler generator to give us a stable scope:

var buttons = document.querySelectorAll(".toolbar button");
var createToolbarButtonHandler = function(button) {
return function() {
if(!button.classList.contains("active"))
button.classList.add("active");
else
button.classList.remove("active");
};
}; for(var i = 0; i < buttons.length; i++) {
buttons[i].addEventListener("click", createToolBarButtonHandler(buttons[i]));
}

Better! And now it actually works. We are using a function to create us a stable scope forbutton, so the button in the handler will always point at the element that we think it will.

So, what the problem?

This seems good and it will work for the most part. However, we can still do better.

First, we are making a lot of handlers. For each element that matches .toolbar buttonwe create a function and attach it as an event listener. With the three buttons we have right now the allocations are negligible.

However, what if we had:

<ul class="toolbar">
<li><button id="button_0001">Foo</button></li>
<li><button id="button_0002">Bar</button></li>
// ... 997 more elements ...
<li><button id="button_1000">baz</button></li>
</ul>

It won't blow up, but it is far from ideal. We are allocating a bunch of function that we don't have to. Let's try to refactor so that we can share a single function that is attachedmultiple times.

Rather than closing over the button variable to keep track of which button we clicked on, we can use event object that is handed to each event handler as the first argument.

The event object contains some metadata about the event. In this case, we want the thecurrentTarget property of the event to get a reference to the element that was actually clicked on.

var buttons = document.querySelectorAll(".toolbar button");

var toolbarButtonHandler = function(e) {
var button = e.currentTarget;
if(!button.classList.contains("active"))
button.classList.add("active");
else
button.classList.remove("active");
}; for(var i = 0; i < buttons.length; i++) {
button.addEventListener("click", toolbarButtonHandler);
}

Great! This not only simplified down to a single function that is added multiple times, also made the code more readable by factoring out our generator function.

But, we can still do better.

Let's say we added some buttons dynamically into the list. Then we would also need to remember to wire up the event listeners directly to those dynamic elements. And we would have to hold onto a reference to that handler and reference from more places. That doesn't sound like fun.

Perhaps there is a different approach.

Let's start by getting a better understanding of how events work and how they move through the DOM.

Okay, how do (most) events work?

When the user clicks on an element, an event gets generated to notify the application of the user's intent. Events get dispatched in three phases:

  • Capturing
  • Target
  • Bubbling

NOTE: Not all events bubble/capture, instead they are dispatched directly on the target, but most do.

The event starts outside the document and then descends though the DOM hierarchy to the target of the event. Once the event reaches it's target, it then turns around and heads back out the same way, until it exits the DOM.

Here is a full HTML example:

<html>
<body>
<ul>
<li id="li_1"><button id="button_1">Button A</button></li>
<li id="li_2"><button id="button_2">Button B</button></li>
<li id="li_3"><button id="button_3">Button C</button></li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>

If the user clicks on Button A, then the event would travel like this like this:

START
| #document \
| HTML |
| BODY } CAPTURE PHASE
| UL |
| LI#li_1 /
| BUTTON <-- TARGET PHASE
| LI#li_1 \
| UL |
| BODY } BUBBLING PHASE
| HTML |
v #document /
END

Notice that you can follow the path the event takes down to the element that gets clicked on. For any button we click on in our DOM, we can be sure that the event will bubble back out through our parent ul element. We can exploit this feature of the event dispatcher, combined with our defined hierarchy to simplify our implementation and implement Delegated Events.

Delegated Events

Delegated events are events that are attached to a parent element, but only get executed when the target of the event matches some criteria.

Let's look at a concrete example and switch back to our toolbar example DOM from before:

<ul class="toolbar">
<li><button class="btn">Pencil</button></li>
<li><button class="btn">Pen</button></li>
<li><button class="btn">Eraser</button></li>
</ul>

So, since we know that any clicks on the button elements will get bubbled through theUL.toolbar element, let's put the event handler there instead. We'll have to adjust our handler a little bit from before;

var toolbar = document.querySelector(".toolbar");
toolbar.addEventListener("click", function(e) {
var button = e.target;
if(!button.classList.contains("active"))
button.classList.add("active");
else
button.classList.remove("active");
});

That cleaned up a lot of code, and we have no more loops! Notice that we use e.targetinstead of e.currentTarget as we did before. That is because we are listening for the event at a different level.

  • e.target is actual target of the event. Where the event is trying to get to, or where it came from, in the DOM.
  • e.currentTarget is the current element that is handling the event.

In our case e.currentTarget will be the UL.toolbar.

More Robust Delegated Events

Right now, we handle any click on any element that bubbles though UL.toolbar, but our matching strategy is a little too simple. What if we had more complicated DOM that included icons and items that were supposed to be non-clickable

<ul class="toolbar">
<li><button class="btn"><i class="fa fa-pencil"></i> Pencil</button></li>
<li><button class="btn"><i class="fa fa-paint-brush"></i> Pen</button></li>
<li class="separator"></li>
<li><button class="btn"><i class="fa fa-eraser"></i> Eraser</button></li>
</ul>

OOPS. Now, when we click on the LI.separator or the icons, we add the active class to that element. That's not cool. We need a way to filter our events so we only react to elements we care about, or if our target element is contained by an element we care about.

Let's make a little helper to handle that:

var delegate = function(criteria, listener) {
return function(e) {
var el = e.target;
do {
if (!criteria(el)) continue;
e.delegateTarget = el;
listener.apply(this, arguments);
return;
} while( (el = el.parentNode) );
};
};

This helper does two things, first it walks though each element and their parents to see if it matches a criteria function. If it does, then it adds a property to the event object calleddelegateTarget, which is the element that matched our filtering criteria. And then invokes the listener. If nothing matches, the no handlers are fired.

We can use it like this:

var toolbar = document.querySelector(".toolbar");
var buttonsFilter = function(elem) { return elem.classList && elem.classList.contains("btn"); };
var buttonHandler = function(e) {
var button = e.delegateTarget;
if(!button.classList.contains("active"))
button.classList.add("active");
else
button.classList.remove("active");
};
toolbar.addEventListener("click", delegate(buttonsFilter, buttonHandler));

BOOM! That's what I'm talking about: A single event handler, attached to a single element that does all the work, but only does it on the elements that we care about and will react nicely to elements added or removed from the DOM dynamically.

Wrapping up

We've looked at the basics of how to implement event delegation in pure javascript in order to reduce the number of event handlers we need to generate or attach.

There are a few things I would do, if I were going to abstract this into a library, or use it for production level code:

  • Create helper functions to handle criteria matching in a unified functional way. Something like:
var criteria = {
isElement: function(e) { return e instanceof HTMLElement; },
hasClass: function(cls) {
return function(e) {
return criteria.isElement(e) && e.classList.contains(cls);
}
}
// More criteria matchers
};
  • A partial application helper would also be nice:
var partialDelgate = function(criteria) {
return function(handler) {
return delgate(criteria, handler);
}
};

If you have any suggestions or improvments, drop a comment or send me a message! Happy coding!

http://codepen.io/32bitkid/blog/understanding-delegated-javascript-events

Understanding Delegated JavaScript Events的更多相关文章

  1. Understanding the JavaScript Engine—— two phase

    Understanding the JavaScript Engine — Part 1   I have been a Ruby on Rails developer for the last 2 ...

  2. Javascript Events

    事件通常与函数配合使用,这样就可以通过发生的事件来驱动函数执行. 事件句柄 html4.0的新特性之一是有能力使html事件触发浏览器中的动作action,比如当用户点击某个html元素时启动一段Ja ...

  3. Javascript Madness: Mouse Events

    http://unixpapa.com/js/mouse.html Javascript Madness: Mouse Events Jan WolterAug 12, 2011 Note: I ha ...

  4. JavaScript Interview Questions: Event Delegation and This

    David Posin helps you land that next programming position by understanding important JavaScript fund ...

  5. 推荐15款制作 SVG 动画的 JavaScript 库

    在当今时代,SVG是最流行的和正在被众多的设计人员和开发人员使用,创建支持视网膜和响应式的网页设计.绘制SVG不是一个艰巨的任务,因为大量的 JavaScript 库可与 SVG 图像搭配使用.这些J ...

  6. 常用的Javascript设计模式

    <parctical common lisp>的作者曾说,如果你需要一种模式,那一定是哪里出了问题.他所说的问题是指因为语言的天生缺陷,不得不去寻求和总结一种通用的解决方案. 不管是弱类型 ...

  7. Javascript——浅谈 Event Flow

    1.Javascript Events : Event Bubbling(事件冒泡) 如果事件从最特定的元素开始,则事件流中的一个阶段称为事件冒泡(DOM中可能最深的节点)然后向上流向最不特定的节点( ...

  8. 集成Javascript Logging on MVC or Core

    ASP.NET Core provides us a rich Logging APIs which have a set of logger providers including: Console ...

  9. 每个JavaScript工程师都应懂的33个概念

    摘要: 基础很重要啊! 原文:33 concepts every JavaScript developer should know 译文:每个 JavaScript 工程师都应懂的33个概念 作者:s ...

随机推荐

  1. calcurse 日程管理软件

    包括有命令行与界面操作两部分: 命令行操作: 1.显示所有的 appointment and events root@zsf:/etc# calcurse -a09/15/13: - 21:35 -& ...

  2. 利物浦VS热刺,我努力不去想,但利物浦真的在争冠

      用这张图作为开头吧,早餐的时候打开网易,苏神破门红军4-0登榜首的新闻,习惯性的点进去看看KOP的评论,有一句回复『利物浦该夺冠了,多少年了.喜欢利物浦比喜欢老婆还早,老婆都成黄脸婆了.现在带着女 ...

  3. Mysql分表和分区的区别、分库分表介绍与区别(转)

    分表和分区的区别: 一,什么是mysql分表,分区 什么是分表,从表面意思上看呢,就是把一张表分成N多个小表,具体请看:mysql分表的3种方法 什么是分区,分区呢就是把一张表的数据分成N多个区块,这 ...

  4. Django 玩转API

    现在,让我们进入Python的交互式shell,玩转这些Django提供给你的API. 使用如下命令来调用Python shell: $ python manage.py shell 我们使用上述命令 ...

  5. Netty问题小结

    1.问题:高并发时连接不够:java.net.SocketException: No buffer space available (maximum connections reached?): co ...

  6. 国外优秀JavaScript资源推荐

    JavaScript的优秀资源          原文链接:http://code.tutsplus.com/articles/resources-for-staying-on-top-of-java ...

  7. luogu U41573 War2

    一道NOIP2018模拟的DayT3 原本没打算做,结果Dukelv秒了(强的过分),就来看看. 状压dp.令dp[i][j]表示在状态 i ,最后选了第 j 个数是的最大分值. 所以我们枚举状态 i ...

  8. 浅谈sql之连接查询

    SQL之连接查询 一.连接查询的分类 sql中将连接查询分成四类: 内链接 外连接 左外连接 右外连接 自然连接 交叉连接 二.连接查询的分类 数据库表如下: 1.学生表 2.老师表 3.班级表 表用 ...

  9. git终端操作

    1.提交 git add . git commit -m "test" git push origini master 2.分支 创建feature_x分支,并切换到feature ...

  10. MVCPager分页使用方法

    public ActionResult AdminUserList(UserListModel model) { var pagedList = _userService.SearchAdminUse ...