第一步骤:hibernate.cfg.xml文件补上如下配置:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!--
This template was written to work with NHibernate.Test.
Copy the template to your NHibernate.Test project folder and rename it in hibernate.cfg.xml and change it
for your own use before compile tests in VisualStudio.
-->
<!-- This is the System.Data.dll provider for SQL Server -->
<hibernate-configuration xmlns="urn:nhibernate-configuration-2.2" >
<session-factory name="NHibernate.Test123456">
<property name="connection.driver_class">NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver</property>
<property name="connection.connection_string"> <!--用于测试自动生成数据库表(不自动生成数据库)-->
<!--<property name="hbm2ddl.auto">update</property>-->
Server=(local);initial catalog=NHibernateSampleAutoCreateTable;Integrated Security=SSPI <!--Server=(local);initial catalog=NHibernateSample;Integrated Security=SSPI-->
</property>
<property name="dialect">NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2008Dialect</property> <!--输出所有的SQL语句到控制台,一般开发打开这个-->
<property name="show_sql">true</property>
<!--整齐的SQL输出到控制台-->
<property name="format_sql">true</property>
<!--自动生成数据库表(不自动生成数据库)-->
<property name="hbm2ddl.auto">update</property>
<!--在数据表设计中如果采用了 bit 类型的字段,并且对应了业务类中类型为 bool 值,一定要如上设置下-->
<property name="query.substitutions">true , false , yes 'Y', no 'N'</property> <!--=======加入Nhibernate自身的HashtabeCache的二级缓存配置=============================-->
<!--1.配置二级缓存提供程序-->
<property name="cache.provider_class">NHibernate.Cache.HashtableCacheProvider</property>
<!--2.显式启用二级缓存-->
<property name ="cache.use_second_level_cache">true</property>
<!--4.启动查询缓存-->
<property name="cache.use_query_cache">true</property> <!--实体类所在的程序集-->
<mapping assembly="Model"/>
<!--3.配置映射的二级缓存-->
<class-cache class="Model.Customer,Model" usage="read-write"/>
<!--<collection-cache collection ="集合名称" region="默认集合名称"
usage="read-write"/>--> </session-factory>
</hibernate-configuration>

实体类上也可以配二级缓存策略,如:

Customer.hbm.xml

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2"
namespace="Model"
assembly="Model"
default-lazy="true"> <class name="Model.Customer, Model"
table="Customer"
discriminator-value="" lazy="false">
<!--.这个不是必须的,因为在nhibernate.cfg.xml文件中已经有了一个总配置
.cache标签必须在id标签前面
-->
<cache usage="read-write"/>
<!--unsaved-value="" 主键表中不需要定义,而是需要在子表中定义-->
<id name="CustomerId"
column="CustomerId"
type="int"
unsaved-value="">
<generator class="native" />
<!-- unsaved-value used to be null and generator was increment in h2.0.3 -->
</id>
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
<set name="Orders" table="Order" lazy="true"
generic="true"
inverse="false" cascade="all">
<!--二级缓存策略-->
<cache usage="read-write"/>
<key column="CustomerId" foreign-key="FK_CustomerOrders"/>
<one-to-many class="Model.Order,Model"/>
</set>
</class>
</hibernate-mapping>

测试1:

二级缓存与Get方法+Lazy设置的关系:

测试图解:

经测试,得出如下结论:

Get方法+Lazy配置+二级缓存测试结果:

Customer.hbm.xml的<Set name="Orders"        Customer.hbm.xml的<Set name="Orders"

lazy="true">                   lazy="false">

<cache usage="read-write"/>                      <cache usage="read-write"/>

Customer数据库中Order个数等于零                   Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer                               Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer

Customer数据库中Order个数大于零                   Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer                               Get方法从不从二级缓存获取Customer

------------------------更新二级缓存测试---------------------------------------------------------------

测试更新-1:

前置条件:

1.Customer没Orders

2.

  <class name="Model.Customer, Model"
table="Customer"
discriminator-value="" lazy="true">
<!--.这个不是必须的,因为在nhibernate.cfg.xml文件中已经有了一个总配置
.cache标签必须在id标签前面
-->
<cache usage="read-write"/>

测试代码:

        [TestMethod]
public void TestSessionFactoryCacheUpdateCustomerHavingNotOrders()
{
CustomerService customerService = new CustomerService(); Customer customer = new Customer()
{
FirstName = "Test",
LastName = "TestSessionFactoryCache",
Age =
}; customerService.Add(customer);
int customerId = customer.CustomerId; Console.WriteLine("第1次获取数据并且更新------------------------------:");
Customer customerGet1 = customerService.Get(customerId); Console.WriteLine("更新前:Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet1.CustomerId, customerGet1.FirstName); customerGet1.FirstName = "我是更新后的FirstName"; //修改FirstName
customerService.Update(customerGet1); //保存更新得到数据库。 Console.WriteLine("更新后:Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet1.CustomerId, customerGet1.FirstName); Console.WriteLine("第2次获取数据==============================:");
Customer customerGet2 = customerService.Get(customerId);
Console.WriteLine("Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet2.CustomerId, customerGet2.FirstName); Console.WriteLine("第3次获取数据==============================:");
Customer customerGet3 = customerService.Get(customerId);
Console.WriteLine("Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet3.CustomerId, customerGet3.FirstName); }

测试结果:

NHibernate:
INSERT
INTO
Customer
(Version, Firstname, Lastname, Age)
VALUES
(@p0, @p1, @p2, @p3);
select
SCOPE_IDENTITY();
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()],
@p1 = 'Test' [Type: String ()],
@p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()],
@p3 = [Type: Int32 ()]
第1次获取数据并且更新------------------------------:
NHibernate:
SELECT
customer0_.CustomerId as CustomerId0_0_,
customer0_.Version as Version0_0_,
customer0_.Firstname as Firstname0_0_,
customer0_.Lastname as Lastname0_0_,
customer0_.Age as Age0_0_
FROM
Customer customer0_
WHERE
customer0_.CustomerId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
NHibernate:
SELECT
orders0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_,
orders0_.OrderId as OrderId1_,
orders0_.OrderId as OrderId1_0_,
orders0_.Version as Version1_0_,
orders0_.OrderDate as OrderDate1_0_,
orders0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_0_
FROM
[
Order] orders0_ WHERE
orders0_.CustomerId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新前:Id:-->FirtstName:Test
NHibernate:
UPDATE
Customer
SET
Version = @p0,
Firstname = @p1,
Lastname = @p2,
Age = @p3
WHERE
CustomerId = @p4
AND Version = @p5;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p1 = '我是更新后的FirstName' [Type: String ()], @p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()], @p3 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p4 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p5 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新后:Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第2次获取数据==============================:
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第3次获取数据==============================:
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName

---------------------------------------------------

测试更新-2

前置条件:

1.Customer有Orders

2.

    <set name="Orders" table="Order"  lazy="false"
generic="true"
inverse="false" cascade="all">
<!--二级缓存策略-->
<cache usage="read-write"/>
<key column="CustomerId" foreign-key="FK_CustomerOrders"/>
<one-to-many class="Model.Order,Model"/>
</set>

测试代码和结果:表明2级缓存失效

        [TestMethod]
public void TestSessionFactoryCacheUpdateCustomerHavingOrders()
{
CustomerService customerService = new CustomerService(); Customer customer = new Customer()
{
FirstName = "Test",
LastName = "TestSessionFactoryCache",
Age =
}; Order order1 = new Order()
{
OrderDate = DateTime.Now,
Customer = customer
};
customer.Orders.Add(order1); customerService.Add(customer);
int customerId = customer.CustomerId; Console.WriteLine("第1次获取数据并且更新------------------------------:");
Customer customerGet1 = customerService.Get(customerId); Console.WriteLine("更新前:Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet1.CustomerId, customerGet1.FirstName); customerGet1.FirstName = "我是更新后的FirstName"; //修改FirstName
customerService.Update(customerGet1); //保存更新得到数据库。 Console.WriteLine("更新后:Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet1.CustomerId, customerGet1.FirstName); Console.WriteLine("第2次获取数据==============================:");
Customer customerGet2 = customerService.Get(customerId);
Console.WriteLine("Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet2.CustomerId, customerGet2.FirstName); Console.WriteLine("第3次获取数据==============================:");
Customer customerGet3 = customerService.Get(customerId);
Console.WriteLine("Id:{0}-->FirtstName:{1}"
, customerGet3.CustomerId, customerGet3.FirstName); }
NHibernate:
INSERT
INTO
Customer
(Version, Firstname, Lastname, Age)
VALUES
(@p0, @p1, @p2, @p3);
select
SCOPE_IDENTITY();
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()],
@p1 = 'Test' [Type: String ()],
@p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()],
@p3 = [Type: Int32 ()]
NHibernate:
INSERT
INTO
[ Order] (
Version, OrderDate, CustomerId
)
VALUES
(@p0, @p1, @p2);
select
SCOPE_IDENTITY();
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()],
@p1 = // :: [Type: DateTime ()],
@p2 = [Type: Int32 ()]
第1次获取数据并且更新------------------------------:
NHibernate:
SELECT
customer0_.CustomerId as CustomerId0_0_,
customer0_.Version as Version0_0_,
customer0_.Firstname as Firstname0_0_,
customer0_.Lastname as Lastname0_0_,
customer0_.Age as Age0_0_
FROM
Customer customer0_
WHERE
customer0_.CustomerId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
NHibernate:
SELECT
orders0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_,
orders0_.OrderId as OrderId1_,
orders0_.OrderId as OrderId1_0_,
orders0_.Version as Version1_0_,
orders0_.OrderDate as OrderDate1_0_,
orders0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_0_
FROM
[
Order] orders0_ WHERE
orders0_.CustomerId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新前:Id:-->FirtstName:Test
NHibernate:
UPDATE
Customer
SET
Version = @p0,
Firstname = @p1,
Lastname = @p2,
Age = @p3
WHERE
CustomerId = @p4
AND Version = @p5;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p1 = '我是更新后的FirstName' [Type: String ()], @p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()], @p3 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p4 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p5 = [Type: Int32 ()]
NHibernate:
UPDATE
[
Order] SET
Version = @p0,
OrderDate = @p1,
CustomerId = @p2
WHERE
OrderId = @p3
AND Version = @p4;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p1 = // :: [Type: DateTime ()], @p2 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p3 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p4 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新后:Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第2次获取数据==============================:
NHibernate:
SELECT
order0_.OrderId as OrderId1_0_,
order0_.Version as Version1_0_,
order0_.OrderDate as OrderDate1_0_,
order0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_0_
FROM
[
Order] order0_ WHERE
order0_.OrderId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第3次获取数据==============================:
NHibernate:
SELECT
order0_.OrderId as OrderId1_0_,
order0_.Version as Version1_0_,
order0_.OrderDate as OrderDate1_0_,
order0_.CustomerId as CustomerId1_0_
FROM
[
Order] order0_ WHERE
order0_.OrderId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName

将该测试(测试更新-2)的前置条件2改为:

lazy="true"  ,即修改后的配置如下:  
    <set name="Orders" table="Order"  lazy="true"
generic="true"
inverse="false" cascade="all">
<!--二级缓存策略-->
<cache usage="read-write"/>
<key column="CustomerId" foreign-key="FK_CustomerOrders"/>
<one-to-many class="Model.Order,Model"/>
</set>
lazy="true" 时,2级缓存生效,测试结果如下所示:
NHibernate:
INSERT
INTO
Customer
(Version, Firstname, Lastname, Age)
VALUES
(@p0, @p1, @p2, @p3);
select
SCOPE_IDENTITY();
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()],
@p1 = 'Test' [Type: String ()],
@p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()],
@p3 = [Type: Int32 ()]
NHibernate:
INSERT
INTO
[ Order] (
Version, OrderDate, CustomerId
)
VALUES
(@p0, @p1, @p2);
select
SCOPE_IDENTITY();
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()],
@p1 = // :: [Type: DateTime ()],
@p2 = [Type: Int32 ()]
第1次获取数据并且更新------------------------------:
NHibernate:
SELECT
customer0_.CustomerId as CustomerId0_0_,
customer0_.Version as Version0_0_,
customer0_.Firstname as Firstname0_0_,
customer0_.Lastname as Lastname0_0_,
customer0_.Age as Age0_0_
FROM
Customer customer0_
WHERE
customer0_.CustomerId=@p0;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新前:Id:-->FirtstName:Test
NHibernate:
UPDATE
Customer
SET
Version = @p0,
Firstname = @p1,
Lastname = @p2,
Age = @p3
WHERE
CustomerId = @p4
AND Version = @p5;
@p0 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p1 = '我是更新后的FirstName' [Type: String ()], @p2 = 'TestSessionFactoryCache' [Type: String ()], @p3 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p4 = [Type: Int32 ()], @p5 = [Type: Int32 ()]
更新后:Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第2次获取数据==============================:
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName
第3次获取数据==============================:
Id:-->FirtstName:我是更新后的FirstName

经测试,得出如下结论:

Update方法+Get方法+Lazy配置+二级缓存测试结果:

Customer.hbm.xml的<Set name="Orders"                 Customer.hbm.xml的<Set name="Orders"

lazy="true">                   lazy="false">

<cache usage="read-write"/>                      <cache usage="read-write"/>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Customer数据库中Order个数等于零                 用 Update方法Customer后,                           用 Update方法Customer后,

Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer                     Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Customer数据库中Order个数大于零                   用 Update方法Customer后                              用 Update方法Customer后

                  Get方法从二级缓存获取Customer                        Get方法从不从二级缓存获取Customer

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

01-08-02【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】二级缓存:NHibernate自带的HashtableProvider的更多相关文章

  1. 01-08-03【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】二级缓存:NHibernate自带的HashtableProvider之缓存管理

    http://www.cnblogs.com/lyj/archive/2008/11/28/1343418.html 管理NHibernate二级缓存 NHibernate二级缓存由ISessionF ...

  2. 01-08-05【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】NHibernate二级缓存:第三方MemCache缓存

    一.准备工作 [1]根据操作系统(位数)选择下载相应版本的MemCache, MemCache的下载和安装,参看: http://www.cnblogs.com/easy5weikai/p/37606 ...

  3. 01-03-03【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】cascade的测试

    相关文章: http://www.cnblogs.com/amboyna/archive/2008/02/18/1072260.html注意上面是hibernate,不是Nhibernate,这解释是 ...

  4. 01-03-02-2【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】CRUP操作-Save方法的一些问题

    此文由于当时不知道NHibernate的Sava方法不是更新操作,不知道Save就是Add,造成如下荒唐的求证过程,但结论是对的 ,可报废此文,特此声明. NHibernate--Save方法: Cu ...

  5. 01-08-01【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】NHibernate中的一级缓存

    缓存的范围? 1.事务范围 事务范围的缓存只能被当前事务访问,每个事务都有各自的缓存,缓存内的数据通常采用相互关联的对象形式.缓存的生命周期依赖于事务的生命周期,只有当事务结束时,缓存的生命周期才会结 ...

  6. 01-05-01-1【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】延迟加载及其class和集合(set、bag等)的Lazy属性配置组合对Get和Load方法的影响

    这篇文章 http://ayende.com/blog/3988/nhibernate-the-difference-between-get-load-and-querying-by-id One o ...

  7. 01-07-01【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】并发控制

    Nhibernate 并发控制 [1]悲观并发控制 正在使用数据的操作,加上锁,使用完后解锁释放资源. 使用场景:数据竞争激烈,锁的成本低于回滚事务的成本 缺点:阻塞,可能死锁 [2]乐观并发控制: ...

  8. 01-03-01【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】id标签的unsaved-value属性

    父表 <class name="Model.Customer, Model" discriminator-value="0"> <!--uns ...

  9. 01-08-04【Nhibernate (版本3.3.1.4000) 出入江湖】二级缓存:NHibernate自带的HashtableProvider之命名缓存

    http://www.cnblogs.com/lyj/archive/2008/11/28/1343418.html 可以在映射文件中定义命名查询,<query>元素提供了很多属性,可以用 ...

随机推荐

  1. AMQ学习笔记 - 05. 客户端模板化

    概述 客户端编程模型中,大部分的步骤都是相同的.将相同的部分做成模板,将不同的部分预留接口,实现者就只需要针对不同的部分提供实现. 设计 类图 发送方客户端 说明: 基于模板的思想,SendTempl ...

  2. PHP的final、抽象类和方法

    final关键字的用法 final class Computer{ //无法继承的类 final public function run(){ //无法继承的方法 } } class NoteBook ...

  3. 8款超酷实用的CSS3 Tab菜单集合

    1.CSS3华丽的Tab菜单 带小图标动画 之前我们分享过一款非常出色的CSS3 Tab菜单HTML5 SVG Tab滑块菜单,结合SVG,Tab菜单实现非常灵活.今天我们要再来分享一款基于CSS3的 ...

  4. 使用struct实现面向对象编程的封装

    虽然C是面向过程的语言,但是这不代表C不能使用面向对象的思想,本质上说语言只是一种手段而已,一种外在的表现形式,支持面向对象的语言只是通过设计的特定的关键字更好的表现了面向对象编程而已.C中也可以使用 ...

  5. iOS ARC下循环引用的问题 -举例说明strong和weak的区别

    strong:适用于OC对象,作用和非ARC中的retain作用相同,它修饰的成员变量为强指针类型weak:适用于OC对象,作用和非ARC中的assign作用相同,修饰的成员变量为弱指针类型assig ...

  6. newsstand杂志阅读应用源码ipad版

    一款newsstand iPad杂志阅读应用源码(newsstand在线下载/动态显示等)可以支持在线下载/动态显示等  ,也是一款newsstand iPad杂志阅读应用源码.运行之后,会在iPad ...

  7. 5.servlet cookie自动登录的实例

    1.要建的文档,.java用servlet创建 2.建一张登陆表格 index.jsp <%@ page language="java" import="java. ...

  8. 在 linux x86-64 模式下分析内存映射流程

    前言 在上一篇中我们分析了 linux 在 x86-32 模式下的虚拟内存映射流程,本章主要继续分析 linux 在 x86-64 模式下的虚拟内存映射流程. 讨论的平台是 x86-64, 也可以称为 ...

  9. ASP.NET MVC 表单的几种提交方式

    下面是总结一下在ASP.NET MVC中表单的几种提交方式. 1.Ajax提交表单 需要引用 <script type="text/javascript" src=" ...

  10. Materialized Views 物化视图 -基础篇

    Materialized Views 物化视图 -基础篇 http://blog.csdn.net/elimago/article/details/5404019