欢迎您到脑科学的世界!

神经美学(或neuroaesthetics)是一个相对较新的经验主义美学的子学科。经验主义美学需要科学的方法来研究艺术和音乐的审美观念。 neuroesthetics于2002年获得沉思和艺术作品的创作神经基础科学的研究作为它的正式定义。 [1] Neuroesthetics使用神经科学的解释和理解的审美经验,在神经水平。主题吸引了来自包括神经学家,艺术史学家,艺术家和心理学家在内的许多学科的学者。

External links

http://neuroaesthetics.net/
    http://www.neuroesthetics.org
    http://www.neuroestetica.org
    http://plaisir.berkeley.edu
    http://www.leonardo.info/
    http://neuroaesthetics.net

Books

Elbs, Oliver (2005): Neuro-Esthetics: Mapological foundations and applications (Map 2003). Munich: m-press. (The first dissertation on Neuroesthetics, written by an art historian).
    Skov, Martin & Vartanian, Oshin (Eds.) (2009): "Neuroaesthetics". Amitiville NY: Baywood.

Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroesthetics

最新文章:

The Neuroscience of Beauty

How does the brain appreciate art?

By Steven Brown and Xiaoqing Gao  | September 27, 2011

The notion of “the aesthetic” is a concept from the philosophy of art of the 18th century according to which the perception of beauty occurs by means of a special process distinct from the appraisal of ordinary objects. Hence, our appreciation of a sublime painting is presumed to be cognitively distinct from our appreciation of, say, an apple. The field of “neuroaesthetics” has adopted this distinction between art and non-art objects by seeking to identify brain areas that specifically mediate the aesthetic appreciation of artworks.

However, studies from neuroscience and evolutionary biology challenge this separation of art from non-art. Human neuroimaging studies have convincingly shown that the brain areas involved in aesthetic responses to artworks overlap with those that mediate the appraisal of objects of evolutionary importance, such as the desirability of foods or the attractiveness of potential mates. Hence, it is unlikely that there are brain systems specific to the appreciation of artworks; instead there are general aesthetic systems that determine how appealing an object is, be that a piece of cake or a piece of music.

We set out to understand which parts of the brain are involved in aesthetic appraisal. We gathered 93 neuroimaging studies of vision, hearing, taste and smell, and used statistical analyses to determine which brain areas were most consistently activated across these 93 studies. We focused on studies of positive aesthetic responses, and left out the sense of touch, because there were not enough studies to arrive at reliable conclusions.

The results showed that the most important part of the brain for aesthetic appraisal was the anterior insula, a part of the brain that sits within one of the deep folds of the cerebral cortex. This was a surprise. The anterior insula is typically associated with emotions of negative quality, such as disgust and pain, making it an unusual candidate for being the brain’s “aesthetic center.” Why would a part of the brain known to be important for the processing of pain and disgust turn out to the most important area for the appreciation of art?

Our interpretation of the result comes from cognitive theories of emotion that argue that aesthetic processing is, at its core, the appraisal of the value of an object -- in other words, an assessment of whether an object is “good for me” or “bad for me.” The nature of this appraisal depends very strongly on what my current physiological state is. The sight of chocolate cake will lead to positive aesthetic emotions if I’m famished but to feelings of disgust if I’m sick to my stomach. Objects that satisfy current physiological needs will lead to positive aesthetic emotions (e.g., pleasure). Those that oppose these needs will lead to negative emotions (e.g., repulsion).

How does the anterior insula fit into this story? In thinking about the contrast between internal and external environments, the anterior insula seems to be much more associated with the former than the latter. It is part of the brain’s “interoceptive” system, evaluating the state of the organs of our body. Other parts of the brain, then, respond directly to objects in the external environment: the sensory pathways of the brain. (One part of the cortex that seems particularly important for processing information across many sensory modalities is the orbitofrontal cortex.)

Brain areas such as the anterior insula and orbitofrontal cortex that are activated by pleasant smells or tastes are also the parts of the brain that are active when we are awed by Renaissance paintings or Baroque concertos. There is virtually no evidence that artworks activate emotion areas distinct from those involved in appraising everyday objects important for survival. Hence, the most reasonable evolutionary hypothesis is that the aesthetic system of the brain evolved first for the appraisal of objects of biological importance, including food sources and suitable mates, and was later co-opted for artworks such as paintings and music. As much as philosophers like to believe that our brains contain a specialized system for the appreciation of artworks, research suggests that our brain’s responses to a piece of cake and a piece of music are in fact quite similar.

Are you a scientist who specializes in neuroscience, cognitive science, or psychology? And have you read a recent peer-reviewed paper that you would like to write about? Please send suggestions to Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook, a Pulitzer prize-winning journalist at the Boston Globe. He can be reached at garethideas AT gmail.com or Twitter @garethideas.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Steven Brown is director of the NeuroArts Lab in the Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. His research deals with the neural and evolutionary basis of the arts, including music, dance, acting and drawing. Xiaoqing Gao is a postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for Vision Research, York University in Toronto, Ontario. He studies the development and neural basis of face perception.

http://www.scientificamerican.co ... roscience-of-beauty

译言网 | 神经美学——解构美和艺术的生物学研究 http://article.yeeyan.org/view/444258/408307
【搬运】从视神经到艺术美学 | 从神经元到脑小组 | 果壳网 科技有意思 http://www.guokr.com/post/343009/

神经美学( neuroaesthetics )在目前为止有哪些有趣的研究成果? - 知乎 https://www.zhihu.com/question/36457902

当代认知神经科学-公开课-高清正版在线观看-爱奇艺 http://www.iqiyi.com/a_19rrjqiaz1.html

International Network for Neuroaesthetics | Stimulating research on the biological basis of aesthetics https://neuroaesthetics.net/

西方神经美学的兴起与发展 http://www.360doc.com/content/12/0717/13/4310958_224713797.shtml

科学松鼠会 » 不是神经病美学,是神经美学 http://songshuhui.net/archives/92160

神经美学

Neuroaesthetics神经美学的更多相关文章

  1. Bash 脚本编程语言中的美学与哲学

    我承认,我再一次地当了标题党.但是不可否认,这一定是一篇精华随笔.在这一篇中,我将探讨 Bash 脚本语言中的美学与哲学. 这不是一篇 Bash 脚本编程的教程,但是却能让人更加深入地了解 Bash ...

  2. 神经网络模型之AlexNet的一些总结

    说明: 这个属于个人的一些理解,有错误的地方,还希望给予教育哈- 此处以caffe官方提供的AlexNet为例. 目录: 1.背景 2.框架介绍 3.步骤详细说明 5.参考文献 背景: AlexNet ...

  3. 网络/运维工程师visio2013模具图标 绘制漂亮的网络拓扑图 狮子XL工程师美学思想

    visio2013狮子XL自定义运维模具下载: 链接:http://pan.baidu.com/s/1bo779Kz 密码:xh3s 狮子XL 的美学思想: 1,一次痛苦,一生幸福. 之前,在绘制网络 ...

  4. lecture3-线性神经元和算法

    Hinton第三课 这节课主要是介绍NN的输出端常用的神经元,然后重点是说明怎么使用BP来计算偏导数,在Hinton这一课中,他提供了他1986年参与写的<并行分布处理>一书的第8章,49 ...

  5. 深度神经网络结构以及Pre-Training的理解

    Logistic回归.传统多层神经网络 1.1 线性回归.线性神经网络.Logistic/Softmax回归 线性回归是用于数据拟合的常规手段,其任务是优化目标函数:$h(\theta )=\thet ...

  6. BP神经网络模型与学习算法

    一,什么是BP "BP(Back Propagation)网络是1986年由Rumelhart和McCelland为首的科学家小组提出,是一种按误差逆传播算法训练的多层前馈网络,是目前应用最 ...

  7. 建模算法(六)——神经网络模型

    (一)神经网络简介 主要是利用计算机的计算能力,对大量的样本进行拟合,最终得到一个我们想要的结果,结果通过0-1编码,这样就OK啦 (二)人工神经网络模型 一.基本单元的三个基本要素 1.一组连接(输 ...

  8. 机器学习之神经网络模型-下(Neural Networks: Representation)

    3. Model Representation I 1 神经网络是在模仿大脑中的神经元或者神经网络时发明的.因此,要解释如何表示模型假设,我们不妨先来看单个神经元在大脑中是什么样的. 我们的大脑中充满 ...

  9. 机器学习之神经网络模型-上(Neural Networks: Representation)

    在这篇文章中,我们一起来讨论一种叫作"神经网络"(Neural Network)的机器学习算法,这也是我硕士阶段的研究方向.我们将首先讨论神经网络的表层结构,在之后再具体讨论神经网 ...

随机推荐

  1. [问题2014A01] 复旦高等代数 I(14级)每周一题(第三教学周)

    [问题2014A01]  试求下列 \(n\) 阶行列式的值: \[ |A|=\begin{vmatrix} 1 & x_1(x_1-a) & x_1^2(x_1-a) & \ ...

  2. IE6兼容性问题及IE6常见bug详细汇总

    转载地址:http://www.jb51.net/css/76894.html 1.IE6怪异解析之padding与border算入宽高 原因:未加文档声明造成非盒模型解析 解决方法:加入文档声明&l ...

  3. 程序设计入门——C语言 第2周编程练习 1时间换算(5分)

    1 时间换算(5分) 题目内容: UTC是世界协调时,BJT是北京时间,UTC时间相当于BJT减去8.现在,你的程序要读入一个整数,表示BJT的时和分.整数的个位和十位表示分,百位和千位表示小时.如果 ...

  4. CSS和Js样式属性的对照关系

    注意:1.在使用js时,如newTD.style.paddingLeft="200";(错误),正确生效的写法是newTD.style.paddingLeft="200p ...

  5. VIM 代码折叠

    VIM 代码折叠 VIM代码折叠方式可以用"foldmethod"选项来设置,如: set foldmethod=indent 有6种方式来折叠代码 1. manual //手工定 ...

  6. uva 1660 & poj 1966(点连通度)

    Cable TV Network Time Limit: 1000MS   Memory Limit: 30000K Total Submissions: 4267   Accepted: 2003 ...

  7. const char * char * const

    2 区分 const * 与 * const 的差别 ( 1 ) 指针本身是常量不可变 ( char * ) const  pCount; const (char *)  pCount; ( 2 ) ...

  8. 如何使CSS3中的animation动画当每滑到一屏时每次都运行

    这个我还没用过,但感觉以后会用到,就随手摘抄一下啦<div id="a1"></div> <div id="a2">< ...

  9. Java:集合工具类-Collections

    Java.util.Collections 集合框架工具类Collections,其方法都是静态的,本身没有构造函数. 常见方法: static <T extends Comparable< ...

  10. 《SICP》读后感:关于软件本质的一点思考

    摘要:软件本身不是目的,人类的需求才是目的,而软件只是达到目的的手段. 软件的本质在于控制复杂性,这个复杂性并非来自于计算机,也并非来自于现实世界,而是来自于人类的思维和知识体系. 软件被使用的广泛性 ...