Domain Driven Design
在Spring官网的第一个tutorial中看到了这种 设计模式
Domain Driven Design
找到了篇介绍这个得文章:
"... the key to expert performance in many fields is domain knowledge rather than intelligence."
Don Reinertsen
Domain Driven Design is a software development methodology, intended to achieve a software system closely modelled on and aligned with real business processes.
Traditionally development tends to be a technically led process, where requirements are passed from the business to the development teams, and then the development teams go off and produce their best guesstimate at what the requirements said.
In a waterfall approach this leads to large requirements documents that are diligently collated, analysed, reviewed and approved. These documents are then given to development teams to turn into working software.
Agile approaches can also accept the requirements documents that waterfall tends to produce, but for them to actually progress forwards they must be broken to small tasks and stories which can then be queued ready for development.
Domain Driven Design to a large degree steps back from these two distinct ends of the spectrum, and looks at how the requirements are gathered in the first place - if you like, it bridges the gap between doing everything up front and everything at the last minute.
DDD understands that requirements are never 'done', but exist as a living document. More importantly, the living document in question is actually the software itself - all other documents are an artefact and reflection of the code.
As the software system develops and grows, deeper understanding of the problem grows too - DDD is all about the discovery of the solution through deeper understanding of the problem.
Where DDD really differs though is that it sees the software system as a reflection of the business process, an enabler rather than the driver. DDD is deeply concerned about the business processes, business terminology and practices. Technical concerns are largely secondary and a means to an end.
The Ubiquitous Language is at the centre of DDD - this is a shared and growing language. A negotiated language derived from the business terminology and enriched by the development teams. If a business person doesn't understand a term in the UL, then the chances are the UL needs an evolution. If a technical person doesn't understand a term in the UL then the chances are they need a conversation with a Domain Expert.
The Domain Experts are the second essential component of DDD - people who deeply understand the business domain, and the business itself. These people are integral to the development process. They may not be required "full time" like the traditional Product Owners of some Agile methodologies, but they must be accessible continually, and be prepared to invest time in the process. Domain Experts are not to be considered outsiders, but as the core of the DDD process - they are as much a part of the development team as any developer or tester.
DDD doesn't begin and end - it is a constant process of re-evaluation, refactoring, remodelling and redesign - every conversation should bring you to a closer understanding of the problem. At no point is DDD 'done' - it is always there; the Ubiquitous Language grows and develops, the Domain Models change as understanding changes, code is restructured and refactored to better represent that understanding.
Artefacts will come and go, but only one really matters - the code base. It is the only expression of the solution that is free of abstraction. While documents may try to explain or describe the system, only the code does so without losing information. This means that in DDD the code must remain of high quality, be clear and expressive, be free of technical abbreviations or jargon, and as far as possible should make at least some sense to a Domain Expert when explained to them.
Clever code doesn't work in DDD, nor do magical processes or "you don't need to know" components. Domain Experts shouldn't need to become developers to understand what the key parts of the software system is doing for them. They also shouldn't need to think in terms of databases or batch jobs or other technical concerns.
DDD is the ultimate expression of Agile - it is about dealing with a constantly shifting and evolving set of requirements - because as anyone who has ever been involved with a software project knows - it is very rare for a requirement to remain intact from the beginning to the end of a project, and almost impossible for it to do so as the business grows and changes.
Through constant conversations, DDD will guide you to an ever more accurate software representation of your business process.
Posted 05-16-2011 3:15 AM by Jak Charlton
over!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
原文链接:http://devlicio.us/blogs/casey/archive/2011/05/16/what-is-domain-driven-design.aspx
http://www.oschina.net/news/18245/what-is-domain-driven-design
Domain Driven Design的更多相关文章
- 什么是领域驱动设计(Domain Driven Design)?
本文是从 What is Domain Driven Design? 这篇文章翻译而来. ”…在很多领域,专家的作用体现在他们的专业知识上而不是智力上.“ -- Don Reinertsen 领域驱动 ...
- DDD:Strategic Domain Driven Design with Context Mapping
Introduction Many approaches to object oriented modeling tend not to scale well when the application ...
- Domain Driven Design and Development In Practice--转载
原文地址:http://www.infoq.com/articles/ddd-in-practice Background Domain Driven Design (DDD) is about ma ...
- 领域驱动设计(Domain Driven Design)参考架构详解
摘要 本文将介绍领域驱动设计(Domain Driven Design)的官方参考架构,该架构分成了Interfaces.Applications和Domain三层以及包含各类基础设施的Infrast ...
- [译文]Domain Driven Design Reference(一)—— 前言
本书是Eric Evans对他自己写的<领域驱动设计-软件核心复杂性应对之道>的一本字典式的参考书,可用于快速查找<领域驱动设计>中的诸多概念及其简明解释. DDD到目前为止知 ...
- [译文]Domain Driven Design Reference(二)—— 让模型起作用
本书是Eric Evans对他自己写的<领域驱动设计-软件核心复杂性应对之道>的一本字典式的参考书,可用于快速查找<领域驱动设计>中的诸多概念及其简明解释. 其它本系列其它文章 ...
- [译文]Domain Driven Design Reference(三)—— 模型驱动设计的构建模块
本书是Eric Evans对他自己写的<领域驱动设计-软件核心复杂性应对之道>的一本字典式的参考书,可用于快速查找<领域驱动设计>中的诸多概念及其简明解释. 其它本系列其它文章 ...
- [译文]Domain Driven Design Reference(四)—— 柔性设计
本书是Eric Evans对他自己写的<领域驱动设计-软件核心复杂性应对之道>的一本字典式的参考书,可用于快速查找<领域驱动设计>中的诸多概念及其简明解释. 其它本系列其它文章 ...
- [译文]Domain Driven Design Reference(七)—— 大型战略设计结构
本书是Eric Evans对他自己写的<领域驱动设计-软件核心复杂性应对之道>的一本字典式的参考书,可用于快速查找<领域驱动设计>中的诸多概念及其简明解释. 上周末电脑硬盘文件 ...
随机推荐
- Hibernate与 MyBatis的比较(转)
第一章 Hibernate与MyBatis Hibernate 是当前最流行的O/R mapping框架,它出身于sf.NET,现在已经成为Jboss的一部分. Mybatis 是另外一种优秀 ...
- javaScript获取url问号后面的参数
javaScript获取url问号后面的参数方法 function GetRequest() { var url = location.search; //获取url中"?"符后的 ...
- java解析xml汇总(转自倾城幻影-Java解析xml汇总,链接:http://www.cnblogs.com/jiugehuanying/archive/2012/01/12/2320058.html)
[引言] 目前在Java中用于解析XML的技术很多,主流的有DOM.SAX.JDOM.DOM4j,下文主要介绍这4种解析XML文档技术的使用.优缺点及性能测试. [一.基础知识--扫盲] sax.do ...
- 【数学】HPU--1037 一个简单的数学题
1037: 一个简单的数学题 [数学] 时间限制: 1 Sec 内存限制: 128 MB提交: 259 解决: 41 统计 题目描述 小明想要知道$a^b$的值,但是这个值会非常的大. 所以退而求其次 ...
- <Mastering KVM Virtualization>:第二章 KVM内部原理
在本章中,我们将讨论libvirt.QEMU和KVM的重要数据结构和内部实现.然后,我们将深入了解KVM下vCPU的执行流程. 在这一章,我们将讨论: libvirt.QEMU和KVM的内部运作方式. ...
- PL/SQL 编程(一)基础,变量,分支,循环,异常
SQL和PL/SQL: SQL 结构化查询语言(Structural Query Language),是用来访问和操作关系型数据库的一种标准通用语言,属于第四代语言(4GL).可以方便的调用相应语句来 ...
- winform 自定义控件的使用
c#的自定义控件还是很方便的,至少相对于c++而言. 1,当然是建立一个windows 窗体空间库,我这里就是用vs 2015 ,工程名MyControl 第二步.在自定义空间窗体内,拖放这样一组空间 ...
- 表空间移动(transporting tablespaces)
--表空间移动(transporting tablespaces) --------------------------------------2014/01/15 1. 表空间传输步骤简介. ...
- 调整ORACLE用户关闭密码有效期
--调整ORACLE用户关闭密码有效期 ----------------------------------2013/11/12 在oracle中执行一下操作:1.查看用户的proifle是那个,一 ...
- SQL连接操作
一.Join语法概述 join 用于多表中字段之间的联系,语法如下: ... FROM table1 INNER|LEFT|RIGHT JOIN table2 ON conditiona table1 ...