Killing an Oracle process from inside Oracle

I had a following situation few days ago – I was running a CREATE TABLE AS SELECT over a heterogenous services dblink. However I cancelled this command via pressing CTRL+C twice in Windows sqlplus (this actually just kills the client sqlplus and not the call).

Anyway, when I wanted to drop that table involved, this happened:

SQL> drop table MYTABLE;
drop table MYTABLE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified

I can’t drop a table as someone is holding a lock on it. Fair enough, this was a dev environment used only by me, so I used DBA_OBJECTS.OBJECT_ID to find out the object ID of that table:

SQL> @o MYTABLE

owner                     object_name                    object_type        CREATED           LAST_DDL_TIME     status           OID      D_OID
------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ----------------- --------- ---------- ----------
XYZ_DEV01_OWNER MYTABLE TABLE 20080616 11:08:44 20080616 11:08:44 VALID 63764 63764

…and then I queried what enqueue locks were held on that object:

SQL> select * from v$lock where id1=63764;

ADDR     KADDR           SID TY        ID1        ID2      LMODE    REQUEST      CTIME      BLOCK
-------- -------- ---------- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
40034278 40034290 130 TM 63764 0 6 0 2662 0

Ok, I see session 130 holding a TM lock on that table. I queried the corresponding SERIAL# from v$session as well and killed the session:

SQL> alter system kill session '130,8764';
alter system kill session '130,8764'
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00031: session marked for kill SQL> select * from v$lock where id1=63764; ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK
-------- -------- ---------- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
40034278 40034290 130 TM 63764 0 6 0 2668 0

After hanging for 60 seconds, my kill command gave up (and marked my session for kill), but my lock was still not released… Now what?

This happens when the victim session is so stuck somewhere in an Oracle call that it never has a chance to receive the message it has been killed. And apparently some resources used can in that call can’t be released (for whatever reason, it may be by design, it may just be a bug).

The below queries against V$SESSION and V$LOCK show that even though the session has been marked to be in killed status, it’s still holding a lock:

--===session usid =====

select sid,s.serial#,taddr,sql_hash_value,prev_hash_value,p.spid,s.username,machine,logon_time
from v$session s,v$process p where s.paddr=p.addr and sid='&sid';

SQL> @usid 130

USERNAME                SID                 AUDSID OSUSER           MACHINE            PROGRAM              SPID          HASH_VALUE   LASTCALL STATUS
----------------------- -------------- ----------- ---------------- ------------------ -------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------- --------
XYZ_DEV01_OWNER '130,8764' 33533 1288249 \XYZHOST001 sqlplus.exe 3872 3564023715 4032 KILLED SQL> select * from v$lock where id1=63764; ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK
-------- -------- ---------- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
40034278 40034290 130 TM 63764 0 6 0 2695 0

Ok, I tried various other options, like kill immediate and disconnect, which should have higher chance to clean up my session properly:

SQL> alter system kill session '130,8764' immediate;
alter system kill session '130,8764' immediate
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00031: session marked for kill SQL> alter system disconnect session '130,8764' immediate;
alter system disconnect session '130,8764' immediate
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00031: session marked for kill SQL> select * from v$lock where id1=63764; ADDR KADDR SID TY ID1 ID2 LMODE REQUEST CTIME BLOCK
-------- -------- ---------- -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
40034278 40034290 130 TM 63764 0 6 0 2710 0

Still no luck, lock is there.

So I found the OS PID of my server process (or actually OS Thread ID inside oracle.exe process as I was on Windows) and used oradebug short_stack to check where that process was stuck (the output is slightly formatted):

SQL> oradebug setospid 3872;
Oracle pid: 18, Windows thread id: 3872, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD) SQL> oradebug short_stack;
_ksdxfstk+14<-_ksdxcb+1481<-_ssthreadsrgruncallback+428<-_OracleOradebugThreadStart@4+819
<-7C80B680<-00000000<-71A557C4<-71AB4376<-6298540C<-6298325E<-60A0D931<-609D005F<-609B073D<-609AF9
endExitAgent+202<-_hoxexit+188<-_hogmdis+890<-_hogdisc+8<-_xupidhs+137<-_upidhs+20<-_kpudtch+305
<-_OCIServerDetach+12<-_ncodncf+268<-_npidr0+2300<-_npifcc+46<-_qerrmFBu+457<-_qerrmFetch+1
+1291<-_opiodr+1099<-_rpidrus+178<-_rpidru+88<-_rpiswu2+426<-_rpidrv+1461<-_psddr0+449
<-_psdnal+283<-_pevm_EXIM+153<-_pfrinstr_EXIM+34<-_pfrrun_no_tool+56<-_pfrrun+781<-_plsql_run+738
<-_pr+1099<-_opidrv+819<-_sou2o+45<-_opimai_real+112<-_opimai+92<-_OracleThreadStart@4+726<-7C80B680

This terse stack shows (start reading from bottom right to left) this process is stuck somewhere “above” qerrmFetch (Remote Fetch). I guess the functions starting with “h” above that are heterogenous services functions. By the way, V$SESSION_WAIT didn’t show any wait state changes either and the session itself was still constantly waiting for “HS message to agent” event. So, being stuck in a HS call was probably the reason why that session could not clean itself up.

Now, in such situations one normally would proceed with ORAKILL on Windows or just killing that server process at Unix level (after carefully thinking what you’re about to do). Killing the process makes PMON to perform the cleanup and PMON usually does clean all resources up ok. However I didn’t have access to that Windows server box, so OS kill was out of question.

So, I used another trick. While being connected to the victim process using oradebug, I issued this:

SQL> oradebug event immediate crash;
ORA-00072: process "Windows thread id: 3872, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)" is not active
SQL>

After waiting for a while (crashdump occurred), sqlplus reported that the target process doesn’t exist anymore. Thanks to the crash, PMON had woken up and performed the cleanup.

Let’s see if it helped:

SQL> oradebug short_stack;
ORA-00072: process "Windows thread id: 3872, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)" is not active SQL> select * from v$lock where id1=63764; no rows selected SQL> @usid 130 no rows selected SQL> drop table MYTABLE; Table dropped.

Yippee, I finally got rid of that session, lock and could drop my table!

Note that I would still prefer killing the processes with Unix kill or Windows orakill, however there are some bugs with orakill (search in Metalink) that it doesn’t always succeed killing the thread properly. And in my case I didn’t have OS access anyway.

Ideally, the ALTER SYSTEM KILL session command should do all needed cleanup for us, but there are some corner cases involving loops, hangs and bugs where this approach won’t work. There’s a Metalink note 1020720.102 with a list of ways for killing Oracle processes/threads from OS level.

NB! If you want to move to the "New World" - offload your data and workloads to Hadoop, without having to re-write your existing applications - check out Gluent. We are making history! ;-)

windows session 管理的更多相关文章

  1. php session session_set_save_handler 接管所有的session管理工作

    一个已知管用的方法是,使用session_set_save_handler,接管所有的session管理工作,一般是把session信息存储到数 据库,这样可以通过SQL语句来删除所有过期的sessi ...

  2. Redis-基本概念、java操作redis、springboot整合redis,分布式缓存,分布式session管理等

    NoSQL的引言 Redis数据库相关指令 Redis持久化相关机制 SpringBoot操作Redis Redis分布式缓存实现 Resis中主从复制架构和哨兵机制 Redis集群搭建 Redis实 ...

  3. Nhibernate的Session管理

    参考:http://www.cnblogs.com/renrenqq/archive/2006/08/04/467688.html 但这个方法还不能解决Session缓存问题,由于创建Session需 ...

  4. Openfire的启动过程与session管理

    说明   本文源码基于Openfire4.0.2.   Openfire的启动       Openfire的启动过程非常的简单,通过一个入口初始化lib目录下的openfire.jar包,并启动一个 ...

  5. ABP(现代ASP.NET样板开发框架)系列之7、ABP Session管理

    点这里进入ABP系列文章总目录 基于DDD的现代ASP.NET开发框架--ABP系列之7.ABP Session管理 ABP是“ASP.NET Boilerplate Project (ASP.NET ...

  6. 2016-1-30 Servlet中Session管理(Sesssion追踪)

    Session管理(Sesssion追踪)是Web应用程序开发中非常重要的一个主题.这是因为HTTP是无状态的,在默认情况下,Web服务器不知道一个HTTP请求是来自初次用户,还是来自之前已经访问过的 ...

  7. Redis3.2+Tomcat实现集群的Session管理 -- tomcat-redis-session-manager的编译和开发部署环境搭建

    已经有不少文章介绍使用tomcat-redis-session-manager来实现Redis存储Tomcat的Session,实现分布式Session管理.但是现在官方编译的tomcat-redis ...

  8. tomcat架构分析 (Session管理)

    Session管理是JavaEE容器比较重要的一部分,在app中也经常会用到.在开发app时,我们只是获取一个session,然后向session中存取数据,然后再销毁session.那么如何产生se ...

  9. Session管理解决方案笔记

    大型网站Session管理解决方案: 1. web服务器之间的session复制.    优点:方案成熟    缺点:复制的性能开销大 2. 减少session使用,使用客户端存储cookie     ...

随机推荐

  1. jquery.validate ajax验证

    $("#form1").validate({ rules: { ctl00$ContentPlaceHolder1$txtShopName: { remote: { type: & ...

  2. IOS中UIActionSheet使用方法详解

    一.初始化方法 - (instancetype)initWithTitle:(NSString *)title delegate:(id<UIActionSheetDelegate>)de ...

  3. iOS 声明属性关键字的总结

    atomic: 原子操作(原子性是指事务的一个完整操作,操作成功就提交,反之就回滚. 原子操作就是指具有原子性的操作)在objective-c 属性设置里面 默认的就是atomic ,意思就是 set ...

  4. RabbitMQ 使用

    安装步骤略过. 启动 启动很简单,找到安装后的 RabbitMQ 所在目录下的 sbin 目录,可以看到该目录下有6个以 rabbitmq 开头的可执行文件,直接执行 rabbitmq-server ...

  5. REST的本质,就是用户操作某个网络资源(具有独一无二的识别符URI),获得某种服务,也就是动词+资源(都是HTTP协议的一部分)

    REST的名称”表现状态转化”中,省略了主语.”表现”其实指的是资源的表现. 资源就是网络上的一个数据实体,或者说是一个具体信息.它可以是一段文本.一张图片.一首歌曲.一种服务.你可以用一个URI(统 ...

  6. MYSQL进阶学习笔记六:MySQL视图的创建,理解及管理!(视频序号:进阶_14,15)

    知识点七:MySQL视图的创建(14) 视图的定义: 什么是视图: 视图数由查询结果形成的一张虚拟的表. 什么时候要用到视图? 如果某个查询结果出现的非常频繁,也就是,要经常拿这个查询结果来做子查询. ...

  7. codeforces 443 B. Kolya and Tandem Repeat 解题报告

    题目链接:http://codeforces.com/contest/443/problem/B 题目意思:给出一个只有小写字母的字符串s(假设长度为len),在其后可以添加 k 个长度的字符,形成一 ...

  8. [Selenium] 操作页面元素等待时间

    WebDriver 在操作页面元素等待时间时,提供2种等待方式:一个为显式等待,一个为隐式等待,其区别在于: 1)显式等待:明确地告诉 WebDriver 按照特定的条件进行等待,条件未达到就一直等待 ...

  9. 【CAIOJ 1178】 最长共同前缀长度

    [题目链接] 点击打开链接 [算法] EXKMP [代码] #include<bits/stdc++.h> using namespace std; #define MAXL 100001 ...

  10. 读取每行的数据,加入到list中

    有txt文件中,每行都有一个字符串或者数据,将每行的数据转换到一个list中 例如: 1 2 3 6 实现: f = open("test1.txt",'r') list1 = [ ...