http://dougmccune.com/blog/2007/03/23/why-i-dont-read-books/

I’ve never read a programming book. I realized this when I got sent a promo copy of the Flex 2 with Actionscript 3 book from Friends of ED. [Side note: start blogging and you get sent free shit.] I was flipping through the book and I realized, wow, I’ve never read one of these before. So it got me thinking about why that is. Clearly people learn programming stuff through books, there’s got to be a market or else they wouldn’t make the books. Am I the norm or the exception?

Timeliness
First I figured this was because this was a Flex book. I’ve been following Flex for a while now, and the newest information has always been online (like any emerging technology these days). So in a sense everything contained in this book has already been written one way or another. The newest information will never be in print, that’s just the nature of the web. If I want the newest info on Apollo I’m going to read the alpha release docs on Adobe Labs, or Mike Chambers’ blog posts, or watch the apollocoders mailing list. The Apollo books are coming, but they’ll always be a big step behind what’s available online.

But then I realized I’ve learned bunches of other stuff that wasn’t brand new. When I was first learning PHP and MySQL there were tons of great books available. But for some reason I never bought a book. Maybe I’m just too cheap (discussed below). Or maybe I’m just too lazy. My bookshelf doesn’t have any programming books (at home or at work). The only books I’ve ever partially read were for some CS classes at school, but that was more to make sure I got the info that was going to be on an exam.

The copy/paste factor and learning by doing
Whenever I’m learning anything computer-related I’m doing it as I’m learning it. That’s the only way I can learn, and I’d be surprised if you find anyone who’s all that different (when it comes to computer programming). You’re not going to learn how to program Actionscript or use Photoshop by reading a book without having one hand on the mouse the entire time. So that means you read at your computer, with the book next to you? Or you read a chapter, then go and try it out on a computer? As I was flipping through the Flex book, I saw lots of Actionscript code. There’s an entire example app that gets created in that book. Cool, but that’s pretty much useless to me without being able to run the code myself, and tweak it a bit and see the results. You’ve got to be able to copy and paste the code and run it yourself. Book publishers know this, so they include downloads or CDs with the code. But now I only need the book for the non-code pieces, which brings me to my next point.

Learning from code versus learning from written paragraphs
I’d be interested in getting other developers’ perspectives on this, but I was thinking about how I learn and whether I learn more from example code or from written text describing the code and the method of programming. If I were to rate learning through code or learning through text, each on a scale of 0-5, I’d give learning through code a 5 and learning through text a 1. If a tutorial doesn’t have code I don’t read it. I think Google code search is the best learning resource ever.

So if we look at the ratio of text to code in this book, I’d say it’s at least 50-50 text-to-code. I’d be interested in seeing the ratio of comments-to-code included in the Flex framework source files. In terms of learning Flex, the framework source is the single most valuable resource I’ve had. They commented the hell out of it, but the code is the focus. You want to learn how the ComboBox component animates the drop-down menu when it gets selected? Go and read the source of ComboBox.

On-demand learning
I don’t know what I want to learn tomorrow. I might play with some custom components I’m working on, or play with Flex mapping components, or explore how to deploy my apps as Apollo apps. Or I might not ever learn any of that stuff and I might go off on some other tangent instead. So am I going to get a book about any of that? No. Am I going to read tutorials and comprehensive guides before I start playing? No. I’m going to start a project, try to do what I want to do, and when I can’t figure it out I’m going to look up what I need to know. Which brings me to my next point.

Learning in tiny bits
Books are too long. There’s just too much information in them. I learn in tiny nuggets, and I only learn the stuff that gets me to the next step in a project. If I’m working on a project and I need to figure out how to pull in an RSS feed into a flex app then that’s exactly what I want to learn, and only that. Once I get stuck at another point then I’ll go and figure out what I need to get past that point. But I don’t want to read a book that tells me in generic terms how to use a technology. I might never use half the information in a book, so why would I waste my time learning it?

The web gives me tiny bits of info that I need. And if you’re searching for programming information on Google, you can pretty easily figure out how to search and get directly to the result you need. It’s rare that I try to look something up on Google that I can’t find the answer to (obviously it happens, at which point I post questions to mailing lists). And the number of tiny bits of information is amazing. Whether it was a question someone answered on a mailing list, or a blog post, or an example in official documentation, somewhere someone has shown you how to do almost everything you want to know. And often you can find an answer to a specific question without wading through irrelevant content. Google is like learning surgery as you’re cutting, books are like medical school.

I’m a cheapskate
And I don’t like paying for something I can get for free (wow, that statement applies to so many other things). Everything you need to learn ANY programming language is available for free online. That said, book publishers can feel free to send me free shit, I like getting stuff for free, even if I don’t really want it.

I guess it just boils down to how different people learn. I’m sure tons of people have had great experiences learning from books. I just don’t get it. I can’t figure out why I would want to buy a book and read it when I can learn everything I need to learn by going online. So I don’t know, am I the norm or the exception?

1. 书本跟不上技术发展。 
2. 通过做来学更有效。 
3. 从代码中学比从文字中学更有效。 
4. 书本会强制持续的学习。 
5. 学习网上的片段信息比学习书本更有针对性,更高效。 
6. 节约钱。(作者说自己是吝啬鬼,我也是:-))

我觉得他说的蛮有道理的。对我这种喜欢喜欢从头到尾看书的人,应该很有启示的。所以,我决定暂时不读电子书了,包括他的那本哈哈。因为我自己已经看过官方文档和教程了,基本入门了,可以按照他说的,试试从网上和代码中学习。

Why I don’t read books的更多相关文章

  1. 7 Must Read Python Books

    7 Must Read Python Books I started learning Python just two years ago. Coming from a C++ and Java ba ...

  2. TCP/IP BOOKS

    TCP/IP Fundamentals for Microsoft Windows: Overview https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb72 ...

  3. UVa 714 Copying Books(二分)

    题目链接: 传送门 Copying Books Time Limit: 3000MS     Memory Limit: 32768 KB Description Before the inventi ...

  4. LightOJ1283 Shelving Books(DP)

    题目 Source http://www.lightoj.com/volume_showproblem.php?problem=1283 Description You are a librarian ...

  5. 抄书 Copying Books UVa 714

    Copying  Books 题目链接:http://acm.hust.edu.cn/vjudge/contest/view.action?cid=85904#problem/B 题目: Descri ...

  6. [LintCode] Copy Books 复印书籍

    Given an array A of integer with size of n( means n books and number of pages of each book) and k pe ...

  7. JSTL标签出错:<c:forEach var="book" items="${requestScope.books}" varStatus="status">

    今天在运行书里的JSTL标签代码的时候出错,总结一下: 问题1.The JSP specification requires that an attribute name is preceded by ...

  8. A Year Of Books - 2016 Javaer书单

    A Year Of Books - 2016 Javaer书单 (PS:欢迎留言推荐,很多来自白衣大哥的推荐) 1. OS & Networking <编码 : 隐匿在计算机软硬件背后的 ...

  9. A Personal Selection of Books on E lectromagnetics and Computational E lectromagnetics---David B. Davidson

    链接. General Books on Electromagnetics When our department recently reviewed our junior-level text, w ...

  10. 【NOIP提高组2015D2T1】uva 714 copying books【二分答案】——yhx

    Before the invention of book-printing, it was very hard to make a copy of a book. All the contents h ...

随机推荐

  1. python3之模板pycurl探测web服务质量

    1.pycurl简介 pycURL是libcurl多协议文件传输库的python接口,与urllib模块类似,PycURL可用于从python程序中获取由URL标识的对象,功能很强大,libcurl速 ...

  2. linux下的usb转串口的使用(修改)【转】

    环境:Ubuntu 10.10 Server minicom是linux下串口通信的软件,它的使用完全依靠键盘的操作,虽然没有“超级终端”那么易用,但是使用习惯之后读者将会体会到它的高效与便利,下面将 ...

  3. 使用pt-table-checksum校验MySQL主从复制【转】

    pt-table-checksum是一个基于MySQL数据库主从架构在线数据一致性校验工具.其工作原理在主库上运行, 通过对同步的表在主从段执行checksum, 从而判断数据是否一致.在校验完毕时, ...

  4. SQL008存储过程总结

    1.如何调用存储过程 DECLARE @Id INT --输入参数 DECLARE @OutPutID INT --输出参数 EXEC [dbo].Order_SellPR @Id,@OutPutID ...

  5. 多继承下的super()指向的不一定是直接父类

    常规情况 class Base: def __init__(self): print('Base.__init__') class A(Base): def __init__(self): super ...

  6. Cover Points

    CF#511 div2 B 现场掉分赛(翻车)...qwq 题目大意: 给定n个点的左边,你需要求出一个腰长最短的等腰直角三角形(顶点为坐标轴原点),是的所有点都在这个等腰直角三角形的内部或者边上. ...

  7. [USACO17FEB]Why Did the Cow Cross the Road I G

    一开始想写$DP$,发现直接转移完全有后效性 所以本小蒟蒻写了个最短路 每走三步就要吃草是这个题最难搞的地方,我们建图时不妨只对于距离等于三的点连边 考虑完全覆盖所有情况,从一个点走一步,两步,然后三 ...

  8. MapReduce实战1

    MapReduce编程规范: (1)用户编写的程序分成三个部分:Mapper,Reducer,Driver(提交运行mr程序的客户端) (2)Mapper的输入数据是KV对的形式(KV的类型可自定义) ...

  9. 关于spark standalone模式下的executor问题

    1.spark standalone模式下,worker与executor是一一对应的. 2.如果想要多个worker,那么需要修改spark-env的SPARK_WORKER_INSTANCES为2 ...

  10. MATLAB遍历文件夹下所有文件

    先给出函数 function [ files ] = scanDir( root_dir ) files={}; if root_dir(end)~='/' root_dir=[root_dir,'/ ...