AlphaGo: Mastering the ancient game of Go with Machine Learning

Posted by David Silver and Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind
Games are a great testing ground for developing smarter, more flexible algorithms that have the ability to tackle problems in ways similar to humans. Creating programs that are able to play games better than the best humans has a long history - the first classic game mastered by a computer wasnoughts and crosses (also known as tic-tac-toe) in 1952 as a PhD candidate’s project. Then fellcheckers in 1994. Chess was tackled by Deep Blue in 1997. The success isn’t limited to board games, either - IBM's Watson won first place on Jeopardy in 2011, and in 2014 our own algorithms learned to play dozens of Atari games just from the raw pixel inputs.

But one game has thwarted A.I. research thus far: the ancient game of Go. Invented in China over 2500 years ago, Go is played by more than 40 million people worldwide. The rules are simple: players take turns to place black or white stones on a board, trying to capture the opponent's stones or surround empty space to make points of territory. Confucius wrote about the game, and its aesthetic beauty elevated it to one of the four essential arts required of any true Chinese scholar. The game is played primarily through intuition and feel, and because of its subtlety and intellectual depth it has captured the human imagination for centuries.

But as simple as the rules are, Go is a game of profound complexity. The search space in Go is vast -- more than a googol times larger than chess (a number greater than there are atoms in the universe!). As a result, traditional “brute force” AI methods -- which construct a search tree over all possible sequences of moves -- don’t have a chance in Go. To date, computers have played Go only as well as amateurs. Experts predicted it would be at least another 10 years until a computer could beat one of the world’s elite group of Go professionals.

We saw this as an irresistible challenge! We started building a system, AlphaGo, described in a paper in Nature this week, that would overcome these barriers. The key to AlphaGo is reducing the enormous search space to something more manageable. To do this, it combines a state-of-the-art tree search with two deep neural networks, each of which contains many layers with millions of neuron-like connections. One neural network, the “policy network”, predicts the next move, and is used to narrow the search to consider only the moves most likely to lead to a win. The other neural network, the “value network”, is then used to reduce the depth of the search tree -- estimating the winner in each position in place of searching all the way to the end of the game.

AlphaGo’s search algorithm is much more human-like than previous approaches. For example, when Deep Blue played chess, it searched by brute force over thousands of times more positions than AlphaGo. Instead, AlphaGo looks ahead by playing out the remainder of the game in its imagination, many times over - a technique known as Monte-Carlo tree search. But unlike previous Monte-Carlo programs, AlphaGo uses deep neural networks to guide its search. During each simulated game, the policy network suggests intelligent moves to play, while the value network astutely evaluates the position that is reached. Finally, AlphaGo chooses the move that is most successful in simulation.

We first trained the policy network on 30 million moves from games played by human experts, until it could predict the human move 57% of the time (the previous record before AlphaGo was 44%). But our goal is to beat the best human players, not just mimic them. To do this, AlphaGo learned to discover new strategies for itself, by playing thousands of games between its neural networks, and gradually improving them using a trial-and-error process known as reinforcement learning. This approach led to much better policy networks, so strong in fact that the raw neural network (immediately, without any tree search at all) can defeat state-of-the-art Go programs that build enormous search trees.

These policy networks were in turn used to train the value networks, again by reinforcement learning from games of self-play. These value networks can evaluate any Go position and estimate the eventual winner - a problem so hard it was believed to be impossible.

Of course, all of this requires a huge amount of compute power, so we made extensive use ofGoogle Cloud Platform, which enables researchers working on AI and Machine Learning to access elastic compute, storage and networking capacity on demand. In addition, new open source libraries for numerical computation using data flow graphs, such as TensorFlow, allow researchers to efficiently deploy the computation needed for deep learning algorithms across multiple CPUs or GPUs.

So how strong is AlphaGo? To answer this question, we played a tournament between AlphaGo and the best of the rest - the top Go programs at the forefront of A.I. research. Using a single machine, AlphaGo won all but one of its 500 games against these programs. In fact, AlphaGo even beat those programs after giving them 4 free moves headstart at the beginning of each game. A high-performance version of AlphaGo, distributed across many machines, was even stronger.

This figure from the Nature article shows the Elo rating and approximate rank of AlphaGo (both single machine and distributed versions), the European champion Fan Hui (a professional 2-dan), and the strongest other Go programs, evaluated over thousands of games. Pale pink bars show the performance of other programs when given a four move headstart.

It seemed that AlphaGo was ready for a greater challenge. So we invited the reigning 3-time European Go champion Fan Hui — an elite professional player who has devoted his life to Go since the age of 12 — to our London office for a challenge match. The match was played behind closed doors between October 5-9 last year. AlphaGo won by 5 games to 0 -- the first time a computer program has ever beaten a professional Go player.

AlphaGo’s next challenge will be to play the top Go player in the world over the last decade,Lee Sedol. The match will take place this March in Seoul, South Korea. Lee Sedol is excited to take on the challenge saying, "I am privileged to be the one to play, but I am confident that I can win." It should prove to be a fascinating contest!

We are thrilled to have mastered Go and thus achieved one of the grand challenges of AI. However, the most significant aspect of all this for us is that AlphaGo isn’t just an ‘expert’ system built with hand-crafted rules, but instead uses general machine learning techniques to allow it to improve itself, just by watching and playing games. While games are the perfect platform for developing and testing AI algorithms quickly and efficiently, ultimately we want to apply these techniques to important real-world problems. Because the methods we have used are general purpose, our hope is that one day they could be extended to help us address some of society’s toughest and most pressing problems, from climate modelling to complex disease analysis.

 
from:http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2016/01/alphago-mastering-ancient-game-of-go.html

AlphaGo:用机器学习技术古老的围棋游戏掌握AlphaGo: Mastering the ancient game of Go with Machine Learning的更多相关文章

  1. 数据挖掘:实用机器学习技术P295页:

    数据挖掘:实用机器学习技术P295页: 在weka软件中的实验者界面中,新建好实验项目后,添加相应的实验数据,然后添加对应需要的分类算法 ,需要使用多个算法时候重复操作添加add algorithm. ...

  2. java围棋游戏源代码

    //李雨泽源代码,不可随意修改.//时间:2017年9月22号.//地点:北京周末约科技有限公司.//package com.bao; /*围棋*/ /*import java.awt.*; impo ...

  3. 谷歌发布"自动机器学习"技术 AI可自我创造

    谷歌发布"自动机器学习"技术 AI可自我创造 据Inverse报道,今年5月份,谷歌宣布其人工智能(AI)研究取得重大进展,似乎帮助科幻小说中最耸人听闻的末日预言成为现实.谷歌推出 ...

  4. 使用Java的GUI技术实现 “ 贪吃蛇 ” 游戏

    详细教程: 使用Java的GUI技术实现 " 贪吃蛇 " 游戏_IT打工酱的博客-CSDN博客

  5. 【机器学习Machine Learning】资料大全

    昨天总结了深度学习的资料,今天把机器学习的资料也总结一下(友情提示:有些网站需要"科学上网"^_^) 推荐几本好书: 1.Pattern Recognition and Machi ...

  6. 机器学习(Machine Learning)&深度学习(Deep Learning)资料【转】

    转自:机器学习(Machine Learning)&深度学习(Deep Learning)资料 <Brief History of Machine Learning> 介绍:这是一 ...

  7. 数据挖掘(data mining),机器学习(machine learning),和人工智能(AI)的区别是什么? 数据科学(data science)和商业分析(business analytics)之间有什么关系?

    本来我以为不需要解释这个问题的,到底数据挖掘(data mining),机器学习(machine learning),和人工智能(AI)有什么区别,但是前几天因为有个学弟问我,我想了想发现我竟然也回答 ...

  8. 机器学习笔记1 - Hello World In Machine Learning

    前言 Alpha Go在16年以4:1的战绩打败了李世石,17年又以3:0的战绩战胜了中国围棋天才柯洁,这真是科技界振奋人心的进步.伴随着媒体的大量宣传,此事变成了妇孺皆知的大事件.大家又开始激烈的讨 ...

  9. 学习笔记之机器学习(Machine Learning)

    机器学习 - 维基百科,自由的百科全书 https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9C%BA%E5%99%A8%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0 机器学习是人工智能的一个分 ...

随机推荐

  1. thinkphp5 返回数组提示variable type error: array

    浏览器访问控制器函数,而函数返回的是数组: function timeArr(){ $time = array(); for($i=1;$i<=7;$i++){ $d= date('d',Tim ...

  2. Robot Framework 快速入门

    Robot Framework 快速入门 目录 介绍 概述 安装 运行demo 介绍样例应用程序 测试用例 第一个测试用例 高级别测试用例 数据驱动测试用例 关键词keywords 内置关键词 库关键 ...

  3. .NET基本权限系统框架源代码

    DEMO下载地址: 百度网盘:http://pan.baidu.com/s/147ilj http://download.csdn.net/detail/shecixiong/5372895 一.开发 ...

  4. mysql 事务回滚

    begindeclare t_error integer default 0;  //添加变量t_error并赋初始值为0declare continue handler for sqlexcepti ...

  5. Vijos1448 校门外的树 [树状数组]

    题目传送门 校门外的树 描述 校门外有很多树,有苹果树,香蕉树,有会扔石头的,有可以吃掉补充体力的……如今学校决定在某个时刻在某一段种上一种树,保证任一时刻不会出现两段相同种类的树,现有两个操作:K= ...

  6. linux下安装Python3.4.1

    1.下载linux 版本的 Python 我是在Windows下下载的,然后共享到linux下. 2.解压文件 tar -xvf Python-3.4.1.tar x是解压 v是查看所有过程 f是使用 ...

  7. https请求过程

    我们都知道HTTPS能够加密信息,以免敏感信息被第三方获取.所以很多银行网站或电子邮箱等等安全级别较高的服务都会采用HTTPS协议. HTTPS简介 HTTPS其实是有两部分组成:HTTP + SSL ...

  8. 执行Shell脚本的4种方法及区别介绍(转)

    原文地址: http://www.jb51.net/article/66824.htm 执行shell脚本有以下几种方式 ###1.相对路径方式,需先cd到脚本路径下 [root@banking tm ...

  9. 【BZOJ 2306】 2306: [Ctsc2011]幸福路径 (倍增floyd)

    2306: [Ctsc2011]幸福路径 Time Limit: 10 Sec  Memory Limit: 256 MBSubmit: 912  Solved: 437 Description 有向 ...

  10. 【贪心大水题】BZOJ3410-[Usaco2009 Dec]Selfish Grazing 自私的食草者

    [题目大意] 给出n个区间,问最多选取多少个区间使得它们互相不重叠. [思路] 水题quq改善心情用.按照右端点大小排序,每次更新上一次的右端点,如果当前左端点大于上次右端点可取. #include& ...