一、缘起

慢sql分析,总行数80w+。

比较特殊的是:其中有个字段info是jsonb类型,写法:info::json->'length' as length

同样的查询条件查这个字段和不查这个字段相差3.3倍

那看来就是json取值拖垮了查询的性能。

取jsonb中的字段有多种取法(如下), 那他们有什么区别呢,对性能有啥影响呢?

  • info::json->'length'
  • info::jsonb->'length'
  • info::json->>'length'
  • info::jsonb->>'length'
  • info->'length'
  • info->'length'
  • info->>'length'
  • info->>'length'

二、对比

2.1 输出类型对比

查询不同写法的类型:

select
info::json->'length' AS "info::json->", pg_typeof(info::json->'length' ) ,
info::jsonb->'length' AS "info::jsonb->" , pg_typeof(info::jsonb->'length' ),
info::json->>'length' AS "info::json->>" , pg_typeof(info::json->>'length' ),
info::jsonb->>'length' AS "info::jsonb->>" , pg_typeof(info::jsonb->>'length'),
info->'length' AS "info->" , pg_typeof(info->'length' ),
info->'length' AS "info->" , pg_typeof(info->'length' ),
info->>'length' AS "info->>" , pg_typeof(info->>'length' ),
info->>'length' AS "info->>" , pg_typeof(info->>'length' )
from t_test_json limit 1;

结果

 info::json-> | pg_typeof | info::jsonb-> | pg_typeof | info::json->> | pg_typeof | info::jsonb->> | pg_typeof | info-> | pg_typeof | info-> | pg_typeof | info->> | pg_typeof | info->> | pg_typeof
--------------+-----------+---------------+-----------+---------------+-----------+----------------+-----------+--------+-----------+--------+-----------+---------+-----------+---------+-----------
123.9 | json | 123.9 | jsonb | 123.9 | text | 123.9 | text | 123.9 | jsonb | 123.9 | jsonb | 123.9 | text | 123.9 | textttui 

分析小结

  • ->> 输出类型为text
  • ->输出到底为何得看调用它的数据类型,比如:info类型是jsonb, 那么info->'length'为jsonb类型
  • ::json、::jsonb起到类型转换的作用。
  • info本来就是jsonb类型,info::jsonb算无效转换,是否对性能有影响,待会验证

2.2 性能对比

jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info::json->'length' AS "info::json->", pg_typeof(info::json->'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.04 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.028..0.028 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..30.62 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.027..0.027 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.056 ms
Execution time: 0.047 ms
(4 rows) jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info::jsonb->'length' AS "info::jsonb->" , pg_typeof(info::jsonb->'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1
jihite-> ;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.017..0.017 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.015..0.015 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.053 ms
Execution time: 0.031 ms
(4 rows) jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info::jsonb->'length' AS "info::jsonb->" , pg_typeof(info::jsonb->'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.010..0.010 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.037 ms
Execution time: 0.022 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info::json->>'length' AS "info::json->>" , pg_typeof(info::json->>'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.04 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.026..0.027 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..30.62 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.025..0.025 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.056 ms
Execution time: 0.046 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info::jsonb->>'length' AS "info::jsonb->>" , pg_typeof(info::jsonb->>'length')
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.053 ms
Execution time: 0.029 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info->'length' AS "info->" , pg_typeof(info->'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.014..0.014 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.052 ms
Execution time: 0.030 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info->'length' AS "info->" , pg_typeof(info->'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.013..0.013 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.012..0.012 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.051 ms
Execution time: 0.029 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info->>'length' AS "info->>" , pg_typeof(info->>'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.012..0.013 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.053 ms
Execution time: 0.030 ms
(4 rows) jihite=>
jihite=> EXPLAIN ANALYSE
jihite-> select
jihite-> info->>'length' AS "info->>" , pg_typeof(info->>'length' )
jihite-> from t_test_json limit 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=1 width=36) (actual time=0.012..0.013 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t_test_json (cost=0.00..23.12 rows=750 width=36) (actual time=0.011..0.011 rows=1 loops=1)
Planning time: 0.053 ms
Execution time: 0.029 ms
(4 rows)

从执行耗时(Execution time)分析小结

执行了类型转换 jsonb->json,转换性能(0.46ms)显然低出不转换(0.3ms)

三、优化

把查询字段:info::json->'length' 改为info->>'length',减少类型转换导致性能的损耗。

四、待调查

4.1 同类型转换是否影响性能

字段本身是jsonb, 进行强转::jsonb 是否对性能造成影响,还是在执行预编译时就已被优化

从大量数据的压测看,转换会对性能有影响,但是不大

4.2 如何分析函数的耗时

在explain analyze时,主要分析了索引对性能的影响,那函数的具体影响如何查看呢?

五、附

5.1 json、jsonb区别

  • jsonb 性能优于json
  • jsonb 支持索引
  • 【最大差异:效率】jsonb 写入时会处理写入数据,写入相对较慢,json会保留原始数据(包括无用的空格)

推荐把JSON 数据存储为jsonb

5.2 postgresql查看字段类型函数

pg_typeof()

5.3 性能分析指令

如果您有一条执行很慢的 SQL 语句,您想知道发生了什么以及如何优化它。
EXPLAIN ANALYSE 能够获取数据库执行 sql 语句,所经历的过程,以及耗费的时间,可以协助优化性能。

关键参数:

Execution time: *** ms 表明了实际的SQL 执行时间,其中不包括查询计划的生成时间

5.4 示例中的建表语句

# 建表语句

create table t_test_json
(
id bigserial not null PRIMARY KEY,
task character varying not null,
info jsonb not null,
create_time timestamp not null default current_timestamp
);

# 压测数据

insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('1', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('2', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('3', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('4', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('5', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('6', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('7', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('8', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('9', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('10', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('11', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('12', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('13', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('14', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('15', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('16', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('17', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('18', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('19', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');
insert into t_test_json(task, info) values('20', '{"length": 123.9, "avatar": "avatar_url", "tags": ["python", "golang", "db"]}');

5.5 示例中的压测脚本

import time
import psycopg dbname, user, pwd, ip, port = '', '', '', '', '5432'
connection = "dbname=%s user=%s password=%s host=%s port=%s" % (dbname, user, pwd, ip, port)
db = psycopg.connect(connection)
cur = db.cursor() ss = 0
lens = 20
for i in range(lens):
s = time.time()
sql = ''' select
task.id,
act.payload::json->'prod_type' as prod_type
from
t_test_json
order by id
offset %s limit 1000 ''' % (i * 1000)
#print("sql:", sql)
cur.execute(sql)
rev = cur.fetchall() e = time.time()
print("scan:", i, e - s)
ss += (e - s) print('avg', ss / lens)

postgresql json取值为何这么慢?的更多相关文章

  1. 选中没有选中的复选框,匹配含有某个字符串的正则,json取值的两种方法,把变量定义在外面跟里面的区别

    一.筛选没有选中的复选框:not("input:checked") 二.匹配有VARCHAR的字符串:".*VARCHAR.*?" 三.json取值的两种方法 ...

  2. JSON取值(key是中文或者数字)方式详解

    JSON取值(key是中文或者数字)方式详解 先准备一个json对象用于演示 var json = {'name':'zhangsan', '年龄':23, 404:'你可能迷路了'}; 使用JS中w ...

  3. 闲扯json取值,联想map取值。

    将list转json(list中的Bean的属性名称为变量,若为常量没必要采用此方式,直接转实体类即可) JSONArray json = JSONArray.fromObject(list); fo ...

  4. JSON取值前判断

    public static void main(String[] args)throws Exception{ String jsonStr1="{\"access_token\& ...

  5. javascript中json对象json数组json字符串互转及取值

    今天用到了json数组和json对象和json类型字符串之间互转及取值,记录一下: 1.json类型的字符串转换为json对象及取值 var jsonString = '{"bar" ...

  6. ZT: C#不建类直接Json解析与取值

    C#不建类直接Json解析与取值 2017年10月19日 15:58:22 圆圆娃哈哈 阅读数:701    版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,未经博主允许不得转载. https://blog.csdn. ...

  7. 【js jQuery】map集合 循环迭代取值---以及 map、json对象、list、array循环迭代的方法和区别

    后台给前台传来一个map @ResponseBody @RequestMapping(value = "getSys") public Map<Long,String> ...

  8. SNF快速开发平台MVC-EasyUI3.9之-WebApi和MVC-controller层接收的json字符串的取值方法和调用后台服务方法

    最近项目组很多人问我,从前台页面传到后台controller控制层或者WebApi 时如何取值和运算操作. 今天就都大家一个在框架内一个取值技巧 前台JS调用代码: 1.下面是选中一行数据后右键点击时 ...

  9. 实用ExtJS教程100例-011:ExtJS Form 使用JSON数据赋值和取值

    上一节中我们演示了ExtJS Form的异步加载和提交数据,本节中我们将演示如何使用JSON数据为ExtJS Form中的字段赋值和取值. 系列ExtJS教程持续更新中,点击查看>>最新E ...

  10. C# 后台解析json,简单方法 字符串序列化为对象,取值

    如果后台是一个JSON的字符串格式如下: string str = "{\"Success\":true,\"Msg\":\"成功!\&qu ...

随机推荐

  1. 使用二进制方式安装Docker

    长期使用安装工具进行安装docker,今天用二进制方式手动安装一下docker环境. 二进制包下载地址:https://download.docker.com/linux/static/stable/ ...

  2. proprety详解

    property() 函数和@property修饰符. 第一种方法,使用property() 函数: class Person: def __init__(self): self.__name= No ...

  3. [Maven]Maven聚合工程

    一直对此问题好奇,正好有这兴致和时间,有必要了解一下. 所谓聚合项目,实际上就是对项目分模块. 互联网项目一般来说按照业务分(订单模块.VIP模块.支付模块.CMS模块-): 传统的软件项目,大多采用 ...

  4. [SVN]SVN checkout 功能不可用 右键只看到提交和更新,没有显示checkout[转载]

    不要在受SVN控制的文件夹里点右键,因为这个文件夹已经在SVN控制之下,当然不会允许在里面嵌套另一个SVN版本库 换个不受控的文件夹点右键,比如: D盘根目录 X 参考文献 SVN checkout ...

  5. Notion AI:门槛更低的ChatGPT Plus

    [2023年3月27日]由于接口成本的问题,如今的大部分应用应该都只会建立在GPT-3/ChatGPT接口的基础上,所以想要体验GPT-4,还是得尊贵的ChatGPT Plus. 前段日子体验了Not ...

  6. 【Contest】Nowcoder 假日团队赛1 题解+赛后总结

    比赛链接 通过顺序:\(B\rightarrow D\rightarrow I\rightarrow J\rightarrow G\rightarrow H \rightarrow A \righta ...

  7. 【Java SE】集合

    1.java集合框架 使用Array存储对象有一定的弊端.java集合就是一种容器,动态地存储多个对象,存储主要是内存层面的存储,不涉及到持久化的存储(txt,avi,数据库). ①一旦初始化好,数组 ...

  8. 基础算法(排序 & 查找)

    快速排序.归并排序.整数二分查找.浮点数二分查找 快速排序 主要思想是分治: 确定分界点 调整范围 递归处理左右两段 代码: #include <iostream> using names ...

  9. Win HttpRunner3 + Allure 实现接口自动化

    HTTPRunner3介绍: HttpRunner 是一款面向 HTTP(S) 协议的通用测试框架,只需编写维护一份 YAML/JSON 脚本,即可实现自动化测试.性能测试.线上监控.持续集成等多种测 ...

  10. 2020-10-01:谈谈golang的空结构体。

    福哥答案2020-10-01:#福大大架构师每日一题# 1.map.value是空结构体,构造集合. 2.通道.只传递信号,不传递数据. 3.切片.不管切片多长,都不会占用空间. 4.仅包含方法的结构 ...